^^^^. 


IMAGE  EVALUATION 
TEST  TARGET  (MT-3) 


K<^ 


1.0 


I.I 


1.25 


UUl    125 

Ui  Ui2    1 2  2 

m  m  ^ 

^  as,  12.0 


1.4 


6" 


1.8 


1.6 


V] 


(^ 


/i 


^r 


^  .v'>' 


.I^J 


/ 


*5. 


'^ 


/i 


T>1 


1     . 


riiuiugicipiiic 

Sciences 
Corporation 


'%ai"~     -^1,* 


33  WEST  MAIN  STREET 

WEBSTER,  N.Y.  14580 

(716)  872-4503 


wmna 


CIHM/ICMH 
Microfiche 


CIHM/ICIVIH 
Coll6Ction  d6 
microfiches. 


Canadian  Institute  for  Historicat  Microreproductions  /  institut  Canadian  de  microreproductions  historiques 


Technical  and  Bibliographic  Notaa/Notaa  tachniqua*  at  bibliographiquaa 


Tha  Instituta  has  attamptad  to  obtain  tha  baat 
original  copy  availabia  for  filming.  Faaturaa  of  this 
copy  which  may  be  bibiiographically  uniqua, 
which  may  altar  any  of  tha  imagas  in  tha 
raproduction,  or  which  may  significantly  changa 
tha  usual  mathod  of  filming,  ara  chackad  balow. 


n 


D 


D 

D 
D 

□ 


n 


Colourad  covars/ 
Couvartura  da  coulaur 


I      I    Covars  damagad/ 


Couvartura  andommag^e 


Covers  restored  and/or  laminated/ 
Couverture  restaurie  et/ou  pellicul^o 


r~~l    Cover  title  missing/ 


n 


La  titra  da  couvartura  manqua 


Coloured  maps/ 

Cartes  gdographiques  en  couieur 


Coloured  ink  (i.e.  other  than  blue  or  black)/ 
Encre  da  couieur  (i.e.  autre  que  bleua  ou  noire) 


Coloured  plates  and/or  illustrations/ 
Planches  et/ou  illustrations  en  couieur 

Bound  with  other  material/ 
ReliA  avec  d'autres  documents 

Tight  binding  may  causa  shadows  or  distortion 
along  interior  margin/ 

Lareliure  serree  peut  causer  de  I'ombre  ou  de  la 
distorsion  le  lor^^  de  la  marge  intirieicra 

Blank  leaves  added  during  restoration  may 
appear  within  the  text.  Whenever  possible,  these 
have  been  omitted  from  filming/ 
II  se  peut  que  certainas  pages  blanches  ajout^es 
lors  d'une  restauration  apparaissant  dans  le  taxte, 
mais,  lorsque  ceia  dtait  possible,  ces  pages  n'ont 
pas  iti  film^as. 

Additional  comments:/ 
Commentaires  suppl^mentaires: 


L'Institut  a  microfilm*  le  meilleur  exemplaire 
qu'il  lui  a  M  possible  de  se  procurer.  Las  details 
da  cat  exemplaire  qui  sent  peut-Atra  uniques  du 
point  de  vue  bibliographique.  qui  peuvent  modifier 
una  image  reproduite,  ou  qui  peuvent  exiger  une 
modification  dans  la  m^thoda  normaie  de  filmage 
sont  indiquAs  ci-dessous. 


0    Coloured  pages/ 
Pagea  da  cojieur 

□    Pagoa  damaged/ 
Pages  endommagies 

j      I    Pages  restored  and/or  laminated/ 


Q 


Pages  restaurSas  et/ou  pellicuiies 

Pages  discoloured,  stained  or  foxei 
Pages  dAcolories,  tacheties  ou  piquAes 

Pages  detached/ 
Pages  ddtach^es 

Showthrjugh/ 
Transparence 

Quality  of  prir 

Qu&lit*  inigala  de  I'impression 

includes  supplementary  materii 
Comprend  du  materiel  suppiementaire 

Only  edition  available/ 
Seule  idition  disponible 


E  Pages  discoloured,  stained  or  foxed/ 

I      I  Pages  detached/ 

I      I  Showthrjugh/ 

I      I  Quality  of  print  varies/ 

r~~|  includes  supplementary  material/ 

r~~|  Only  edition  available/ 


Pages  wholly  or  partially  obscured  by  errata 
slips,  tissues,  etc..  have  been  ref limed  to 
ensure  the  best  possible  im^ge/ 
Les  pages  totaiement  ou  partiellement 
obscurcies  par  un  feuiilet  d'errata,  une  pelure, 
etc.,  OTii  6ti  filmies  A  nouveau  de  fagon  A 
obtanir  la  meilleure  image  possible. 


This  item  is  filmed  at  the  reduction  ratio  checked  below/ 

Ca  document  est  film*  au  taux  de  reduction  indiquA  ci-dessous. 

10X  14X  18X  22X 


26X 


SOX 


I    I    |7|    i    i     I    I    I     I    I     I    I    I 


12X 


16X 


20X 


24X 


28X 


32X 


Th«  copy  filmed  hart  has  b««n  raproducad  thanks 
to  tha  ganarosity  of: 

Ths  Nova  Scotia 
Lagislativ*  Libiary 


L'axampiaira  film*  f ut  raproduit  grica  A  la 
gin^roait*  da: 

Th«  Nova  Scotia 
Lagitlativa  Library 


The  images  appearing  here  are  the  best  quellty 
possible  considering  the  condition  and  legibility 
of  the  original  copy  and  in  keeping  with  the 
filming  contract  specifications. 


Las  Images  sulvantes  ont  6t6  reprudultes  avec  le 
plus  grand  soin,  compte  tenu  da  la  condition  at 
da  la  natteti  da  rexamplaira  film*,  et  en 
conformity  avec  lea  conditions  du  contrat  da 
fllmage. 


Original  copies  in  printed  paper  covers  err  filmed 
beginning  witlr«  the  front  cover  and  ending  on 
the  last  page  with  a  printed  or  illustrated  imprea- 
siori,  or  the  back  cover  when  appropriate.  All 
other  original  copies  are  filmed  beginning  on  the 
first  page  with  a  printed  or  illustrated  imprea- 
sion,  and  ending  on  the  last  page  with  a  printed 
or  illustrated  impression. 


Les  exemplairea  originaux  dont  la  couverture  en 
papier  est  ImprimAe  sont  filmis  en  commenpant 
par  le  premier  plat  et  en  terminant  solt  par  la 
darniAre  page  qui  comporte  une  empreinte 
d'impresslon  ou  d'lllustration,  soit  par  la  second 
plat,  aalon  le  caa.  Tous  lea  autres  exemplairea 
originaux  sont  film*s  en  commenpant  par  la 
premiere  page  qui  comporte  une  empreinte 
d'impresslon  ou  d'lllustration  et  on  terminant  par 
la  darniire  page  qui  comporte  une  telle 
empreinte. 


The  last  recorded  frame  on  each  microfiche 
ahall  contain  the  xymbol  •— »>  (meaning  "CON- 
TINUED"), or  the  symbol  y  (meaning  "END"), 
whichever  applies. 


Un  de>i  symboles  suivants  apparaftra  sur  la 
dernidre  image  de  cheque  microfiche,  selon  le 
cas:  le  symbols  — »>  signifie  "A  SUIVPE",  le 
symbols  V  signifie  "FIN  ". 


Maps,  plates,  charts,  etc.,  may  be  filmed  at 
different  reduction  ratios.  Those  too  large  to  be 
entirely  included  in  one  exposure  are  filmed 
beginning  in  the  upper  left  hand  corner,  left  to 
right  and  top  to  bottom,  as  many  frames  as 
required.  Tiiie  following  diagrams  illustrate  the 
method: 


Les  cartes,  planches,  tableaux,  etc.,  peuvent  Atre 
film6s  A  des  taux  de  reduction  diff Arenta. 
Lorsque  le  document  est  trop  grand  pour  Atra 
raproduit  en  un  seul  clichi,  il  est  film*  *  partir 
de  Tangle  sup*rieur  gauche,  de  gauche  k  drolta, 
et  de  haut  en  bas,  en  prenant  le  nombre 
d'Smages  n*cessaire.  Les  diagrammea  su:vanta 
illustrent  la  m*thode. 


1  2  3 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

QUESTIONS   OF  THE   DAY 

h.     „,    El.c..„„.  and    .    Problem    i„    P„„    Go..n,m.„,.      By 

JuNn;s.    Octavo,  paper        .        .  ^ 

«-Frce  Land  .nd  Free  Tr.de.      The  Lesson,  of  'the  E„«lis-'  Corn' 

Laws  Applied  to  the  United  State,.     By  Sam-    l  S.  Cox.     Octavo. 

S^Our  Merchant    Marine!      Kow  it  .«;   increased,  be'came'  great! 
decl.ned,  and  decyed  ;  with  an  inquiry  into  the  conditions  essential 
to  .t.  resuscitation  and  prosperity.     By  Dav.d  A.  Wells.     Octavo 
cloth     .  ' 

*  •  •  • 

4~The  Elective  Franchise  in  the  United  States.     Bv  D.  C  Mo 

MILLAN.     Octavo,  cloth       ...  '  ' 

5  *  «-The  American  Citizen's  Manual.'    Edited  by  Wcrth.noto'T 
U  FORD.     Parr  /.-^Governments  (National,  State,  and  Local)   the 
Electorate,  and  the  Civil  Service.       />«,,  //._The  Functions  .f 
Government,  considered  with  special  reference  to  taxation  and  ex- 
penduure.  the  regulation  pf  commerce  and  industry,  provision  for 
the  poor   and  insane,    the  management  of    the  public   lands,    etc 
Two  vols,  in  one.     Cloth 
7-Spoiling  the  Egyptians.      A  Tale  of'    Shame.  '   Told    from 'the 
Brmsh  Blue-Books.     By  J.  Seymour  Keav.     Octavo,  doth.        75 
«-The  Taxation  of  the  Elevated  Railroads  in  the  City  of  New 
York.     By  Roger  Foster.     Octavo,  paper  3, 

«-The  Destructive  Influence  of  the  Tariflf  upon  Manufacture  and 
commerce,  and  the  Figures  and  Facts  Relating  Thereto 
By  J.  SCHOENHOK.  Octavo,  doth,  75  cents  ;  paper  ^o 

10-Of  Worlc  and  Wealth.     A  Summa^'  of  Economics.     By' R.  R 
BowKER.     Octavo,  cloth 

11-Protection  to  Young  Industries  as  Applied  in  the  United 
States.  A  Study  in  Economic  History.  By  F.  W.  Taussig. 
Octavo,  cloth 

■         •         • 75 

l8-Storage  and  Transportation  in  the  Port  of  New  Yor3c.  By 
W.  N.  Black.     Octavo,  paper    ..... 

O.  P.  PUTNAM'S  SONS.  PubHahers.  New  York  and  London. 


QUESTIONS   OF   THE    DAY 


18— Public  Relief  and  Private  Charity.   By  Josephine  Shaw  Lowell. 
Octavo,  cloth,  75  cei.ts ;  paper      ,         .         ,    '    .        ,        ,        ^^ 

14—"  The  Jukea."  A  Study  in  Crime,  Pauperism,  Disease,  and  Heredity. 
By  R.  L,  DuGDALR.     Octavo,  clot!\     .        .         .        ,         .     t  oo 

16— Protection    and    Communism.      By  Wm.  Rathbonk 
paper   

16— TheTrue  Usue.     By  E.  J.  Donnell.    Octavo,  paper  . 

17— Heavy  Ordnance  for  National  Defence,  fly  Wm.  H.  Jaques, 
Lieut.  U.  .S.  Navy.     Octavo,  paper 3, 

18— The  Spanish  Treaty  Opposed  to  Tariff  Reform.  By  D.  H. 
Chamberlain.  Jno.  Dewitt  Warner,  Graham  McAdam,  and 
J.  SCHOENHOF.     Octavo,  paper 25 

19-The  History  of  the  Present  Tariff.    By  F.  W.  Taussig.    Octavo, 


OoJavo, 
as 


cloth 


75 


aO-The    Progress    of  the  Working    Classes  in    the   Last    Half 
Century.     By  Robt.  Giffen.     Octavo,  paper     .         .        .        ^5 

81— The  Solution  of  the  Mormon  Problem.    By  Capt.  John  Codman. 
Octavo,  paper ^^ 

8«-Defective    and    Corrupt    Legislation;    the    Cause    and    the 

Remedy.     By  Simon  Sterne.     Octavo,  paper    .        .        .25 

28— Social  Economy.   By  J.  E.  Thorold  Rogers.  Octavo,  clotli,      75 

84— The  History  of  the  Surplus  Revenue  of  1837.     By  Edward  G. 

Bourne.     Octavo,  cloth 

8B~The   American    Caucus    System. 

Octavo,  cloth,  $1,00;  paper ^         „ 

8e-The  Science  of  Business.  By  Roderick    I.Smith.  S^'o,  doth,  i  25 
S7-The  Evolution   of   Revelation.      By  James   Morris   Whiton, 

Ph.D.     Octavo,  paper         ....  „-' 

•         •         •         25 

8a-The  Postulates  of  English  Political  Economj.    By  Walter 
Baoehot.     Octavo,  doth \  ^  ^ 


.     I  25 
By  Georg*  W.   Lawton. 


G.  P.  PUTNAM'S  SONS,  Publiahers.  New  York  an»^  Lond< 


— L-....  II  fifmmimmir 


Hi 


^0VASC0TJ4 


PROVINCE  HOUSE 


i 


Questions  of  the  D. 


I  y  SK/tiEs.—No.  LXIl. 


AMERICAN    FARMS 


THEIR  CONDITION  AND  FUTURE 


BY 


J.  R.  ELLIOTT 


III  fares  the  land,  to  hast'ning  ills  a  prey, 
Where  wealth  accumulates,  and  men  decay  • 
rnces  and  lords  may  Hourish.  or  may  fa.fe*; 
A  breath  can  make  them,  as  a  breath  hath  made- 
But  a  bold  peasantry,  their  country's  ^7        * 
When  once  destroyed,  can  never  be  supplied." 

Oliver  Goldsmith 


NEW  YORK  Sl  LONDON 

G.   P.    PUTNAM'S   SONS 

Sfee  Jlnickctbotlur  j^rrsa 

1890 


COfVmoHT  BV 

J.  R.  ELLIOTT 
1890 


trbe  fintehcrbocljcr  prcee,  Wcw  ijorft 

Electrotype<l  and  Printed  by 
G.  P.  Putnam's  Sons 


THE  AUTHOR 

GRATKFULI.V   DKDICATES  THIS 
VOLUMK   To 

HIS  WIFE 

WHOSE    SVMPATI.IES,    SENTIMENTS.   AND    COUNSELS    HAVE    BEEN 

AN    INVAI.irAHlL   AID   AND    INCENTIVE   IN   THE 

WORK    OP    ITS    PREPARATION 


v^ 


CONTLNTS. 


Intrcductohy 


fAOR 

I 


HOOK    I, 

IMI'URTANCK  ANI>   TmssIBiIITIKH  ok  AtJKUlfLTlRK. 

ClIAPTKR  I.     WImt  U  t'lc  Kcal  Importance  of  ABritultiire  ? 
n.     The  I'osaioUities  of  Agricultu.e 


21 


BOCA'  //. 

A    K.iR-RKACHINO  DiSORDKR   UPON  THK  InTKRKST  OK  tlUStlANDRY. 


Chapter  I.     Troubles  »f  the  Agriculturists  of  Ancient  Ti:nes 
"       II.     The  I)i«kulty  Kar-Reachii:g  To.I)n) 
'      III.     The   American    P'armer's    Waning    Economic 
I'ower       ....  .         . 

'■      IV.      i''arm  Mortgages     ...... 

"        V.     The  Capitalists (iaining the  Land — the  TypitJ 
American  Farm  ..... 

"      VI.     Kented  Farms 

"    VII.     AbHndoned  Farms 


34 

?<> 
45 

53 
58 
6o 


BOCA'  in, 

Agricultl're's  Struggle. 

Chapter  L    The  F-rmer's  Cotemporaries  .... 

"       II.     Competition   ....... 

"     III.     Bct'veen  the  Upper  and  Nether  Mill-stones     . 
"      IV.     Protecticn  a  Deadly  F.nemy  to  the  Farmers  of 

America 

*'        V.     Trusts,  Coribines,  etc 


67 
78 
c;o 

94 
no 


-  >  >.. 


VI 


CO  A' TENTS. 


^v.     Protection    as    it    R.f   " 

'*5'    It    Kefers    to 
■t^ngjanrl    , 

..      „Y-     -^^^  to  Frugality       ' 

■     """"-y  George's  Remedy         ." 


'Agriculture   in 


BOOK    V. 

J   W     ^^'^ation  in  General 

..     ,;;•     The  Single  Tax      ."'••. 

u      ^y.-     ^''•ect  Taxation  "         '         '         •         • 

^he   Real   Strength    of'  an    Evil'svst;         ; 
Taxation  -^yt-tem   of 

*  •  , 

Chaptkr  I      Th«  ir  Politics. 

"■     '■'"'^"■•'"W  be  Selfish  as  »;„,;«„,■,     ' 

»■■.  '!»  Inefficiency  of  F,f,r-J\T°"' 
ments        .  ^^^ee-i.ade  Move- 


PAGE 

122 

125 

128 
132 

^34 


141 
145 
156 
163 

170 


175 
187 


206 


T"K  Physical,  Mentat    «„ 
C.«-a  r      .He  7        '-"-     ""^^  '^°'^™— 

„       J  Consequences         ^  ''"""•  "'f  "^ 

THeCo,.c.„s,o.,i„  Which, he  Re„e<,,, .,„„„,        '        '        -« 


PAGE 

122 

"5 


128 
132 
134 


141 
145 
156 
163 


170 


"  Feel  for  the  wrongs  to  universal  ken 

Daily  exposed,  woe  that  unshrouded  lies  ; 
And  seek  the  sufferer  in  his  darkest  den, 

Whether  conducted  to  the  spot  b>  sighs 
And  moanings,  or  he  dwells  (as  if  the  wren 

Tauglit  him  concealment)  hidden  from  all  eyes 
In  silence  and  in  the  awful  modesties 

Of  sorrow  ;— feel  for  all,  as,  jjrother  Men  ; 
Rest  not  in  hope  want's  icy  chain  to  thaw 

By  casual  boons  and  formal  charities  ; 
Learn  to  be  just,  just  through  impartial  law  ; 

Far  as  ye  may,  erect  and  equalize  ; 
And,  what  ye  cannot  reach  by  statute,  draw 

Each  from  his  fountain  jf  self-sacrifice  !  " 

— Wordsworth. 


AMERICAN   FARMS. 


ERRArUM. 


Read  50  per  cent,  instead  of  100 
line  25,  and  page  96,  line  2. 


per  cent,  on  page  95, 


agriculture,  uui  10  a  uuiumg  cv.v.„v.»...  „._  „_ 

culty  which,  it  would  appear,  has  been  gradually  creep- 
ing upon  this  nev/  world  for  many  years. 

As  I  attempt  to  note  my  thoughts  on  this  matter,  I 

find  myself  among  the  best  of  farms,  in .     I  have 

been  familiar  with  their  history  for  many  years.  Their 
changes,  on  the  one  hand,  and  their  lack  of  changes,  on 
the  other,  have  impressed  me  most  seriously. 

The  grandsires  of  the  present  occupiers  were  the  real 
pioneers  in  the  settlement  of  this  district.  They  pros- 
pered ;  settled  their  sons  round  them  in  comfortable 
homes.  The  fathers  of  the  present  generation  also 
prospered   m  a  high   degree  ;    though  from  this  point 


I 
I 

1: 
F 


AMERICAN   FARMS. 


INTRODUCTORY. 

It  is  not  necessary  to  recount  the  many  experiences, 
the  various  mental  evolutions,  which  have  carried  me  on 
to  a  resistless  desire  to  solve  one  of  the  most,  if  not  the 
most  important  problem  of  the  day— to  wit  •  "  What  is 
the  trouble  on  the  old  farms  ?  Why  is  a  disease  taking 
hold  of  agriculture  in  America  ? 

I  do  not  here  allude  to  any  technical  question  of 
agriculture,  but  to  p.  burning  economic  and  social  d'-ffi- 
culty  which.  It  would  appear,  has  been  gradually  creep- 
ing upon  this  new  world  for  many  year^. 

As  I  attempt  to  note  my  thoughts  on  this  matter  I 

find  myself  among  the  best  of  farms,  in I  have 

been  familiar  with  their  history  for  many  years  Their 
changes,  on  the  one  hand,  and  their  lack  of  changes,  on 
the  other,  have  impressed  me  most  seriously. 

The  grandsires  of  the  present  occupiers  were  the  real 
pioneers  m  the  settlement  of  this  district.  They  pros- 
pered ;  settled  their  sons  round  them  in  comfortable 
homes.  The  father,  of  the  present  generation  also 
prospered   in  a   high  degree  ;    though  from  this  point 


^  AM  ERICA  N^  FARMS. 

Of  Observation,  it  can  be  plainly  seen  th.»        u 

set  in.     The  building  Jw  J  ^  "^^^"8^  '^^^ 

had  ceased    the   farlH  .^     '^f  ''"^"^  ^^^'^  ^^^^^ 

vated.  '  '"'"    ^°'"^^'  °^  but  half  culti- 

The   majority  of  the  sons—brothers  tc^  fh« 
occupiers-have   drifted    awav  .ntn     .  ^'"""^ 

many  it  is  fn.P  ,  ,     ""'"^^y  '"^^  o^'^er  occupations; 

"lany,  ii  is  true,  to  make  complete  faiiurp^  in   Tk 

On  th.s  stnp  of  fine  agricultural  land,  the  farm  non 

dunng  the  twemy  years  which  followed'  Zeover 
much  finer  buddings  were  erecled  during  the  first  „,mH 
per.d^.han  in  the  ia.ter.  whi.e  they  wer^  ^^iTt:^ 

Recently  (Ju„e,  ,889),  I   had  occasion  to  travel  bv 

aistr  cts  of  this  fine  country.     In  this  journey  I  passed 

who.    of     rob?  ""T""  '"""■  '"''  '-roughou       e 
Whole  of  ,t     observed  not  a  single  farm-house  in  course 
of  constructton.     But  I  did  notice  on  the  route  one  verv 
fine  new  residence  being  finished  for  the  occupancy  of  a 
government  official,  and  another  under  extensfve   epa L 
for  the  purpose  of  lodging  summer  boarders  from  X 
cities,  and  also  the  foundation  being  laid  for  a  cuTtom 
house,  the   cost   of   which    is    to  I  six  tYmes  the  rT 
quirements  of  the  port  in  which   it  is  to  be  locLT 

furtJerii*;'.;:";!;::::!  :;:"*':!='  ^'-"^ "-  -^  y^-^  wome„ 

g  me  interests  of  agriculture,  and  farm  laborer... 


INTRODUCTORY. 


A  large  number  of  abandoned  houses,  however,  were 
observed  ;  the  farms  connected  being,  probably,  in  some 
way  passed  over  to  the  care  of  a  neighboring  husband- 
man. 

With  the  assistance  of  a  gentleman  well  informed  as 
to  the  financial  standing  of  the  farmers  of  this  section 
of  the  county,  we  gather  data  ;  and  arrive  at  the  conclu- 
sion that  not  less  than  25  per  cent,  of  the  farms  are  in 
the  grip  of  the  usurer.  This,  it  would  seem,  is  a  grow- 
ing evil.  During  the  twelve  months,  ending  31st  July, 
1889,  there  were  30  per  cent,  more  mortgages  given,  in 
this  county,  than  releases  granted.  At  this  rate  of  in- 
crease, in  less  than  fifteen  years,  50  per  cent,  of  the 
farms  will  be  under  mortgage. 

Dairying,  once  a  leading  industry,  has  decreased  fully 
50  per  cent,  in  the  last  score  of  years.  And  it  would 
require  an  outlay  of  large  proportions  to  dot  these  old 
hill-side  pastures  over  again  with  the  milk  herds  of 
twenty-five  years  ago. 

The  value  of  farm  lands  has  seldom  been  lower  dur- 
ing the  last  thirty  years  than  now  ;  notwithstanding  the 
fact  that  this  is  an  important  part  of  the  much-famed 

apple   region   of  ,  which   has   lately   come   into 

prominence. 

The  average  $5,000  invested  in  farming  (not  including 
the  dwellings),  at  the  present  estimated  value  of  farms, 
will  give  to  the  farm  proprietor  about  $750  per  year 
gross  income,  including  value  of  amount  consumed  by 
his  family.  Out  of  this,  at  least  $250  must  be  paid  by 
the  average  farmer  for  labor  (including  board),  and  at 
least  another  $150  for  direct  taxes,  insurance,  fertilizers, 
and  renewal  of  machinery,  wagons,  and  harness,  etc.  : 
leaving  $350  for  the  farmer.     A  good  farm  laborer  will 


^'tA'A/S, 


">  ""•  ra...  Jd  ;.     ;  T"  "f  ""•••  ""•'  "•^"  "f  <..H  family 

«■"''  all  lus  ,  .„i„,|      VK  '  *■'"'•  "'""  ""■  f-^™'cr, 

.'• K. I  ,V      ,;:"7""""'     '»'"-'''>'-" 

"■••  •'•'a..'  .,f  .1,..  ,uti„  ,  ■    ;  •'  ""'  '"  l""l'""i"n  to 

"I"""  I'i",.     I.,„  "        I ,  '  T'""'  ''-^  "'^'"^  ""-"s 

-"'■e  =o  aKri..„l„' ;:  ;  """""•""  *■"»"'""•>  '"  rcfcT. 

I'lif  iivcragc  farm  |>ro|,ri«„r  m  ii,;. 

">  North  AtiuTi,-,  -  ,v„     I       ,  "^        ""^  '">■  "f  '"'""ry 

•'— •    i"."..u.,  i  „7;:"';"'""'  schedules  of 

»tre„g,|u.ns  our  sus,,ioi  '      i'""""    ">™'s«lves, 

i»  this  cc.,„n,„„i,v  , ,  ,  """"•'''.'"«  '"  "■'•""K  :  tha, 

"H-  mai,.ri,v  .•,„""""'•  ^'"''  •"'•■"''-'•^^■"  farmers. 

overage  a„,.„a,  ,„^o„.e  I.f  t  "  ,    ^  r''"/  •';^'  "«  "'  - 
some  tune  entort  line.l    th.  *^'^^        ^^"-^  ^'^^'*^  for 

»"/ 1--,  propri";;;:  >;tx™,  f  •  ""'"-"<'»  <>' 

'^"■-  "'.".try.  forced  ,„  „ ",    u"         '""''.'•  "''•  i"  this 
"•'■ir  fandlie...  a,ul  pav  ,1     .  '„  'td  ""f"'"  "'  "''^  '- 

-oety.  out  of  ies.\ha„ i:  ^;:;';:r^■r  •'■?• ''^ 


INTKODUCTOKY. 


s 


But  on  extending  the  scope  of  our  inquiries,  we  find 
this  is  a  matter  for  si-rioiis  consideration  ;  not  only  for 
this  district,  but  for  others,  and  for  other  parts  of 
America  We  want  to  know  if  it  is  world-wide  in  its 
character ;  if  it  is  an  old  |)roblein,  with  a  new  face  ;  if 
it  is  a  normal  condition  ;  if  agriculture  is  not  first  in 
importance  to  national  welfare  ;  if  it  should  not  in  this 
era  of  extended  division  of  labor  give  to  its  votaries  the 
maximum  of  wealth  and  comforts  in  return  for  faithful 
toil  :  for  when  was  there  a  period  in  which  'he  produc- 
tive forces  were  doing  more  toward  increas  r  ,  national 
wealth  ?  When  was  there  a  time  of  greater  hoastinj^  of 
material  progress,  and  its  attendant  results  in  the  grand- 
eur of  civilization  ? 

If  the  condition  is  abnormal,  where  is  the  remedy  ? 
If  there  is  no  remedy,  what  of  the  future  ? 

To  this  end  1  humbly  contribute  the  result  of  energies 
of  pen  and  brpin,  of  head  and  heart,  discarding  all  party 
feeling,  selfish  prejudice,  or  unworthy  motives. 

One  of  America's  gifted  sons  asks  : 

"  For  what  nvail  the  ploufrh  or  sail, 
Or  laiul  or  life,  if  freedom  fail  ?  " 


We  ask  :  What  avail  to  bridge  our  oceans  with  float- 
ing palaces,  to  span  our  continents  with  the  most 
magnificent  rail  trains,  to  stud  our  land  with  smoking 
chimneys— the  product  of  the  industries  they  represent 
reaching  the  grandest  proportions,— to  pile  up  national 
wealth  away  beyond  all  precedent,  if  for  all  this,  or  with 
all  this,  the  sons  of  the  pioneers  who  hewed  down  the 
primeval  forests,  and  brought  the  lr~-^s  under  subjection 
to  the  influence  and  service  of  civilization,  are  to  be- 


AMBKICAtf  hAHMS. 
KP.  ,„H  ,r  '  ""P"''''  ">  '"reh  out  the  dan- 


BOOK  I. 

IMPORTANCE   AND   I'OSSIHIIJTIKS  OK  AliklCULTURE. 

"  (iive  fools  their  g<>l<l,  ami  knaves  their  power, 
Let  fortuiie's  bubbles  rise  or  fall, 
Who  sows  a  field,  or  trains  a  flovvtr. 
Or  plants  a  tree,  is  more  than  all. 


*'  For  he  who  blesses  most  is  blest, 

And  ( loil  and  man  shall  »)wn  his  worth, 
Who  toils  to  leave,  as  his  betjuest, 
An  added  beauty  to  the  earth." 

— Whittikr. 


m 


\  ■-■  \  : 


CHAPTER  I. 


WHAT  IS  TIIK  RKAI,  IMI'^»KT.\NCK  OF  AGRirULTL'RE? 

That  the  progress  of  Amei'ca  during  the  century 
which  now  drann  to  a  close  has  been  of  upprecedented 
greatness,  ns  companxl  with  the  past  or  present  progress 
of  the  (.thcr  nations  of  the  world,  is  a  nerally  accepted 
belief.  The  idea  prevails  that  America  is  "  built  up." 
This  feeling  fnids  exi)rc'»sion  every  da^  in  the  utterances 
of  its  peopL.  and  in  most  (juarters. 

That  this  development  on  our  continent  has  been 
ir-rvelious,  is  not  to  be  questioned.  However,  to  ap- 
proximate a  correct  estimate  of  the  rea^  worth  of  this 
expansion  and  greatness,  and  of  the  principal  factors  in 
its  accomplishment,  »'arious  considerations  are  involved. 
Account  has  to  be  made,  not  only  of  its  political  stand- 
ing among  the  nations,  but  of  the  power  and  vigor  of  its 
institutions,  and  its  conditions  (or  the  existence  and 
promotion  of  peace,  contentment,  morality,  and  stability 
among  its  people.  A  country's  '  strength  is  in  its  men, 
and  in  their  unity  and  virtue."  '  In  these  nre  the  essen- 
tials of  a  development  which  may  be  true  and  enduring, 
a  progress  which  may  be  verifiable. 

To  the  question,  to  whac  great  indu  -try  are  we  most 
indebted  for  what  may  be  true  and  abiding  for  good  in 
our  development  ?  I  have  no  hesitancy  in  answering  : 

'John  Ruskin 


ro 


AMERfCAN  FARMS. 


•••".l  »IUM,1.1  „„i  1,0  l.r?     "■°^''""y  i»  very  great ; 

"•""cdiate  y  h,       ;    '  "::'""'™  °"  .""••  P-'  of  those 
continue  to  do  so.  "I'sthicf,  and  must 

A  review  of  history  will    remin.l    ,l, 
f--><:t  that,  with  the  m,L  '  f  '.  "'"  ^'""^•"  "f  »he 

very  rerent  ne    ,,)    .  ,      ^"""'""y-  »>"l  '•'ven  until  a 

firs,  as  ndi  '•";:■;"'""  "^'^  «-''""^  '""-iered 
^poctabih-tv  a  ",:  '■•  "'"'""  "f  --"">.  first  in  re- 
to  society  '"  "■-'•^'"•'"8  I'^'^<^  ^>n<l  happiness 

.o.'hr;:Sse:;f":h:::;;:.°'  '':r ''-'  '°°""'^  »--- 

•I'e  (Grecians  of  the  Heroic  a"    .         "'  '"'■"'"'  '•""""g 
'hat  arriclturc  with  , I,  ^  '    '"'''  '"  ""•'  "•»<--i"sion, 

ITobability  .hat  the  t.ller        t     "oil  wr''"'    '°    "" 
altairs  of  the   tM.,,.    ;nf    ■  *'  '"  I'"'"ical 

'here  n.ay  1      on  "hieh  "T   '"   """"     '''"'■'""  '""^ 
regards  li^  Z  ^Z  ""  "^'^"'""^  decision  as 

specu^d  and  e^e  n,«l    '  •    OS    ""  ,"''™"^  "'^"'^  - 

'-.e  knowledge  .:  be  laTtrelet::,:  "uT"^  "  "  ''"= 
tions  of  the  time.  -entim.nts  and  condi- 


THE  REAL  IMPORTANCE  OE  AGRICULTURE, 


II 


When  Homer  draws  his  picture  on  the  shield  which 
he  causes  Vulcan  to  forge  for  Achilles,  he  mingles  feasts, 
dancing,  and  luxur),  with  contentions  and  bloodshed 
in  his  city  scenes  ;  while  rural  life  is  represented  by 
"  soft  fallowfields,  rich  glebes,"  **  industrious  plough- 
men," "  fields  of  deep  corn,"  "  diligent  reapers  and 
delighted  masters,"  banquets  in  preparation  for  the 
toilers,  observances  of  religious  rites,  scenes  repre- 
senting the  union  of  industry,  comfort,  sanctity,  peace, 
and  pleasure  ;  a  mingling  of  what  is  truest  in  nature 
and  in  life  ;  rites  portraying  a  confiding  faith  in  Nature's 
God,  the  All  Father. 

That  great  man,  Aristotle,  the  economist  as  well  as 
philosopher  and  logician,  reckoned  agriculture  as  the 
chief  source  of  national  wealth.  Modern  political  econ- 
omy, as  taught  by  the  best  writers,  more  correctly  gives  to 
all  industries  a  value  in  proportion  to  the  utility  of  the 
articles  they  produce  ;  but  the  prevailing  thought  and 
custom  of  the  day  goes  farther  than  this,  and  finds  its  ex- 
ercise in  practically  belittling  agriculture. 

The  ancient  Romans,  as  all  are  aware,  looked  upon 
this  favorite  occupation  with  a  sort  of  "  devotional 
respect."  Reproducing  from  Von  Schlegel's  "Philos- 
ophy of  History,"  we  have  the  following  passage,  com- 
prehensive and  frequently  quoted  :  "  They  (the  Romuns) 
were  exceedingly  covetous  of  gain,  or  rather  of  land,  for 
it  was  from  land,  and  in  the  production  of  the  soil,  that 
their  principal  and  almost  only  wealth  consisted.  They 
were  a  thoroughly  agricultural  people,  and  it  was  only  at 
a  late  period  that  commerce,  trades,  and  arts  were  intro- 
duced among  them,  and  even  then,  they  occupied  but  a 
subordinate  place."  When  at  length  the  majority  of  the 
Roman  people  lost  their  hold  upon  the  best  of  occupa- 


12 


AMERTCAIV  FARMS. 


an^e^t  re  ;„? X';  «ood„  „„„ber  of  .he  nobles, 
universal  custrArt  rhrn'Tlh'"  'f '  '°  ""^  °"« 
»'-•     Man,  i.  see„s  sted'.H     't^:^^ ^'^ 

lead  .0  the  on  "oXf !"  T'""^'  '""  '"-"P'-ns 
tion  also  accomp  d  .Ms  lotT'f  «^°'^'^'"- 
choices,  of  occupation.  °'  ""^  ^""^^  '»  '^is 

carried  agricult,.:;    tsu'it  "Tn^r^V^f  '';^ 
Bntann  ca  "  will  he  fnn„^  .1,    ,  ,,  tncyclopsd  a 

relative  to  the  L'ttan".  /  '"""""^  ^°""^«  Passage, 
Israelites:  " The soiou "  'f°K  T"""'"'  "'"^  "'^  ^afi; 
them  for  the  morpu  e,v  a  7'"',"'" '^^^P^^-^d 
them  on  theirrtm!  .'^  a.ncultural  life  that  awaited 
Nearly  the  whole  po'ln  '  P"^""°"  "'  Canaan. 
Upon  their  entrance  "mo  Ca:"'  T"""  ""sbandmen. 
try  occupied  by  a  de-  f""  ""'''  '°""''  "^^  ™un. 

cities  anS  inn^mLt  ^.^.^^^f '7.  ""^---^  "^  -"ed 
lated  wealth,  and  sulsisttr  t"' °^  ^'■'^"' "'=™'""- 
highly  cultivated  soil  whl.*  k"  !  P™"""  °'  "-eir 
and  olive-yards     It  tl  so  rich         ''  """   ""'^"^^ 

ing  army,  Lmberi  g    o  .^ToTb t'boS  "■''  "^  '"^^<'- 
"ives  and  children    ,„:'^    '""''7<"'"^d  men,  with  their 

followers,  found  "Mcorr'-nTf  T""""^  °'  -""P 
tain  them  from  the  Iv  ,h  .1      ^"^  "'^"''"  '°  "'ain- 

breasts  of  the  !tte"i    ?'/"''    ^'^'"'^    "^    '^e   two 

expression  fvL  ^  I.'  u^ed"  an'd  T  ""'''  l^  *''^"  '"« 

usea  ,  and  the  ancient  belief,  that 


THE  REAL  IMPORTANCE   ^'^  AGRICULTURE.     1 3 


'*  no  other  labor  is  at  once  so  good  for  mind  and  body, 
and  so  worthy  of  freemen,  as  agriculture,"  was  one  that 
might  well  be  revived  at  the  present  day. 

It  is  something  more  than  mere  poetic  fancy  which 
designates  "  the  golden  age  "  the  days  when  kings,  and 
priests,  and  philosophers  were  husbandmen.  The  days 
when  love  for  the  occupation,  and  veneration  for  sacred 
customs  pertaining  thereto,  combined  in  producing  a 
happy  people,  in  making  "  the  soil  perpetual,"  in  caus- 
ing the  land  to  "  flow  with  milk  and  honey."  They  were 
the  days  of  national  longevity,  for  agricultural  nations 
were  the  longest  lived,  and  became  the  most  eminently 
accomplished,  and  the  most  wealthy  in  the  truest  sense. 

Whatever  may  be  the  political  economy  of  the  states- 
men of  modern  times,  the  most  eminent  teachers  of  this 
science  have  continued  to  uphold  the  wisdom  of  the 
ancients  in  their  ascribing  to  agriculture  supremacy 
among  national  industries. 

Quesney,  the  French  political  economist  of  the  eigh- 
teenth century,  urged  that  "  the  sovereign  and  the  nation 
sho'Jd  never  lose  sight  of  the  fact  that  the  earth  is  the 
unique  source  of  riches,  and  that  it  is  agriculture  which 
multiplies  them."  J.  B.  Say,  another  French  economist  of 
a  later  time,  taught  that  "  it  is  the  acme  of  skill  to  turn  the 
powers  of  nature  to  best  account,  and  the  height  of  mad- 
ness to  contend  against  them,  which  is,  in  fact,  wasting 
part  of  our  strength  in  destroying  those  powers  she  de- 
signed for  our  use." 

Professor  De  Laveleye,  in  his  "  Elements  of  Political 
Economy,"  a  work  recently  published,  earnestly  main- 
tains the  sovereign  worth  of  agriculture.  "  At  the  pres- 
ent time,"  says  he,  "  attention  and  encouragement  are 
exclusively  given  to  manufacturing.     If  it  be  more  im- 


'4 


^^fF.K^lCAlV  FA/fAfS, 


-ery  advantage.     O.he     ^  ,„  ;^:"""'^^  •"»'  "c-serves 
hey  mcrease  the  „ti,i,y  o,hi„  "''"'''  "?''""'"=■  ^'"« 
for  our  use,  but  .he  fa^cr  s'.    ft  J  '  r'"''"'"*"  ">cm  fi. 
»"d  chemical,  bu.  also  vita   L'    "''  ,""^""'^  '">^^'"' 
«m„,odi,ies.     He  ,„„,  ^;'/";'^.  ^'n1  thus  „,uhi,,|,es 

'"■•••"'y  ;  .his  year  he  has  TZ7  ",  'r"  """   ■''^^'P' 
y^r-'  1.0  „.il|  have  a  Ck      A  '    "  T'  ""-'^P'  '"  "  <^^ 
■ndustri.-s,  because  it  is  the  >"7'""-'-'  '»  "'e  first  of 
These  can  only  incr  a^e  tt  r"f '"""  "^  ""  ""'ers. 
employ  if  the  farms  s,m  I  ■"'"  °'  ""''""^  'hey 

"  «ould  be  >m,v  ,e  1"  "'""  "'"'  -"ore  food."         ^ 

•■■nguished  authon-;;:  ::,fr„  ';••-■  ™,""^"  -^  ""^  i- 

"'»  of  no  party  or  das    to  1  ""''  ''"''"8  ""•■  '"'er. 

'"vestigations  in  the  oen    e  of  t"    '  ""'   ""^"""6  his 
enterprises  of  Europe.  ™  S'"^'  ""nufacturing 

p.;bii^::d':r;i:r;j:  ^-^/j;'-  ;°"™f .  'he  author 

If've  desire  our  people  to  .v  'h         "'""'"S '^ds  : 
ness  of  occupation    anl  ^^'encss  or  single- 

f;  -I'ies.  sureV  wT's::!':;?'""""'''  ''^■«-da.io/of 
'"^- .  ^f  i'  be  for  the  poss  1 1:  ""f  '^""  '°'  '^etory 
com.orts  and  pleasures  to  :,u  "  «™'  ^"'''^'^  "f 
doubtedly  that  occupat.on  >.|,fc  w  "^ ""^"-"ers.  u„. 
develo,,,  that  is  indigenous  „,''  "'  ^"'^  P^'P"'-d  to 
'''eh.rgest,p,anti,voaha  „  ^a  ;;  .  ;"'7;  "'^'  «'"  y'eld 
'ho  conunand  of  all  neal  h    T   u  '"" ''^  P°'^" 

"  greater  multiplicity  of  int'ere  ?     "°  ?""P'-"i°»  offers 
-d  e.vperimcnt  than'grL;^  ::,','"«  ="'=J«'^  ^^  study 

"eeperand  more  eKtm^^A    1\, 
"Pinion  of  this  vteV:^  ,„"">■  'T,""'  '^""S^'i  °- 
husbandry,  but  it  has  impre"  h' ,°""^  occupation  of 
'mporiance.  "Pressed  us  even  more  with  its 


^  to  inces- 
t  deserves 
five,  since 
'  them  fit 
'  P'lysical 
nuJtiplies 
id    roans 


author 
t'ords  ; 
?ingle- 
ion  of 
ictory 
sty  of 
',  lin- 
ed to 
yield 
o\ver 
•ffers 
tudy 

our 

rj  of 
I  its 


r//£  REAL  IMPORTANCE  OF  AGRICULTURE.     1 5 

What  opportunities  it  should  offer  for  the  practical 
application  of  a  broad  education,  useful  and  entertain- 
ing to  the  intelligent  being  ;  an  education  embracing  the 
physical  sciences,  geology,  chemistry, botany,  and  vegeta- 
ble physiology,  as  well  as  the  historical  and  classical 
branches  ;  the  cultivation  of  a  refinement  which  finds 
expression  in  taste,  order,  and  beauty,  in  the  arrange- 
ment of  trees  for  fruit,  protectvon,  or  ornament,  as  well 
as  of  the  field  and  garden  plots  ;  an  intellectual  culture 
which  has  quite  as  much  a  place  in  the  bringing  into 
being  of  the  crop  of  corn,  potatoes,  or  grains,  as  an 
elaborate  education  for  the  clergyman  or  the  lawyer ;  a 
culture  which  should  lead  the  possessor,  above  all  others, 
to  most  profitable  admiration  of  the  wondrous  works  of 
the  Great  Creacor  ! 

Turning  our  attention  to  the  rural  economy  of  the 
British  Isles,  we  find  its  history  bearing  most  conclusive 
testimony  to  the  transcendent  importance  given  in  the  past 
by  Britons  to  agriculture,  in  its  economic,  its  social,  and 
its  national  bearings.  Since  the  days  of  the  Great  Charter 
love  for  rural  life  has  been  a  national  characteristic  with 
the  English  people,  while  a  large  proportion  of  English 
statesmen  have  had  their  chief  care  in  legislating  for  the 
interests  of  the  country.  Even  to-day,  31  per  cent,  of  the 
Parliament  of  Great  Britain  is,  in  some  way,  connected 
with  the  landed  interests.  We  may  well  claim  that  with 
few  other  nations  has  the  seat  of  economic,  social,  and 
political  power  been  longer  retained  in  the  country  ; 
notwithstanding  the  vexed  problems  which  have,  for 
centuries,  surrounded  her  land-holding  system. 

England's  sovereigns,  with  few  exceptions,  have  also 
shared  with  the  people  this  attachment  for  country, 
taking  the  greatest  interest  in  rural  pursuits,  while  the 
nouility — the  temporal  lords — have  always  prided  them- 


l6 


^ME/ilCAN  FARAfS. 


selves  on  being  a  rural  aristocacv      lu 
'•^^rature,  in  a  marked  delrerd'     ,       '°'"'  '^"^''^^ 
nat.onal  trait,  England's  poetslM^^^^^^^         this   peculiar 
<^ray,  Shakespeare    Thom!  '  ^^''P^'''  ^Penser. 

^n  the  early  vear«t  nf  ♦!,     a         . 

American  statesmen  anri  Jl      ,,         '  ""'«  "f  most 
day.  and  AJa^^o  "<,,"'''•'"'' ^"'='' ''»  ^^bster, 

farm  a  ..Cesom^Mrge  t^'Tt  ""'"'"'  °'  ">^ 
statesmanship.     Thomas  r„ff  "bstractmg  cares  of 

P'ow.     The  first  PresTde„{  H?°"  '"""'^<'  "«=  '''"-'de 
^oln  were  familiar  w  h  ,o  '  ",     '!?  ."""  ^''"'•am  I.i„. 
Washington,  howl  er  Xt"      °  '"  '"^''^  ""'y  <^^y^- 
dent  of  the  United  Statestst?    T"^^'''"^  first  Presi- 
year  (April  «,  ,88^)    4"  '      ?'-''''"' '«" ''''' 
great  friend  of  Americrn  'ag  L  1'::!  "'l.^.^'P--.  '^e 
who  led  the  armies  of  the  Rev!^^,i '      \      ""'  ^reat  man, 
dent,  who  "was   by  gener,' """^  "^^  "'''^e  Presi- 

»"ntry,-was  more  a    arme,  ,7'""  ,"'  ''''''"  "'  '"» 
In  fact,  husbandry  wa     .0   h  '°''"'^'  °^  P^'Wcian. 

highest  order,  and  it  seems  to  h.""  r"P""°"  °'  ">« 
Perative  demands  of  his  roul       k    .'""  °"'^  "">  ™- 
from  his  rural  pursuits  ,0  trv"^'""  <'^"'  '""'  "way 
Immediately'afte   t  e  :     ^fT,;  "7  "  '^°""-'  "ena' 
to"  retired  to  his  estates    n  V  g  nf/™!""""'  '"-'>-g- 
■^a   etter  to  Lafayette,  he  remSk        <  ,  °"'  k"^  '""'■ 
private  citizen  on  the  banks  of  7h.  p  .      ^'"  '"'=°'"^  « 
the  shadow  of  my  own  v^n'      j^  '^°"""a<=.  and  under 
bustle  0.  camp,  and  th" hi^  "«''''='='  ''''  '^°"'  the 

-facing  mysei^  w  th  these  trano™^  °'  """'"^  ''f^'    '  "m 

--ier,whoiseveriTrt-^r:r:hrstt:^ 


THE  REAL  IMPORTANCE  OF  AGRICULTURE.     17 

man,  whose  watchful  days  and  sleepless  nights  are  spent 
in  devising  schemes  to  promote  the  welfare  of  his  own, 
perhaps  the  ruin  of  other  countries,  as  if  this  globe  were 
insufficient  for  us  all ;  and  the  courtier,  who  is  always 
watching  the  countenance  of  his  prince,  in  hopes  of 
catching  a  gracious  smile,  can  have  little  conception.  I 
have  not  only  retired  from  all  public  enjoyments,  but  I 
am  retiring  within  myself,  and  shall  be  able  to  view  the 
solitary  walk,  and  tread  the  paths  of  private  life  with  a 
heartfelt  satisfaction.  Envious  of  none,  I  am  determined 
to  be  pleased  with  all  ;  and  this,  my  dear  friend,  being 
the  order  of  march,  I  will  move  gently  down  the  stream 
of  life,  until  I  sleep  with  my  fathers." 

During  the  eight  years  of  which  Washington  held  the 
office  of  President,  he  took  every  means  to  impress  upon 
the  minds  of  his  government  and  his  people,  the  import- 
ance of  fostering  agriculture  by  public  patronage.  To 
Sir  John  Sinclair,  an  English  gentleman,  he  writes,  under 
date  July  20,  1794;  "I  know  of  no  pursuit  in  which 
more  real  and  important  service  can  be  rendered  to  any 
country  than  by  improving  its  agriculture."  In  his  last 
message  to  Congress  he  refers  to  aj^riculture  and  its  im- 
portance to  civilization  in  the  following  terms  :  "  It  will 
not  be  doubted  that  with  reference  either  to  individual 
or  national  welfare,  agriculture  is  of  primary  importance. 
In  proportion  as  nations  advance  in  population  and 
other  circumstances  of  maturity,  this  truth  becomes  more 
apparent,  and  renders  the  cultivation  of  the  soil  more  and 
more  an  object  of  public  patronage."  With  Washington, 
successful  agriculture  meant  national  life,  virility,  and 
power. 

Beyond  all  this,  agriculture  as  a  promoter  of  peace  is 
of  vast  importance  to  the  human  family.     For  while  the 


i8 


AMKfi/CAf/  tAKAfs, 


'™=<:  for  .he  lion's  11  in  .  "  ""''  """  "">"  '"' 

change,  the  Mrrae  -t  .  r  1  "ur;'""  '""  "■^'"■«''  "■ 
in  a  large  degree,  or  ,nh"cen   "'"'""«  "^^  "«"  w^nu 

'»'"   of  »elf.e„„,;i„,ri„ue"    ,  "?   '"''"''"'"  ^X'" 

'■••K«  of  peace       A^l, ?,,  '    ^™"~''"''-'=»  'he  privi- 
con,n,on  cause  in  ^!"^T''  '"^  "°"''  °ver,  have  a 
""serial,  commerciTl  and^n,     '""""'^'"^  bcneHts  „f  i„. 
Laveleye  is  no.  fa  ton!  "'""?"""''"  !«»«•     Then  r,e 
•ion  dates  f.o,„  the  imet;":'"™;*-'  ""'  """'  """«• 
of  corn  to  the  soil  "  """■  "'•^'  ™'^"sted  a  grain 

sec^s  ;tThT;rt ::;  *i  -^^  '""^ '-  -iai 

"■e  institutions  of  ,hrcm,n,rvf?/"'"r  °'  P'«"™? 
than  those  who  have  prober  ^      ?  --^olutionary  shocksi 

associations  ?  '^    '  "'^  '"  '"»"  >"''^  all  its  valued 

moral,  the  sociarafwei' as  heT?'  "'  "''«'"-•  ""= 
our  civilization.     See  Book  VII         ''°'°™'^  ^"PP°"  '" 

'HaMh^rfuta^rtctre-r  ^'^'-^  «- 

capital  invested Tn Tgl: '; '"  "'^'r  '"P°"»«.  *e 
ployed  in  any  oth  X'  of  "^  "''  '''P"="  cm- 
builds  the  raflways  Of  aI  icr^o^T"-  ^^"^"""- 
anticipation  of  the  farmer.  ?    ^^>'  "^   ^uilt  in 

.ii-tly  the  largest  t™  i^S  ^  \^-  ^  '-"PPo«s 
pal  part  of  the  foreien  iccnJ,  r  .  '  .  ^"'''  ""c  P^^nci- 
millions  of  crude  frticerofmT"''"'''"'^"""^ 
other  cou„tries-to    a'  Lth        ?""'  P^-^h^^cd  in 

"^  """""S  of  'he  manufactured 


THE  REAL  IMPORTANCE  OF  AGRICULTURE.     1 9 

The  same  may  be  said  of  the  nation's  annual  debt  of 
nearly  a  million  of  dollars  to  foreign  ships  for  carrying 
her  imports  and  exports  to  and  from  the  country  ;  also 
of  the  million  dollars  yearly  accrumg  to  foreign  capital 
invested  in  the  countiy. 

In  Canada,  as  in  the  United  States,  the  farmers  are 
really  at  the  oack  of  the  railways  ;  they  give  the  largest 
part  of  the  employment  received  by  h.r  small  shipping  ; 
send  to  foreign  customers  over  fifty  per  cent,  of  her  total 
exports,  without  which  it  would  be  difficult  for  the  inter- 
est on  the  public  debt  to  be  paid,  and  the  profits  on  for- 
eign capital  invested  in  the  country  to  be  settled.' 

The  importance  of  agriculture,  as  viewed  by  the  early 
'vriters  of  sacred  history,  is  of  too  much  moment  to  be 
left  unnoticed.  They  claim  that  it  was  in  the  garden  of 
Eden  that  man  commenced  his  labors.  "  Out  of  the 
ground  made  the  Lord  God  to  grow  every  thing  that  is 
pleasant  to  the  sight  and  good  for  food,"  and  also  "  in 
the  midst  of  the  garden  "  was  the  "  tree  of  life,"  and  the 
"  tree  of  the  knowledge  of  good  and  evil."  Man  in  the 
image  of  God,  perfect  in  all  essentials,  was  put  "  into  the 


'  That  the  "  Trade  and  Navigation  Returns  "  do  not  show  a  very  large 
balance  of  trade  against  Canada  is  owing  to  the  fact  that  she  borrows 
from  abroad  much  faster  than  the  interest  on  her  foreign  debt  is  paid. 
For,  eventually,  all  borrowed  capital  must  come  into  the  country  in 
the  shape  of  material.  Consequently,  it  may  be  very  far  from  the 
fact  to  state  that  the  production  of  any  articles  "  would  sweep  away 
the  balance  of  trade  against  her."  That  the  change  has  not  already 
taken  place  in  a  marked  degree  is  because  she  is  still  running  in  debt. 
The  farms  must  pay  these  debts,  or  the  interest  on  these  debts,  through 
exports.  The  policy  of  the  country  has  stopped  the  export  of  manu- 
factured goods.  In  1878  she  exported  manufactured  goods  to  the 
value  (- '  "14,715,776.  In  1886,  only  $3,306,587.  (This  latter  amount 
was  increased  slightly  in  1888.) 


20 


^^ff'l/^'WAN  FAHMS, 


garden  of  Kden,  to  dress  it  and  keen  it  "    tk    « 
then,  given  to  man  was  „  7n        •     ,      ^^he  first  trust, 
very  presence  of  the     no'l"     '''^^^f  ""'^^  y-^  i"  the 
endowed.  knowledge  w.th  which  gods  are 

'hou  eat  broad."  we  have   hi  r  '*":'  "^  "'^  f"' «  »•""' 
political  erono  „„  I„  ,r '.f''.  ""'  8'"»I«e  of  a  primitive 

on,  a  greater  division  wis  .Z  "^f'  '-f"™"'  Father 
Lamech,-Jabal,J„M,::^l.,;'^^^^;'-7  '^  '""'  "^ 
cat.  e.farn,ingand  agria,,.,.  '„t ^r,  •  he""  "'?'»" 
the  harp  and  organ   wh.Vh  .     "°"^ '"^^^ ,  the  second  was 

forces  for  the  multinlicatinn  r  ,  !  "'°"'  ""=  "■•g^nic 
We,"  withotu  whi  7  :  Wt'?  "■^rj","'-- """  "="■'"'" 
To  attain  the  high  and  nobTJn    ,     "'°'"''  ■"•■  '™Possible. 

and  '>un.ani.•„g^•„rence  '  o  r^^Lr"^  T  '""''''' 
sented  by  fabal  ir..  .i,  'mmaterial,  as  repre- 

sented by  Tubal  clin       "T'"'' ''  "'  "'^  ''-«  «Pre- 

.«™ng  the.  into  „e.fo.:tV:;:i-:^        ""   '"^  ^^"''' 

-^ertet:: ":::  "zr:'-^'  "•^'  -"'-" 

requiring  more  and  mo.    tw    '"       7  'l!^'  "^'"^^  '^ 
numbers  of  the  human  fL        '°  J«PP'y  'he  increasing 

■•nto  play  an  everWea  ^g  v^a^'y:;? ^'1™'=^'  -'""' 
poses  of  invention  and  fabrCl  "'""  ^°'  P"" 

<his  cannot  be  realised  and  me.Lvth'''  ""  ''''°''  '"^^ 
l"s  o,v„  ground,  and,  in  a  sense  ^nd      T'""""^' °" 

a  sense,  mdependen.  of  other 


THE   ftEA!    l\tnoK  VANCE   OF  ACKlCt'irUKP..     21 


clftsies.  New  conditions  should  find  th»?  larmcr  expand- 
ing his  higher  faculties  to  meet  them  in  the  prosecution 
of  his  own  labors ;  exen  sing  not  only  acquisitions 
which  a  liberal  education  should  give,  but  also  of  that 
valuable  instruction  preserved  in  tradition  only — a 
science  **  transmitted  in  fragments  from  father  to  son," 
from  ncighbcr  to  neighbor,  an  evolution  without  record. 

Taking  societies  in  the  aggregate,  it  is  from  the  farm- 
er's surplus  that  other  occupations  become  possible. 
When  they  take  more  than  this,  they  are  trenching  upon 
the  farmer's  capital  and  estates,  and  if  continued  it  must 
be  but  a  mr.tter  of  time  when  a  crisis  of  vast  proportions 
must  be  the  result.  It  is  after  the  necessities  of  life  are 
satisfied  that  opportunities  arise  for  new  forms  of  pro- 
duction and  consumption. 

'I'he  enjoyment  of  civilized  life  requires  the  full  and 
uninterrupted  development  of  all  the  great  divisions  of 
labor  consistent  with  justice  and  safety  ;  we  cannot  dis- 
pense with  either.  But  it  is  in  rural  life,  surrounded  by 
nature,  that  the  higher^  and  grandest  application  of  the 
results  of  all  progress  for  the  development  of  man  is 
possible. 

To  sum  it  all  up,  we  have  science,  our  own  observa- 
tion, and  the  histories  of  civilizations  which  have  come 
and  gone,  all  loudly  prnfosting  against  a  decline  of 
agriculture. 


CHAPTER   ri. 

T"K  ,.„.s.mUTIK,s  .,,  A,iKlcUI.TlIRE. 

•"•my,  we  arc  of  the  (.elicf  eh  „    h  ,  •,    '''  ^'^  ""^ 

<-■""•■«•  arc   immense      I  „■'    '^  l.»"'l>'li'ic,  of  agri- 

«'"'l.l.secm  possible.  „„,,"'''  '^"  "'''"  ""'J^'""  'hat 

-«Kes,s  ,o  ,hc  mind  ;   ;  :",t°   '"f-^''  <i-el„p„,„, 

I>i«l  Ihe  reader  who  '"^'"''^'""-•^  '"'  grand  results, 

•"ound  his  d„elliL>  \Vh,  '•'  """''  ^'  ""^  »"« 
dcvelopn,en.  of  i„,cf,ect  clu  ,  be  tT"  '"'  """^  -^ 
family  and  society  !     And  d     ,  '  "°""''''"  "'  •>'» 

a  calc„la,ion  of  what  mLh.  h  ■  ■'''.'  ""'''"""= '"  """'« 
proper  mixing  of  soils"  Id  ,h  f    °"  ""'^  '"'"  ''^  ">e 

or  ho,v  exceeding  y  1 ,"'  l'!  '^"'f """"  "f  fertilizers, 
"  Tifle  of  their  pts' ibihti^  ?         '""""=""'=  ^'^Wing  even 

"c"":::rtha;^;rjL':r'°''^'^'^"''-™ 

United  States  and  Canad  T  .r"^  "'  *''"'  '"  "-^ 
every  tn-cnty  of  -he  poputtir"  "^  !""  ""'  P"^""  '" 
"o>;r  in  each^ear.  IIZ^^^;  ^  I'X^^  "  barrel  of 
'and  capable  of  producing  whea   is^'  '"'^-     ■^'" 

•h-ng  like  one  twentich'^f    .s    ^"n,  "w'"""  ™^ 
K"m   enough   on  a  small  part  of  .h.,  ""  '"'" 

part  ot  the  territory  of  the 
;i2 


THK   POSSm/L/r/ES  OF  AGRICULTVRF.         23 


United  Suifu  to  feed  the  world.  United  Staten  Consul- 
(ieneral  Way  reports  that  "  Russia,  under  ''»"orable 
conditions,  rould  supply  the  world  with  wheat."  India 
could  probably  do  the  same,  and  the  Argentine  Republic 
would  not  fall  far  behind. 

A  single  State,  properly  fertilized,  is  capable  of  bear- 
ing vegetables  to  fed  the  population  of  the  whole 
Union.  And  there  is  enough  fertilizer  in  Bostoi  harbor 
to  meet  this  requirement  for  very  many  years.  There 
iire  States  in  the  West  ecpial  to  the  task  of  supplying 
meat  for  the  whole  people  of  North  America  if  the  lands 
were  properly  treated.  The  little  Annapolis  Valley  in 
Nova  Scotia  has  sufncient  apple-orchard  area,  with  trees 
in  bearing  and  properly  fertilized,  tj  produce  sufficient 
apples  to  glut  the  markets  of  Great  Britain  and  Nev. 
Mngland.  The  fertilizer  lies  in  the  Annapolis  basin. 
California  coi  Id  be  made  to  supply  this  whole  continent 
with  most  fruits. 

There  can  be  no  exhaustion  of  the  soil  if  properly 
treated.  There  can  be  no  destruction  of  matter  in  the 
consumption  of  the  products  of  the  faim,  but  there  may 
be  displacement.  By  intelligent  guidance  their  forces 
may  be  continually  augmented  for  the  increase  of  bath 
animal  and  vegetable  life.  If  the  proper  returns  are 
m.ide  to  the  soil,  the  demands  of  man  upon  it  can  never 
exhaust  it. 

It  is  the  order  of  nature  tha  the  surface'of  the  globe 
be  more  and  more  adapted  to  the  support  of  vegetable 
and  animal  life.  The  results  of  decomposition  of  rocks, 
and  the  breathing  of  gases  from  beneath  the  crust  of  the 
earth  and  from  our  broad  oceans,  are  being  taken  up  con- 
tinually by  plant  life  through  its  leaves  and  roots  ;  to 
decay  and  become  soil,  or  to  go  into  an?  lal  matter  ;  all 


H 


■11//  /,V(:(A'  /-.lAWS. 


an,m.-,l  life  ,„  find  i,s  higlKst  c-nd  in  man  ;  an,l  ,he  con- 
-™,.t.on  of  man  ,o  return  again  ,o  th  .soil.  Bu7  a 
man,  whose  dema„d  upon   the   soil   once  re.,uired  an 

LM,   I  n,        f  f"   '■"'■'■■■      ■'■''"'"S''    "'^-   intelligent 

K  "dance  o    man,  ,vhat  then  may  be  the  possibilities  of 
the  produclive  capacity  of  land  > 

That  man  has  abused  all  these  favorable  natural  con- 
ditions ,s  patent  to  those  who  study  the  subject  -jTe 
abuse  ,s  proved  in  the  success  which  has  a.  ended  in 
a^l  cases,  proper  care  to  return  to  the  land  its  due 
Wc  have  now  about  one  and  one  half  billions  of  Jo- 
pie  sustamed  on  the  surface  of  the  globe  What  in  .h,. 
correct  evolution  of  the  productive  'powers  of  the    a 2 

many.'     W.t.  these  numbers  so  many  times  increased 
thaVn^"'^"  "'  '""'"  ~™""'  ""^  •^-'-^'^d  -y  -re 
As  the  ,iuestion  refers  to  America,  deduction  f-om 
sc,en, fie  argument  gives  the  following  result  .•  "  In  Eng- 
land  the  densUy  of  population  i,  about  389  persons  It 

shop  of  the  world,  a,,     suj.ports,  by  her  foreign  trade  a 

greater  population  than  the  soil  c.™  nourish.     In  France 

he  den   ,y_of  population  is  about  ,„  ;  i„  Oerma^J ' 

I^n  e  r;  r  '"  r°-  °"  *"^  Sroun<ls  we  n!^ay 
assume  that  the  number  of  persons  which  a  square  mile 
can  properly  sustain,  without  generating  the  pressure  of 
a  redundant  population,  is  ,50  at  the  latitude  of  50  »!nd 
^6  IS  the  number  which  expresses  the  productiveness  of 
thts  paranel.  Then  taking,  for  the  sake  of  simplicily  ,, 
as  the  ,ndex  of  the  productiveness  of  the  useful  soi['be 


Tin-  PossiniuTiRs  of  agriculture.      25 

yond  30"  in  America,  and  85  as  that  of  the  country  within 
the  parallel  of  30''  on  each  side  of  the  equator,  we  have 
about  4,000,000  square  miles,  each  cajjable  of  supporting 
490  persons.  It  follows  that,  if  the  natural  resources  of 
America  were  fully  developed,  it  would  afford  sustenance 
to  3,600,000,000  of  inhabitants,  a  number  nearly  three 
times  as  great  as  the  entire  mass  of  human  beings  now 
existing  upon  the  globe."  ' 

But,  after  all,  the  tleory  of  Malthus,  that  moral  re- 
straint  must  be  exercised  for  the  prevention  of  famines, 
only  teaches  that  men  must  suffer  when  their  supply  of 
food  does  not  increase  with  the  increase  of  their  number. 
The  moral  standard  required  is,  moreover,  movable,  and 
It  is  quite  as  likely  to  become  a  social  condition,  under 
favorable   circumstances   of   food    supply,  as   when   the 
supply  is  low.     With  a  true  progress  man's  desires  take 
higher  forms  ;  they  seek  expression  in  the  exercise  of  his 
better  faculties  ;  not  as  a  beast,  he  must  live  ;    his  is  an 
archetype  of  a  grand  and  noble  purpose.    Where  the  na- 
tional supply  of  food  has  dropped  too  low  to  ^ive  the  peo- 
ple a  comfortable  subsistence,  it  has  always  resulted  from 
a  congested  state,  brought  about  through  the  sway  of  a 
false  condition  in  social  organizations.     Society  is  con- 
vulsed because  of  some  men's  inability  to  gain  the  bread 
which  their  associates  believe  their  requirements  demand. 
These  convulsions  are  becoming  not  far  removed  from 
civil  war. 

And  :  "  What  is  man,  the  animal  who  builds  cities,  and 
excavates  docks,  and  lays  wires  under  the  ocean,  and 
drives  ships  over  it  ?  Is  he  not  a  land  animal,  whose 
very  body  is  composed  of  land  .?  What  are  his  produc- 
tions but  the  bringing  forth  of  land  materials  drawn  from 
_j         '  "  Encyclopopdia  Britannica,"  vol.  i.,  p.  717. 


26 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


land  by  moving,  combining,  separating  them  so  as  to 
satisfy  his  designs  ?  Look  in  every  direction  ;  see  land 
half  used,  or  not  used  at  all.  Why  should  there  be  any 
scarcity  of  work  ?  Why  should  men,  willing  to  work, 
suffer  and  strain  for  the  want  of  the  things  that  work 
produces,  while  land,  the  natural  source  and  means  of  all 
production,  is  so  abundant  ?  There  is  no  reason  in  the 
nati're  of  things."  ' 

We  may  well  ask  what  are  the  possibilities  of  agricul- 
ture,  or  to  what  extent  may  thr  earth,  when  properly 
treated,  be  fruitful  and  multiply  for  the  satisfaction  of 
man,  when  the  science  which  may  be  brought  to  her  aid 
IS  studied,  and  its  teachings  followed  ?  when  mankind 
looks  upon  it  as  it  should,  as  the  greatest  of  all  the 
sciences,  or  the  science  of  which  others  are  only  a  part  ? 
lo  this  end— namely,  that   lands  "be  fruitful"  and 
man   prosper-it    is   necessary   that   every   agricultural 
community  be  a  centre  of  interest  to  society  in  general  • 
that  society  seek  the  agriculturist,  and  not  that  the  agri- 
culturist seek  society  ;  that  the  city  seek  the  country  not 
the  country  the  city.     If  he  (the  agriculturist)  prospers, 
they  will  come  to  him.     Make  drafts  upon  him  of  all 
sorts,  to  be  consumed  away  from  his  land,  and  his  prod- 
ucts must  go  abroad  in  any  case  to  satisfy  this  demand  • 
he  will  have  nothing  to  spend  on  society  at  home. 

With  a  numerous  and  prosperous  land-holding  class 
production  will  be  large  and  competition  natural,  and 
monopoly  m  agriculture  will  not  be  thought  of  Nu. 
merous  country  towns  are  far  more  desirable  for  the 
indirect  benefit  of  agriculture  tiian  the  growth  of  a  few 
though  wealthy  cities.  Between  the  former  and  the  agri- 
culturists, there  is  much  more  likely  to  be  a  real  com- 

'  Henry  George  in  the  North  American  Revieiv,  October,  1889. 


THE  POSSIBILITIES  OF  AGRICULTURE. 


27 


munity  of  interests  than  with  the  latter.  That  such 
towns  may  grow  and  prosper,  it  is  required  that  the 
industry  of  agriculture  be  first  prosperous,  as  a  base  of 
general  industrial  power.  Agriculture  must  be  treated 
as  the  leading  industry — not  of  secondary  importance. 

It  is  not,  then,  a  correct  political  economy  which  de- 
termines that  manufacturing  leads  husbandry,  as  the 
protectionists  would  have  it ;  nor  that  trade  should  lead, 
as  many  free  traders  desire  ;  but  that  agriculture  be  the 
first,  the  only  true  condition. 

Mr.  Henry  C.  Carey  was  correct  when  he  advocated  the 
theory  :  "  That  man  may  cease  to  be  enslaved,  and  that 
agriculture  may  become  a  science,  it  is  indispensable 
that  there  be  a  division  of  employments  ;  that  his  facul- 
ties be  stimulated  to  activity  ;  thai  the  power  of  associa- 
tion arise  ;  that  the  market  for  his  products  be  brought 
to  the  neighborhood  of  the  land  ;  that  the  utility  of  jjU 
the  things  yielded  b;  it,  whether  in  the  form  of  t^od 
or  vegetable  fibre,  coal,  ore,  lime,  or  marl  be  thus  in- 
creased ;  that  its  owner  be  thereby  freed  from  the 
enormous  taxation  to  which  he  is  subjected  because  of 
the  extending  necessity  for  effecting  changes  of  place ; 
that  he  be  freed,  too,  from  the  extraordinary  waste  of 
human  power,  physical  and  mental,  that  always  attends 
the  absence  of  diversity  in  the  modes  of  employment ; 
and  that  the  powers  of  the  land  be  increased  by  means 
of  the  constant  repayment  to  it  of  the  manure  yielded  by 
the  consumption  of  its  products."  ' 

'  Carey  was,  however,  far  from  correct  in  his  claim  that  even  the 
extreme  measures  which  he  advocated  could  bring  about  the  freedom 
and  community  of  interests  which  he  desired,  the  very  opposite  being 
the  evident  experience  of  America,  as  she  has  approached  them. 


41 


BOOK   H. 

A   FAR-REACHING   DISORDER. 

Rome,  in  the  days  of  Se-vius,  presented  to  view  a  numerous  body 
of  small  proprietors,  cultivating  the  land  they  owned.  Later,  we 
find  palaces  owned  by  Scipios  and  Pompeys— the  land  having  become 
consolidated,  and  the  free  proprietors  having  disappeared.  Fixed 
property  declined  in  value,  while  slaves  increased  in  number,  and 
bankers  in  wealth  and  power. — Henry  C.  Carey. 


J 


CHAPTER  I. 

TROUBLES   OF    IME    AGRICULTURISTS    OF   ANCIENT 

TIMES. 


In  a  former  chapter  we  suggested  a  desire  to  make  the 
inquiry  as  to  whether  we  have  set  about  a  solution  of  an 
old  difficulty.  A  careful  survey  of  the  histories  of  the 
nations  of  antiquity,  such  as  that  of  Israel,  Greece,  and 
Rome,  will  convince  the  student  that  the  agrarian  ques- 
tion and  trouble  to  land  properties  has  been  an  extremely 
old  subject  of  national,  as  well  as  individual,  concern. 

The  husbandmen  of  Israel  had  their  days  of  glory, 
when  the  whole  land  of  Palestine,  to  use  the  description 
of  one  of  England's  great  writers,  was  *'a  magnified  copy 
of  our  finest  ideal  of  landscape  gardening,  "  "  laughingly 
beauteous,"  "sumptuously  rich,"  "lavishly  varied." 
But  we  find  that,  though  with  its  mountain-clad  vine- 
yards, its  olive  groves,  its  palm  plantations,  its  orchards 
of  dates,  its  pomp  of  fruit,  and  with  its  boundless  store 
to  its  votaries,  yielding  its  "thirty  to  one  hundred-fold," 
it  finally  failed  to  be  the  land  of  prosperous,  happy  homes 
for  intelligent  men. 

The  hills  of  Benjamin  and  Tudah,  with  once  a  "  teem- 
ing population"  of  husbandmen,  are  now  the  home  of 
wild  beasts  ;  fertile  Esdraelon  and  luxuriant  Carmel  are 
inhabited  by  a  few  unintelligent  beings  ;  and  the  high- 
lands of  Galilee,  "  with  no  appearance  Of  life  except  the 


mi 


♦ 


32 


AMERICAN  FARMS 


occasional  goatherd  on  the  hill-side,  or  the  gathering  of 
the  women  at  the  wells."  '  The  old  farms  of  Palestine 
have  been  all  abandoned,  and  the  sons  of  the  fathers  and 
founders  of  so  much  that  we  prize  wander  about  in  the 
world,  bereft  of  social  or  political  influence  anywhere. 

As  to  the  Grecian  Republic,  its  history  teems  with 
accounts  of  vexatious  changes  and  disturbances  on  ac- 
count   of  land   difficulties.     Plutarch,   in   his   "Lives" 
speaks  frequently  of  the  disorders  of  the  state,  which  he 
attributes  to  agrarian  troubles.     Lycurgus,  with  a  power 
that  seems  marvellous  to  us,  upsets  the  .vhole  of  the  land 
titles,  m  order  to  give  back  to  thousands  a  share  in  the  soil. 
^    A  few  hundred  years  later  and  the  country  is  plunged 
m  civil  war  over  these  land  troubles.     Agis  and  Cleo- 
menes  meet  death  through  an  attempt  to  grapple  with 
these  difficulties  :— landed  property  in  the  hands  of  "  the 
few,"  "  and  the  rest  of  the  people  poor  and  miserable  " 
Poor  and  miserable  was  evidently  the  correct  descrip- 
tion  of  the   peasantry   of  the   Grecian    Republic   as  it 
approached  its  many  social  and  political  crises. 

A  hint  only  seems  necessary  to  remind  the  intelligent 
reader  that  most  disastrous  misfortunes  overtook  the 
rural  citizens  of  the  Roman  Republic  and  Empire,  before 
their  overthrow.  Roman  gods  and  goddesses  were  un- 
equal to  the  task  of  saving  the  small  landed  proprietors 
from  destruction  ;  for  it  amounted  to  that. 

The  land-holders  must  have  been  very  numerous  at 
one  time,  especially  at  the  period  when  seven  acres  con- 
stituted the  limit  of  the  extent  of  the  individual  estate 
The  vast  majority  of  these,  with  their  posterity,  not 
only  had  their  grievous  difficulties  to  contend  against, 
but  were  finally  dispossessed  of  their  properties.     "  Ex- 

*' Dr.  Cuiiiiingham  Geikie. 


TROUBLES  OF  ANCIENT   TIMES. 


33 


tensive  parks,"  controlled  by  the  favored  few,  took  the 
place  of  the  once  very  numerous  peasantry.  The  free 
Roman  citizen  disappeared  from  the  old  farms,  and  the 
cultivation  of  the  soil  was  given  over  to  the  **  slave 
gangs."  Tiberius  Gracchus,  who  undertook  to  grapple 
with  the  trouble,  said  of  his  unfortunate  fellow-citizens  : 
"  They  are  called  *  masters  of  the  world,*  and  have  not 
a  foot  of  grouad  in  their  possession ;  without  homes, 
without  any  fixed  abode,  they  wander  from  place  to 
place  with  their  wives  and  children." 

It  is  not  required  to  pursue  this  farther,  to  show  that 
we  have  not  catered  upon  the  solution  of  an  altogether 
new  problem,  or  a  problem  which  has  not  a  counterpart 
in  some  important  particulars,  at  least,  with  the  fallen 
civilizations. 


^11 


CHAPTER  II. 

THE   DIFFICULTY    J  AK-REACHING  TO-D/^v. 

Where  is  the  country  at  the  present  time  which  has 
not  to  face  senou.  questions  in  relation  to  agriculture  ? 
laking  a  hasty  glance  at  the  chief  countries  of  Europe 
Ztj'  '^^^Z^^"^*^'  ^-"^-ny,  Belgium,  and  Great' 
Bntam,  we  find  not  one  of  them  whose  thinking  men 
do  not  see  m  this  matter  (as  it  concerns  themselves) 
cause  for  reflection.  ' 

Rural  Italy  has  of  late  years  been  experiencing  a 
cnsis  m  agriculture.  The  condition  became  so  serious 
that  a  government  commission  was  set  at  work  about  ten 
years  ago  to  investigate  the  matter.     Their  labors  cov- 

n  1885.     The  substance  of  the  report  was  to  the  effect 

hat  the   peasantry  of   Italy  are  "poor  and  miserable, 

leadmg  a  life  of  wretchea  existence,  to  which  emigration 

atit  th°     "  '.""""  "  '  ^'^*  "  ""''"'y  ^50,000  Italians 
quit  the  country  every  year  "  ;  that  "  half  the  children 
die,  under  seven  years,  in  the  Marches  "  ;  that  "  families' 
live  together  sometimes  to  the  number  of  forty  "  •  that 
m  the  mountain  districts  the  whole  family  live  in  one 

chickLT'^n"''   ''"'  .P^^^'   ''''''  ^'^'^^   ^^^   ^heir 
chickens.       This  is  certainly  a  gloomy  picture  of  the 

condition  of  modern  rural  Italy,  the  garden  of  Europe 

Like  Italy,  France  has  made  these  matter-  a  subject 

34 


THE  DIFFICUL TY  FA R.REA Cf/IXG   TO. DAY,     35 


hich  has 
culture  ? 
Europe, 
d  Great 
ing  men 
nselves) 

ncing  a 
serious 
)out  ten 
•rs  cov- 
)peared 
e  effect 
ierable, 
gration 
[talians 
lildren, 
amilies 
' ;  that 
in  one 
1   their 
of  the 
urope. 
ubject 


of  parliamentary  inquiry,  and  it  iti  found  that  the  ag.i- 
cultural  clar,3  are  in  a  very  unhappy  condition.  The 
Institute  Natural  of  Paris  reported  some  time  ago,  that 
in  parts  of  France  peasants  are  living  like  beasts.  Of 
eight  millions  of  land  proprietors,  three  millions  are  now 
looked  upon  as  subjects  of  charity. 

As  to  Germany,  one  government  commission  after 
another  has  been  issued  to  look  into  the  state  of  agricul- 
tural troubles.  They  find  that  in  many  parts  of  the 
empire,  farm  mortgages  are  eating  up  the  peasants'  little 
properties,  that  the  condition  is  any  thing  but  satisfac- 
tory ;  and  many  schemes  are  proposed  to  alleviate  their 
distresses. 

These  matters  in  Belgium  have  also  become  a  subject 
of  parliamentary  notice.  In  every  province  in  the  land 
a  government  representative  has  been  stationed  to  ren- 
der the  farmers  assistance,  but  still  the  trouble  goes  on. 
In  Russia,  not  only  are  the  peasants'  properties  in  very 
many  cases  loaded  with  debt,  but  the  owners  them- 
selves actually  mortgaged  for  many  years  in  advance. 
As  to  Great  Britain,  her  land  troubles  are  a  subject  of 
every-day  conversation.  We  all  know  that  efforts  tow- 
ard their  solution  consume  a  very  large  portion  of  the 
time  of  the  British  statesman.  This  glance  over  Europe 
will  suffice  to  remind  us  that  we  are  dealing  with  a  diffi- 
culty of  large  p'-oportions. 


CHAPTF.R  III. 

•nil:   AMKHCAN   FARMERS  WAM.N,,   KCONOMIC 

I'OWKR. 

Most  students  of  social  science  will  admit  that  in  ill 
stage,  m  the  growth  of  nation,  and  of  soH^  '    ,u    ^nd 
-dual,  or  the  clas,c,  which  have  had  the  I    g    ^r^! 
n  the  general  wealth  have  possessed  immenfe  advan' 
ages  over  those  less  abundantly  supplied.     S  ch  pos 
session,  have  truly  given  them  the  '•  poier  of  position"  tn 
command  n,e„  as  well  a,  things.     The  ear         me", 
Amenca  could  well  hoast  of  being  the  wealth  produ  ers 
as  well  as  .he  wealth  controll.rs  of  the  Western  worM 
a  power  of  position  which  could  reasonably  de  y  oZes' 
sion  from  the  hands  of  others.  ^  " 

I  am  aware  that  the  aggregate  apparent  wealth  of  the 
agncjUural  and  pastoral  classes  has  increased  in  he 
last  n  ty  years,  and  that  the  average  farmer  may  be  in  a 

rio'r  r::f iHt^  t  r '-"  t  -"'"-  ^-^ 

mupcr  of  to-day  is,  m  a  sense,  better  circumstanced  than 

progress.      As   much  could  be   said,  perhaps    for   'he 

pared  with  the  free  savage  of  an  earlier  period     At  anv 
stage  of  development,  however.  ,he  successful  ones,  or 

36 


AMERICAN  FA  KM  En's  ECONOMIC  POWER.      37 

those  who  have  made  the  greatest  progress  in  gathering 
wealth,  have  secured  the  power  of  position  over  their 
contemporaries — the  power  to  dictr.te  terms.  This  has 
been  a  rule,  with  few  if  any  exceptions,  all  the  way  up. 

The  typical  American  farmer  once  held  such  control 
of  the  national  purse  strings  ;  even  in  the  year  :85o,  the 
farmers  of  the  United  States  could  boast  of  possessing 
60  per  cent,  of  the  capital  power  of  the  Union.  It  is 
not  easy  to  give  a  sufficiently  high  estimate  to  this  rela- 
tive power,  secured  and  maintained  as  it  was  by  indi- 
vidual eK  It  undoubtedly  secured  for  its  possessors 
a  commanding  influence  in  political  and  social  affairs, 
while  fostering  a  most  desirable  spirit  of  independence. 

This  ^.  tr,  however,  which  was  really  on  the  wane  in 
5850,  though  60  per  cent,  of  the  total,  sank  to  53  per 
cent,  in  i860.  This  decline  of  relative  wealth  has  con- 
tinued until  the  i)resent  day.  In  1880,  it  had  gone  down 
to  40  per  cfmt.  and  it  is  [)robably  not  more  than  35  per 
cent,   j-day. 

Further  than  this,  I  say,  the  farmer's  power  is  declin- 
ing, absolutely  as  well  as  relatively.  In  i860  there  were 
2,044,077  farms  in  the  United  States  ;  in  1880,  4,008,907. 
In  1 860  the  total  value  of  farm  property  was  $7,980,493,- 
063,  or  an  average  of  $3,904  per  farm  ;  in  1880  the  value 
of  the  total  value  was  $12,104,001,  or  an  average  of 
$3,019  per  farm.  Up  to  i860  the  farmers  held  their 
ground,  or  rather  increased  the  value  of  their  possessions, 
but  from  that  date  to  1880  the  shrinkage  has  been 
equivalent  to  $885  per  farm,  and  we  have  every  reason 
for  supposing  that  th^s  decline  is  still  going  on. 

In  1870  the  property  of  the  farmers  of  the  six  New 
England  States  was  valued  at  $707,942,439;  in  1880  it 
had  fallen  to  $671,846,058.     Is  this  not  a  serious  change 


38 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


—a  change  that  demands  searching  inquiry  ?  Have  we 
not  m  It  a  question  quite  equal  to  the  vexed  question 
between  labor  and  capital,  the  unequal  distribution  of 
land  ?    Or,  are  they  not  parts  of  one  great  question  ? 

But,  let  us  review  the  opinions  held  thirty  years  ago 
as  to  the  relative  importanre  of  agriculture  in  some  of 
the  New  England  States.     ( .ur  eye  rests  upon  a  volume 
of  the  New  England  Farm,  •■  for  the  year  1854,  and  from 
an  editorial  we  extract  the  following  emphatic  passage  • 
In  the  year   1850,  the  improved  land  of  the  State 
(Massachusetts)  amounted  to  2,133,436  acres,  and  the 
cash  value  of  the  farms  was  1109.076,347  ;  the  imple- 
ments and  machinery  were  worth  $3,209,584  ;  the  value 
of  the  hve-stock  was  $9,649,710  ;  and  the  value  of  rye 
and  Indian  corn  of  that  year  was  $2,857,732  ;  to  say 
nothing  of  hav,  fruit,  root  crops,  which  would  be  as 
much   more.      These   sums   find    the   farmer  investing 
capital   and    producing   crops  in  a  single  year   to   the 
^mount   of  one-  hundred  and  twenty-seven    millions   six 
'mndred   and  fifty-one   thousand   one    hundred  and  five 
dollars.  '' 

"  The  other  principal  industrial  pursuits  gave,  for  the 
same  period,  m  the  cotton  and  woollen  manufacture  in 
pig-iron,  castings,  wrought-iron,  malt  and  spirituous 
liquors,  and  tanneries,  an  aggregate  of  eighty  millions 
three  hundred  thousand  nine  hundred  and  fifty -four  dollars 
leaving  a  balance  of  forty-seven  millions  three  hundred 
and  hfty-one  dollars  in  favor  of  the  industry  of  farming  " 

In  this  State,  the  value  of  the  productions  of  Indian 
corn,  wheat,  and  rye  has  fallen  from  $2,75,v,ooo  in  1854 
to  $1,750,000  in  1887.  The  value  of  live-stock  has  risen 
from  $9,649,7  >o  in  1850  to  only  $12,957,004,  or  an 
average  yearly  increase  of  $89,386  :  not  quite  one  per 
cent,  per  year. 


AMERICA!^  FARMER'S  ECONOMIC  POWER.      39 

In  1865  the  pounds  of  beef  slaughtered  were  70,000,- 
000  ;  in  1885,  only  10,000,000.  The  potato  crop  in  1845 
amounted  to  4,767,000  busnels  ;  in  1885  it  was  reduced 
to  3,584,000  bushels. 

In  1845  the  production  of  wool  reached  the  fine  figure 
of  1,015,000  pounds  ;  in  1885  the  insignificant  amount  of 
255,000  pounds. 

Most  startling,  however,  is  the  fact  that,  while  the 
total  value  of  property  rose  from  $573,343,286  in  1850 
to  $2,795,000,000  in  1880,  the  value  of  farm  property 
only  rcse  from  $121,935,641  in  1850  to  $164,288,956  in 
1880.  That  is  to  say,  while  the  valuation  of  the  property 
of  the  people  of  the  whole  State  increased  by  171  per 
cent,  in  thirty  years,  the  per  capita  valuation  of  the 
farmers'  property  increased  by  only  30  per  cent.  ;  the 
value  of  farrp.  land  declining  $5,929,142  in  the  ten  years 
1875-85. 

As  in  Massachusetts,  the  production  of  grain  in  New 
Hampshire  has  declined.  In  1853  it  amounted,  in  wheat, 
Indian  corn,  rye,  buckwheat,  and  oats,  to  2,988,982 
bushels  ;  but  in  1880,  to  only  2,665,912  bushels. 

In  1853  the  production  of  potatoes  was  4,304,916 
bushels,  in  1880,  3,358,828  ;  of  hay,  598,854  tons  in 
1853,  in  1880,  583,665  tons  ;  of  cheese,  3,196,663  pounds 
in  1853,  in  1880,  807,076  pounds. 

The  value  of  live-stock  for  this  State  was  $8,871,901 
in  1853,  and  only  $9,812,064  in  1880— an  increase  of  only 
a  fraction  over  10  per  cent,  in  twenty-seven  years.  The 
production  of  fruit  has  no  doubt  much  increased,  but 
with  this  exception  and  the  slight  increase  in  live-stock 
and  that  of  butter,  the  falling  off  has  been  alarmingly 
large  in  every  line. 

'  This  decline  was  from  $116,629,849  to  $110,700,707. 


^mi 


V^l 


'1 


'^  1 


40 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


It  IS  admitted  now,  on  all  sides,  that  farm  industry  is 
not  progressing  in  New  England  ;  rather,  fast  losing 
ground.  We  have  found,  however,  that  not  long  since 
the  foremost  public  men  of  New  England  thought  other- 
wise.  Not  only  were  they  satisfied  with  the  progress  of 
their  time,  but  were  sanguine  believers  in  a  prosperous 
future  for  the  farmers  of  their  several  States. 

The  following,  a  portion  of  Governor  Fairbanks'  ad- 
dress to  the  General  Assembly  of  Vermont,  in  session 
December,  i860,  takes  the  same  view  ; 

"  From  an  abstract  of  the  seventh  United  States  cen- 
sus, It  appears  that  in  1850  there  were  in  this  State 
2,600,409  acres  of  improved  land,-a  quantity  exceeding 
that  of  any  other  New  England  State  ;  and  that  our 
agricultural  products  of  that  year  exceeded  in  quantity 
those  of  any  of  the  same  States  in  the  articles  of  live- 
stock,  butter,  cheese,  wool,  wheat,  oats,  potatoes,  hay 
and  a  variety  of  other  crops. 

"The  value  of  live-stock,  as  shown  by  that  census,  was 
$12,643,228,  and  the  aggregate  of  farm  productions  for 
that  year  shows  a  valuation,  including  live-stock,  of 
about  $25,000,000,  being  nearly  equal  to  $80  for  each  in- 
dividual of  our  population. 

"The  well-known  industry  of  our  citizens  engaged  in 
agricultural  pursuits  and  the  capabilities  of  our  soil  have 
been  made  available  for  increasing  the  amount  of  'these 
products  under  the  stimulus  of  augmented  prices  conse- 
quent  upon  the  opening  of  railway  communication  with 
the  markets.  It  may  therefore  be  assumed  that  this 
department  of  industry  has  not  only  maintained  its 
relative  importance,  but  that  it  has  during  the  intervening 
years,  since  the  above  data,  experienced  a  constant  and 
healthful  growth  and   increase.     Still    it   is  conceived 


AMERICAN  FARMER'S  ECONOMIC  POWER.      41 


that  it  is  capable  of  far  greater  development  and  a  much 
more  abundant  increase. 

"Vermont  is  essentially  an  agricultural  state.  The 
great  body  of  its  citizens  are  engaged  in  agricultural 
pursuits.  The  salubriousness  of  its  soil  and  the  variety 
of  its  physical  structure  adapt  it  to  the  cultivation  of  the 
most  essential  and  profitable  crops  and  to  the  successful 
prosecution  of  sheep  and  cattle  husbandry.  Other  im- 
portant interests  exist,  and  are  successfully  prosecuted  ; 
but  it  is  to  this  essentially  that  we  are  to  look  for  the  most 
marked  and  healthy  growth  of  the  state  in  wealth  and 
prosperity." 

The  following  is  an  extract  from  the  message  of  Gov- 
ernor Martin  to  the  legislature  of  New  Hampshire  in 
1853  :  "  Agriculture  is  our  leading  interest,  and,  although 
our  state  is  more  mountainous  than  any  of  our  neigh- 
boring states,  yet  we  can  justly  boast  of  large  quantities 
of  luxuriant  intervale  ;  our  uplands  are  productive,  and 
afford  a  pasturage  unrivalled  in  excellence.  Nowhere 
can  the  necessaries,  conveniences,  and  comforts  of  life  be 
found  combined  in  greater  abundance.  Our  lands,  im- 
proved and  under  tillage,  number  2,251,448  acres  ;  value 
of  farms,  $55,245,997  ;  farming  implements  and  ma- 
chinery, 12,314,125;  live-stock,  $8,871,901;  orchard 
products,  $248,563  ;  domestic  manufactures,  $393,455. 
We  raise  an  average  crop  of  185,658  bushels  of  wheat, 
183,117  bushels  of  rye,  1,573,970  bushels  of  Indian  com, 
973,381  bushels  of  oats,  70,856  bushels  of  buckwheat, 
4,304,919  bushels  of  potatoes,  and  we  produced  1,108,- 
476  pounds  of  wool,  6,977  pounds  of  butter,  3,196,663 
pounds  of  cheese,  1,294,863  pounds  of  maple  sugar, 
598,854  tons  of  hay.  Let  the  young  farmers  of  this 
state  estimate  the  foregoing  products  of  the  farm  and 


:■  !i 


^'f- 


•■'■'\\ 


42 


AMBRlCAe^  FARMS. 


dairy  a,  fair  average  prices,  and  see  what  a  fine  aggregate 
of  values  they  will  have  as  the  result,  bearing  in  mTnd 
.  e  wh„e,  that  he  who  most  increases  the  produc^eness 
of  he  earth  ts  the  greatest  benefactor  of- his  race  "He 
fo  lowed  th,s  by  claiming  that,  although  all  classes  in 
the  State  were  thriving  and  prosperous,  the  remark  wis 
especially  applicable  to  the  department  of  agri::Uure 
It  IS  important  for  us  to  note  that  agriculture  had  the 
lead  in  this  portion  of  America  a.  that  time,  and  that  the 
first  government  functionaries   thought  it  destined  to 
experience  a  still  higher  measure  of  success  in  the  fuLe 
They  saw  nothing  for  the  farmers  to  fear,  but  a  great 
deal  to  give  them  courage.  * 

The  decadence  of  the  agricultural  interests  of  New 
Hampshire  and  Vermont  is  now  the  object  of  official  in 
ves  igation      Mr,  B.  Valentine,  Commissioner  of  Agri- 
culturefor  Vermont,  finds  that  good  areas  of  tillable  land 
can  be  bought  m  his  State  at  prices  approximating  to"e 
0    Western  lands.     Two-hundred-acre  farms,  with  "fa 
buildings  "  good  orchards,   and   plenty  of    imber    are 
being  sold  for  less  than  $,,ooo.     In  some  counTie    lal 

o"  doll     ""'  °'  '"^  ''"^'"^'  ^^"  "^^  '^°"8'>'  '-  *r  n 
four  dollars  per  acre.     Town-Clerk  Fuller,  of  Vershire 

Vermont,  says:  "We  have  many  abandoned  farm    in 

tr  T:  "!  °"  '°""''  "'"'  S°°d  buildings  on  Tern 
that  could  be  bought  for  five  dollars  or  lesf  per  acr"' 
AlHhis  land  was  once  occupied  by  thrifty  and  prosperous 

of 'wetlth'i^th'"'",  '"""^  '■"  C°""«"-'  the  decrease 

to  $2,741,5  0.     Out  of  603   farmers   interviewed    „8 
show  a  yearly  loss.     As  we  travel  away  from  New  Eng! 


AMERICAN  FARMER'S  ECONOMIC  POWER,      43 


land  to  more  western  lands,  we  meet  the  same  cry — the 
decline  of  agriculture.  The  report  on  the  financial 
affairs  of  the  farmers  of  Nebraska  (1887-88)  shows  that 
of  215  farmers,  ever  50  per  cent,  stated  that  they  were 
losing  money. 

Under  the  head  of  "  Mortgaged  Farms  "  we  will  deal 
further  with  the  relative  condition  of  the  Western  farmer. 
But,  while  touching  the  subject,  we  may  say  that  the 
relative  capital  power  of  the  Western  farmer  is  waning, 
as  is  that  of  the  Eastern,  though  not  so  apparent  in  its 
rapidity. 

From  an  article  on  "  Commercial  Union,"  to  be  found 
in  Mr,  Goldwin  Smith's  "  Hand-Book  of  Reciprocity," 
written  by  Mr.  Thomas  Shaw,  Secretary  of  the  Perma- 
nent Central  Farmer's  Institute,  Hamilton,  Ontario,  we 
extract  the  following  :  "  In  1882  the  farmers  of  Ontario 
were  worth  $882,624,610,  in  1886  they  were  worth  $989,- 
497,911.  The  advance  of  these  four  y  ;ars  has  been 
$106,873,301,  or  an  advance  on  the  average  capital  in- 
vested for  the  four  years,  $948,302,805,  or  .028  per  cent. 
The  manufacturers  of  the  Dominion  made  an  advance 
of  42  per  cent,  less  the  running  expenses,  exclusive  of 
wages,  in  the  years  of  i88o  and  1881." 

The  Bulletin  from  the  Bureau  of  Industries  for  Ontario 
published  in  August,  1889,  reports  the  value  of  farm 
property  to  have  in  eased  during  the  past  year  from 
$981,368,094  to  $9&.  ^0,664,  an  increase  of  about  one 
tenth  per  cent. ;  probably  not  more  than  the  increase  in 
the  amount  of  farm  mortgages. 

The  Worthy  Master  of  the  Dominion  Grange,  in  an  ad- 
dress at  Toronto,  in  the  autumn  of  1886,  contended  that 
the  wealthy  amongst  the  farmers  were  comparatively 
few,  and  that  "  as  matters  exist  the  farmer  can  never 


■ifV 


:t 


J 


44 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


copewith  .he  overwhelming  odds  .hat  are  pi..ed  against 
Jufy"!' ""'ass  -'"t"  '::  (C™-rva.ive)  in  i.s  editorial  of 

.:'rertfrat"^'^^r-  ^^-  ^ei'r-rZt 
Important,  as  it  co.es  fL  aCu:.e  nl  '  iCra.e 


CHAPTER  IV. 

FARM    MORTGAGES. 

Probably  no  better  proof  of  the  loss  of  the  farmer's 
relative  capital  power  is  required  than  in  his  growing  de- 
pendence for  his  capital  on  the  successful  men  of  other 
occupations.  And  it  certainly  is  an  unquestionable  in- 
dication of  coming  disaster,  if  this  demand  for  aid  by  the 
farmer  be  growing  faster  than  the  increase  in  the  value 
of  his  possessions.  Fifty  years  ago  farm  mortgages  were 
rare  in  America  ;  to-day  they  are  the  rule  in  many  locali- 
ties ;  and  everywhere  they  threaten  to  defy  the  farmer's 
efforts  to  contend  with  the  load  they  create. 

It  is  claimed  of  New  England  '  that  at  least  ^^^  per 
cent,  of  the  farms  are  mortgaged  to  the  capitalists.  Few 
undertake  to  deny  this  startling  declaration.  In  fact,  it 
is  generally  admitted.  But,  while  some  see  in  this  grow- 
ing evil  in  the  New  England  farmer's  financial  condition, 
the  result  of  a  malady  which  extends  its  destructive 
influence  over  the  whole  continent,  others  find  a  cause 
wholly  in  the  unequal  competition  of  the  Western  rival. 
The  grounds  for  the  latter  contention,  though  in  a  certain 
senfe  of  great  importance,  are  not  enough,  since  serious 
troubles  are  overtaking  the  Western  competitor. 

■  In  Connecticut,  out  of  603  farms  recently  visited  by  an  investiga- 
tion, 241,  or  34  per  cent.,  valued  at  $1,008,350,  were  mortgaged  to  the 
extent  of  1451,109. 

45 


f  r     f     i 


46 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


The  New  York  State  Agent  reported  about  eighteen 
months  ago  that  ''  there  are  large  numbers  of  farms   hat 

would  not  now  sell  for  more  than  the  face  of  the  mort- 
gages, owing  to   the   depreciation   of  the  farm   lands, 
which   on   an   average    is    2>2.   per  cent,    in   ten   years 
Probably  one  third  of  the  farms  in   the   State   would 
not  sell  for  more  than  the  cost  of  the  buildings  and 
other  improvements,  owing  to  this  shrinkage 
Thirty  per  cent,  of  the  farms  in  the  State  are  mortgaged" 
ranging  from  2  per  cent,  of  their  value  to  100  per  cent  • 
average,  66f  per  cent,  of  estimated  value.     These  serurV 
ties   are   held   by  retired   or  more   successful   farmers 
merchants,  savings-banks,  and  insurance  companies  "     ' 
While  the  State  agent  claimed  that  "  still  a  large  pro- 
portion of  the  farmers  of  New  York  are    prosperous, 
one  cannot  but  be  startled  by  a  report  from  an  officia 

Union'        t.   'r>"'^  °'  '""^  leading  State  in  the 
o^herrh  f.  'r    T"'  advantages   superior    to    most 
others-had  declined  in  value  ^^  per  cent,  in  ten  years 
and   hat  one  third  of  the  farms  in  the  State  would  no^ 
sell  for  more  than  the  cost  of  the  buildings  and  other 
improvements,  owing  to  the  shrinkage."     The  State  of 
New  York  contains  within  its  limits  some  of  the  largest 
centres  of  production  and  consumption  in  America,  and 
It  also  contains  as  good  land  as  is  to  be  found  anywhere. 
Ihen  why  should  not  the  tillers  of  this  soil  prosper  ? 

Ihe  State  of  Ohio  has,  according  to  official  reports 
an  assessed  valuation  of  real  estate  amounting  to 
$1  220,262525,  on  which  are  291,000  mortgages,  forming 
a  total  indebtedness  of  $330,999,205,  much  of  which  is! 
however,  upon  other  than  farm  lands. 

Mr.    Heath,   Commissioner    of    Labor    Statistics    of 
Michigan,  has  recently  reported   on   the  mortgage  in- 


FAR\f  MORTGAGES. 


47 


debtedness  of  the  farmers  of  his  State.  He  stated  that 
he  has  reports  from  90,803  farms,  or  58  per  cent,  of  all 
the  farms  in  the  State.  The  assessed  valuation  of  all 
farms  reported  is  $194,854,663,  upon  which  there  is  a 
mortgage  indebtedness  of  $37,456,272,  or  a  little  more 
than  19  per  cent,  of  the  total  assessed  valuation,  and 
nearly  47  per  cent,  on  that  of  the  farms  mortgaged. 
The  assessed  valuation  of  the  farms  in  the  State  is 
$335*378,025,  upon  which  the  estimated  mortgage  in- 
debtedness is  $64,392,580,  with  an  annual  interest 
charge  of  $4,636,265  on  farms  alone. 

The  opinion  of  the  Labor  Commissioner  of  Michigan, 
that  the  mortgages  upon  the  farms  of  that  State  operate 
"  as  a  mammoth  sponge  "  upon  the  labor  of  the  owners, 
is  the  growing  feeling  of  the  majority  of  farmers  all 
over  America — the  older  parts  at  least.  The  farms  of 
Michigan  surround  the  great  iron  industries  of  the  West. 
The  State  now  contains  large  centres  of  population,  and 
its  lands  are  fertile  and  productive,  and  yet  the  farmers 
are  evidently  on  the  downward  track. 

Says  a  Southern  journal  :  "  Think  of  it  !  In  as  pros- 
perous a  State  as  Michigan  47  per  cent.,  or  nearly  half, 
of  the  farms  are  mortgaged.  In  Georgia,  if  one  would 
take  the  trouble  to  examine  the  clerks'  offices  in  the 
different  counties,  a  condition  of  affairs  equally  bad, 
perhaps  worse,  would  be  brought  to  light." 

The  Bureau  of  Labor  Statistics  for  the  State  of  Illinois 
has  issued  reports  which  show  that  the  farm  lands  of  the 
State  have  mortgages  upon  them  to  the  amount  of  $123,- 
733*098,  not  including  Cook  County. 

As  to  Nebraska,  official  reports  do  not  indicate  a 
happy  condition  of  affairs  in  that  State  in  reference  to 
this  matter.  The  reports  of  1887-88  deal  with  215 
farmers  scattered  ail  over  the  State.     An  analysis  of 


48 


AMhimCAN   /-.tA'MS. 


thcw   reports   shown   that,   of  the   215   farms,  113  arc 
mortgaged. 

Scventy.fivc  per  cent,  of  farms  of  Dakota  are  rnort^ 
gaged  for  an  aggregate  amount  of  $50,000,000.' 

The    New   York    Tim^s   of    Dccfmber  ^7,  1886,  con- 
tained  a  long  artic  le  from  Mr.  Frank  Wilkeson  on  the 
condition  of  the  farmers  of  Kansas.     Me  said  :  *'  It  is  a 
financial  impossibility  in  this  era  of  agncultural  com- 
petitive warfare  for  a  farmer  of  average  intelligence  and 
skill  who  tills  a  farm  of  loo  acres  of  land,  except  corn 
land,  to  lift  a  mortgage  of  say  $1,000,  with  money  earned 
by  growing  staple  crops.     ...     1  can  safely  say  that 
nine  tenths  of  all  the  uplands  lying  west  of  the  ninety- 
seventh  meridian  are  really  small  grain  lands,  which  are 
'  .A.ionlin^;  to  iKf  rt'imrt  ..f  the  loiumissioncr  of   I.ahor  Statistics 
f«>r   Illinois,    "the  morti^'rtt-o  in.U-l.tc.liu'ss  ..f   farmers  for  Lorrowed 
im»ncy   Ims  iiunnisca  twcnly-tluie  per  cent,  siiuc  ivS8o  in  this  Slate. 
tn'iit  M/  immtsf  in  thf  t\%tm  ,\f  farm  Luuis."     Twenty-five  counties 
are  rep,»rlo»l  \,^  have  incrcasetl  their  value  of  farm  lan.ls.  twenty-three 
have  .Iccreasoil.  nn.l  in  sixteen  the  values  have  remainc.l  the  same. 

"  It  is  now  twenty  years  at  least  that  farminjj  has  iK-en  jjoinj;  rapidly 
dowtuvanl.  Farms  bou^jht  in  the  war  era  have  l>een  selling  almost 
evcrywheif  in  the  Ivast  for  •»»«•  *.i//"  to  om  third  of  their  ost.  Karnw 
ill  New  Knglan.l.  un.l  some  in  the  MitMle  States,  are  freipiently  sohl 
for  less  than  the  lniihlinj;s  cost  whioh  are  upon  them.  This  is  really 
noexaiiniration.  .Sales  of  this  sort,  ami  where  the  ilepreciatii>n  in 
value  has  wipetl  out  the  owner's  etjuiiy  in  them,  have  been  for  years  a 
nialler  of  notorious  kn.nvle.lj;e  in  almost  every  Eastern  community. 
Within  a  year,  in  a  healthy  ami  fertile  c^ninty  not  sixty  miles  from 
New  York,  a  farm  having  on  it  two  nu>rtg»^;es— a  lii-st  mortg.ige  of 
#.».ixx>  ami  a  sea»n.l  mortgage  of  |a.ixx>— was  sohl  uiuler  foreclosure 
for  the  sum  representetl  by  the  tirst  mortgage  i>nly.  The  holder  of 
the  sci\»na  one  did  not  think  it  worth  while  to  Ix?  present,  or  to  have 
A  nrpresentative  present  tsx  the  sale,  to  bid  the  single  dolKar  which 
wouKl  have  saveti,  or  made  a  show  of  saving,  his  investment'" 

JoKL  Hkni\»n-,  in  r.-fmiar  SdtHn  M,>tUAA,  Nov.,  iSSg, 


M 


ii 


FARM  MORTGAGES. 


49 


utterly  unfit  to  produce  com,  excepting  in  excessively 
wet  seasons." 

The  picture  given  of  life  on  Saturday  in  a  Kansas 
town  is  certainly  a  startling  one  :  "It  matters  not  how 
dull  the  town  has  been  during  the  week,  on  Saturday 
the  streets  are  crowded  with  people  ;  on  that  day  chat- 
tels are  sold  to  satisfy  the  overdue  mortgages.  At  pres- 
ent these  sal  are  numerous  in  the  West,  outside  of  the 
corn  belt,  and  a  very  large  portion  of  these  do  not  real- 
ize  sufficient  to  pay  the  mortgages.  Teams,  wagons,  or 
horned  stock,  which  six  months  ago  were  considered 
ample  security  for  a  loan  of  from  $ioo  to  $150,  fre- 
quently fetch  at  public  auction  25  per  cent,  less  than  the 
price  of  the  mortgage." 

So  important  has  the  question  of  increased  mortgage 
indebtedness  become,  that  the  Cleveland  Administration 
thought  itself  justified  in  appropriating  $250,000  for  col- 
lecting the  statistics  relating  thereto. 

"Mr.  Henry  M.  McDonald,  President  of  the  Traders' 
Bank,  Pierre,  Dakota,  estimates  that  the  volume  of 
Western-mortgage  business,  confined  chiefly  to  Kansas, 
Nebraska,  Minnesota,  and  Dakota,  has  reached  the  sum  of 
$150,000,000  yearly.  It  may  exceed  his  figures.  That 
it  is  of  great  magnitude  is  evident  from  the  fact  that  in  all 
Eastern  cities  (and  in  most  of  the  towns  and  villages) 
are  located  numbers  of  agents  who  make  a  living  from 
the  commissions  paid  them  for  securing  loans.  Boston 
numbers  more  than  fifty  agencies  of  farm-mortgage  com- 
panies. It  is  computed  that  Philadelphia  alone  nego- 
tiates yearly  more  than  $15,000,000  on  Western  loans. 
Kansas  and  Nebraska  have  134  incorporated  mortgage 
companies.  The  companies  organized  under  the  laws 
of  other  States,  but  operating  in  these  two  States,  in- 


50 


AMERICAN  FAKMS, 


(ii 
HI 


crease  the  number  at  least  aoo.  In  this  reckoning  no 
account  is  taken  of  firms  and  individuals,  although  a 
large  amount  of  money  is  directly  invented  by  lenders  of 
this  class."' 

One  feature  of  importance  to  be  observed  in  this 
mortgage  business,  is  the  fact  that  the  chief  part  of  tht^ 
power  to  put  in  bonds  the  lands  of  America  comes  not 
from  the  country,  but  from  the  city  ;  while  the  country 
is  gaining  no  equivalent  power  over  city  interests  of 
any  kind. 

As  to  the  oppressive  nature  of  the  Western  farm  mo-% 
gages  the  Chicago   Times  says  :    *  The  syndicates  that 
loan  money  at  from  one  to  three  per  cent,  per  month  ar.' 
mainly  made  up  of  Scotch,  English,  and  New  England 
capitalists,  who  have  their  agents  throughout  the  South 
and  West.     These  mortgages  are  falling  due,  and  soon 
an  immense  number  of  Souchern   and  Western   farms 
will  be  in  the  hands  of  foreign  mortgageors.    .    .    .    The 
territories  are  covered  with   mortgages   on   new  far.ns 
not  yet  patented.     In  some  of  them  the  law  has  permit- 
ted outrageous  interest,  so  that  the  farm-mortgage  busi- 
ness has  grown  into  immense  proportions.      In  many 
districts    half    of   the   settlers   borrow   money   at   high 
interest  to  pay  the  small  price  required  by  the  govern- 
ment in  proving  up.     This  is  leading  to  widespread  dis- 
aster.    The  object  of  the  pre-emption  law  is  perverted. 
Eastern  and  foreign  cjnitalists  get  the  land  with  such 
improvements  as  the  settler  has  put  upon  it.    The  settler 
loses  all  by  reason  of  the  exorbitant  interest  he  is  com- 
pelled to  pay." 

There  are  those  who  would  fain  establish  the  idea  that 
these  growing  financial  embarrassments  upon  the  farms  of 

'  W.  F.  Mappin  in  Politial  Sneme  Quarterly,  September,  1889. 


/        « 


^A/iM  MORTGAGES. 


St 


America  are  "an  evidence  of  thrift  rather  than  the  cori- 
trary."  Borrowed  capital  has,  no  doubi,  enabled  n:any 
Western  farmers  to  push  their  enterprises  with  a  success 
which  they,  probably,  would  not  have  attained  without  ii 
Rut  the  payment  of  the  interest  on  Western  farms,  with 
wheat  at  80  cents  per  bushel,  is  quite  a  different  matter, 
as  compared  with  the  time  when  this  ccre.V  ^mmanded 
a  price  30  per  cent,  higher.  It  was  a  different  matter 
when  the  lands  yielded  an  average  of  ir  bushels  of  corn 
to  the  acre,  as  compared  with  ao  bu„:..l8  now— when 
heavy  outlays  for  fertilizers  are  required  to  secure  a 
crop. 

Farm  mortgage  is  a  comparatively  new  disease  with 
the  agriculturists  of  America.  Fifty  years  ago,  the  farmer 
•vho  was  obliged  to  put  a  mortgage  on  his  farm  wi..  con- 
sidered  next  to  insolvent,  and  its  clearance  was  thought 
highly  improbable.  They  are  so  numerous  now  that 
their  increase  is  harc'iy  not;':ed  by  the  rural  communities. 
Sut  I  believe  that  r.t  the  present  day  not  more  than  50 
p:.-r  cent,  of  mortgiged  farms  are  released,  except  by 
change  of  ownership. 

Before  us  is  the  address  of  Mr.  R.  Wilkie,  the  Woithy 
Master  of  the  Dominion  Grange  Patrons  of  Husbandry, 
delivered  at  a  session  of  the  Order  in  Toronto,  Novei.  ' 
ber,  1886.  From  this  high  authority  we  learn  that  a 
large  proportion  of  the  lands  of  the  Dominion  are,  like 
the  United  States  farms,  becoming  hopelessly  incum- 
bered. He  said  :  "  Doubtless  a  very  large  amounb  of 
capital  is  invested  in  farming ;  but  much  of  it  belongs 
to  capitalists,  and  is  only  loaned  on  the  land— a  very 
large  proportion  of  which  is  under  mortgage  much 
greater  than  most  people  suppose,  and  much  of  it  is 
hopelessly  sunk    .      .      .      The  only  hope  that  still  re- 


52 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


mains  in  many  cases  is  that  the  land  may  be  sold  for 
something  more  than  the  amount  of  encumbrance.  If 
any  one  doubts,  this,  let  him  turn  to  the  number  of  ad- 
vertisements of  farms  for  sale.  The  newspapers  are  full 
of  them.  And  hundreds  of  land  agents  throughout  the 
country  are  furnishing  long  lists  free  to  any  expectant 
purchaser.  The  owners  of  these  lands  arc  not  men  who 
are  retiring  on  their  fortune.'.,  nor  are  they  men  who  de- 
sire to  engage  in  other  pursuits.  A  large  proportion  of 
them  are  men  wi  o  are  selling  to  save  the  little  which 
still  remains,  thers  being  no  longer  any  hope  of  saving 
the  farm." 

From  what  can  be  gathered  from  other  sources,  the 
picture  drawn  by  the  Worthy  Master  is  not  overdrawn  as 
regards  Ontario.  The  lowest  estimate  puts  the  mortgage 
indebtedness  upon  the  farms  of  this  province  at  $58,- 
000,000.  The  Montreal  journal  of  Commerce  recently 
stated  that,  "  as  the  possibility  of  the  mortgages  ever 
being  paid  off  is  so  remote,  the  interest  T^iy  fairly  be 
looked  upon  as  a  fixed  annual  charge." 

We  may  well  ask  :  **  Who  are  to  own  the  farras  of 
America  ? " 


CHAPTER   V. 

THE  CAPITALISTS  GAINING  THE  LAND— THE  TYPICAL 

AMERICAN  FARM 

Thi5  definition  of  an  American  farm,  as  given  by  Web- 
ster, is  :  "  A  portion  or  tract  of  land  consisting  usually 
ot  grass  land,  meadow,  pasture,  tillage,  and  woodland, 
cultivated  by  one  man,  and  usually  owned  by  him  in 
fee."  His  definition  of  a  farm  in  Great  Britain  is  as  fol- 
lows :  "  A  tract  of  land  leased  on  rent  reserved  ;  ground 
let  to  a  tenant  on  condition  of  his  paying  a  certain  sum, 
annually  or  otherwise,  for  the  use  of  it." 

As  a  rule,  the  typical  American  farm  was,  and  is, 
worked  by  the  owner  and  his  family,  with  sometimes  the 
assistance  of  hired  help  for  a  large  portion  of  the  year, 
but  frequently  without  any  help  beyond  the  family,  and 
an  extra  gang  for  the  ha- '  ig  season.  He  was  and  is 
virtually  landlord,  capitalir  .  and  laborer.  His  lands  do 
not  support  an  idle  aristocracy ;  he  was  and  is  inde- 
pendent of  the  usurer,  and  he  depends  in  the  main  upon 
his  own  industry,  the  sweat  of  his  own  brow,  for  the 
part  that  man  must  do  to  fill  his  granaries,  or  for  the 
power  to  satisfy  the  wants  of  himself  and  family. 

First,  then,  the  typical  American  farmer,  with  his  grass- 
land, meadow,  pasture,  tillage  and  woodland,  chiefly 
depending  for  its  care  and  cultivation  upon  his  own 
exertion p,  was  and  is  wh-it  is  now  called  a  small  farmer. 

53 


■V^ 


S4 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


Second,  the  typical  American  farmer  was  and  is,  usually, 
an  owner. 

In  order  to  show  the  present  tendencies  towards  large 
estates,  \v  e  will  divide  the  large  from  the  small  at  too 
acres,  and  compare  those  above  and  below  at  different 
periods,  say  i860  with  1880.  In  the  year  i860,  of  the 
2,044,077  land-holdings  in  the  United  States,  1,387,614, 
or  67  per  cent,  were  of  the  classes  100  acres  and  under. 
In  Canada,  the  census  of  1881  found  the  lands  in  hold- 
ings of  100  acres  and  under,  to  the  extent  of  71  percent, 
of  the  total.  From  this  we  draw  the  conclusion  that 
farms  of  100  acres  and  less  have  been  the  rule.  Such 
have  been  the  typical  farms. 

Such  farmers  providing  their  own  capital,  both  for  the 
ownership  of  theii?  lands  and  the  prosecution  of  their 
business,  and  depending  chiefly  upon  their  own  labors, 
needed  no  extensive  areas.  Indeed  large  areas  would  be 
an  intolerable  encumbrance  to  the  owners,  as  the  fencing 
of  even  a  200-acre  farm  would  be  a  severe  tax  on  their 
time.  It  is  true  that  in  many  cases,  such  as  those  which 
formed  the  estates  of  Virginia,  the  original  grants  were 
large  blocks  of  land,  but  in  those  early  days  when  such 
grants  were  made,  they  were  not  taken  for  speculative 
purposes,  as  now,  or  for  carrying  on  a  wholesale  com- 
petition in  agriculture.  And  when  a  community  did 
really  get  down  to  the  cultivation  of  the  soil,  or  to  gen- 
eral farming,  it  was  on  small  plots  or  town  lots  that  the 
farmers'  labors  were  prosecuted,  and  each  farmer  was  a 
proprietor. 

We  have  statec'.  already  that  in  i860,  67  per  cent,  of 
the  land-holdings  were  of  the  classes  occupying  100 
acres  and  under.  The  census  of  1880,  however,  showed 
that  a  rapid  change  had  been  made  during  the  decade 


THE    TYPICAL  AMERICAN  FARM. 


55 


in  reversing  this  condition ;  of  4,008,907  holdings, 
only  2,208,374  were  of  the  classes  named  ;  of  the  classes 
between  ten  and  one  hundred  acres  there  were  2,069,133, 
or  51  per  cent.,  while  those  over  100  acres  had  risen  to 
1,800,533.' 

Still  more  important  does  this  rapid  change  appear, 
when  we  compare  each  class  by  their  acres.  Then  we 
begin  to  realize  something  of  the  real  magnitude  of  the 
change.  So  far  as  we  can  gather  from  the  census  reports 
in  i860,  not  more  than  30  per  cent,  of  the  farm  lands 
were  held  by  owners  of  over  100  acres  ;  in  1880,  not 
less  than  75  per  cent,  was  in  the  hands  of  this  class.  In 
i860,  the  acres  in  possession  of  holders  of  above  500 
acres  were  (taking  the  lowest  limit  of  average)  not  over  4 
per  cent,  of  the  total ;  in  1880,  not  less  than  12  percent. 

It  may  be  contended  that  all  these  movements  toward 
increase  in  the  average  size  of  land-holdings  are  taking 
place  only  in  the  West,  where  foreigners  have  absorbed 
so  much  of  the  land  that  the  old  States  are  holding  to 
their  normal  conditions.  Even  if  this  were  the  case,  it 
would  not  do  much  to  disprove  the  statement  that  the 
typical  American  farm  was  disappearing  ;  but  what  are 
the  facts  even  in  this  case  ?  We  select  three  of  the  most 
prominent  of  the  farming  States  of  New  England,  for  the 
purpose  of  comparison — Massachusetts,  Maine,  and  Ver- 
mont. These  old  States  contained,  in  1 860,  94, 7  23  holders 
of  land  of  100  acres  and  under  ;  in  1880,  only  73,892  ; 
whereas,  of  holdings  of  upwards  of  100  acres,  there  was 
an  increase  of  34,435.  or  from  23,412  to  57,847. 

In  the  foregoing  calculation  all  holdings  below  ten 

acres  are  included.     In  1880  they  amounted  to  about  5 

'  It  must  be  remembered  that  but  for  the  subdivision  of  plantations 

in  the  South,  since  i860,  the  total  change  in  ilie  comparative  decrease 

of  small  holdings  would  appear  far  more  conspicuously. 


56 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


per  cent,  of  the  total  for  these  States.  They  probably 
represent  the  number  of  holdings  occupied  by  other 
classes  than  tillers  of  the  soil.  But  ten  acres  and  under 
have,  in  many  cases,  supported  families.  We  are  brought 
face  to  face  with  the  startling  fact  that  20,821  of  the 
typical  farms  of  these  States  during  the  twenty  years, 
1 860-80,  had  either  been  abandoned  to  the  wilds  alto- 
gether, or  become  attached  to  the  large  estates.  No 
doubt  the  transformation  has  bten  in  both  directions. 
If  in  either,  however,  the  changed  condition  is  one  for 
serious  thought. 

One  of  America's  most  famous  economists  '  states  that 
between  1875  ^"d  1885  the  woodland  of  Massachusetts 
increased  49.64  per  cent.  In  this  State  the  tacking-on 
must  have  been  very  considerable,  as  the  number  of 
holdings  above  500  acres  had  increased  in  the  twenty 
years— 1860-80— by  254,  while  the  cultivated  land  had 
fallen  from  2,133,436  to  2,128,311  acres. 

In  the  State  of  Maine  the  holdings  of  over  100  acres 
were  only  9  per  cent,  of  the  total  in  i860  ;  in  1880  they 
were  39  per  cent.  In  i860  there  were  only  2  holders 
of  estates  exceeding  1,000  acres  ;  in  1880  there  were  116. 

Using  the  lowest  limit  of  the  census  figures,  we  find 
that  there  were  64,550  acres  of  the  lands  of  Massachu- 
setts, Maine,  and  Vermont  in  the  hands  of  holders  of  up- 
wards of  500  acres  in  the  year  i86o,  but  in  1880  these 
acres  had  swollen  to  856,000.  Using  the  medium  figures 
for  the  10-  to  50-acre  holdings,  there  were  in  the  neigh- 
borhood of  1,624,485  acres  of  farm  lands  in  these  small 
divisions  in  i860,  tut  in  1880  only  1,009,750. 

With  such  figures  as  these,  culled  from  official  sources, 
who  can  deny  that  the  lands  of  New  England,  and,  in 

'  Hon.  r  .vid  A.  Wells. 


THE    TYPICAL  AMERICAN  FARM. 


57 


fact,  of  the  whole  United  States,  are  not  rapidly  assum- 
ing a  shape  other  than  that  represented  by  the  typical 
American  farmer? 

It  is  well  known  that  the  Wall  Street  capitalists  are 
becoming  owners  of  vast  tracts  of  Western  lands,  and  that 
Boston  capitalists  are  getting  a  mortgage  grip  upon  the 
New  England  farms,  while  British  capital  is  fast  coming 
to  the  position  of  controlling  more  land  in  America  than 
at  home.  Restricted  in  the  United  States,  it  turns  its 
attention  to  Canada. 

Aliens  may  have  absorbed  the  new  lands  of  Western 
States,  but  how  are  we  to  account  for  the  rapid  absorp- 
tion of  the  small  properties  by  the  large  in  the  East  ? 

A  like  condition  is  developing  in  Canada.  The  great 
Northwest  is  falling  into  the  hands  of  the  moneyed  classes. 
In  Manitoba  44  per  cent,  of  the  land  holdings  in  1880 
were  of  the  classes  above  500  acres  ;  in  the  territories  58 
per  cent,  were  upwards  of  500  acres  in  area.  Sir  Lester 
Key  now  manages  for  a  $2,000,000  syndicate  1,200,000 
acres  of  Canadian  lands. 

By  reckoning  the  1,000-acre  classes,  we  have  gained 
but  a  slight  insight  into  the  real  condition  of  affairs,  but 
we  see  enough  to  exemplify  one  important  phase  of  the 
nature  of  the  question  under  discussion. 


CHAPTER  VI. 


RENTED     1  A  R  M  S  . 


Through  the  United  States  census  of  1880  an  effort 
was  made  to  ascertain  the  tenure  of  American  farms, 
with  the  following  result  :  It  M^as  found  that  out  of  a 
total  of  4,008,907  farms  and  plantations,  1,024,601  were 
rented  for  money  or  worked  on  shares.  This  went  to 
show  that,  at  that  time,  slightly  over  25  per  cent,  of  all 
the  farms  of  the  United  States  were  not  owned  by  the 
occupiers. 

In  studying  the  census  report  still  further,  it  will  be 
found  that  of  the  2,208,374  holdings  of  less  than  100 
acres,  730,702,  or  ^5  per  cent.,  were  not  owned  by  the 
occupiers.  But  of  the  holdings  of  from  500  to  1,000 
acres,  87  per  cent,  were  owned  by  the  occupiers  ;  and  the 
holdings  of  above  1,000  acres  were  thus  owned  to  the 
extent  of  90  per  cent,  of  the  total.  It  is  true,  the  largest 
proportion  of  rented  farms  is  in  the  South,  where  the 
land  has  been  rented  to  the  negroes  since  their  liberation, 
and  it  is  true  also  that  the  largest  proportion  of  small 
holdings  are  tenanted. 

The  census  statistics,  however,  teach  us  that  at  the 
date  of  their  formation  7  per  cent,  of  the  farms  of  New 
England  were  occupied  by  tenants,  or  one  in  about  every 
fourteen,  and  of  New  York  16  per  cent,,  or  one  in  about 
every  seven.      Farther  west,  on  the  rich  and  productive 

58 


RENTED   FARMS. 


59 


lands  of  Ohio,  20  per  cent,  of  the  farms  were  rented,  or 
one  in  every  fiv" 

In  Canada  a  fraction  less  than  12^  per  cent,  of  the 
lands  were  rented  in  1880,  or  one  in  about  every  eight- 
owners  and  occupiers  numbering  403,491,  and  tenants  as 
occupiers,  57,245. 

In  the  Maritime  Provinces  one  in  every  fourteen  farms 
was  occupied  by  tenants,  and  in  Ontario  one  in  every 
six. 

In  addition  to  the  discovery  recently  made  by  the  New 
York  State  assessors,  that,  in  fourteen  counties  visited 
farm  land  is  declining  in  value  while  city  property  is  in- 
creasing, sufficient  information  was  gained  on  the  ques- 
tion of  rented  farms  to  warrant  the  State  assessor  in 
forming  the  opinion  that,  "  in  a  few  years  there  will  be 
few  left  but  tenant  farmers." 

When  we  consider  that  about  25  per  cent,  of  the  small 
farms  of  the  United  States  are  already  in  the  hands  of 
capitalists,  and  the  occupiers  are  mere  tenants,  and  that 
this  condition  is  on  the  increase,  and  add  to  this  that 
capitalists  have  mortgages  on  at  least  20  per  cent,  of  the 
remainder,  and  further,  that  small  farms  are  disappear- 
ing, we  may  well  say  that  the  typical  industry  of  rural 
America  is  fast  becoming  a  thing  of  the  past. 


CHAPTER  VII. 


ABANDONED    FARMS. 


One  who  has  been  familiar  with  the  past  history  of 
the  farm-homes  of  a  country,  who  has  known  of  the 
struggles  and  triumphs  of  the  early  possessors  of  these 
properties,  cannot  but  be  saddened  when  he  sees  them, 
one  after  another,^  abandoned  ;  the  lands  to  become  the 
pasture  domain  of  more  successful  estates,  or  to  be  en- 
tirely given  over  to  the  public  common.  To  be  a  wit- 
ness to  the  industry,  the  planning,  and  the  achievements 
in  moulding,  in  fashioning,  and  in  subduing  these  spots 
to  the  tastes  and  requiren;ents  of  the  occupiers,  and  then 
to  see  them  at  last  entirely  surrendered  to  the  wilderness, 
is  surely  an  impressive  picture,  even  to  the  most  indifferent 
mind.  Such  an  observer  cannot  but  ask  the  question  : 
"  Is  this  not  an  evidence  of  coming  national  decay  ?  " 

Large  tracts  of  country — away  from  the  towns  and 
cities— in  the  old  States  and  Provinces  of  America  are 
thus  being  transformed  ;  and  not  only  are  these  manifes- 
tations of  failure  on  the  part  of  our  old  farms  to  hold 
their  own  against  the  conditions  of  the  times  confined 
to  the  old  States,  but  are  rapidly  extendihg  over  the 
continent. 

The  New  England  farms  have  been  the  first,  however, 
to  succumb.     There  are  several  reasons  for  this,  though 

60 


ABANDOMED   FARMS. 


6i 


none  of  them  give  any  assurance  that  the  disease  is  not 
to  become  general  among  the  typical  farms  of  America. 

Through  the  Boston  Advertuer,  a  rather  conservative 
journal,  we  have  the  following  graphic  picture  of  the 
desolation  which  already  reigns  over  portions  of  Massa- 
chusetts, once  the  settlements  of  happy  and  prosperous 
farmers  : 

"  Throughout  the  State  of  Massachusetts,  away  from 
the  cities  and  from  the  large  towns,  may  be  met,  besides 
oral  reports,  traces  of  farms  once  yielding   a  support 
to  their  occupants,  but  now  abandoned.     The  signs  of 
former  tenancy  are  to  be  found  in  conditions  varying 
from  the  indications  of  recent  occupancy  to  those  of  a 
generation  or  longer  ago.     Sometimes  the  dwelling-house 
has  a  look  of  neatness,  in  its  white  paint  and  green  blinds, 
not  yet  yielding  much  to  the  weather.     The  barns,  wagon 
sheds,  corn-cribs,  and  other  out-buildings  will  be  black- 
ened, of  course,  from  exposure  of  their  unpainted  surface, 
but  yet  have  in  them  wear  and  utility.     But  the  stillness 
of  a  solitude  haunts  the  place,  and  the  sign,  affixed  to  a 
tree,  *  For  Sale,'  stirs  in  the  practical  observer  the  sus- 
picious question,  Why  ?    He  glances  over  the  undulating 
fields,  where  now  the  grass  is  growing  thinly,  and  thence 
back  to  the  stone  wall,  so  carefully  laid  as  to  suggest  that 
at  some  inspection  by  a  committee  of  an  agricultural 
fair,  it  must  have  won  a  prize.     What  labor  the  red- 
dened and  wearied  hands  must  have  expended  here,  and 
yet  the  sons  have  not  stayed  to  reap  any  profit  from  the 
father's  toil ! 

"  Again,  the  house  is  not  so  trim.  The  storms  of  several 
decades  have  worn  the  paint  away.  The  clapboards  are 
darkening  in  the  weather.  The  mortar  has  crumbled 
from  between  the  bricks  in  the  chimneys,  so  that  you 


■■■  \ 


•  ♦■ 


'  f' 


63 


AMERICAN  Fa     MS. 


see  the  light  of  the  sky  through  the  crevices.  Some  of 
the  panes  in  the  windows  are  broken.  The  front  door 
hangs  ajar.  The  winds  sigh  through  the  empty  wood- 
shed. The  out-buildings,  first  to  go,  are  falling  in. 
Acres  of  land  once  cultivated  lie  around.  The  sign 
announcing  the  place  as  being  for  sale  is  broken  and 
hanging  by  a  single  nail,  and  the  words  are  almost 
untrriceable. 

"  Another  scene  will  represent  a  ruin.  The  roof  has 
tumbled  in.  The  charming  prospect  of  hill  and  dale  and 
wood  and  setting  sun  is  now  never  more  to  be  shut  out 
from  the  tront  door,  where  once  the  bjsy  housewife  may 
have  sometimes  glanced,  for  the  door  is  swung  far  back 
and  gaping  on  the  scene,  and  no  one  is  there  to  push  it 
to.  At  some  time  or  other  the  barn  fell  down,  and  the 
boards  and  timbers  are  rotting  from  the  repeated  dryings 
and  wettings.  It  is  a  scene  of  desolation.  The  sugges- 
tiveness  of  former  tenancy  imparts  to  it  a  melancholy, 
such  as  a  mere  old  cellar  or  the  traces  of  a  stone  under- 
pinning do  not  have.  These,  too,  may  be  found  some- 
times in  the  midst  of  lonely  woods,  where  the  trees  have 
grown  up  in  the  fields  formerly  ploughed  and  sowed,  so 
that  the  owner  is  already  counting  on  their  value  at  some 
lone  saw-mill.  But  where  the  remnant  of  a  frame  is 
standing,  it  suggests  the  farmer's  hopes,  the  housewife's 
counsels,  the  ploughboy's  whistle,  once  known  here,  and 
now  gone  forever. 

"  Large  areas  are  now  offered  for  sale.  The  prices 
asked  for  the  land  are  low  compared  with  the  prices 
asked  for  land  in  the  places  where  the  population  is 
growing." 

If  any  State  of  New  England  can  be  said  to  have  made 
verifiable  progress  in  the  past,  it  is  Massachusetts  ;  and 


ABANDONED  FARMS, 


«3 


yet  the  foregoing  is  the  report  with  which  a  leading  jour- 
nal furnishrs  its  readers.     The  article  further  states  : 

"  Take  the  farmers  of  Franklin  County.  It  has  been 
estimated  that  their  average  surplus  of  profit  above 
expense  does  not  exceed  $75  a  year.  In  some  localities 
in  that  county,  a  farmer,  who,  at  seventy-five,  has  ac- 
cumulated $3,000  or  $4,000,  is  thought  to  have  attained 
to  the  greatest  measure  of  success. 

"  But  many  have  found  themselves  unequal  to  the  strug- 
gle between  the  expenses  and  the  profits.  Not,  indeed 
the  large  proportion  of  the  farmers  of  the  preceding 
generation,  but  the  sons,  who,  though  laborious  and 
well-meaning,  have  not  had  the  discipline  that  comes 
from  originating  an  enterprise,  but  have  depended  upon 
their  father's  training  and  instruction.  In  the  unequal 
battle  they  have  given  up  and  fled  from  the  field." 

The  cause  assigned  for  the  abandoned  farms  of  New 
England  '  is  one  that  is  given  by  many— the  competition 
of  the  Western  farms  has  been  too  severe,  and  in  the 
unequal  contest  the  New  England  competitor  has  been 
obliged  to  give  up  and  flee  to  other  parts. 

The  Hon.  David  A.  Wells  says  :  "  A  few  years  ago 
the  inhabitants  of  Ludlow,  formerly  a  most  prosperous 
town  in  Windsor  County,  Vermont,  memorialized  the 
legislature  to  the  effect.that  there  were  twelve  deserted 
farms  within  the  town  limits,  and  asked  permission  to 
guarantee  to  any  persons  who  would  lease  and  work 
them  exemption  from  taxation,  local  and  State,  for  a 
considerable  term  of  years."  He  also  states  :  "All  over 
New  England,  farms  in  abundance  can  now  be  pur- 
chased for  less  than  the  cost  of  the  improvements  upon 

'  Official  reports  state  that  in  six  towns  in  Massachusetts  the  un- 
occupied dwellings  number  from  ten  to  forty-five. 


% 

»ii*i 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


thcra,— jret,  for  less  than  the  cost  of  the  construction  of 
their  stone  walls."' 

A  writer  in  the  Grar^e  Homes^  of  Boston,  mentions 
•seing  farms  sold  in  Ver  nont  for  less  thaii  the  cost  of 
the  buildings  upon  them.  He  |jeitinenlly  su^-csts  the 
query  :  The  fathers  among  the  hills  were  poor ;  but  they 
cleared  away  the  forests,  raised  and  educated  families, 
and  built  homes.  Why  do  the  buildings  now  sell  for 
less  than  they  are  worth,  with  one  or  two  hundred  acres 
of  land  thrown  in  to  make  the  trade  ? "  Yes,  why  are 
these  lands  being  abandoned  ?  Why  are  the  farmers 
becoming  mere  tenants  ?  Why  are  mortgages  settling 
down  on  the  old  farms  of  America  ?  Why  is  the  wealth 
of  farmers  all  over  the  land  so  little  increased,  when  the 
aggregate  weilth  i^  grc  ing  so  rapidly?  Why  is  such  a 
large  proportion  of  the  agricultural  class  of  the  world 
groaning  under  the  trouble  of  procuring  the  necessities 
of  civilized  life  ?  Why  ..11  this,  while  agriculture  stands 
at  the  base  of  all  material  development  ? 

'  The  catalogue  of  the  ab.infloned  f.irms  of  New  Hampshire  contains 
particulars  of  352  of  these,  referring  to  wh  '1  i!ie  State  Commissioner 
says,  that  "  in  most  instances  these  farms  have  not  been  abandoned 
because  the  soil  has  become  exhausted,  or  from  the  lack  of  natural 
fertility,  but  from  various  causes  appearing  in  the  social  and  economic 
history  of  the  State." 

On  August  II,  i88q,  the  New  York  *Tribune  had  an  article  on  the 
decline  of  the  farming  industries  of  Virmont,  in  which  it  said : 
"  Good  lands  are  offered  for  sale  as  low  |t  ^n  acre,  and  it  is  said 
that  it  will  be  necessary  to  make  $5  an  acre  the  maximum  price  for 
settlers,  if  the  new  Vermont  booi  .ers  expect  to  compete  with  Western 
lands.  It  may,  as  a  vivid  notion  of  the  extent  to  which  the  depopu- 
lating process  has  gone  on,  be  said,  that  no  diflicu.iy  was  encountered 
in  finding  abandoned  farms  in  one  locality  to  furnish  contiguous 
farms  for  the  first  proposed  colony  of  'ifty  families.  In  fact,  four 
such  localities  were  found." 


t 


BOOK  III. 

AGRICULTURE'S   STRUGGLE. 

Man  becomes  more  free  as  the  prices  of  rude  products  and  Hnished 
commodities  approximate. — IIknry  C.  Carey. 

The  whole  question  of  freedoM  or  slavery   for   man  is  therefore 
embraced  in  that  of  competition. — Henry  C.  Carev. 


CHAPTER  I. 


THE   farmer's   COTEMPORARIES. 


It  is  necessary  to  keep  the  fact  well  in  view,  that  there 
are  those  cotemporary  with  the  farmer  who  are  prosper- 
ing, or  who  are  gathering  to  themselves  wealth  and  the 
various  pov/ers  which  abundance  yields. 

In  a  former  chapter  it  was  shown  that  relatively  the 
other  great  classes  in  the  aggregate  were  leaving  the 
farmer  far  behind  in  the  race  for  wealth,  but  nothing 
was  done  to  show  the  position  of  other  special  industries. 

Some  industries  in  America,  like  that  of  agriculture, 
are  in  a  depressed,  if  not  a  ruinous,  condition.  Shipping 
is  prosperous  in  some  countries,  but  going  to  ruin  in 
America.  This  is  admitted  on  all  sides,  and  will  require 
little  verification. 

Manufacturing  stands  out  prominently  as  of  the  utmost 
importance  in  almost  every  dissertation  on  the  industrial 
progress  of  America.  It  certainly  occupies  a  large  place 
in  giving  employment  to  labor,  in  the  production  of 
wealth,  and  to  development  of  various  kinds. 

Its  real  magnitude,  us  well  as  the  importance  which 
the  prevailing  thought  and  political  policies  of  the  time 
evidently  tender  it,  as  compared  with  their  treatment  of 
agriculture,  makes  its  consideration  one  of  great  moment 
in  the  discussion  we  have  entered  upon. 

67 


T-  . 


68 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


By  the  United  States  census  reports  of  1880  we  find 
that  the  capital  engaged  in  mining,  mechanics,  manufac- 
turing, and  in  the  production  of  petroleum  in  the  Union, 
amounted  to  $2,790,000,000,  employing  22  per  cent,  of 
the  industrial  population,  or  3,838,112  persons,  who 
threw  on  the  market  that  year  a  production  valued  at 
$5,679,854,599.  It  is  estimated,  that  of  this  amount, 
$3,394,000,000  went  into  it  in  the  shape  of  raw  material, 
which  would  leave  $2,285,854,599  to  represent  the  net 
production  for  the  year,  or  $595  for  each  person  engaged. 
Employed  in  agricultural  pursuits  were  7,670,493  indi- 
viduals, or  44  per  cent,  of  the  total  industrial  population, 
with  a  capital  of  $12,602,000,000,  whose  products — not 
including  increase  in  value  of  farm  stock — amounted  to 
only  $2,213,402,564. 

A  more  comprehensive  estimate  made  by  Mr.  J.  R. 
Dodge,  Statistician  of  the  Department  of  Agriculture, 
gave  $3,600,000,000  as  the  lotal  value  of  the  products  of 
agriculture  for  the  census  year  ;  which  amount  includes 
an  allowance  of  $1,000,000,000  for  home  consumption, 
giving  $473  for  each.  The  farmers*  outlay  for  seeds  and 
other  articles  consumed  in  procuring  a  crop  (to  say 
nothing  of  taxes,  insurance,  etc.),  would  average  not 
much  less  than  $100,  leaving  the  average  farmers  of 
America  (including  farm  laborers)  a  net  income  $220  less 
than  the  average  manufacturer.  It  is  claimed  that  farm- 
ers have  been  paying  as  high  wages  to  labor  as  have 
been  paid  by  manufacturers,  and  especially  is  this  the 
case  when  compared  with  the  wages  paid  by  the  £ v^"*^ 
cotton  and  iron  industries.  Then  the  farmer,  with  his 
farm,  his  capital,  and  his  labor,  is  receiving  a  share  in  the 
national  income  reduced  in  exchange  value  to  .  -y  small 
proportions  compared  with  the  manufacturer,     i  hus  we 


THE  FARMER'S  COTEMPOR ARIES. 


69 


find  that  though  the  farmers  are  by  far  the  most  impor- 
tant class  in  numbers,  they  are  of  very  much  less  impor- 
tance in  regard  to  the  exchange  value  of  their  productions. 

Mr.  Andrew  Carnegie  statr-  that  "in  manufacturing, 
the  annual  product  of  each  ope.  ative  has  advanced  in  value 
from  $r, 100  in  1850  to  $2,015  in  1880." '  The  increase  to 
agriculture  shows  really  no  advance  compared  with  this. 

From  a  computation  of  that  reliable  statistician  Mr.  M. 
G.  Mulhall,  we  find  that  the  per  capita  valuation  of  the 
wealth  of  the  United  States,  exclusive  of  agricultural 
wealth,  rose  from  $250  in  i860  to  $502  in  1880,  or  an 
increase  of  slightly  over  100  per  cent.  Surely  this  does 
not  seem  much  like  decadence. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  value  of  the  ag-icultural  wealth 
only  increased  by  22.5  per  cent.,  or  from  $280  to  $343 
per  inhabitant  in  the  twenty  years. 

Looking  to  the  State  of  Massachusetts,  of  which  the 
serious  decadence  of  agriculture  is  admitted  or  confirmed 
by  "official  documents,"  we  find  that  from  the  year  i860 
to  1880,  the  per  capita  valuation  of  property  in  this 
State  rose  from  $662  to  $1,568.  Here  we  find  agriculture, 
in  close  proximity  to  largest  consuming  "-"arkets  for  the 
productions  of  agriculture,  absolutely  falling  behind, 
while  others  are  rapidly  advancing. 

At  this  very  time  (1889),  when  so  much  is  said  about 
the  decay  of  the  farm  interests  of  this  State,  reports  come 
to  us  of  enormous  profits  to  many  o''  er  industrial  enter- 
prises within  its  borders  during  the  nast  year  (1888).  I 
will  name  those  of  one  city,  F?.l1  xUver,  in  the  cotton 
manufacturing  industry. 

Four  mills,  with  a  capital  of  $2,500,000,  declared  earn- 
ings of  $663,000,  or  26  per  cent  upon  their  capital. 

'  "  Triumphant  D-jmocracy." 


-  y 


70 


AMEKICAJV  FARMS. 


The  Amoskeag  Cotton  Company  is  reported  to  have 
cleared  in  the  past  year  (1888)  $425,000.  It  paid  a 
dividend  of  25  per  cent.,  and  put  4  per  cent,  by  for 
surplus. 

Many  branches  of  commerce  and  manufacturing  in 
this  old  State  are,  no  doubt  suffering  from  a  lop-sided 
trade,  owing  to  the  restrictive  character  of  the  fiscal  pol- 
icy of  the  Union,  but  capital,  even  in  this  State,  is  gath- 
ering more  and  more  power. 

In  the  Empire  State,  agricultural  property  declines  ; 
but  here  we  find  that  the  average  wealth  of  some  classes 
must  be  increasing  at  a  very  rapid  rate.  The  per  capita 
valuation  of  property  in  this  State  was  only  $475  in  i860  ; 
but  in  1888  it  had  risen  to  $1,499.  ^^  ^^9^'  ^^  ^^^^^  ^^^ 
be  less  than  $2,000. 

Going  farther,  to  the  State  of  Ohio,  of  which  it  has 
been  said  one  half  of  the  whole  assessed  valu''  of  the 
farm  lands  is  covered  by  mortgages,  the  per  capita  valu- 
ation of  property  rose  from  $510  in  i860  to  $1,032 
in  1880. 

In  the  city  of  Cleveland,  of  this  State,  is  the  great 
Rolling-Mill  Company,  owned  by  the  three  Chisholr^s, 
of  which  Mr.  Erastus  Wiman  remarked  in  his  speech  at 
Dufferin  Lake  in  Ontario  in  July  of  1887  :  "  The  products 
of  this  firm  last  year  reached  the  enormous  sum  of  $12,- 
000,000.  These  are  some  of  the  items  which  comprise 
this  aggregate  : 


100,000  tons  of  sttel  rails. $3,600,000 

150,000  tons  of  pig-iron 3,000,000 

50,000   tons  merchants'   steel  boiler-plate 

and  sheets 2,750,000 

40,000  tons  wire 2,400,000 


THE  FARMER'S   COTEMPOPARIES. 


71 


"  With  an  increased  output  and  an  advance  in  the  prices 
their  business  this  year  will  probably  reach  the  high  fig- 
ure of  $15,000,000,  a  sum  equal  to  the  whole  earnings  of 
the  Grand  Trunk  Railway,  a  corporation  of  40,000  share- 
holders, and  at  least  50  per  cent,  more  than  the  whole 
earnings  of  the  whole  Canada  Pacific  Railway,  to  which 
you  (in  Canada)  have  donated  $100,000,000.  All  this 
was  the  growth  of  a  little  more  than  twenty  years.  .  . 
Think  of  the  business  of  this  one  firm  of  American-Ca- 
nadians nearly  equalling  the  aggregate  earnings  of  your 
two  great  systems  of  railways,  whose  combined  capital 
reaches  away  up  beyond  $300,000,000." 

Going  south,  to  the  State  of  Pennsylvania,  where  the 
greatest  iron  and  coal  industries  of  the  Union  are  located, 
the  farmers  are  not  making  any  headway  toward  increas- 
ing their  stores  of  wealth.  At  the  same  time  the  aggre- 
gate wealth  of  this  State  is  increasing  with  wonderful 
rapidity.  In  i860  the  whole  wealth  of  Pennsylvania  was 
estimated  at  $1,416,510,818.  Not  a  paltry  amount  by 
any  means,  but  small  compared  with  the  wealth  of  1880 
~$5>393>ooo,ooo  I  rising  from  a  per  capita  valuation  of 
$487  in  i860  to  $1,259  in  1880. 

Here  we  find  among  other  successful  enterprises  the 
famed  Edgar  Thompson  Works,  of  whose  proprietor — 
Mr.  Andrew  Carnegie,— Mr.  Wiman  at  Dufferin  Lake, 
made  this  remark  :  "  A  little  over  twenty  years  ago,  they 
(Andrew  Carnegie  and  brother)  went  into  the  iron  busi- 
ness. One  of  the  two  brothers  recently  died,  and  the 
other,  Andrew  Carnegie,  now  employs  more  than  7,000 
men,  and  his  business  will  this  year  very  nearly  equal  the 
combined  earnings  of  both  your  combined  Grand  Trunk 
and  Canadian  Pacific  Railway  systems." 

Certainly  "  times  "  cannot  bear  hard  on  one  who  can 


72 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


boast  of  a  yearly  net  income  of  $1,250,000,  and  who, 
besides  supporting  an  establishment  in  America,  has  his 
castle  in  Scotland  for  a  summer  retreat. 

The  Standard  Oil  monopoly,  which  started  not  many 
years  ago  with  a  capital  of  $1,500,000,  and  is  now  said 
vo  be  declaring  dividends  on  $90,000,000,  has  made 
this  vast  fortune,  and  the  fine  dividends  which  it  has 
paid  to  its  lucky  stockholders,  out  of  the  control  of  an 
article  almost  wholly  consumed  by  the  rural  populations. 

This  concern  is  now  able  to  dictate  State  and  national 
legislation  and  the  management  of  most  important  rail- 
way systems.  It  is  absorbing  the  oil  lands  of  Ohio,  and 
will  soon  have  the  whole  oil  business  of  North  America 
under  its  own  management.  This  great  monopoly  has 
evidently  been  able  tc  bear  up  agdnst  troubles  of  all  kinds. 

As  to  Michigan,  of  which  official  reports*  prove  the 
serious  nature  of  the  troubles  under  which  its  farmers 
labor,  the  per  capita  value  of  property  rose  from  $343  in 
i860,  to  $837  in  1880.  Of  the  iron  industries  of  this 
State  Mr.  Wiman  says  : 

"  Recall  the  isolation,  the  barrenness  of  Canadian  iron 
regions,  and  contrast  them  with  the  activity  of  the  upper 
peninsula  of  Michigan,  whose  total  money  value  of  out- 
put in  1883  was  over  $24,000,000  !  Listen  to  the  story 
of  one  or  two  mines  as  told  in  the  following  extract  from 
a  report  on  the  Gogebic  region,  Michigan,  a  State  just 
next  door  to  Canada  : 

"  *  The  Menominee  Mining  Company  was  organized  ten 
years  ago  on  the  modest  capital  of  $100,000,  which,  not- 
withstanding the  extent  of  its  operations,  which  cover 
the  working  of  six  mines,  has  never  been  increased. 
The  company  has  already  paid  to  its  stockholders 
$6,500,000.     So  great  is  the  appreciation  of  its  shares, 


THE  FA  KM  EM'S  COTEMPORARIES. 


n 


that  a  single  one  has  sold  as  high  as  $6,750  upon  a  par 
of  $100!     The  total  output  of  its  mines  for  the  seven 
years  up  to  1S83  was  1,569,929  tons.     Take,  for  example, 
a  stockholder  in  the  Republic  Company  who  bought  his 
shares  when  they  were  at  their  lowest,  and  held  them. 
He  may  have  purchased  the  original  stock  at  $12,  on  a 
par  of  $25,  and  possibly  lower.     From  that  point  it  rose 
to  $325.     Then  the  capital  was  increased  from  $500,000 
to  $-',400,000,  and  the  stock  rose  as  high  as  $67,  or  $335 
a  share  for  the  whole  stock.     This  profit  does  not  take 
into  account  the  enormous  dividends  that  were  being 
paid   in   the   meantime,  frequently  more  than   100  pe- 
cent.     The  stock  of  the  Cleveland  Company  has  sold  as 
low  as  $6  or  $7.     From  these  figures  it  advanced  to  about 
$250.     The  copjpany  made  an  increase  of  capital  r.imilar 
to  the  Republic's,  and  its  new  shares  sold  as  high  as  $40 
and  as  low  as  Sr4  ;    its  present  price  is  about  $20.     But 
aside  from  the  fluctuations  of  market  the  steady  holders 
of  Cleveland  ha.  e  enjoyed  much  larger  returns  than  they 
could  get  out  of  any  other  security.     During  the  last  six 
years  this  company  has  paid  two  dividends  of  80  per 
cent,  and  one  of  1 20  per  cent.     The  Lake  Superior  Com- 
pany is  another  mine  that  has  made  its  stockholders  rich. 
The  capital  of  the  company,  originally  half  a   million, 
was  increased  to  $1,500,000.     The  quotation  of  the  new 
stock   has  ranged  from  %2,2,  to  $80.     The  old  sold  as 
high  as  $400,  we  believe.     The  Lake  Superior  is  one  of 
the  big  dividend  payers,  and  the  steady  holders  have 
been  unable  to  get  Aladdin's  lamp  out  of  their  minds  ! '  " 
The  Calumet  Hecla  Copper  Company,  started  a  few 
years  ago  with  a  capital  of  $1,200,000,  has  paid  dividends 
amounting  to   $20,000,000,  and  still  holds  a  property 
valued  at  $29,000,000. 


I 


74 


A  M ERICA  .V   FA  RMS. 


The  Iron  Age^  of  New  York,  a  well-informed  authority, 
in  its  issue  of  August  4,  1887,  gave  some  information  of 
the  doings  of  one  huge  enterprise.  It  said  :  '*  An  estab- 
lishmerit  which  can  show  gross  earnings  amounting  to 
over  $14,000,000  in  twelve  months  as  the  result  of  manu- 
facturing operations  exclusively,  is  certainly  entitled  to 
be  called  great.  This  is  the  showing  made  to  the  stock- 
holders of  the  North  Chicago  Rolling-Mill  Company  at 
their  annual  meeting,  which  was  held  in  Chicago  on  the 
25th  ult." 

We  are  aware  that  figures  are  given  to  show  that  the 
money  made  in  great  enterprises  does  not,  as  a  rule,  stay 
by  the  families  of  those  who  engage  in  them  ;  but  the 
fact  remains  that  every  year  a  larger  proportion  of  the 
national  income  finds  its  way  to  this  class  than  ever  be- 
fore ;  while  it  finds  a  larger  proportion  of  the  farmers 
facing  financial  ruin  than  ever  before. 

Manufactures  may  not  always  pay  large  dividends, 
especially  when  forced  into  existence  where  not  required, 
or  in  localitit  not  suited  to  their  development,  or  when 
they  have  been  outdone  by  new  rivals  with  superior  ad- 
vantages. The  question  for  the  farmer's  consideration 
is  :  Are  not  these  losses,  of  whatever  nature  they  may  be, 
frequently  thrown  on  the  farmer  •  and  are  not  these 
manufacturers,  whether  they  succeed  or  fail,  given  a 
chance  to  enjoy  large  incomes  and  the  luxuries  of  life 
for  at  least  a  time,  while  the  farmer  must  be  satisfied 
with  a  narrow  income  and  the  satisfaction  of  only  the 
most  ordinary  wants  ?  Situated  in  one  of  the  principal 
towns  of  New  England  is  a  large  manufactory,  producing 
an  article  used  almost  wholly  by  the  farmers,  which  pays 
only  a  trifling  interest  to  the  shareholders.  Yet  by 
having  a  controlling  interest,  one  family  has  been  en- 


THE  FARAfER'S   COTEMPORAKIES. 


n 


abled  to  draw  in  salaries  from  the  concern  at  times  the 
fine  sum  of  $100,000  annually.  Such  cases  are  not  at  all 
infrequent  under  the  present  regime. 

Of  millionaire  concerns,  New  York  boasts  of  having 
its  hundreds,  and  Montreal  its  fifties.  The  Senate  of 
the  United  States  has  its  twenty  millionaires.  How 
many  of  these  are  farmers  ? 

Mr.  Thomas  G.  Shearman,  the  publicist  and  statistician, 
states  in  The  Forum,  for  November,  1889,  that  there 
are  seventy  persons  in  the  United  States  whose  average 
wealth  is  over  $37,500,000,  amounting  in  the  aggregate 
to  $2,700,000,000.  The  wealth  of  J.  J.  Astor  is  esti- 
mated at  $150,000,000  ;  Gould,  Stanford,  Rockefeller 
and  two  Vanderbilts  are  rated  at  $100,000,000  each  ;  two 
at  $70,000,000  each,  seven  at  $40,000,000  each.  Then 
there  are  four  at  $35,000,000,  thirteen  at  $30,000,000, 
ten  at  $25,000,000,  four  at  $22,500,000,  fifteen  at 
$20,000,000,  while  there  are  fifty  others  who  are  worth 
$10,000,000,  each.  These  are  probably  overestimated, 
but  enough  is  known  to  establish  the  fact  that  the  wealth 
of  the  United  States  in  the  hands  of  some  250,000  of  its 
people  is  enormous,  whereas  the  average  farmer's  wealth 
is  less  than  it  was  twenty  years  ago. 

However,  in  order  to  reduce  this  comparison  to  the 
most  severe  test,  we  must  show  the  position  of  the 
proprietor  farmer  as  compared  with  the  ordinary  wage 
earner.  Mr.  Edward  Atkinson's  '  elaborate  statistics  go 
to  show  that  the  average  wages  of  the  laboring  class  in 
the  United  States  is  about  $400  a  year,  and  of  the  total 
of  the  agricultural  class  $419.  He  states  that  "the 
average  farmer  can  be  assumed  to  earn  but  a  moderate 
sum  above  that  of  the  farm  laborer." 


>  >< 


Distribution  of  Products." 


76 


AMERICAS'  FARMS. 


I  have  averaged  the  farmer's  income  at  $473  ;  and  I 
place  the  wage  earner's  incom«  at  not  less  than  $35o» 
I50  less  than  Mr.  Atkinson,  in  order  to  be  within  safe 
bounds.  Out  of  the  $473,  the  farmer  must  meet  cost  of 
production,  wear  of  machinery,  loss  of  stock,  pay  in- 
surance, and  pay  taxes  ;  all  of  which  would  amount  to 
not  less  than  an  average  of  $173.  This  would  leave  the 
farmer  $300  for  living,  savings,  and  interest  on  his 
investment. 

The  average  farmer's  property  in  the  United  States, 
according  to  census  statistics,  is  $3,019  value.  I  contend 
that  at  least  $2,000  of  this  should  be  subject  to  a  charge 
of  interest  at  the  rate  of  6  per  cent,  in  our  calculation. 
This  will  leave  the  farmer  $180  for  support  of  family  and 
savings,  or  $170  less  than  the  wage  earner.' 

"  The  farm  does  not  pay  if  it  merely  affords  a  living 
and  prevents  the  accumulation  of  debt.  It  may  do  more 
than  this— it  may  even  decrease  debt  and  add  to  the 
value  of  stock  and  improvements — and  yet  not  pay.  It 
being  assumed  that  the  labor  and  superintendence  of  the 
owner  is  equal  in  value  to  the  support  of  the  family,  then 
the  net  accumulations  of  the  year  must  be  equal  to  the 
legal  interest  upon  the  whole  capital  invested,  or  the 
farm  does  not  pay.  This  is  a  simple  method  of  farm 
book-keeping,  and  will  always  answer  the  question  ;  yet 
too  many  farmers  will  shrink  from  applying  the  test."* 

'  It  is  well  to  note  that  official  reports,  now  coming  in.  go  to  show 
that  the  price  of  labor  is  gradually  increasing,  while  the  returns  to 
agriculture  are  diminishing.  While  the  wealth  of  the  agriculturists 
decreased  by  $890  per  farm,  the  per  capita  increase  of  the  property  of 
the  Union  was  I566,  though  the  increase  in  number  of  those  who  en- 
tered occupations  other  than  agricultural,  owning  nothing,  was  quite 
as  great  as  those  who  had  swelled  the  numbers  of  the  agriculturists. 

'  American  Agriculturist,  September,  1889. 


TftE  FARMEItS  COTEMPORARIES. 


77 


The  Hon.  Geo.  B.  Loring  gives  some  statistics  recently 
in  the  NortA  American  Review '  to  prove  the  prosperity 
of  agriculture.  I  propose  analyzing  those  referring  to  this 
question  as  it  relates  to  Massachusetts,  which  he  assures 
his  readers  "  is  a  good  illustration  of  the  type  of  Ameri- 
can agriculture  which  increases  year  by  year,  and  which 
affords  constant  labor,  and  consequently  good  returns  to 
the  farmer."  Mr.  Loring  says  that  the  aggregate  value 
of  the  agricultural  products  of  the  Siate  is  $47,756,033  ; 
that  the  total  agricultural  property  of  the  State  is  valued 
at  $215,230,550  ;  that  his  estimate  gives  to  each  person 
employed  in  farming  about  $620  annually,  out  of  which 
must  come  the  expense  of  producing  and  selling  the 
product— the  total  wages  paid  annually  being  $6,390,- 
252. 

If  we  assume  that  the  average  farm  proprietor  of 
Massachusetts  is  receiving  $700  (an  outside  figure),  and 
out  of  which  deduct  $200  for  insurance,  taxes,  repairs, 
loss  of  stock,  seeds,  and  fertilizers,  we  have  $500  left. 
Out  of  this  $500  we  have  to  take,  at  least,  $150  for  wages. 
This  would  leave  $350  for  the  farmer,  the  return  of  an 
ordinary  wage  earner,  with  not  a  cent  for  interest  on  his 
investment.  If  the  farmer  charge  this  interest,  say  $150, 
he  would  have  only  $200  for  his  family  to  live  upon. 

In  the  paragraph  wherein  Mr.  Loring  refers  to  the 
above  matter,  he  states  that  the  income  of  the  manufac- 
turing operatives  in  Massachusetts  averages  $364.  He 
has  this  without  a  cent  risked  in  the  business  which  em- 
ploys him.  Surely  if  the  laborers  of  America  have  cause 
to  make  loud  and  bitter  complaints  of  the  inequality 
under  which  they  labor,  the  farm  proprietors  have  much 
more. 

'  March,  1889. 


t*. 


m 


^ 

..^^^< 


W"  "<  ^ 


IMAGE  EVALUATION 
TEST  TARGET  (MT-3) 


A 


w 


£// 


„v 


:^ 


I 


.2- 


<^ 


fA 


1.0 


I.I 


1^128 

Ill 

|J0     "^ 

1^ 

£  1^ 

u 

■Hut. 

1  ^ 

II  m 

1.25      1.4       1.6 

< 6"     

► 

<^ 


% 


/] 


^>. 


^. 


m 


^^ 


Photographic 

Sciences 
Corporation 


^ 


,v 


<v 


# 


^^. 


ri; 


'S) 


-u^ 


23  WEST  MAIN  STREET 

WEBSTER,  N.Y.  14580 

(716)  872-4503 


%" 


CHAPTER   II. 


COMPETITION. 


Taking  a  wide  survey  of  the  subject,  we  can  consis- 
tently say  that  a  severe  competition  from  even  the  most 
distant  producing  countries  is  springing  up  to  claim  the 
farmer's  serious  attention.  The  wheat  fields  of  the  great 
American  prairies  have  to  contend  for  the  markets  of 
the  United  Kingdohi,  not  only  against  India  and  the 
continent  of  Europe,  but  the  Argentine  Republic  is  be- 
coming a  formidable  rival.  India  is  devoting  each  new 
year  more  than  formerly  to  the  production  of  this  great 
staple.  The  fourteen  thousand  miles  of  railway  now 
constructed  in  that  country  tap  some  of  the  finest  wheat 
lands  of  the  world,  and  with  plenty  of  cheap  labor  to 

work  them. 

Competition  all  around,  and  the  low  rates  of  trans- 
portation over  the  railways  of  America  as  well  as  in 
other  countries,  have  brought  down  the  price  of  wheat 
in  the  London  market,  during  the  last  ten  years,  lower 
than  ever  before.  During  the  past  five  years  the  average 
price  at  Mark  Lane  has  been  thirty-five  shillings  per 
quarter  ;  during  the  decade  1860-70  it  averaged  fifty-one 
shillings  ;  in  1868,  sixty-three  shillings. 

The  cattle  and  meat  exports  are  also  not  without 
rivals.  Australia  and  South  America  are  expanding 
this  trade  remarkably.     Me-ts  are  now  sent  to  the  ma-- 

78 


COMPETITION. 


79 


kets  of  Great  Britain  in  steamers  with  vast  refrigerators 
in  which  these  meals  are  safely  carried.  One  establish- 
ment on  the  Plata  River  is  equipped  with  'he  necessary 
facilities  for  preparing  and  shipping  five  hundred  car- 
cases yearly. 

Australia  takes  the  lead  in  exports  of  mutton,  and  is 
likely  still  to  do  so,  because  of  its  great  natural  advan- 
tages and  its  shipping  facilities. 

The  fiscal  policy  of  the  United  States  has  made  it 
easy  for  such  European  countries  as  France  and  Ger- 
many to  find  plausible  excuse  for  shutting  out  American 
food  products.  The  pork  industries,  in  an  especial 
manner,  have  suffered  from  this  retaliation. 

Even  for  the  products  of  the  dairy,  England  is  not 
by  any  means  dependent  upon  the  farmers  of  America. 
Danish  and  Irish  butter  are  now  preferred  in  that 
country. 

In  fact,  England  is  not  so  absolutely  dependent  upon 
outside  countries  as  many  suppose.  She  has  large  ar^as 
uncultivated,  which,  were  they  cultivated,  would  increase 
her  food  supply  very  much. 

It  is  possible  that  with  her  lands  all  carefully  culti- 
vated, the  present  yield  might  be  doubled,  an  amount 
which  would  more  than  feed  the  people.  In  1880, 
according  to  Sir  James  Caird,  a  most  reliable  authority, 
her  consumption  of  corn  and  vegetable  products  was 
of  the  value  of  ^6386,637, 500,  of  which  her  own  soil 
contributed  ^260,737,500. 

These  economic  facts,  apparent  to  the  observing 
citizen,  are  of  great  practical  importance  to  the  food 
exporter.  They  evidently  point  to  the  conclusion  that 
competition  is  likely  to  be  even  more  severe  in  the 
future  than   in  the   past,  and  should   be    met   by   the 


80 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


^^.%. 


American  agriculturists  if  they  would  have  their  pro- 
ductions find  customers  in  foreign  marts.  No  possible 
home  policy  can  shut  off  this  competition. 

Neither  is  the  outlook  at  home  any  mo;e  cheering. 
The  small  or  least  favored  grain  producers,  who  havr 
been  unable  to  change  their  labors  to  othf  directions, 
are  being  borne  down  by  the  overwhelming  odds  pitted 
against  them.  The  majority  of  the  great  "  bonanza 
farms,"  from  which  the  severe  competition  comes,  have, 
in  many  cases,  cost  the  owners  comparatively  but  a  trifle, 
while  little  outlay  is  required  for  fertilizers.  Further- 
more, the  most  effective  machinery  to  be  procured  is 
being  employed  to  turn  these  unequalled  natural  re- 
sources into  food  products. 

Of  this,  says  a  noted  American  economist':  "A 
huge  abundance  therefore  ensues  from  the  least  amount 
of  human  labor.  On  some  of  the  fattest  land  of  the 
West,  the  measure  of  the  product  of  one  man,  working 
the  best  machinery  with  a  pair  of  horses,  has  reached 
one  hundred  tons  of  corn  in  a  single  season.  The  aim  of 
some  of  the  great  '  bonanza  farms '  of  Dakota  has  been 
to  apply  machinery  so  effectually  that  the  cultivation  of 
one  full  section,  or  six  hundred  and  forty  acres,  shall 
represent  one  year's  work  of  only  one  man.  This  has 
not  yet  been  reached,  but  so  far  as  the  production  of 
the  grain  of  wheat  is  concerned,  one  man's  work  will 
now  give  one  thousand  persons  enough  for  a  barrel  of 
flour  a  year,  which  is  the  average  ration." 

On  the  great  farms  of  the  West  ploughing  is  per- 
formed by  immense  double-gang  ploughs — too  expensive 
and  ponderous  for  use  on  the  small  farms.  Each 
plough  is  drawn  by  four  horses,  the  ploughman  riding 
'  Mr.  Edward  Atkinson. 


COMPETITION.  Jii 

upon   it  as   it  moves  along,   cutting    two    furrows  of 
fourteen  inches  wide.     When  it  is  considered  that  not 
infrequently  four  of  these  four-horse  teams,  one  after 
the  other,  are  seen  in  the  same  field,  cutting  furrows 
miles   m  length,  au   idea  is  gained  of  what  is  being 
done  m   the   West   by   machinery   and   a  very  limited 
amount  of  human  labor.     One  man,  who  does  the  har- 
rowing, drives  four  horses  attached  to  a  gang  of  four 
harrows,  covering  a  width  of    twenty-four  feet      The 
seed  IS  sown  by  broadcast  seeders,  planting  seed  over  a 
width  of  sixteen  feet,  and  drawn  by  four  horses.     To 
gather  the  harvest  self-binding  reapers,  drawn  by  three 
horses,  are  also  managed  by  one  man. 

Of  the  great  reapers    one    farm  in   Dakota  operates 
sixty-five.     It  i.  said  that  *'  Dr.  Glen's  forty-five  thou- 
sand    -res  of  wheat  in  California  in  1880  were  gathered 
by  machines,  each  of  which  cut,  threshed,  winnowed 
and  bagged,  sixty  acres  of  wheat  in  a  day."  ' 

The  threshing  and  cleaning  are  mostly  done  by  steam 
power  m  the  field,  and  the  grain  is  frequently  hauled  in 
bulk  to  the  railway  stations  to  be  deposited  in  elevators 
or  warehouses. 

Mr.  Dalrymple's  hundred  square  miles  of  wheat  are 
cultivated  and  gathered  with  machir.es  and  a  troop  of 
four  hundred  farm  servants.  Mr.  Andrew  Carnegie  in 
referring  to  this  in  his  "  Triumphant  Democracy,"  gi  ves'his 
opinion  that  it  would  require  five  thousand  men  in  the 
ordinary  way  of  the  East  to  accomplish  the  same  result. 

As  conditions  exist  it  seems  practically  impossible  for 
small  farmers  to  compete  with  farming  conduc^od  on 
such  a  stupendous  scale  as  that  on  the  great  farms  of 
the  West. 

At  home,  the  broad  ranches  of  Texas.  Kansas,  and 


i 


■H 


mmm 


AMERICAN  FA /IMS. 


'iding  the  meat  markets 
the  Pine  Tree 


to 


other  States  of  the  West;  are  p 

of  the  old  States  of  the  East,  even 

State  and  the  Maritime  Provinces. 

The  numerous  rail-vays  traversing  the  continent  have 
brought  the  vast  prairies  practically  alongside  the  East- 
ern consumers.  In  1865,  it  cost  from  three  to  four 
cents  a  ton  per  mile,  to  convey  freight  to  the  Atlantic 
seaboard.     It  is  now  done  for  three  fourths  of  a  cent. 

"  Cornelius  Vanderbilt  consolidated  and  perfected 
the  railroad  service  in  such  a  way  that  a  year's  supply  of 
meat  and  bread  can  be  moved  one  thousand  miles,  from 
the  Western  prairies  to  the  Eastern  workshops,  at  the 
measure  of  the  cost  of  a  single  day's  wages  of  the 
mechanic  or  artisan  in  Massachusetts,— that  is  to  say,  if 
the  mechanic  or  ahisan  of  the  East  will  give  up  one 
holiday  in  a  year,  he  removes  one  thousand  miles  of 
distance  betv^een  himself  and  the  main  source  of  his 
supply  of  necessary  food."  ' 

"  Edward  Atkinson,  "  Distribution  of  Products,"  p.  38. 

The  following  is  from  the  Halifax  Morning  Herald,  Saturday,  No- 
vember 23,  1889,  entitled  "  Impoverished  Farmers"  : 

"  In  recent  issues  the  Herald  has  called  attention  to  a  great  body 
of  evidence  furnished  by  state  and  municipal  reports,  newspaper 
articles,  public  addresses,  etc.,  all  of  which  serve  to  show  that  the 
farmers  of  the  United  '^^ates,  both  in  New  England  and  in  the  States 
farther  west,  are,  relai  ,ly  speaking,  in  a  most  deplorable  condition. 
Large  numbers  of  deserted  farms  are  in  vain  offered  for  sale  in  New 
England,  while  others,  which  were  a  few  years  ago  in  excellent  con- 
dition and  free  of  debt,  are  now  placed  under  the  hammer  of  the 
auctioneer  to  pay  the  mortgages  that  have  been  placed  upon  them. 
In  the  West  the  farmers  are  endeavoring  as  best  they  can  to  bear  up 
under  their  almost  overwhelming  burden  of  indebtedness,  living 
largely  on  their  capital-outlay,  hoping  against  hope  for  better  times  in 
the  near  future.  The  Bankers'  Magazine  for  November,  in  '  A  Re- 
view of  Finance  and  Business,'  shows  very  clearly  that  the  impov- 


COMPETITION, 


83 


HOME    MARKET. 

Compare  the  position  of  the  different  localities  in 
America,  as  regards  the  production  of  grain  and  live- 
stock fifty  years  ago,  with  the  present,  and  it  will  be 
found  that,  at  that  time,  the  farmers  had  the  advantage 
of  a  home  market,  while  to-day  no  locality  can  boast  of 
being  practically  a  home  market.  During  the  past  half- 
century  the  increase  of  the  town  and  city  populations  of 
Massachusetts  has  been  upwards  of  loo  per  cent.,  and 
the  increase  of  the  aggregate  wealth  over  200  per  cent., 
while  during  the  same  period  the  increase  in  the  pro- 
duction of  live-stock  has  been  but  a  trifle,  and  an  actual 
decline  of  over  36  per  cent,  has  come  about  in  the 
production  of  grain. 

erished  condition  of  United  States  farmers  is  due  to  a  limited  demand 
for  their  products,  and  in  a  consequent  decline  of  prices  which  does 
not  return  him  sufficient  to  pay  for  his  seed  and  labor.     We  quote  : 

Instead  of  keeping  up  her  early  purchases  of  our  new  ci  .p, 
which  were  quite  free  in  August,  to  bridge  over  the  gap  between  her 
(/.  e.,  England)  old  and  new  crops,  she  has  taken  less  and  less  as  we 
have  gone  into  the  new-crop  year.     Not  only  this,  but  it  has  been  in 
the  face  of  steadily  declining  prices  under  an  unusually  heavy  move- 
ment of  the  crop,  which  has  been  necessitated  by  the  impoverished 
condition  of  American  farmers.     This  has  been   true,  not  only  of 
wheat,  but  of  every  thing  the  farmer  has  raised,   until  prices  have 
reached  a  point  in  remote  sections  which  hardly  pay  for  hauling  his 
crops  to  market  after  being  harvested.     This  is  especially  true  of 
corn,  oats,  and  potatoes  in  the  far  West,  where  much  of  the  crops 
stil)  lie  on  the  ground  unhoused,  as  farmers  are  too  poor  to  buy  the 
lumber  to  crib  their  grain.     Potatoes,  which  rotted  so  badly  in  the 
East,  owing  to  the  wet  autumn,  seemed  to  have  escaped  in  the  West, 
where  they  have  been  selling  by  the  car-load  at  20  cents  a  bushel 
delivered  in  Chicago.     Oats  are  selling  there  at  17  to  i8  cents  ;  corn, 
30  to  31  cents,     xlow  much  is  left  the  unfortunate  farmer,  after  pay- 
ing even  the  reduced  rates  of  transportation  the  railways  were  com 


rw 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


THE    FRUIT    PROBLEM. 

As  the  great  grain  fields  of  the  West  have  poured 
their  products  into  every  market  at  home,  the  small 
grain  areas  of  the  past  have  been  converted  into 
orchards  and  vegetable  plots  ;  and  now  there  is  not 
only  excessive  production  in  cereals,  but  also  in  all 
other  field  productions.  Only  a  few  months  ago  (June, 
1888),  fifteen  to  twenty  thousand  crates  of  fruit  and 
vegetables,  **  in  good  condition,"  were  destroyed  in  New 
York  Harbor  to  relieve  an  overstocked  market.  Larg^ 
portions  of  the  South,  such  as  the  country  around  Norfolk, 
Virginia,  have  recently  become  devoted  to  fruit  and  vege- 
table culture  for  Northern  consumption.  This  production 
will,  do  doubt,  be  vjistly  increased  in  the  near  future,  if 
the  new  cotton-picking  machines,  now  under  contem- 
plation, drive  the  negroes  from  the  industry  of  cotton- 
picking,  which  has  given  so  many  of  them  employment 
in  the  past. 

pelled  to  make  in  order  to  get  the  farmers  to  move  their  crops  at  all, 
can  easily  be  figured.  lie  is  not  getting  enough  to  jiay  for  his  seed 
and  his  labor,  and  the  result  is  seen  in  the  wholesale  default  in  inter- 
est, not  only  on  farm  mortgages,  but  on  farm  implements  and  live- 
stock, which  are  being  foreclosed,  and  the  producers  of  our  abundant 
harvests  are  left  homeless  and  penniless  in  an  unusually  large  number 
of  cases  to  face  the  inclemency  of  the  winter.  As  a  consequence  tiiere 
is  more  or  less  uprising  of  the  farming  communities  of  the  far  West 
against  the  demands  of  the  Eastern  loan  companies,  which  have  not 
only  kept  up  the  old  rates  of  interest,  but  in  some  cases  have  in- 
creased them.  Cases  have  come  to  public  notice  where  5  per  cent, 
per  month  is  charged  upon  cattle  mortgages.  Between  the  exporters, 
who  refuse  to  take  their  crops,  except  of  corn,  even  at  these  ruinous 
prices,  and  the  Eastern  and  local  money-lenders,  the  farmers  of  the 
country  are  being  ground  between  the  upper  and  neither  millstone, 
instead  of  their  harvests,  which  are  too  abundant  to  house  and  too 
cheap  to  market.'  " 


H 
1  If 


COMPETITION,  || 

It  certainly  seems  that  in  scarcely  any  line  has  there 
been  a  more  rapid  increase  of  competition  than  in  that  of 
fruit-raising.  In  1859  the  value  of  the  production  of  the 
orchards  of  the  United  States  was  $19,991,885  ;  in  1879  it 
rose  to  $50,876,154,  or  an  increase  of  154  per  cent.  Mr. 
Loring  now  estimates,  that  by  adding  all  the  fruits  sold 
in  small  citios  and  villages,  and  those  consumed  on  the 
farms  enumerated,  "  the  annual  value  of  the  fruits  of  the 
United  States  would  not  fall  much  below  $200,000,000." 
It  must  also  be  remembered  that  at  no  former  period 
in  the  history  of  America  has  there  been  a  more  rapid 
•r.cie.'SP  in  (he  area  of  new  orchards  than  during  the  last 
ie*i  years. 

In  Canada,  In  lecc'nt  years,  pomology  has  become  the 
mcr-i  popular  science  of  husbandry.  Investments  in  fruit 
».  jltare  ar.  made  b;  Dofh  the  practical  farmer,  the  theo- 
rist, u.id  the  speculator.  And  now,  as  with  their  contem- 
poraries, the  crchardists  of  Canada  have  to  deal  with  the 
question  of  cc  .-petition  in  a  way  not  dreamed  of  twenty 
years  ago,  except,  perhaps,  by  the  very  observing  pubJf' 
cist  or  economist.  In  1871  the  crop  of  apples  in  Ontario 
was  estimated  at  2,000,000  of  bushels  ;  seventeen  years 
later,  i88r  at  20,000,000  of  bushels,  an  increase  of  over 
900  per  cent.,  though  the  population  of  the  Dominion  had 
not  increased  30  per  cent. 

The  apple  production  of  the  Annapolis  valley  in  the 
year  1871  was  estimated  at  45,000  barrels  ;  in  1888,  at 
300,000  barrels, — an  increase  of  566  per  cent.  In  1871, 
80  per  cent,  of  the  standard  varieties  were  marketed  at 
home  ;  at  present  50  per  cent,  of  the  yield  would  glut  the 
home  market  even  in  a  "  short-crop  "  season.  It  is  gener- 
ally estimated  that  when  the  young  orchards  already 
planted  get  into  bearing—or  ten  years  hence— the  pro-, 
duction  of  the  valley  will  be  over  a  million  of  barrels,  oi: 


III 


'f^B 


86 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


sufficient  to  supply  a  population  greater  than  the  whole 
of  the  Maritime  Provinces  would  contain,  seventy-five 
years  hence,  at  the  present  rate  of  increase. 

It  seems  evident  that,  to  carry  on  this  industry  as  the 
orchardists  ot  America  have  set  out,  foreign  markets,  and 
especially  the  markets  of  Great  IJritain,  must  bo  secured 
in  the  face  of  competition  growing  sharper  year  by  year. 

Australia  all  at  once  threatens  to  become  a  formidable 
competitor  for  the  spring  markets  of  London.  It  is  a 
mistake  to  suppose  that  this  new  rival  is  at  a  disadvantage 
as  regards  freights  ;  for  the  odds  arc  the  other  way.  The 
commerce  carried  on  between  Australia  and  Great  Britain 
is  seven  times  as  much  per  capita  to  Auitralia  as  that 
between  America  and  Great  Britain  is  to  America. 

Apple  producers  and  shippers  cannot  dictate  the 
prices,  neither  at  home  nor  abroad  ;  while  the  foreign 
market  decides  the  pri  :cs  which  may  be  obtained  in  the 
home  market.  In  former  times,  a  local  short  crop  meant 
high  prices  in  the  home  market.  It  was  purely  a  local 
question.  Now,  in  many  cases  in  the  northeastern  part 
of  America,  the  production  in  most  years  being  greater 
than  consumption,  the  prices  must  be  fixed  in  the  open 
markets  of  the  world. 

This  (1889)  is  called  an  unusually  "short  apple-rrop 
year  "  everywhere,  and  yet  prices  are  not  sufficiently  high 
in  our  domestic  markets  to  make  the  returns  of  the  aver- 
age tree  any  thing  like  what  it  would  have  been  twenty 
years  ago  under  similar  circumstances  as  to  its  yield. 


COMPETITION    BETWEEN    THE    UPPER    AND    LOWER 

PROVINCES. 

Ontario  and  the  Western  provinces,  with  their  immense 
tracts  of  fertile  prairie  lands,  and  their  railway  system 
opening  these  lands  up  to  cultivators  even  faster  than 


COMPBTTTION, 


«7 


they  can  be  induced  to  occupy  them,  are  unequalled  (or 
competitive  fanning.  The  production  of  cereals  is  in- 
creasing  by  leaps  and  bounds,  and  the  lands  of  the  older 
provinces  are  rapidly  giving  up  the  contest  in  this  branch 
cf  husbandry. 

Manitoba  now  bids  fair  to  become  the  banner  potato- 
producing  province.  The  Canada  Pacific  Railway's 
reports  state  that  the  yield,  per  acre,  runs  up  from  300  to 
800  bushels.  The  Maritime  Provinces,  which  have 
hitherto  borne  the  palm  in  the  production  of  this  tuber, 
fall  far  behind  in  their  yield  per  acre,  aoo  bushels  now 
being  considered  a  good  average  crop.  The  surplus  yield 
of  potatoes  in  Manitoba,  in  .888,  was  estimated  at  two 
millions  of  bushels. 

In  1864.  twenty-five  years  ago,  the  Upper  Provinces  sent 
to  Nova  Scotia  beef,  pork,  hams,  butter,  lard,  and  cheese  to 
the  tnflmg  amount  (,f  $8,269.  This  was  at  a  time  when 
trade  was  perfectly  free  of  tariff  restrictions.  Since  the 
operation  of  the  railways  between  these  provinces,  the 
shipments  of  farm  produce  from  the  Upper  Provinces  to 
Nova  Scotia  have  developed  to  about  $.00,000  yearly  ' 
According  to  Mr.  A.  C.  Fairweather,  an  authority  on 
this  subject,  $.05,000  in  cheese,  cured  meats,  and  butter 
alone,  were  sent  from  the  Upper  to  the  Maritime 
Provinces  m  1884. 

THE   BIG    FISH   CONSUME    THE    LITTLE. 

The  principle  of  the  big  fish  consuming  the  little  is 
well  exemplified  m  many  of  the  anomalies  connected 
with  the  subject  of  the  present  competition  in  husbandry 
Some  great  central  interests  get  all  the  advantages  in  re- 
gard to  freights,  and  others  get  other  favors.  The  fruit 
region  of  Nova  Scotia  is  eight  hundred  miles  nearer  to 
'Including  grain  and  flour,  about  12.500,000. 


ilj 


88 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


London  than  the  fruit  districts  of  Ontario  ;  but  it  costs 
more  to  put  apples  into  the  London  market  from  the 
former  than  from  the  latter.  These  centralizing  influ- 
ence.  gain  more  strength  ♦.wery  day. 

But  perhaps  the  most  trying  feature  of  our  develop- 
ment is  the  compeiition  growing  U{»  between  individual 
operators,  the  big  and  the  little.  How  is  the  small  or- 
chardist  to  live,  who,  for  instance,  is  depending  chiefly 
upon  his  crop  of  two  hundred  barrels  of  apples,  in  com- 
peting w-'th  the  capitalist  merchant,  lawyer,  or  banker, 
as  great  orchardists.  who  are  satisfied  with  a  small  in- 
terest on  their  investments. 

There  are  orchards  in  America  which  now  turn  out 
from  twenty-five  to  fort'  thousand  bushels  of  apples. 
Three  hundred  actes  »j  the  average  of  a  fuir-sized  or- 
chard in  :;ome  parts  of  »he  United  States,  and  t'lere  are 
orchards  in  Canada  coming  into  bearing,  which  are  ex- 
pected soon  to  t".rn  out  their  five  to  ten  thousand 
barrels  annually. 

The  small  farmers,  in  competing  with  their  bonanza 
competitors,  must  support  families  and  provide  them 
with  the  necessaries  of  life  through  the  whole  year.  The 
large  capitalist  operator  needs  to  the  amount  produced, 
but  a  fraction  of  hired  help,  and  needs  it  but  a  short 
period  in  each  year. 

But  this  is  not  all.  The  odds  are  entirely  in  favor  of 
the  large  operator  every  time  an  article  is  purchased 
for  use  upon  the  farm.  Special  rates  are  always  for 
the  capitalist's  benefit  in  the  commercial  world.  Thus, 
we  are  forced  to  the  conviction,  that  unlimited  com- 
petition, bearing  on  the  typical  American  farmer,  is  a 
condition  which  should  be  regarded  as  one  of  utmost 
significance. 


COMPETlTlOSr, 


89 


Eycry  advantage  gained  in  est  of  production  by  the 
farmer,  in  the  way  of  improved  implement,  of  husband 
ry.  m  transportation,  or  throuph  abundant  harvests,  etc 
becomes  not  mediately,  but  immediately,  fused  through 
society  fow/x  benefit.     On  the  other  hand,  though  the 
cost  of  fabrication   is   being  continually   lessened,    its 
pr-cs  greatly  lowered  to  consumers,  and  the  compara- 
tive  capacity  for  its  expansion  vastly  increased,  these 
benefits  qo  not  become  entirely  -r  immediately  fused 
through  society,   but  sufficient  .      gi„  remains  in  the 
hands  of  the  producers  of  such  /.orication^  to  unduly 
enrich  them.     Hoy  this  advantage  is  secured  10  the  lat- 
ter, v'lll  be  shown  in  chapten  w'  -^h  follow. 


Ill 


ij 


CHAPTER    III. 


BETWEEN    THE    UPPER    AND    NETHER    MILLSTONES. 


Whatever  be  the  cause  of  the  troubles  to  agriculture, 
the  query,  as  to  why  contemporaneous  industries  are  not 
also  in  the  same  case,  must  now  be  met. 

It  is  not  the  result  of  an  unavoidable  evolution  in  the 
conditions  of  society  which  must  close  in  upon  the  agri- 
culturists sooner  or  later  everywhere,  and  in  all  ages, 
to  overthrow  them. 

No,  the  condition  is  not  natural,  it  is  most  decidedly 
abnormal.  The  world  is  governed  in  its  customs,  in  its 
sentiments,  in  its  politics,  and  in  its  laws,  by  a  false 
political  economy.  We  magnify  the  importance  of 
nearly  every  thing  but  agriculture,  and  it  is  made  to 
bear  all  kinds  of  loads  that  other  industries  may  develop 
and  be  maHe  prosperous,  until  agriculture  is  crushed 
beneath  the  weight ;  and  government  by  unjust  laws  is 
the  chief  medium  through  which  this  evil  is  brought 
about. 

The  weight  of  a  ponderous  governmental  machinery 
as  an  outcome  of  endless  law-making,  and  the  granting 
of  privileges  to  all  others  at  the  expense  of  agriculture, 
have  put  the  farmers  of  America  between  the  upper  and 
nether  millstones.  On  the  upper  stone  is  the  crushing 
weight  of  a  vicious  system  of  taxation — the  usurer,  the 
monopolist,  and  combines  of  all  kinds  pressing  upon  it, 

90 


THE  UPPER  AND  NETHER  MILLSTONES.      91 

While  the  nether  stone  stands  firm.  The  first  is  governed 
by  artificial  laws ;  the  other  by  natural  laws,  though  natural 
laws  sad  y  imposed  upon  ;  one  by  impositions,  injustices, 
and  duplicity,  the  other  by  the  stern  logic  of  facts 

The  price  of  the  farmer's  productions  is,  as  we  have 
seen  in  a  former  chapter,  governed  by  a   world-wide 
competition,  being  neither  protected  by  national  boun- 
daries nor  by  special  combinations.     This  is  the  natural 
the  normal  condition.     On  the  other  hand,   the  prices 
which  the  farmer  is  obliged  to  pay  for  the  productions 
and  the  services  of  others  are  inflated,  through  the  re- 
sult of  artificial  barriers,  against  all  competition  from 
production  outside  the  limits  of  the  nation,  and  by  com- 
hinations  within.     This  is  the  unnatural,  the  abnormal 
condition. 

With  such  as  the  manufacturer,  the  conditions  are 
exactly  reversed.  As  producers,  the  results  of  their 
laoors  are  inflated  in  exchange  value  by  protection ; 
whereas,  as  consumers  of  farm  produce,  they  have  but 
to  pay  competition  prices.  The  system  .  f  extreme  in- 
direct  taxation,  as  operated  in  America,  gives  the  great 
manuractunng  industries  the  power  to  relieve  themselves 
however  much  they  may  be  pressed  upon.  This  is  done 
by  forcing  unnatural  terms  upon  such  as  the  farmer 

Whatever  the  extortion  which  one  manufacturer  may 
practise  upon  another  in  the  price  he  demands  for  his 
productions,  that  other  finds  relief  through  an  equivalent 
exaction  in  return  ;  but  the  farmer  is  victimized  by  both 
and  he  does  not,  or  cannot,  retaliate.  ' 

The  trades  combine  one  against  another,  and  both 
against  the  farmer ;  and  he  does  not,  or  cannot,  retaliate 
Government,  in  its  combination  with  capital,  uses  its 
power  against  such  as  the  farmer;  and  nothing  is  done 
or  can  be  done,  by  retaliation.  ' 


92 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


It  is  these  unnatural  conditions  which  are  a  chief 
cause  of  the  relative  decline  of  the  farmer's  share  in  the 
national  income  ;  which  are  causing  the  rapid  increase  of 
our  tenanted  anJ  mortgaged  farms  ;  which  make  the 
manufacturers  and  other  combiners  wealthy,  and  the 
farmers  comparatively  poor  ;  which  cause  the  fierceness 
of  competition  to  appear  so  much  more  severe  in  agri- 
culture than  in  other  occupations  ;  which  do  much  to 
dishearten  our  rural  denizens  and  make  them  appear 
unequal  to  the  struggle  of  life  ;  which  deprive  our  best 
citizens  of  the  pleasurable  enjoyment  and  proliting  con- 
sumption of  their  just  and  natural  share  in  the  results  of 
the  progress  of  the  age. 

American  shipping  engaged  in  foreign  trade  is  gov- 
erned by  natural  laws,  the  normal  condition,  on  the  one 
hand,  and,  like  agriculture,  is  crushed  by  vicioiis  arti- 
ficial laws  on  the  other,  and  is  being  exterminated. 
When  these  obstacles  were  taken  from  this  industry  by 
England's  free-trade  policy,  English  shipping  received 
new  life. 

From  doing  but  26  per  cent,  of  the  world's  ocean 
carrying-trade  ut  the  time  of  the  removal  of  duties,  she 
now  does  over  50  per  cent.  Whereas,  in  the  United  States, 
burdens  have  been  laid  upon  shipping  until  United 
States  ships  have  be*  n  pretty  nearly  driven  from  the 
seas.  Thirty-five  years  ago  the  United  States  had  five 
million  tons  of  ships  sailing  the  oceans  ;  they  now  have 
less  than  one  million*. 

'  It  is  frequently  contended  that  it  is  England's  superior  advan- 
tages for  building  iron  steamships  that  gives  her  the  chance  to  control 
the  world's  carrying-trade.  We  ask  :  Did  she  build  all  the  ships 
she  owned  during  the  first  twenty-five  years  after  the  repeal  of  ob- 
structions to  ship-building  and  ship-owning  ?  Why  cannot  America 
buy,  r>ail,  and  repair  English  ships,  as  England  has  done  in  the  past 
with  American,  and  prospered  by  so  doing? 


THE  UPPER  AND  NETffEP  MILLSTONES.      93 

While  natural  conditions  sho^v  the  immense  importance 
of  these  great  mediums  of  wealth  and  general  well-being 
artificial  conditions  throttle  them. 

Others  are  empowered  to  dictate  prices  to  the  farmer 
but  who  ever  thinks  of  him  taking  .le  advantages  which 
others  may  take,~for  instance,  pile  up  his  grain  from 
season  to   season,  until  he  can  sell  at  his  own  price  ? 
Does  he  store  a^^ay,  in  times  of  abundance,  his  butter 
his  cheese,  etc.,  knowing  that  government  will  help  him 
out  at  whatever  price  he  and  his  neighbors  decide  to 
ask  ?     Can   the  farmers—as   an   able   writer  suggests— 
meet  at  hotels,  and  over  their  wine  and  cigars  agree  as 
to  what  the  price  of  their  productions  shall  be,  and  the 
public  be  obliged  to  submit  to  it  ? 

The  manufacturer  may  run  one  engine  or  more,  or 
may  shut  down  as  many  days  in  the  week  as  he  likes 
Legislation  is  made  to  insure  him  against  loss,  and  the 
consumers  of  his  productions  are  obliged  to  furnish  the 
means. 

We  aie  governed  by  a  political  economy  which  takes 
from  the  one  class  upon  which  our  greatest  prosperity 
depends,  that  another  may  be  empowered  to  crush  it  • 
national  policies,  which  are  based  on  laws,  the  actions  of 
which  are  to  victimize  the  worthy,  for  the  promotion  of 
that  which  m  its  effects  is  unworthy  ;  which  erects  a 
tower,  to  finally  overthrow  the  whole  structure. 


CHArXER  IV. 


Il    I' 


PROTECTION  A    DEADLY    ENEMY   TO  THE    FARMERS 

OF  AMERICA. 

In  fair  New  England,  among  the  great  manufacturers, 
pampered  and  protected  for  generations  ;  on  the  broad 
prairies  of  the  West  ;  down  the  valley  of  the  Mississippi, 
unequalled  for  its  fertility  ;  in  favored  Ontario,  and  in 
the  provinces  by  the  sea,  the  farmers  have  a  common 
cause  in  resisting  the  great  foes  which  threaten  their 
annihilation.  To  this  end,  it  is  absolutely  necessary 
that  their  foes  be  well  known,  and  that  their  modes  of 
operation  be  clearly  understood. 

It  ?s  perfectly  familiar  to  the  tariff  student,  that  almost 
every  thing  the  farmers  require  as  consumers  is  taxed 
in  America  to  near  the  utmost  limit.  But  many  piotec- 
tionists  maintain  that  the  prices  of  goods  are  not  higher 
on  account  of  indirect  taxes  levied  on  them.  This  latter 
claim  is,  of  course,  denied  by  the  state  socialist  laborer, 
who  contends  that  the  Manchester  free-trade  theories 
threaten  to  bring  about  a  competition  that  would  reduce 
the  price  of  goods  and  the  price  of  labor  to  a  shadow. 

The  socialists  are  right,  as  a  rule,  in  their  contention 
that  free  competition — that  is  to  say,  competition  where 
monopoly  controls  no  part  of  production — causes  a  con- 
stant lowering  of  the  cost  and  price  in  exchange  of 
products,  but  not  that  through  this  laborers  would  be 
injured. 

94 


PROTECTTON  A   DEADLY  ENEMY,  95 

Free  competition  permits  the  most  abundant  and  per- 
fect production  of  goods  necessary  for  man's  want^ 
with  the  least  possible  friction.  The  supplying  of  these 
wants  in  the  highest  possible  degree-that  is  to  sav  to 
gam  the  most  liberal  consumption-is  the  end  or  aim  of 
all  production  Hence,  freedcm  in  competition  implies 
increased  consumption.  Where  fhis  freedom  is  universal 
and  the  exchange  of  services-that  is  to  say,  of  the 
results  of  labor-is  not  obstructed,  all  should  gain  a 
benefit.  ** 

Contrariwise,  where  services  or  goods  made  dearer  by 
friction  or  needless  labor  or  unnatural  conditions,  on 
the  one  hand,  are  exchanged  for  services  or  goods  made 
cheaper  by  a  relief  from  friction,  on  the  other,  their 
relative  conditions  are  then  improper  and  burdensome 
to  that  party  who  has  been  handicapped.  And  now  we 
return  to  an  important  point  in  the  subject,  and  reaffirm 
that  the  protective  laws  of  America  produce  a  friction 
which  causes  a  relative  increase  in  the  exchange  value 
of  protected  commodities. 

Many  illustrations  may  be  furnished  to  show  that  a 
friction,  and  a  serious  one,  is  placed  on  product'on  by 
our  meddlesome  laws,  but  a  few  of  these  will  suffice 

Wood  screws  are  protected  in  the  United  States  by  a 
duty  of  100  per  cent,  on  the  foreign  article.  The  wood- 
screw  combination  is  said  to  have  paid  the  English 
makers  of  screws  ^25,000  yearly,  to  keep  their  goods 
out  of  the  American  market.  We  ask  :  has  the  American 
bcrew  Combination  paid  this  ^•25,000  out  of  the  pockets 
orits  members  for  the  mere  fun  of  it .?  Has  it  not  been 
taken  from  the  consumers  of  wood  screws  in  the  prices 
charged  them  ?  ^ 

The  Mills  tariff  bill,  which  was  lately  brought  before 


96 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


the  American  people  by  the  then  dominant  party,  pro- 
posed to  reduce  the  loo  per  cent,  protection  to  35  per 
cent.  The  manufacturers,  of  whom  a  large  proportion 
were  supporters  of  the  party  proposing  the  reduction, 
made  such  an  outcry  that  the  movement  was  abandoned. 
They  declared,  that  with  a  protection  of  only  35  per 
cent,  the  business  would  be  ruined  !  What  was  this  but 
an  admission  from  the  manufacturers,  either  that  the 
manufacturers  are  taking  more  than  35  per  cent,  of  its 
protection  from  consumers,  or  that  screws  may  be  pro- 
cured from  other  countries  at  35  per  cent,  less  than  in 
the  United  States  ? 

The  window- glass  industries  of  the  United  States  have 
a  protection  of  70  per  cent.  Even  with  this,  th*>  manu- 
facturers of  these  goods  are  not  satisfied,  and  some  of 
them  have  proposed  moving  to  Belgium  for  the  purpose 
of  manufacturing  and  shipping  to.  this  country  in  the 
face  of  a  70  per  cent.  duty.  Does  this  not  indicate  a 
friction  somewhere,  and  a  serious  impediment  to  the 
production  or  procuring  of  these  goods  ? 

The  tack-makers  of  Canada  have  a  protection  equiva- 
lent to  60  per  cent.,  but  these  goods  are  coming  in  from 
the  United  States  at  regular  prices  plus  this  60  per 
cent.;  but  the  Canadian  tack-makers,  rather  than  lower 
their  prices  to  the  price  of  the  foreign  article  plus  the 
duty,  desire  more  protection.  This  is  an  industry  which 
was  established  and  prosperous  before  the  high-tariff  era 
in  Canada,  and  it  cannot  be  claimed  that  such  favors  are 
necessary  merely  "  to  put  them  on  their  feet." 

But  here  we  have  a  very  telHng  confession  from  a 
manufacturer  himself,  in  a  circular  addressed  to  the 
capitalists  of  the  United  States,  a  copy  of  which  will  be 
found  by  referring  to  the  Iron  Age  of  New  York,   of 


PKOTECTION  A   DEADLY  KKF.MY.  97 

August  9,  .888.     The  paper  first  gives  i,s  views  of  th, 
conduion  of  .he  nail  market  in  Nel  York  ' 

J^  t.et"'::Ue:^rutT.f'  ^^  '^ ." 

observed  that  the  proportion  „rs.:e7„ai;:t, ,:"/,::  I 

g  owmg.     Inqu.nes  are  running  toward  heavier  lots  but 

pnces  remam  unsatisfactory,  concessions  from  «!  go  o  ' 

And  then  the  following  •  '^quency. 

a  cirtlt  'frot' '  1 1' '  •"*"• ''"'  ^^""■'"'='''  "-»  ■--'ed 
a  circular,  from  which  we  quote  as  under  •  '  v^,„  „. 

rde'\:  ma  'V'^  '"''  ^"°""'  "'  ^^^  ''^'"^be" 

ehf :reirc::x;rr  ";fa  Tatr  '^-  -'- 

there  is  nothing  to  eaual  i    in  .t    f .  ^^^'^^    investment 
■'"B  10  equal  it  m  the  history  of  the  Am*»r,' 
can  iron  trade.     Cut  nails  are  worth,  wholesale  t  Ca' 
nadian  market,  $2.60  per  kei?  of  ,„„  1     ""'"ale,  in  Ca- 

upwards,  othe;!i.es  in  pr/po  t  o^,  T^f  cttll' t"' 
more  than  in  the  Boston  market  Jhi       "  '''« 

^nded  here  at  |,.a.  per'"tl'^:tar:^'™-r: 
UntVstteTdr  "^"^  "'^'^""^"«  saved^e^l:';' 
Canad1aXtrC;:rtrvi::  ^^'^  ""  ^  ^^ 

55  cents  a  keg  more  than  in  Boston  market,  wholesale  \T' 

Saved  on  scrap  iron vuuiesaie |ii  qo 

4  82 

Total 

the  amount   to  credit  of  manufacturing  here  over  «nH 

ac  urer  a  good  profit.    The  demand  for  bar  iron  is  lar^e 
arg^tr^^^^  °^  -nufacturinTirmufh 

Nova  ScoH.       M^Tf  ^'''''-     ^''^''^^'  ^oals  from 
Nova  Scotia  can  be  laid  down   at  proposed  works  for 

9 


98 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


$2.65  per  ton.  Within  six  months  we  will  have  the 
Short  Line  Railway  open,  placing  us  v/ithin  sixteen  hours 
of  Montreal,  which  will  also  open  that  market  to  this 
company,  as  finished  goods  can  be  taken  to  Montreal 
and  other  western  points  at  a  much  less  proportionate 
rate  of  freight  than  the  manufacturers  there  pay  upon 
our  coal,  which  they  must  have.  I  intend  forming  a 
company  with  capital  of  $200,000  in  2,000  shares  of  $100 
each,  organized  under  the  laws  of  New  Brunswick.  This 
company  will  pay  a  yearly  dividend  of  20  per  cent,  on 
its  paid-up  capital  at  present  prices.'  " 

The  foregoing  circular  was  from  an  old  respectable 
manufacturer,  who  was  quite  competent  to  give  correct 
{reformation.  The  price  of  cut  nails  has  been  upwards 
of  sixty  cents  per  kdg  lower  in  price  in  New  York  than 
in  the  Provinces  for  the  last  two  years,  and  continues  so 
at  the  present  day.  The  New  York  Iron  Age  of  August 
2c  1889,  says  :  "We  quote  cut  nails  $1.85  to  $1.90  for 
car-load  lots  on  dock  for  standard  brands  and  good  as- 
sortments." At  the  same  date  not  a  keg  of  cut  naiis  is 
to  be  procured  in  Canada  for  $2.60 

The  Maritime  Provinces  consume  about  100,000  kegs 
of  cut  nails  yearly,  of  which  the  farmers  shouM  take  at 
least  one  half.  If  they  consumed  100,000  kegs  during 
the  last  two  years,  they  have  paid  out  for  this  one  article 
not  less  than  $70,000  more  than  had  they  the  privilege 
of  buying  where  they  pleased. 

To  manufacture  these  nails  it  requires  the  service  of 
about  sixty  nail-makers  for  the  period  of  two  years. 
Their  families  have  consumed  in  the  time  not  more  than 
$15,000  worth  of  the  products  of  the  Maritime  farmers, 
on  which  the  farmers'  profit  would  not  be  more  than 
$3,000. 


mOTECnON  A   DEADLY  ElVEMY.  95 

Domestic  nail,  controlled  the  Canadian  market  before 
the  Canadian   protective  era,  and   the   farmers  unH„ 

"Zrof  Th"""'"^'  ~"'""°"^  """  nail-marerrfo  "cu  : 
tomer,  of  their  productions.    Consequently   the  farm 
ers  of  the  Maritime  Provinces  areno.'paying-pro  Xi 
they  are  consuming  the  quantity  of  nails'they   hou  d- 
»35,ooo  worth  yearly  above  free-trade  pricesf  to  insure 
the   production  of  an  article  which  docs  not  in  an! 
possible  way  return  them  $,,500  yearly  „e,  profi"  and 
which  was  once  produced  among  them  with  bufr, rifllr 
artificial  stimulant.  * 

Statrran'tt  "I  T  ""'  '"■""  '»  "^«  United 
States  on  all  the  nails  he  purchased,  paid  an  average  of 

th.rty.five  cents  per  keg  more  than  had  he  the  privLe 

of  purchasing  in  the  open  markets  of  the  world.    During 

the  e  firm  "r  °'  "'  '■'"""'  °'  "■'  U""""  S'-'«  COS. 
prces  r:  ™;;«"•^P-  pound  above  free-trade 
prices.  In  fact,  these  articles  were,  at  the  time  above- 
ment.,ned,  sent  from  Canada  to  New  York  for  export 

But  It  ,s  the  tariff  against  the  import  of  European 
gooas  which  causes  the  greatest  burden  to  be  put  upon 

States  and  Canada  is  made  dear  through  the  nractical 

prohibition  of  many  European  goods,  'xh     c'anX 

ariff  IS  .3  per  cent,  higher  against  the  average  impor" 

IIT:,  J   ,     Tl^  ^"""  '"'*  '^  S°  P"  «"'•  higher 
agoing  England  than  against  the  average  import  f'rom 

min'onTt  ?n ''   "''"  "^"^"""^  '™^  '"out  twenty 
pockets  m  the  enhanced  price  of  imported  manufactures 


loo 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


of  cottun,  and  about  ninety  millions  to  the  home  manu- 
facturers. Through  them  at  least  thirty-five  millions  of 
dollars  go  to  revenue  in  the  enhanced  price  of  imports  of 
iron  and  steel  goods,  and  one  hundred  millions  of  dollars 
to  the  home  manufacturers  ;  about  one  hundred  and 
fifty  millions  to  revenue  on  woollen  goods,  and  one  hun- 
dred to  th"  manufacturers ;  about  thirty  millions  to 
revenue  on  the  import  of  glass,  and  fifteen  to  the  manu- 
facturers ;  about  fix  j  millions  to  revenue  on  the  consump- 
tion of  salt,  and  two  and  one  half  millions  to  the  domestic 
producers  of  salt.  Of  these  amounts  at  least  two  thirds  are 
paid  by  the  farmers  of  the  United  States. 

In  1871,  Canada  manufactured  97  per  cent,  of  her 
agricultural  implements  und«,r  a  tariff  of  15  per  cent.  In 
the  interest  of  maniufacturers  the  duty  has  been  v?ised 
from  time  to  time,  until  it  now  averages  39  per  cent. 
The  writer  is  prepared  to  state  that  the  manufacturers,  ot 
all  small  farming  tools  at  least,  have  loaded  the  price  of 
the  domestic  goods  to  very  near  the  full  extent  of  this 
protection. 

On  an  annual  import  by  the  Maritime  Provinces  of 
about  $150,000  worth  of  burning  oil,  a  duty  of  $100,000 
is  exacted,  principally  from  the  rural  districts,  all  for 
the  benefit  of  a  few  manufacturers  in  Petrolia. 

In  fact,  the  farmer  of  both  the  United  States  and 
Canada  has  to  pay  protectionist  taxes  on  nearly  every 
thing  he  eats,  drinks,  wears,  or  uses  in  the  prosecution  of 
his  industry.  He  has  to  do  this  in  order  that  favorites  of 
this  meddlesome  system  may  secure  profits  from  their 
investments.  These  favors  average  from  25  per  cent,  to 
100  per  cent,  in  the  United  States,  and  quite  near  as 
much  in  Canada, — principally  at  the  expense  of  the 
farmer. 


PKOTECTIOfl  A  DEADLY  ENEMY.  ,o, 

nnW^"^'*"?  V  "«*"■  "■»'  P""""""  in>pli«  higher 
price,  for  good.,  bu.  i.  doc,  no.  imply  an  inc  ea.e  in  IhJ 

ZL  r«,TK  ■"»»"f''c<urer     The  .ociali.t  .hould 

.  ue  »;  'o„d?"""'°  ™"'"  '"  "'  ™"''''"'<'  ■■  °«.  'he 
.he  value  of  e„  h"  ""  °V"  ^""'"'"P"""  =  "nd  'he  o.her. 
.he  fo™  °  •*'  '"  "'-'"'"«■'  "'  '-^  P'oducion,  and  .ha. 
.he  former  .,  quae  a.  important  in  estimating  the  power 
of  income  as  the  latter.  power 

Nearly  one  half  of  the  families  of  the  continent  of 
America  say  twenty  millions  of  families,  are  depending 
on  industnes  almost  directly  upon  land  for  the  r  sh  re 

weaUh      Po'li  i'^'',  ""^  """"^  """"■     ^"'I  "->»'  i»  'hi 
wealth  ?   Political  economy  says  :  "  Riches,  or  wealth  is 

d"„  >!■  T"-'"'  P°""  "f  «^«'"8  ""'  one  w  hi: 
done  by  <«her  men,  either  by  remunerating  them  ,:i  ec" 

ly,  as  m  the  case  of  servants,  or  by  purchasin.,  .h.;, 
product,,  to  which  labor  must  be  applU""  A  'd  !gai  " 
Z^^rT'  \'  "'""'"  "^  ^^"^  ">'"«  -hich  answers  "o 

"evelonm^!"",  """"V  '""=  "'"P'''^  ""^  harmonious 
development  of  every  human  faculty  being  the  object  in 

view,  all  wants,  the  satisfaction  of  which  tends  to  th" 
end,  may  be  considered  rational  " 

bri'nVlh*  ?'  '!,°""''"  '"°"°""'  '"''"^f'   endeavors   to 

tend!  ±1 ,'  ""  '"  P""""^'^'  "■"  "»<"'-"   "i^'ch 

e"u™   for    h  "'."k  '"  ""  "'^"  ""=  P°*"  "f  "-"h  '" 
return   for  their  labor,  time,  and  efforts.     It  consider, 

.ha.    barring  accidents,  the  full  play  of  natural  law 
wou^d  go  very  far  .oward  giving  toeveryindustrio  s  and 
pennanent  citizen  the  opportunity  i„  ,ome  shape  for 

w/nts      No  7   "'  '"  ''"  ■""'^''"^  "™''er  of 

"ants.     Not  merely  power  to  satisfy  the  bare  necessities 


71 


« *' 


lii 


I03 


AMBHICAN   FARMS. 


i  #i» 


of  an  undeveloped  existence,  but  for  something  far  be- 
yond this — something  which  makes  man  a  victor  over 
nature ;  opportuniticH  for  independent  action  ;  the 
chances  for  education,  for  travel,  for  comforts,  for 
luxuries,  for  the  adornr-ient  of  homes  ;  the  power  for 
voluntary  action  in  charities,  religion,  or  for  social 
development.  It  is  in  the  growth  of  this  margin  that 
man  becomes  an  individuality,  an  independent  manhood. 

While  natural  laws  do  so  much  to  place  these  chances 
within  the  reach  of  most  men,  it  is  a  duty  resting  upon 
all,  by  every  legitimate  means,  to  gain,  in  some  shape, 
the  power  these   represent. 

It  is  undoubtedly  required  of  men  that  they  occupy 
as  large  a  place  in  the  affairs  of  life  as  possible.  The 
higher  their  aims,  it  is  the  more  important  that  they  con- 
trol the  iiifluences  which  material  acquisitions  assist  in 
securing.  And  is  it  not  a  beautiful,  a  grand  arrange- 
ment t'n  the  laws  of  Providence,  that  the  prosperity,  the 
dev  ^lopment  of  one  manhood  need  not  interfere  with 
others,  but  rather  that  the  advance  of  one  may  help  to 
carry  others  forward  ? 

Emerson  finely  says  :  "  Kings  have  long  arms,  but 
every  man  should  have  long  arms,  and  should  pluck  his 
living,  his  instruments,  his  power,  and  his  knowing  from 
the  sun,  moon,  and  stars.  Is  not  then  t\u  demand  to  be 
rich  legitimate  ?  Yet  I  have  never  seen  a  man  as  rich  as 
all  men  ought  to  be,  or  with  an  adequate  command  of 
nature.  The  pulpit  and  ihe  press  have  many  common- 
places denouncir  \  .  .f  t'/trst  for  wealth,  but  if  men 
should  take  these  moralists  at  their  word,  and  leave  off 
aiming  to  be  rich,  the  moralists  would  rush  to  rekindle 
at  all  hazards  this  love  of  power,  lest  civilization  should 
be  undone." 


PffOrHCrWN  A    DEADLY  K^^BK'y,  ,o^ 

rcquTc  conditions  .hich  wi„  do  ^T^,  ^  t^: 

belter  that  fhe  aggregate  „f  wealth  be  less  if  in T  ' 

.".um  there  r^ns.  be  great  .nequality  Th;  w  ol  wr" 
o  man  supports  the  foregoin^con.en.iln  rh™« 
progress  ha,  been  where  errcr.  has  been  crowned  wfth 
ibundani  returns      ;'-rni,oh  ,i,„  <-rowned  with 

H.n  r.  ,.      ,        '-"'"gh  thejc  successes  in  orodur 

Wdurrdevelop:er "'''''°"'  """'  ""  "■""«'"'  f-  '""'• 

^Jntrt;:=o:,r.;:itM:=::;rr 

gression  mus  of  „:•(":,„•::"  '— f'-     Retro- 

--It,  Of  effor,  ur,m  :^iS  ■:  educrd";;f"'r'"'^ 

r-in,  and  annihilation  '"  "»'''»"sm, 

deavoring  by  even-  rem-,™,  ,  ?  "'''  "="• 

result   hv  Z.  '""''"t  to  secure  the  mximum  of 

shortening  and   .mprov.ng  of  routes  of  trrvei  and  ol 


104 


A  Af ERIC  AN  FARMS. 


transportation,  by  the  removal  of  difficulties  to  naviga- 
tion;  and  by  securing  every  market,  in  all  lands,  for  the 
cheapest  and  most  desirable  articles  as  agents  in  repro- 
duction, or  for  unproductiv?  consumption  ? 

It  is  also  true  of  our  legislators  as  it  was  with  the 
legislators  of  Bastiat's  time,  that  though  obstructionists 
in  public  policy  when  looking  to  their  own  interests,  they 
show  that  they  recognize  the  advantages  of  their  procur- 
ing for  themselves  the  largest  returns  by  their  endeavors 
to  escape  the  friction  between  effort  and  reward  they 
place  against  others.  Is  it  not  a  common  occurrence  for 
legislators  to  favor  friends  and  corporations  by  the 
removal  of  obstructions  to  the  effectual  disposal  of  the 
results  of  labor  and  to  the  receiving  of  the  results  of  the 
labors  of  others  ?  What  is  all  this  for  but  to  increase  the 
margin  of  gain  between  effort  and  result  ?  In  Canada  a 
great  transcontinental  railway  has  lately  been  built  with 
free  foreign  material,  and  is  now  disbursed  and  repaired 
with  stock  disencumbered  from  the  taxation  burdens 
which  most  of  other  productive  enterprises  have  to  bear. 
What  has  this  been  for  but  to  secure  to  the  stockholders 
the  beneilts  of  a  great  result  i.i  return  for  their  efforts  ? 

We  are  told  that  the  success  of  such  enterprises  is  a 
boon  to  the  whole  people.  But  is  it  not  so  with  most 
enterprises  ?  Should  not  the  success  of  agriculture  be  a 
boon  to  the  country  ?  Can  a  nation  afford  that  the 
farmers  above  all  others  shall  not  have  effort  crowned 
with  rich  result  ?  Or  is  it  wisdom  to  see,  without  regret, 
the  agricultural  population  obliged  to  absorb  the  stored- 
up  capital  oi  the  past  in  order  to  cartel  the  deficit 
between  the  effort  and  result  of  the  present  ? 

What  sort  of  a  national  policy  is  it  thpt  takes  no  heed 
to  these,  when  it  is  so  jealous  of  the  interests  of  others  ? 


"cure  .0  agriculture  a  nev^r  tjl^ '"°°"' r'^^  ""' 
effort  and  result?  There  L/^  •r"^""'""'''^" 
sentiment  that  o.,r  far  Jrs  a  d  heirlr  'a7e  o^t'T  " 
■ng  a  commendable  and  in  fact  ZJ  ^  '''°*- 

making  no  complaintslainr.  ,'h"  r'^  P''"°"™  '" 
parent  impediments  v  hich  vLt  K  !  "°"*"°"^  "■•  "'e  ap- 
liberal  returns  -that  it  t  .      '''"  ""^'^  eifortsand 

certain  classTs'to  ll  ^ '^' P''°P"  P^'"°'i™  for 

Sive  o„,y  thT  a  3 fTct  on"oV:rtf ''  °'  "'"^"^  "-■<=" 
others  are  increa^i-J  ""-d'Harv  wants,  so  long  as 

they  wish  well  to  ih'.       ""P°"^"-»  "nd  power  ;  and  i 

the  HghtfurJ  port  n    errTh?:^  T'  "°:  '""''  ' 
progress  is  vitiheld  from  them  soi^        'I  "^^  ^°"^'' 

^n\^:r;it"r''-""- 

one  count;  ^'ir;'  ■' ^  '"""le  which  is  not  confined  to 
mthou.  a  goodv  „umh  '°"""y'  ho-ever,  is  badly  off 
do  not  requTre  '  "  rro'ill  "'"""'"  "''''"''  ""'we 
We  Should"  not  df^rsa  XesXt  tf" "  ''"■^• 

r-o^-i.  1  •  national  purse-sfrino-c 

Capital  ,s  permitted  to  gain  whatever  i/^ 
«  agents  ■;,  production  rel  .^Tf  """''  "'^''"'re 

ments  in  order  that  teeff  "^  ''""''=''"  '"P^di- 

Wehav.  an  iUult  ^  tSnTd^ ""^ /''^  """■"■-• 
'■•x  and  a  half  million  dollars' wonh  of  h^  ™''°"  °'  *^ 
sheep's  wool  freed  from  dTtv  r.n  ,  ,  ''.'°"°''^' ''"<' 
that  it  may  produce  ^th  1  "^        "  '^us  favored, 

-rifice  Of  ^^HotiailluTrirhefarm:"' " '^^ 
Whom  these  imports  comoete     r.J  ^''  ^^^'"^^ 

was  sacrificed  b'v  its  government    n"f"  v ''"^^  ^^^^^ 
^^  ,        government  m  furnishing  the  High 


io6 


AM  URIC  A  A    FARMS. 


Commissioner's  a  costly  establishment  in  London,  with 
English  fabrics  instead  of  Canadian.  What  r  splendid 
chance  \,  as  thus  'ost  for  an  exhibition  of  patriotic  feeling 
and  for  the  advertisement  of  the  country's  superior 
productions  ! 

VV  len  the  Postmaster-General  requires  a  quantity  of 
woo!  serge  for  postmen's  uniforms,  as  was  lately  the  case 
in  Canada,  the  order  goes  to  a  foreign  country,  although 
the  farmers  are  all,  more  or  less,  depending  on  the  suc- 
cessful production  of  the  raw  material  from  which  such 
goods  art  fabricated,  and  the  cloth  manufacturers  are 
grumbling  on  account  of  lack  of  orders. 

Protection — more  correctly  "  aggression  " — is  the  dead- 
ly enemy  of  our  farmers  ;  for,  while  the  general  tenden- 
cies are  for  monopoly  to  absorb  the  rural  population,  a 
protective  policy,  such  as  we  now  have,  rl'jrives  its  power 
to  assist  monopoly,  not  from  the  planets,  not  from  the 
mountains  of  the  moon,  but  from  the  pockets  of  the 
farmers. 

Protection  narrows  down,  to  the  farmer,  the  margin  of 
profit  between  effort  and  result.  Thus  his  opportunities 
for  progress  are  not  only  limited,  but  are  actually  being 
reduced  to  nothing.  The  results  are,  that  the  class  who, 
in  the  early  days  of  America's  historj',  laid  the  founda- 
tion for  its  present  greatness,  are  in  the  future  to  be 
deprived  of  the  necessary  opportunities  for  economic 
power,  for  political  influence,  for  the  gain  of  knowledge, 
for  culture,  for  the  exercise  of  the  high*^r  faculties 
through  which  progress  is  possible.  There  can  be  uo 
escape  from  this  conclusion,  for  reports  and  proofs  come 
to  us  from  all  parties  and  i.rom  all  quarters,  that  the 
farmers  of  America  are  becoming  hopelessly  involved 
in  financial  ruin, 


the  men  who  are  securL        "t  '"  ™"=^<I"ences,  but 

Who  hold  ehe  balanc!  !f  '"'=''  ^'  "'^  '">""•' 

the  men  who  are  seeded  a'T^h'  '!!  ""  ''«'^'""°"'  ""' 
efforts  at  the  expense  of  2  ''"'  ""'"^  '°'  "'-'■ 
Who  are  able  to'^  e  to  thetf:  "r'  f  '"'  '"'""' 
luxuries  of   «...       \  ^'""'''"  ">«  shelter  and 

advantage  of  tavTand  7"'  ""'  '°  ''^''  •^'"""™  "•« 

those  wh^o  arerbsidtd";;;rer:r '::r "  "-- 

0   those  situated  as  the  farmL^"";;:  s   'i    MgLT^r 

thote'thoTretrSdr  '"  -"^^  ™^"^  -'^"'"" 

j-d   hrigandanri;  .te^ToeTetsT'rh''^  '^«^'- 
farmers?     Who  fmv.i  .  ^   ^  o^kets   of  such    as   our 

-.  our  pa  J::sro  rfin^rrrLrT 
ormU:r'e'^rr  "-,'^^°  ^"s^:tfo:et-b; 

-^ds  on  th;  farmt^trvtr: :  ""  -~ 
the  rich  return,  of  ^l  f     '''™^"'  >   '°  oounteract 

- .  to  reir  thiir'tr^ur .  tei*  thf r " 

satisfaction  „?:  ""  "  '^T  "  '"^'™^  ""  '"^ 
"■idstof  his  abunda  ce  it  is  or'Zr  "'l"  '"  '"^ 
flowing  granaries,  withoi,  pi  r  to  .ail  f"'  u'  °"" 
step  forward  in  command  Jfl  ^         °'  ^""  ""'^ 


io8 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


\  #1* 


a  force  in  the  direction  of  barbarism,  whereas  frtedom 
from  its  thraldom  of  attendant  evils  would  allow  high 
measures  of  progress  and  development. 

Protection  causes  our  lich  valley  farms  to  be  little 
more  powerful  in  yielding  independence  to  tne  ov/ners, 
than  barren  hill-tops  would  yield  with  freedom.  It  makes 
our  mountain  farms  powerless  to  give  to  their  owners 
command  of  the  mediums  for  progress  of  scarcely  any 
kind  ;  it  is  to  shackle  the  farmers,  from  decade  to  decade, 
to  nothing  but  rounds  of  drudgery,  in  order  that  they 
may  be  permitted  merely  to  exist. 

To  meet  our  argument,  some  of  the  supporters  of  pro- 
tective legislation  contend  that  mankind  progresses  in 
civilization  much  faster  where  they  have  a  great  deal  to 
contend  against.  They  will  say  that,  where  natural  con- 
ditions are  too  favorable,  there  the  people  will  be 
indolent,  shiftless,  and  improvident ;  that  obstructions 
remedy  all  this  ;  yet  we  find  that,  where  the  obstructions 
have  been  \  eat,  there  mankind  remains  the  same,  making 
no  percepti  !e  progress  through  ages. 

The  scho  1  which  finds  obstructions  so  beneficirl  for 
the  development  of  the  mass  is  not  the  least  disturbed 
at  the  prospect  of  easy  and  abundant  incomes  for  its 
own  members.  They  have  no  fear  for  thi  consequences 
to  their  families  on  account  of  the  thousands  guaranteed 
to  them  by  government,  for  which  they  give  nothing  in 
return. 

Protection  has  been  very  properly  designated  Sisy- 
phism,  from  the  fact  that  its  effects  are  similar  to  those 
endured  by  the  robber  Sisyphus  of  fabulous  history,  who 
was  punished  by  being  required  to  roll  a  huge  stone  to 
the  top  of  a  hill,  which  stone  constantly  returned,  con- 
signing him  to  perpetual  '^^  or. 


fxorEcnojv  a  dead,,  y  enemy.         ,09 
fanner  of  three  do' ir  lug    ^itiot^''^''^  '"^ 


•  i 


CHAPTER  V. 


TRUSTS,    COMBINES,    ETC. 


A  RELIABLE  Statistical  expert  recently  published  the 
statement  thai,  in  the  United  States  alone,  the  capacity 
for  manufacturing  the  principal  articles  of  production  is 
equal  to  the  requirements  of  two  hundred  and  sixty 
millions  of  people  instead  of  sixty  millions.  As  the 
country  has  little  foreign  market  for  her  manufactures, 
the  results  are:  idlb  blast  furnaces,  closed-down  mills, 
restricted  production,  extensive  strikes,  frequently 
throwing  vast  numbers  out  ot  employment;  thus  causing 
losses  and  expenses,  which  are  thrown  upon  the  people 
in  various  ways. 

That  manufacturers,  as  well  as  undertakers  of  some 
other  great  enterprises,  may  be  safe  from  pressure  upon 
the  profits  of  their  investment  because  of  their  idle 
works,  and  from  competition,  or  that  the  returns  may  be 
commensurate  with  their  idea  of  what  the  public  should 
pay  for  their  services,  various  systems  are  brought  into 
play,  familiarly  known  by  the  names  of  trusts,  combines, 
and  associations. 

At  the  present  time,  huge  trusts — in  other  words, 
enormous  combinations  of  monopolies — are  the  prevail- 
ing methods  of  controlling  production  and  profits.  A  de- 
scription of  the  mode  of  forming  these  is  interesting. 

It  is  resolved  by  the  great  leading  firms  in  a  specified 
industry  to  put  themselves  in  a  position  to  secure  its 

no 


muSTS,    COMBINES,    ETC.  ,,, 

success,  claiming,  of  course,  all  for  the  public  benefit 

p^rrnr  iU;^^r  ^r  "^^  ---  ^^  ^ '^  -^^ 

decUion  .„    I        '"''"f'.'^''-    These  give  notice  of  their 

ness.  The  terms  and  stipulations  are  often  of  verv 
objeconable  character,  to  the  smaller  concerns  verT 
unfair  and  oppressive,    But  rather  th.n  suffer  the  annov 

heT  °  M  "aldT"  ™""^f "™  'y  --  Powerf^l^ri  a,  ; 
they  yield  and  become  subject  to  it.     Those  who  r»fuse 

wit^sr  tt  "fro' ""'""  f  ^  '"'"'"'^'^  -'  »f  "i:.:-„ce 

~eatrs,/r"  °'""""  """"'•  "''  "P-'""- 

de^r"o,  :,1  Itbf  '"?''  °'  '"^'^  combinations  is  to 

OnTv  on!  ^  """"^"  ^^  ""^  ^"'^  "f  ^o'  """erial. 

Only  one  appears  as   purchaser,   whereas,  before   the 
umon,  many  were  appearing.     The  result    s  disastrou 

wrers'of"  h°es""'"'   "'"'"^'.  ""  "'^'^-'''  —  " 
comtLrion     "  ""   "^'"""^  "^  ^'^°  '"  ^  -">■'- 
The  Butchers'  National  Convention  in   Philadel,>hia 
"The  m     ;"°r"'  "^  ^"'""  "-f  P-'  «  C-Wcio 
United  States.     ...     We  think  also  that  the  worst 

erted  TaZ  '"  T  '°'"'"'  ''  '"^  "-''  P-"'  ^^  "d    ■ 

due     hi:  l"""^-     "^"^  '""''  °'  ^"""^  '»  ">^  pro- 
ducer having  gone  down  50  per  cent.,  and  the  price  to 

h     mZZ'  r"'  '""''''"•  ''"y  -6'^  dollar  0° 
the^difference  has  gone  into  the  pocket  of  the  com- 

An  instance  of  the  power  of  trusts  to  control  the  price 
of  raw  products  occurred  at  the  port  of  New  York  in  Feb 
ruary  of  that  vear  ^T«8s\      a  r     "'^'^  ''"^'^ '" -reD- 

mJuu  y^^'y^^^)-     A  cargo  of  ,,200  tons  of  raw 

Manilla  sugar  arrived,  and  was  offered  at  auction-thi 


^m 


112 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


)    r 


usual  way  of  disposal.  There  was  just  one  bid  for  it,  and 
this  bid  secured  it  at  4J  cents  per  pound.  About  four  weeks 
previous  to  this  sale,  or  beiore  ihe  sugar  trust  had  begun 
to  show  its  power,  a  similar  cargo,  almost  a  duplicate, 
was  sold  under  competition  at  4J  cents  per  pound.  This 
was  a  matter  of  about  $15,000,  or  thereabout,  on  a  single 
cargo,  for  the  benefit  of  the  trust.  Meanwhile  the  re- 
fined article,  which  had  been  selling  for  6  cents  per 
pound,  was  advanced  to  7J  cents  or  to  8J  cents.  From 
these  data  we  gather  that  the  trust  realized  ,a  this  single 
transaction  over  $100,000,  through  restricting  compe- 
tition, on  purchase  of  raw  material,  and  the  sale  of  the 
refined  article. 

The  power  of  the  trust,  or  in  fact  any  monopoly  or 
capital  power  over  smaller  competitors,  was  well  exem- 
plified in  the  expose  before  the  House  Committee  at 
Washington  last  winter,  as  to  the  character  of  the  tians- 
actions  of  the  Standard  Oil  Company  as  a  competitor. 
It  was  found  that  the  Pennsylvania  Railroad  gave  the 
Standard  and  affiliated  companies  a  rebate  on  crude 
oil  of  49  cents  per  barrel  in  transportation  charges 
from  one  field,  and  51  cents  from  another.  The  rail- 
road also  gave  the  Standard  22J  cents  per  barrel  on  all 
oils  shipped  by  all  people  not  affiliated  with  the  Stand- 
ard. The  rates  of  freight  were  $1.45  to  the  public  and 
80  cents  to  the  Standard.  State  Senator  Lewis  Emery, 
of  Bedford,  testified  to  the  effect  that  the  independent 
refineries  had  been  driven  from  the  field  by  reason  of 
the  rebates  allowed  the  Standard.  Representative 
Breckenridg'^'  thought  that  the  amount  of  rebates  given 
to  the  Standard  amounted  in  the  aggregate  to  over 
$100,000,000.  Had  the  railways  treated  all  shippers 
alike,  those  shippers   would   now   have  a  larger  income 


TJl(/STS.    COMBINES,   ETC,  „, 

our  ..„„f.e,uH„«  cnd^.S       eX'^'Z' 
ong  smce  a  certain  line  of  manufacture  was^o,  pavtr 
the  concerns  m.erested  profits  which  satisfied"  hem      f 
combme  was  pr-posed.     The  "  bis  fish  "  of  ,7       ? 
refused  to  consent  tn  «n  ,  ^  ""  '"<l"stry 

Trusts  and  combines  place  the  consumer  at  the  mercv 

made  th.  I  '  "  P°°'  •"  manufacturers,  had 

underseU  stipu.alf  ^  •„  XTh^  1::^^^ 

to  aayance  prices  at  any  time  ^^' 

Very  similar  to  the  action  of  the  Oil-Cloth  Association 

-..hasput-nllX^rrrtlHuXt 


114 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


who  purchasing  from  it  must  sell  no  lower  than  a  certain 
stipulated  price.  The  result  has  been  that  it  has  not 
only  pocketed  at  least  twenty-five  per  cent,  above  free- 
trade  prices,  but  has,  at  the  same  time,  compelled  its 
customers  to  exact  combination  pric  s  from  all  con- 
sumers. These  are  only  a  few  illustrations  of  a  wide- 
spread evil.' 

The  Montreal  Star  (Protectionist),  speaking  of  com- 
bines in  Canada,  says  :  **  They  are  nothing  less  than  a 
scandalou.:  abuse  of  the  privilege  of  protection  from 
foreign  competition  granted  to  Canadian  manufacturers." 

Adam  Smith  was  not  far  from  correct  when  he  said  : 
"  The  price  of  monojjoly  is  upon  every  occasion  the 
highest  which  can  be  got ;  .  .  .  the  highest  which  can  be 
squeezed  out  of  the  buyers." 

At  a  recent  session  of  the  legislature  at  Albany,  New 
York,  the  Committee  on  Trusts  gave  a  very  good  descrip- 
tion of  the  character  of  the  average  combine.  "  How- 
ever different  the  influences  which  give  rise  to  these 
combinations  may  be,  the  main  purpose,  management, 
and  effect  of  all  upon  the  public  is  the  same,  to  wit :  the 
aggregation  of  capital,  the  power  of  controlling  the  manu- 
facture and  output  of  various  necessary  combinations, 
the  acquisition  or  destruction  of  competitive  properties — 
all  leading  to  the  final  and  conclusive  purpose  of  annihi- 
lating competition,  and  enabling  the  combinations  to  fix 
the  price  at  which  they  would  purchase  the  raw  material 
from  the  producer,  and  at  which  they  would  sell  the 


'  "  All  the  Western  pottery  manufacturers,  with  a  single  exception, 
have  entered  into  an  agreement  to  maintain  prices  under  bonds  of 
$1,200  each.  .  .  .  The  greater  portion  of  the  pottery  industries  in 
the  United  States  are  represented  in  the  combination." — Iron  Age, 
itet:     '/ct.  10,  1889. 


TJiO'srs,  cPMfi/Ans,  dsrc.  ,,j 

refined  product  to  the  consumer.  In  any  event  the 
pubhc  at  each  end  of  the  industry- -the  p'rod::  r  and 
consu,ner~.s  and  .s  intended  to  he.  in  a  certain  sense, 
at  the  mercy  of  the  syndicate,  combination,  or  trust  •" 


BOOK  IV. 

IMPOTENCE  OF  THE  REMEDIES  PROPOSED  AND  THE 
ERRONEOUS  REASONS  ASfKIUKD  Kok  TUF  DIFFi' 
CULTIES  NOW  OVERTAKING  THE  FARMERS  OF 
AMERICA. 

What  man  is  free  to  practise  or  not.  is  that  association  with  his 
fellow  men  wh.ch.  within  certain  lin.its.  increases  his  powers  and 
enables  h.m  to  perform  prmligies.  lUu  carry  this  association  to  ex- 
tremes  let  no  limit  l.e  assigned  t..  its  action,  let  it  he  developed  a..d 
ophed  wahout  measure  and  without  consideration,  and  whL  doe. 
u  end— in  law  or  in  communism  ?— Courtois. 


%"^''*l=';^- 


CHAPTER  I. 

DOES   PROTECTION   PROTECT  THE   FARMER? 

The  admitted  decline  of  agriculture,  especially  in  the 
mo3t  piotected  countries,  gives  pretty  conclusive  evi. 
dence  that  nothing  has  been  done  for  it  by  forcing  the 
growth  of  other  industries  at  its  expense.  Notwithstand- 
mg  this,  It  has  been,  and  still  continues  to  be,  the  pros- 
pect of  indirect  benefit  to  farmers  sooner  or  later,  which 
has  tempted,  and  still  continues  to  tempt,  many  commu- 
nities to  submit  to  Jaws  which  promise  this  result 

While  natural  laws  of  competition  govern  the  produc- 
tion and  exchange  value  of  farm  produce,  the  tendency 
IS  to  make  the  consumer  of  farm  produce,  in  almost 
any  locality,  independent  of  the  local  producer  of  such 
products.     The  tendency  of  the  present  day-there  has 
always  been  a  tendency-is  in  the  direction  of  giving  the 
consumer  the  benefit  of  this  advantage  much  faster  than 
the  producer  could  gain  by  the  growth  of  forced  indus- 
tries     The  assumption  is  borne  out  by  a'l  facts  bearing 
on  the  history  of  the  subject.     The  conclusion  follows! 
that  protection,  to  be  consistent,  cannot  be  a  temporary 
national  policy.     It  must  either  grant  equal  privileges  all 
round,  which  would  be  absurd,  since  it  .would  be  the 
people  granting  privileges  to  themselves  out  of  their  own 
pockets,  or,  after  it  has  built  up  certain  industries  to  the 
rum  of  agriculture,  it  must  then  turn  round  and  build 

119 


,f 


P  '\ 


^4 


u 


120 


AM  ERICA  ^r  FARMS. 


up  agriculture  at  the  expense  of  other  industries.  It 
must  either  do  this,  or  it  must  be  decided  that  a  country 
may  b'i  as  well  off  without  prosperous  husbandmen  as 
with  them — a  position  which  it  will  i>ardly  do  to 
assume. 

Furthermore,  protection,  to  be  fair,  and  especially  to 
the  farmers,  should  be  extremely  local  in  its  operations. 
Each  protective  unit  should  be  very  small.  This  was  the 
idea  of  General  Hancock,  though  it  is  evidently  true  he 
lost  popularity  by  its  propagation.  A  protective  line 
drawn  around  North  America  might  serve  the  protective 
requirements  of  the  carpet,  rubber,  paper,  glass,  sugar, 
and  a  iiost  of  other  manufacturing  industries.  But  what 
would  it  do  to  protect  the  fruit,  the  cattle,  the  sheep,  the 
horses,  and  mai  y  o^her  productions  of  the  farm  ?  The 
half-dozen  concerns  that  may  govern  a  line  of  manufac- 
ture may  easily  form  combinations  to  govern  the  prices 
of  their  commodities,  but  not  so  the  farmer. 

To  serve  the  protective  purpose  of  the  fruit  raisers  of 
New  York,  they  must  be  protected  from  the  fruit  indus- 
tries of  Michigan  ;  the  cattle  raisers  of  New  England 
tnd  the  Maritime  Provinces  from  Texas,  Illinois,  and 
the  Nor^hv  est  ;  the  grain  grower  of  the  East  from  the 
grain  grower  of  the  West ;  the  potato  producers  of  New 
England  from  their  rivals  in  the  Maritime  Provinces  ; 
the  grain,  butter,  and  cheese  productions  of  the  Maritime 
Provinces  from  those  of  Ontario,  Manitoba,  and  the 
Western  States  ;  and  so  on. 

Protection  for  the  purpose  of  building  up  '■aried  indus- 
tries, that  the  farmer  might  be  eventually  benefited,  has 
so  far  been  a  conspicuous  failure  in  America.  The 
sacrifices  which  this  class  has  been  called  upon  to  make 
have  never  been  made  good,  nor  can  they  ever  be. 


DOES  PROTECTION  PROTECT   THE  PARMER?     ,2, 

./r/f^'  '^'  ^^"^'^^'^"^  that  are  made  by  protectionists 

account  of'w'"."'  '''"^'.  ''  ^'^  ^^^^^^"  ^--^"«  on 
account  of  Western  competition,  are  a  tacit  acknowledg- 
ment of  the  opinion  that  the  manufacturers  of  th-^  East 
have  not  come  to  the  aid  of  Eastern  farmers,  a;  yet 
hough  the  manufacturers  have  been  receiving  aid  from 
the  farmers  for  a  century. 
6 


11 


CHAPTER  II. 


THE   HOME   MARKETS   FURTHER   CONSIDERED. 


It  is  claimed  for  protective  legislation,  that  by  stimu- 
lating the  growth  of  home  industries,  and  the  creation  of 
home  markets  for  the  products  of  the  soil,  a  stop  is  put 
to  the  export  of  the  extractive  industries '  of  the  coun- 
try. That  a  tremendous  waste  is  continually  going  on  in 
the  consumption  of  farm  products,  th'-ough  their  practical 
annihilation,  at  least  for  the  time,  as  agents  of  reproduc- 
tion, is  very  apparent.  The  waste  is  taking  place  at 
home,  in  every  city  of  America.  From  all  over  the 
Union  food  products  find  their  way  to  the  New  York 
market,  are  Cv.nsumed,  and  the  principal  part  of  their 
fertilizing  properties,  in  the  change,  flows  to  the  ocean. 
Probably  hundreds  of  tons  of  beef  are  transported  from 
the  country  to  that  city  each  week,  and  but  a  trifling  part 
finds  its  way  back  again  to  the  country.' 

The  products  of  the  extractive  industries  are  continu- 
ally being  shipped  between  nations,  and  protective  legis- 
lation is  powerless  to  prevent  it.  Since  Great  Britain 
adopted  a  free-trade  policy,  other  countries  have  cease- 
lessly pouiedinto  the  ports  of  that  country  the  products 

'  Agriculture  is  not  properly  an  extractive  industry. 

*  The  city  of  Brooklyn  alone  expends  ninety  thousand  dollars  annu- 
ally in  carrying  off  to  the  ocean  the  kitchen  garbage,  to  say  nothing  of 
what  goes  in  the  sewers. 


122 


THE  HOME  MARKR TS  FUKTHEK  COS'SIDEKED.    123 

of  their  extractive  industries.  The  United  States,  with  a 
pohcy.  one  of  the  objects  of  which  has  been  to  create 
home  markets  for  the  products  of  the  farm,  sent  to  oh 

•»75  >88o,  of  the  products  of  the  farm  |3,,,4,,8c  000 

of  ,hi'f  ^'°Kr  "'  "'"""  ''  P"  ""'•  °'  'he  total  exports 
of  the  Repubhc  Under  protective  legislation  there  has 
been  no  d.m.nution  of  the  volume  of  thf  substance  of  thi 
outflow,  but,  on  the  contrary,  a  vast  increase.  In  ,860 
he  proportion  of  United  States  exports  o<her  than  minu 
actured  goods  was  83  per  cent,  of  her  total  expo"  ,^' 
'87o,87percent.,in,8Soitroseto8S percent  oratota^ 
vo  u„   of  $685,,6,,ooo  ;  ,3  per  cent,  of  the  to tllA     ' 

180  iTirT""  P"'""^'  °'  '■"  "-^  '™  y^"^  between 
.850  and  ,«6o,  the  growth  of  home  manufacturing  indus- 
tries reached  88  per  cent.,  while  in  the  extremefy  hth- 

v'as  only  139  per  cent.  The  export  of  manufactured 
goods  mcreased  in  the  low-.ariff  period  just  mentioned 
to  he  extent  of  lyr  per  cent.,  while  in  the  twenty  years 
which  followed,  the  increase  was  only  90  per  cent 
Farther  than  this,  we  are  not  aware  t'hat  the  yearly 
export  of  manufactured  goods  from  the  United  States 
has  ever  nsen  above  $.30,000,000.     The=e  facts   have 

that  withal!  t-'A'  V  '"""'  '°'  *''y  «"  '"  P"- 
hat,  with  all  tnat  has  been  done  to  build  up  the  nation 

through  the  manufacturing  industries,  these  industries 

have  done  nothing  to  bring  wealth  from  abroad.     The 

whole  burden  put  upon  consumers  through  inflated  prices 

o    manu  actures,  has  been  borne  by  one  class  'or  the 

hL  had  ,  "■     ^"^  "^  """'  ''"°*  ">at  the  farmer 

Has  had  to  carry  a  good  part  of  the  load  at  every  turn. 


124 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


The  condition  of  the  agricultural  lands  of  New  Eng- 
land, notwithstanding  the  great  development  of  its  cities, 
is  very  good  proof  that  there  is  something  wrong  in  the 
home-market  theory. 

The  true  home-market  theory  for  the  farmer  is  in  the 
independence,  through  natural  laws,  of  each  little  rural 
home.  Bv  allowing  these  to  be  the  base  of  economic 
action,  a  home  market  is  always  secured.  Manufactures 
will  spring  up  as  they  are  required.  The  productions  of 
the  farm  will  be  the  raw  material  of  the  home  manu- 
facturer. Then  our  manufactures  will  be  of  natural 
development,  and  these  will  exchange  in  foreign  countries 
for  such  goods  as  are  the  natural  productions  of  those 
countries. 

This  is  the  true  division  of  labor,  with  a  natural,  a  solid 
base.  How  senseless  it  is>  to  force  foreign  raw  material 
into  our  markets  in  order  to  give  employment  to  our 
artisans,  when,  without  compulsion,  artisans  might  be 
fabricating  our  own  raw  materials  for  foreign  countries. 
By  following  the  former  course,  our  position  is  always 
false ;  by  the  latter  it  would  be  sound  and  enduring, 
causing  all  classes  to  be  ever  more  and  more  self- 
sustaining. 


CHAPTER  III. 

TRUSTS  FOR  THE  FARMERS. 

fhlTf  "  '''''"  *  P^^alent  feeling  among  fa-mer. 

can  h.  H        T ,     ^^  ^'  '"="  ^''>°y  ''h^'^ver  benefits 
can  be  denved  from  them  ;    that  many  lines  of  the 
fanner's  productions  might  well  com^  ,„;„        u- 
to  the  farmer's  advantagf,  sZ^I^Z^^^^^^nTZ 
marketmg  of  butter,  and  the  like.    Their  opin  on  s  this 

prices  made  steady,  and  a  profit  from  their  industry  al 
ways  made  secure,  resulting  in  an  advantage  to  the  bLet 
as  well  as  to  the  seller.     This,  however   has  hlnT 

circle  of  the  combme.     It  is  desirable  for  all  farmers  to 
g.ve    he  character  of  the  trus't  or  .ombine  a  'rrchin^ 
exam.nat.on,  that  they  may  know  whether  they  may  "» 
far  countenance  the  principle  of  the  combine  Is  to  d" 
P«d  upon  such  means  for  benefting  themselves.     The 
indirect  consequences,  as  well  as  the  remote  results 
should  be  well  weighed.    However  just  and  hono  able 
may  be  the  motives  which  prompt  men  to  enter Tto  "' 
association,  the  object  of  which  is  to   make  s  je  thei^ 
po  ition  m  transactions  with  their  fellow-men  who  may 
not  be  placed  m  equally  secure  positions  themselve-  Tnd 
upon  .hom  the  means  for  the  success  of  their  en.er^Se 

12$ 


i\ '' ' 


136 


AMERICA isr  FARMS. 


must  largely  depend,  it  is  a  dangerous  position  to  occupy. 
As  men  gain  power,  they  are  apt  to  feel  power ;  and  be- 
come infused  with  the  idea  that  power  is  safest  with 
them  and  may  be  increased  with  profit  to  all.  If  they 
escape  this  themselves,  there  is  always  risk  of  their 
associates  becoming  subject  to  this  influence. 

The  nature  of  trusts  and  combines  is  to  encourage  the 
impulse  which  seeks  gain  at  the  expense  of  others.  This 
is  an  impulse  which,  for  many  reasons,  the  rural  classes 
have  a  most  decided  interest  in  checking  in  every  possi- 
ble way.  The  effect  of  a  trust  that  succeeds,  is  to  crish 
all  who  are  not  inclined  to  come  under  its  manage- 
ment This  is  decidedly  against  the  permanent  welfare 
of  the  masses  engaged  in  agriculture.  The  trust  also 
forces  terms  upon  |he  weakest  members,  and  the  weak 
become  subject  to  the  strong  ;  a  condition  which  the  true 
friend  of  the  typical  American  farmer  would  avoid  as 
the  danger  of  the  future — real  enthronement  of  wealth. 
The  trust  causes  business  to  pass  over  to  the  hands  of 
a  directorate  ;  thus  it  brings  the  majority  of  its  members 
into  a  practical  slavery.  Its  tendency  is  to  stop  the 
growth  of  individuality. 

Completeness,  individuality,  self-dependence,  is  the 
ideal  life  which  the  country  should  stimulate — a  state  so 
desirable  for  the  really  developed  man.  The  growth  of 
sentiments  and  customs  of  a  slavish  character  develops 
slavery.  It  is  necessary,  that  the  rural  classes  may 
retain  their  individuality,  that  they  exercise  it  in  all 
their  institutions.  In  the  stimulating  of  this  individual 
development,  there  is  the  greatest  actual  bond  of  union. 
"  Throughout  our  solar  system,  harmony  of  movement — 
interdependence — is  a  result  of  that  local  attraction 
which  preserves  a  perfect  independence.     So,  too,  is  it 


f  r  (. 


T/tUSrs  FOK    THF.   FAKMEKS.  ,27 

among  them  being  m  the  ratio  of  their  interdependence  • 

dence"  "'^r:  f"  ""  "r'  """  "'  ">«' indepel' 
aence.  Since  liberty  is  the  soul  of  independence- 
powe,  ,  ,  ,  ,,„^  interdependence  knoC   ,"  v  ,h 

bond,.    Assocafon.  union,  there  should  be  among  farm 

tTc  rust  ,h  ,^'  'P""«'  °'  '"O'^id""'  «"ivity. 

1  he  .rust,  then,  13  not  for  the  use  of  the  farmer  n,„,./k 

we  would  not  throttle  it  in  the  mler  that  s  m    Z 
lators  undertake  to  do.  ^ 

Henry  C.  Carey,  vol.  iii.,  p.  464. 


"ife  —  '^ 


CHAPTER   IV. 

PROTECTION    AS    IT    REFERS    TO   AGRICULTURE    IN 

ENGLAND. 


!     i 


I 


In  Great  Britain,  the  freemen,  or  small  holders  of  the 
land  have  been  over-borne  from  time  to  time  in  one  way 
and  another,  until  they  have  become  about  extinct  as  a 
class.  The  great  body  of  the  farmers  of  England  now 
own  no  land,  but  t|iey  must  depend  upon  the  lords  of 
the  manor  for  the  privilege  of  tilling  the  soil,  though  not, 
as  once,  obliged  under  all  circumstances  to  accept 
these  lords'  terms. 

The  agricultural  lands  of  Great  Britain  are  supposed 
to  support  three  classes — namely,  the  landlord,  the  capi- 
talist farmer,  and  the  farm  laborer.  When  a  bushel  of 
grain  is  raised  in  England,  three  parties  must  each  have 
a  share  in  the  profit.  The  chances  for  a  share  of  this 
profit  to  any  one  of  these  parties  have  very  much  les- 
sened during  the  last  fifty  years.  The  chances  for  the 
landlord  to  take  this  profit  to  himself  have  also  very 
much  lessened  in  the  same  period.  For  many  years,  agri- 
culture in  the  hands  of  the  landlords  was  a  monopoly  ; 
profits  through  laws  which  prevented  foreign  competi- 
tion being  secured  to  the  landlord.  These  profits  went 
to  the  landlo-d  because  the  labor  market  was  glutted. 

These  conditions  are  all  changed.  Agriculture  is  not 
now  a  monopoly  in  England  ;  and  the  laborer  is  much 

128 


more  independent  of  the  landlord      ir««^  , 

invade  .He  „.Ms  of  ^..^^L,  frX'Z  Tfir 
of  Araenca,  Ind.a,  and  the  continent,  at  price,  whth 
.ppa  the  home  producer.  But  the  landlord  ihe  one 
who  look,  upon  .hi,  with  the  mo,t  concern.     The  can! 

:::::::.txtcutr""="---^-- 

The  American  farm  and  the  American  farmer  asCe, 
were  pecuhar  to  America.  Their  relative  condttionrin' 
h.s  respec,  have  vastly  changed,  and  with  U  another 

lord  sm   n  England  was  all  that  could  be  desired  by  the 
Enghsh       d,o,d.  and  the  landless  English  farmers,'who 

Tf  America     T^T'  T^"-"--!?  "•«  'ypical  fa™er. 
Of  America.    To-day  the  English  capitalist  invests  hi, 

cXi  r    kT"?"  '""''  '"  ''<='=°"«'  "  competitiragr 
culturtst.  while  the  average  emigrant  is  no  attracted  to 
he  land,  but  come,  to  swell  the  other  occupation,     AN 
hough  such  a  large  portion  of  our  interests  are  agricu 

Why":  Lr;  '^T  ™^  '°  "'""  ""'^  ^^  agricultu'r;:^ 

Why  these  relative  change.  ?  Are  we  not  insidiously 
br.nging  upon  the  small  farmers  of  America  what  wt 
done  to  them  in  England  in  past  times  by  force  ? 

Adam  Smith's  idea  that  agriculture,  a,  he  saw  it  in 
England,  was  the  b  .st  of  industries,  because  it  supported 
three  classes,  was  calculated  to  crerte  an  impresstn 
hardly  correct  as  an  axiom  of  political  economy 

ntrinsically  great  a.  the  industry  undoubtedly  is,  it  i, 
not  able  to  support  an  idle  class,  and  when  openl    ^ced 

6* 


i^ 


»30 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


to  do  »o,  as  in  past  days  in  Rngland,  it  must  have  been  at 
the  expense  of  others. 

In  the  days  of  monopoly  in  English  agriculture  the 
lands  of  ICngland  assured  a  value  which  they  could  not 
maintain.  ('onsc(|ucntly,  in  '-omparing  the  condition  of 
agriculture  there  now  with  'ormrr  periods  and  with  other 
countries,  we  must  conclude  that  in  England  a  more 
normal  condition,  even  under  a  chronic  disorder,  is  being 
reached  for  a  lime  ;  while  in  America  an  abnormal  condi- 
tion increases,  while  a  chronic  disorder  is  being  produced. 

When  was  the  English  farmer  in  a  more  miserable  con- 
dition than  just  prior  to  the  repeal  of  the  corn  laws  ? 
Lardner's  Annual  Retrospect^  of  1831,  stated  that  the 
most  interesting  tqpic  touched  upon  in  the  king's  speech, 
was  that  contained  in  the  paragraph  which  informed  Par- 
liament that  "  the  export  of  British  produce  and  manu- 
factures in  the  last  year  had  exceeded  that  of  any  former 
year."  It  lamented  that  **  notwithstandin  j  this  indication 
of  active  commerce,  distress  should  prevail  among  the 
agricultural  and  manufacturing  classes  in  some  parts  of 
the  United  Kingdom."  Says  our  authority  '  :  "  The 
country  gentlemen  brought  reports  to  Parliament  of 
the  sufferings  among  the  tenantry  and  laborers,  that 
rents  could  not  be  paid,  and  poor-rates  had  absorbed 
the  profits  of  the  farmers.  One  petition  to  Parlia.nent, 
from  Bedfordshire,  stated  that  the  laborers  were  receiv- 
ing wages  which  gave  them  barely  the  means  of  pro- 
tracting a  cheerless  existence,  deprived  of  all  the  comforts 
and  almost  all  the  necessaries  of  life  ;  that  there  are 
parishes  in  the  country  purely  agricultural,  where  fifty 
to  ninety  able-bodied  men,  destitute  of  other  work, 
are  employed  by  the  parishes,  and  receiving  four  shil- 

•  Tht  Financial  Reformer,  i»f  Liverpnul. 


PKO  TBCTIOtr  IN  BKGLAKD.  ,  3 , 

^V'  •  w»k,  and  th.t  no  blamr  .ttache,  to  the  farmer, 
•ho  a,,  unable  .0  afford  ,„orc."  In  B.-rlchTc^'h,; 
w«kly  payment  to  able-bodied  men  who  .  ould  find 
«np  oyment  i,  „a,ed  a,  being  in  ,o.e  place,  JL  j 

TrlTs"''  "T"""  *  Buckingham  petition  ia' 
fottned  I'arhament  that  "many  person. commit  depreda- 
.  ^n»  and  m.sdemeanors  to  get  into  pr.son.  thus  to 
preserve  themselv-,  from  lingering  starvation  "  ,  ,h.° 
many  have  contracted  disorders  by  eating  the  flesh 
Id""'"  Th  "?.'  r  ""''""^'  """  ""■"  ""Wholesome 

one  from  l.rome,  m  Somersetshire,  said,  in  support  of  it 
I  have  been  .-    ••  tness  to  the  most  afflicting  distre., 

which  I  could  not,  if  I  would,  describe  " 
Sir  James  Caird,  a  very  high  authority  on  these  mat- 

Z:  !r  'fu,"^  ■"='"'  "  "'»"''"«  i"  England 
ha,  .he  spendable  income  from  the  landed  interest, 
fell  off  J„4  00,000  m  .885.  And  yet  it  is  evident 
.hat  the  mere  day  laborer  was  in  no  such  deplora- 
ble condition  in  .885,  as  is  related  of  sixty  years  ago  in 

that  t^!T^.    "'"'"'"'■     '="''^""'   ^'-^'y  indicate 
balof  f  ","'  ""'   ''"""'  P-->'"8  -nts  upon   a 

ba  IS  of  former  values,  are  those  of  the  landed  interests 
which  are  feeling  the  depression  most 

Finally,  we  arrive  at  the  conclusion  that,  in  all  our  com- 
pansons  as  to  the  condition  of  agriculture  in  England  to- 

keep  the  act  well  in  view  that  its  congested  state  is  due 
to  the  evil  results  of  protection  in  the  past,  and  a  bad 
system  of  latid-holding  opposed  to  the  best  use  of  land 
Germai-y,  France,  and  Italy.  .,11  having  high  protective 
are  each  contending  with  most  perplexing  agri- 
cultural dii.iijulties.  *  ^ 


*    1 


CHAPTER  V. 


AS  TO   FRUGALITY. 


:     I 


H 


i   ; 


Not  a  few,  even  of  farmers  themselves,  attribute  the 
disease,  which  they  have  to  admit  is  settling  itself  upon 
agriculture  in  America,  or  upon  the  economic  affairs  of 
those  who  pursue  it,  to  their  habits  of  expensive  living. 
For  a  cure  they  demand  frugality.  This  demand  may, 
in  a  sense,  be  reasonable  ;  but  those  who  make  it  must 
concede  to  the  view  that  they  ask  cure  for  a  disease 
which  is  growing  upon  other  classes  even  more  than 
upon  the  f  mers.  Then,  why  are  the  agriculturis<-s  less 
able  to  bi      up  under  it  than  other  classes  ? 

It  may  well  be  claimed  that  the  consumption  of  the 
income  of  the  husbandman  is  as  rational  as  that  of  any 
of  his  contemporaries.  Let  one  become  familiar  with 
the  expenditures  and  habits  of  the  bulk  of  the  manufac- 
turing and  commercial  classes,  and  they  will  be  con- 
vinced that  these  are  far  more  irrational  in  such  respects. 
In  fact,  the  farmer,  of  all  men,  feels  very  sensibly  the 
consequences  of  any  injudicious  use  of  his  means.  The 
farmer  also  faces,  as  no  one  else,  the  responsibility 
of  his  folly.  It  can  rarely  be  thrown  upon  others,  as 
in  the  more  commercial,  or  even  professional,  occupa- 
tions. Governments  may  be  extravagant,  and  their  sup- 
porters commend  them  for  it,  claiming  that  the  country  so 
represented  is  made  to  appear  more  important  and  influ- 

133 


^S   TO  FRUGALITY, 

133 

ential  through  these  expenditures  •  h,,f  fK« 

for  them.     The  oatenf  Z.a  ' .       ^^^  P^^P^^  pay 

.     1  uc  patent-medicine  vender  snpnHe  k;»  u 
dreds  of  thousands  in  advertisin'    j^r  ?h  ""' 

creating  an  interest  in  .  .  """^^'^'''"S,  tor  the  purpose  of 
8  «"  interest  in  his  compounds      Th^  m«,^ 

citT-;:  r  r  r' '-"-^^^^^^^ 

»'ell,  and  the  latter  must  visit  the  be't  hot!      ^"t" 
consumers  of  the  »onrt«  i,»      1,       ""' "°'«'s  J  and  the 

the  bill.  Wecansafelvtv  thai    r"  '^^'""^"^  ««'« 
of  a  too  liberal  use  of  i-  ^  ""''  *"">"  *"' 

engendered "i  M„  the  rankr'oTth  'f  ^  '^--<«been 
from  without.  ""*  '""""='  >""  ^me 

oneLme'  ^a';:  td  ^r^P''-'  ^-bably  „„t 
consuming  as  liberalt  1  ^rLre  'tha't  T''^^'  '^ 
though  perhaps  less  rItionalTy  It  3  a  olmit  r"' 
class  to  lose  its  power  to  consume      R«-„  ^    °'  * 

so  situated    it  mLt  „i,        ."""*•     ^^'ng  continually 

The  man  who  is7n  bondf'/"'"  '1""^  °'  '""^  '''"<» 
that  he  may  produce     xt'  "  '"f "'  '^™^''™«  ""^'y 

what  barely  suffices  for  an  ^^  tl^e  ""  °"!^  ^°"^™^ 
'.ecessities.    As  man  Jt,  h.       J    k  '   '=  ^  ^'^^-^  to  his 

Wctorovernatu^e^h^bCSe.'XLtrtr-'^ 
dowments  with  whch  God  t-   k'  '''''"'''°"  "^  ^"  '^^  «»■ 

America.  .0  allow  him  "^ X  M    :tLe\iroT  "if 
who  would  guide  his  destinies  ,0  a  happy  ss„e 


CHAPTER  VI. 


HENRY  GEORGE'S  REMEDY. 


I  i 


Ui     -a 


The  undoubted  tendency  of  the  time  toward  larger 
farms,  and  the  control  of  land  by  men  of  capital,  and  the 
increase  in  the  number  of  farms  owned  by  others  than 
the  occupiers,  is  evidently  an  indication  that  capital  has, 
in  some  way,  gained  an  ascendency  over  the  typical 
American  farmers.  That  the  greater  number  of  farms 
becoming  subject  to  the  landlord  are  those  of  the 
quite  small  areas,  also  goes  to  prove  that  the  small  land 
proprietors  are  giving  up  the  contest  more  rapidly  than 
anv  others. 

Yet,  notwithstanding  all  this,  there  is  nothing  in  the 
nature  of  the  conditions  now  existing  to  give  a  grain  of 
weight  to  the  conclusion,  that  the  destruction  of  land 
values  to  the  individual  would,  in  any  way,  give  relief 
to  the  small  land  proprietor.  That  the  large  farm  is 
growing  larger  by  additions  to  its  area  of  the  small  farms 
about  it,  only  shows  that  the  larger  farm  is,  in  some 
way,  better  circumstanced  to  hold  its  own  in  the  contest 
for  gain. 

The  causes  which  have  brought  the  small  farms  into 
the  hands  of  the  capitalists  are  various,  but  the  weight 
of  mortgage-debt  has  been  the  final  agent  in  the  ma- 
jority of  cases.  The  once  fortunate  owners  of  such 
farms  were,  at  the  first,  benefited  by  small  loans   from 

134 


HBNKY  GBOKGE-S  REMEDY.  ,35 

the  usurer,  but  through  their  struggle  ,0  keep  on  with 
hetr  enterpnses.  and  to  meet  the  demands  of  socle  v 

earedTbe^^";  "r. '^"'^  ""*  '~'^.  ■»' 
ceased  to  be  paid,  and  finally  the  mortgagee  took  them 

over  .0  save  his  money.     I„  .he  vast  m'afor  ,y  of    ' S 
to-day  the  owners  of  tenanted  farms  would  gladly  sel 
them  off  at  a  good  discount  on  .he  amounts  which  thev" 

lords,  and  u  has  only  been  through  the  failure  o  The 
mongageors  that  they  have  become  so  possessed  with 

strlv  "low"''  °'  "'^  "'"'■"  """=  '"  America  is  to  de- 
stroy  love  for  country  life-to  denude  .he  farmer  nf 

^e  sentiments  that  should  impel  him  to  hand  dow"    o 

h.     own  posterity,  intact,  the  lands  of  his  forefathers 

c" latel  T-  '''"''  ''"~'""'°"^-     •^''^  -«'<= '-      c    - 
tendency.      I    is  to  increase  this  tendency  with   those 
who  engage  in   rural  pursuits,  for  them  to  look  upon 
he  farm  as  only  a  great  factory  for  material  purposes 
and  material  purposes  only.     The  farms  subjected  to  t' 
would  become  more  and  more  the  possession  otos 
who  would  look  upon  them  only  as  the  medium  through 
which  to  gam   riches.      Its  adoption  would  be  but  to 
give  more  stimulus  to  a  tendency  which   Mr    George 
dilates  upon  as  an  evil  of  great  proportions  already- 
bonanza    arming."     "These  machine-worked  'grain 
factories'  of  our  Great  Republic  of  the  New  World  a  e 

n  'T:''^'  ""  -^""^  "y  ">^  slave-worked  /I 
A»^..  of  the  Roman  world.     Here,  they  prevent  where 
there,  they  destroyed,  '  the  crop  of  lien.'  •>  ■     Th   wholl 
sale  system  of  agriculture,  gathering  more  and   more" 

The  Land  Question,"  p.  5^. 


J.-^ 


13^ 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


W\^ 


force  in  America,  is  something  far  more  to  be  feared 
than  any  danger  from  landlordism.  Under  it  are  being 
destroyed  our  "  best  crops  of  men  " —  our  small  land  pro- 
prietors,—  a  trouble  that  would  not  abate  one  iota  under 
the  single-tax  regime. 

Mr.  George's  remedy  would  relieve  the  "  bonanza  fac- 
tories "  of  farm  produce  in  the  great  West  from  taxes, 
for  he  says  :  "To  put  taxation  solely  upon  land  values 
would  shift  the  weight  of  taxation  from  the  sparsely  set- 
tled agricultural  districts  to  those  populous  centres  where 
land  has  a  real  and  a  high  value.  As  it  would  destroy 
the  speculative  value  of  land,  the  result  would  be  that 
many  farmers  would  have  no  taxes  at  all  to  pay  ;  for,  no 
matter  what  might  b^  the  value  of  his  improvements,  no 
farmer  would  have  more  taxe?  to  pay  than  could  be  col- 
lected from  unimproved  land  equal  to  his  own  in  quality 
and  situation," 

On  the  other  hand,  the  advocates  of  the  single-tax 
claim  that  one  of  their  aims  is  to  make  the  great  unoccu- 
pied lands  in  the  hands  of  the  capitalists  cheap  by  taxing 
them,  in  order  that  men  of  small  means  may  obtain  them. 
I  think  the  result  would  be  more  likely  in  the  direc- 
tion of  making  them  bonanza  agricultural  estates,  and 
thus  increase  competition  in  agriculture. 

The  single-tax  theory  abounds  with  contradictions,  but 
at  best  it  has  nothing  to  offer  for  the  relief  of  the  small 
farmer.  The  great  aim  of  the  single-tax  advocate  is  to 
bring  about  a  greater  equality  in  the  distribution  of  wealth 
among  men.  It  might  have  a  levelling  tendency  in  some 
instances,  but  in  others  it  would  have  just  the  opposite 
effect.  We  will  suppose  the  case  of  two  farms  of  equal 
size  and  natural  value,  and  each  paying  the  same  heavy 
tax  ;   the  owner  of  the  one  having  capital  to  procure 


UBtTR  Y  GEOJtGE  'S  REUBD  Y.  ,  ,7 

the  best  of  machinery,  drains  for  liis  lands,  trees  for  hi. 

nine  of  th' '  T"*  "*  ""^"^""^ '  '"«  <>*"  haWng 

lauer  wol  h    Z'"''""-     """^  ^'"^'>  'edition,  thf 
laiter  would  be  driven  to  the  wall      TTn^^.        i. 

S,r""  ""'^  -■'^  -tters  'worse  f^th^e^'laU 
■  S»e  Book  v.,  Ch.,,«r  II..  „„  ■•  The  Single  Tu." 


fl. 


H 


^% 


BOOK  V. 

TAXATION. 

ogether  as  practicable.    Nevertheless,  I  am  an  absolute  Free  Trader 
I  would  have  no  custom-house  on  the  face  of  the  eartL      Never  wii 
government  be  administered  honestly  and  frugally  un  il  The Tosro 
admm.tenng  it  i.  paid  by  direct  taxation.     AndLve   winVovern 
ment  be  conhned  within  its  proper  limits,  until  its  sole  office  shJl  he" 
to  protect  persons  and  property. -Gerri;  Smith  ^" 


I 


t  !  I 


CHAPTER  I. 


TAXATION   IN  GENERAL. 

Taxation  of  some  sort   and  degree  is  <.   „.       •. 
of  c.vi„«d  life,  and   it  should  be  the  desire  of  e''' 

rsr:rtredir;nrorr"^^ 

state.  °  '^'  '"'""^  requirements  of  the 

Excessive   taxation   is   evidenflv    o 

since  the  farmers  be^an  tn  Zl  T-         ,       ^  y^^'"'  ^'^ 
enough  to  slarU^otCn:  tVi^rjutrlo^T;,;: 

people  «,.„  oer  capita  ;  ,n  ,888,  $5.57  per  capita  ;  or, 


t family  of  five  in  i«>.«  <»*:  - 


3   > 


lu 


141 


1056,  5^27.85  ;  an 


143 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


I' 


increase   of  over  400  per  cent,   in  one  department  of 
taxation.' 

In  Canada,  federal  taxation  has  grown  in  volume 
125  per  cent,  during  the  last  twenty  years,  while  the 
population  has  not  increased  50  per  cent. 

Mr.  Edward  Atkinson  estimates  the  total  taxation  of 
the  Union  for  1880,  viz.,  federal.  State,  and  municipal,  at 
$14  per  capita,  or  $70  for  the  family  of  five,  and  the 
savings  of  the  people  at  $18  per  capita.  In  Canada,  the 
proportions  are  probably  about  the  same.  These  figures, 
which  we  presume  are  near  correct,  show  the  somewhat 
alarming  proportion  taxation  bears  to  actual  savings, 
and  how  absolutely  necessary  it  is  that  such  a  tax  be  put 
upon  the  right  shoulders.  According  to  Mr.  Atkinson, 
the  yearly  net  savings  of  the  people  would  be  nearly  its 
present  amount,  but  for  these  taxes.  The  incidence  of 
taxation,  in  city  as  well  as  country  municipality,  and 
between  the  classes  universally,  becomes  a  serious  one. 
Are  not  the  majority  of  our  agriculturists  groaning 
beneath  their  unequal  burdens  ? 

There  is  hardly  a  doubt  that  such  impositions  did 
much  to  assist  in  bringing  about  the  ruin  of  the  ancient 
civilizations.  Ar.d  we  are  not  without  evidences  to 
show  that  the  peasant  classes  in  those  times  were  the 
bearers  of  the  principal  part  of  a  load  which  was  seldom 
any  thing  but  crushing.  Geikie,  in  his  "  Life  of  Christ," 
speaks  of  the  exhaustion  of  Palestine  through  the  op- 
pression of  the  Romans  "  falling  with  special  weight  on 
an  agricultural  people  like   the  Jews  "  ;  Gibbon,  in  his 

'  The  late  civil  war  should  not  be  held  accountable  for  the  weight 
of  taxes  twenty-three  years  after  its  close.  From  1789  to  1830,  with 
the  burden  of  the  expenses  of  two  wars  resting  upon  the  United 
States,  the  tax  per  capita  was  less  than  $1.75  annually.  But,  what  of 
Canada's  federal  tax  in  the  year  1889,  of  $5-66  per  capita,  without 
any  disastrous  war  on  which  to  throw  the  odium  ? 


"T^^^TIOU  W  GENE/iAL 
u  ^^ 

Downfall  of  the  Roman  Empire."  of  the  'Sntm      u 
weight   of  taxes  attached  to  the    and  "     M  '"^«'"«ble 
warning  f„r  all  ase,  ar.  ♦!  "^"^   ^""    of 

Latin  rLtoridlwLr'''''^'^'"^  Uctantius,  the 
^all  of  the  Zan'  E^rf  ""h'a:.  ^f  '^ '^"'^^  ^^  ^^^• 
functionaries,   there   w  -re  mnr     ?  ''''  '""'^''"^^  ^^ 

empire  than  tax  pa;:/;ort'thT"""^    '"   ^'^^ 
by  the  exactions  to  whlhh  <="»^'vator  was  ruined 

_■  •  lions  to  wnich  he  was  exDo«/->1      c:.i  i 

deserted,  and  lands  once  tilled  <^er^^    t      ^         ""* 
''•l«ed  again  i„,„  ,he  kZ"    7",^  ■''"^-  ""  "''^ 

"  the  treasury  was  a  mhh  ^^"°"'"  ""'er  »ay»  that 

.he  Roman  Em^Jlre  "        ^  """"  '='""P'"«'  ""  '»"  »< 

.-in%r:h'"  :rof -V::"'  -'  :rr  ^'""'"  -« 

"urden  o,  taxation  rested  p  „  laTd  'Z'^T"'  "" 
lure  the  assertion  that  all  .h,V^  u  '"''«'',  we  ven- 
organisation  of  sodety  th  „' i™'-'"',  '"'  "«■=»  ''"«  ""e 
in  some  way  been   ,1,;         "^        P"'  """^  ''"<'™»  h^ve 

whenever  2.yZJ^TJZn':  T"  "  '''  ^°" 
piteous  wail  comes  ^.J     a  "^PP'*^^-     I"    our    time  a 

peasants  of  It^Fr:::  ,:"„!  0"™::?  0^^-^'^" 
'unate  Cass   i„  r„,,,,  "aformrrTs  de„?"'writ"ef  "• 

-.ha,  to    protect^tir   bodLs    from';:;  ''L"'"'- 

-«  d;n^r^e-trm^h:rt^-X- 
officials  multiply  in  Canada  fthl^.  'ncreas.ng.  If  the  number  of 
'he  last  twenty,  they  will  om^n  "I  .  ''"  ^'^"  "^  '^^^^  '^^^^  during 
^-er  than  the  a„ ""P""  *  '"'>'  "^  tax-con.,.er.  not  n.«ch 


144 


AMERICAS'  FARMS. 


requiiite  to  keep  the  administrative  machine  in  motion. 
Oh,  Father  of  Compawion  !  is  this  the  only  gateway  to 

prosperity  ?  " 

After  the  masses  of  the  ruralists  have  once  begun  to 
lose  their  relative  power,  it  has  only  been  when  the  lands 
have  become  the  property  of  a  monopoly  of  some  kind  or 
other  that  the  land-holding  classes  have   been  able  to 

dictate  terms. 

"The  progress   of   a  community  toward  wealth  and 
power  being  in  the  direct  ratio  of  the  combination  of 
action  among  the  people  of  whom  it   is  compoced  ;  it 
follows  that  the  advance  towards  both  must  be  in  the 
ratio  in   which- they  are  enabled   to  dispense  with  the 
services  of  the  (politician,  the  soldier,  the  owner  of  slaves, 
and  the  trader— of  that  class  which  lives  by  virtue  of  the 
simple  act  of  appropriation.     Ever>  movement,  however, 
in  that  direction,  looking  necessarily  to  a  diminution  in 
the  power  of  the  latter,  they  are  all— soldier,  trader,  and 
politician— found  uniformly   banded    together  for  the 
subjugation  of  the  people  ;  as  was  seen  in  Athens  and  in 
Rome,  and  as  may  now  be  seen  in  all  the  countries  of 
Europe  and  America.     The  history  of  the  world  is  but  a 
record  of  the  attempts  of  the  few  to  tax  the  many,  and 
those  of  the  many  to  escape  taxation  ;  and  the  tendency 
of  society  to  assume  a  natural  and  stable  form  is  in  the 
precise  ratio  of  the  success  o''  this  latter  class— a  success, 
however  slowly  and  teaiously  accomplished,  because  of 
the  power  of  those  who  live  by  appropriation  to  come 
together  in  towns  and  cities,  while  they  who  contribute 
to  their  revenues  are  scattered  throughout  the  .:ountry."  ' 

'  This,  from  the  pen  of  Henry  C.  Carey  ("  Social  Science,"  p.  235), 
applies  to  America  to-day  even  better  than  when  it  was  written,— 
thirty  years  ago. 


CHAPTER   II. 
THE    SINfir.E  TAX. 

Wi  ,re  brought  again  to  a  consideration  of  the  ad- 
tafon  now  go.ng  „„,  ,„  have  all  taxc  for  public  r.ve  ue 
merged  mto  one  upon  land  only  1,  has  already  assumed 
propor  tons  which  should  cause  the  utmost  concern  o 

est  of  the  laboring  classes,  years  ago  in  Europe    anJ 
more   recently  and  perhaps  more   pfominentirby  Mr 
Henry  George  m  America, :.  i,  .ow  growing  in  favor  we 
have  to  adm,.,  with  most  ci.y  classe,.     Andfeven  l4dirg 

.haT1r'"^'r"  ^''™""'  '""'"^^  »  P"'"'  of  contending 
that  so  nearly  ,s  d.rec.  taxation  now  thrown  upon  rea^ 

estate,  that  U  would  be  but  taking  a  short  step  farther  to 

make  ,t  bear  the  whole.     They  are  right,  in'  so  far    ! 

Amenea  .s  concerned,  in  claiming  that  th^  chief  burden 

of  d.rect  taxation  bears  upon  this  class  of  propert,- 

It  .s  admitted  by  most  observers  that  real  estate  is  sure 

to  be  taxed,  while  personal  property  is  sure  to  e  c  pe 

Phe  estimate  recently  made  of  personal  property  which 

.escaping  taxation  in  the  State  of  New  York'  runs  up  o 

the  fine  figure  of  $,,500,000,000.     Mr.  Thomas  G.  ihear- 

man,  makes  the  statement  that  between  ,860  and  .880 

'he  assessed  value  of  real  estate  in  the  United  States,' 


146 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


■  .1 


i  i 


I 


increased  from  $4,564,000,000  to  $10,470,000,000,  or  an 
increase  of  130  per  cent.  ;  while  the  increase  in  the 
assessed  value  of  personal  property  increased  from 
$2,015,000,000  to  $2,870,000,000,  or  an  increase  of  only 
43  per  cent.  It  must  be  borne  in  mind,  in  these  com- 
parisons, that  personality  in  the  aggregate,  as  it  is  valued 
in  exchange,  is  augmenting  at  much  the  faster  rate. 

The  situation  appears  serious  for  our  farmers,  when  it 
is  realized  that  the  c]'iss?s  which  may  be  likely  to  favor 
this  system  of  taxation  are  a  growing  majority  of  the 
voters  ot  America.  Mr.  Creorge  intimates  his  satisfaction 
on  this  score  in  his  chapter  on  "The  American  Farmer," 
in  "Social  Problems."  It  is  now  proposed  to  liave  the 
adoption  of  this  mode  of  taxation  secured  for  all  local 
purposes  where  the  farmers  are  in  the  minority — and  so 
hem  the  farmers  in.  Hence,  it  becomes  incumbent  on 
farmers  not  only  to  giv  the  question  of  taxation  their 
earnest  attention,  but  their  immediate  attention  also. 

While  Mr.  George  admits  that  the  adoption  of  his 
scheme  of  taxation  would  destroy  the  selling  value  of  the 
farmers'  land,  ne  claims  '  that  it  would  increase  the  value 
of  his  improvements,  and  thus  make  his  labor  so  much 
more  remunerative,  that  he  would  be  more  than  com- 
pensated for  the  loss  of  his  land,  I  thinl:  it  v/ould  not 
only  take  from  him  the  selling  value  of  his  land,  but  in 
many  ca^^s  be  the  cause  of  the  loss  of  the  improvements 
as  well.' 

'  "  Social  Problems,"  p.  304. 

*  According  to  Mr.  Edward  Atkinson,  the  total  amount  of  t^xes 
paid  by  the  people  of  the  United  States  aggregated  $700,000,000  in 
1880.  It  is  safe  to  assume  that  uiider  the  single  tax  much  more  than 
one  half  would  have  rested  upon  the  land-holdings  01  the  country 
districts — say  $400,000,000.  At  that  time  there  were  4,008,907 
farms.     For  these  farms  to  have  paid  the  $400,000,000,  the  average 


THE  SINGLE    TAX. 


H7 


What  are  the  single-tax  arguments  ?     They  mav  be  di 

:'  ^  r^r  ^r''  ''■™'°-'  --^  ••  < "- 'Lc  ■ 

sTme      and   h^     "'"  "^^  .""^"X  ^es.  upon  .he  con- 
»r  Vk  oPPosites,  which  maintain  that  taxes  fall 

altogether     pon  production.     The  first  may  be  renre 
=ented  by  the  following  quotations  from  Mr.  Edward  aI' 

mind  that  w,th  few  exceptions,  all  taxes  are  distributed 
wherever  they  may  be  first  imposed,  and  ultin     d;  f^^i 
on  Pll  consumers  in  almost  the  exact  ratio  of  thetr  con 
-mpfon."    (p.  ,03.)     "The  writer  is  of  l.ZoZ 
conv,e.,™  .,,,  „,,„,^„  ,^^  ^^  taxation   :  re 

.ttiv;n2i;:inrs"\r:rr-.^'V-f 

leadmg  students  and  publicists  upon  tie  subject  oTthI 
nnal  bearmgs  of  taxation. 

cuWvaToTtif"  "^"i'"''  ^"  ''"'  "'■^'^)  ™d  'he 
cultivator,  .t  IS  argued  :   Every  one  must  consume  the 

products  of  land.     Every  produce-  must  go  to  the  land 
or  his  raw  material.     ConsequentL    where  land  il  taxed 
he  one  in  possession  of  i.  is  enauted  to  charge  thTs  tax 
to  the  consumer,  who  is  obliged  to  purchase  his  produces 

"a  tax  o?;     H  '':''  *"'•  "™^^  °<=°^S^  contends  thai 
a  tax  on  land  values  does  not  add  to  prices   and  is 

us  paid  directly  by  the  person  on  whom  it'al     '  Ther 
as  all  taxes  upo.   things  of  unfixed  quantity  increase 

™id  have  had  to  pay  |ioo.    Since  the  unearned  increment  or  ren, 

n"  :::h::rc::;':t:j:r^7'-^ "-  -^^  ^^^^::^ 

encr„aehed%i^L^;:rr::-;— 


148 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


I 


I  } 


1,1    J 


prices,  and  in  the  course  of  exchange  are  shifted  from 
seller  to  buyer,  increasing  as  they  go  " '  ;  that  the  un- 
earned increment  attached  to  the  value  of  land  should 
belong  to  the  s.ate  ;  that  it  is  becoming  impossible  for 
laborers  to  buy  farms,  and  that,  as  a  consequence,  the 
cities  are  being  overcrowded. 

Neither  the  real-estate-tax  advocate,  who  contends  that 
all  taxes  placed  upon  land  values  must  finally  rest  iipon 
the  consumer  of  the  products  raised  from  this  land,  nor 
the  one  who  claims  that  no  tax  upon  land  values  can  add 
to  prices,  is,  by  any  means,  correct.  This  is  where  the 
grand  mistake  is  made. 

That  all  must  consume  the  products  of  land  is  per- 
fectly true,  but  that  all  must  consume  the  products  of 
labor  is  also  true.  Professor  Sumner's  claim,  that  the 
unearned  increment  is  upon  most  property  in  a  condition 
of  property,  is  probably  not  far  from  correct.' 

The  gathering  of  people  about  land  increases  the  value 
of  land,  the  gathering  of  people  on  land  creates  a  demand 
for  the  products  of  labor.  One  waits  for  his  increment, 
and  the  other  takes  it  at  the  time  he  throws  his  products 
on  the  market.  The  settler  on  land  is  induced  to  accept 
a  small  immediate  return  for  the  products  of  his  land, 
looking  to  the  more  remote  benefits  to  be  derived  through 
the  increasing  value  of  his  lands  as  neighbors  surround 
him  ;  the  fabricator  of  the  materials  extracted  fr  n  land 
receives  his  unearned  increment  at  once. 

That  the  power  of  this  increment  on  farm  land  may  be 
over-estimated,  as  compared  with  the  productiveness  of 
other  industries,  is  seen  now  by  the  relatively  impoverished 
condition  of  the  peasant  proprietors  of  Europe,  in  their 

'  "  The  Canons  of  Taxation,"  p.  2. 
'  "What  Social  Classes  Owe  to  Each  Other." 


THE  SINGLE   TAX. 


149 


ment  af  er  they  have  ceased  to  give  their  ownors  xh. 
uotf  n^h"";"'  ~"'''  ■""  ^'''"  *^''  ""««io"  burdens 

aeposits  ;  or  the  oil  trust ;  or  the  coal  anH  W^r.  u     • 

z:i :!  t '"'' '"' '""  <^«^o  'or;,  rj 

sumers   of  these   commodities   to   pay   their  lr,n^  f 
They  would  simp,y  charge  .0  cost'of  ptduc  o„     S 
the  consumers  would  pay  it  in  the  prices  paid 

Customs  walls  aid  these  combinations  in  accomplish- 
mg  their  purposes,  but  they  are  not  necessary  for    his 
chfralfe?  "I      'T^  '^^""^  internat.onaf  il^.he 
DutZ  ,  ,  ""*'"'""   ^'^'°'^''  <=°"'™ds   that  by 

rr^  M^u  """"  "^^  """"''^d  ■"i^^^al  lands  these 
lands  would  become  available  to  new  competitors  but 
how  long  before  the  latter  would  be  brought  int;  'he 

capital  ?  The  average  farmer  of  America  to-day  is  Z 
powerless  to  burden  society  in  any  shape,  in  his  con.ro 
of  the  rent  value  of  his  land,  as  he  is  to^make  the "0° 
^^^r-'-'-  ^"  '-'-«■- conditions  rr-n 
Mr  George  is  one  who  is  able  to  see  that  the  f—er 
cannot  throw  the  burden  of  indirect  taxation  up^nX 


I50 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


K\ 


classes,  for  he  says  :  "  Let  the  working  farmer  consider 
how  the  weight  of  indirect  taxation  falls  upon  him,  with- 
out his  having  the  power  to  shift  it  off  upon  any  one 
else  ;  how  it  adds  to  the  price  of  nearly  every  thing  he 
has  to  buy,  without  adding  to  the  price  of  what  he  has  to 

sell."  • 

Why  has  the  farmer  "  not  the  power  to  shift  it  off  upon 
any  one  else  ? "  Simply  because  competition  is  so  great 
in  the  articles  he  produces  that  he  is  powerless  to  make 
his  own  prices,  and  every  pinch  drives  him  to  seek  relief 
by  increasing  production — that  is  to  say,  competition." 

Notwithstanding  the  fact  that  many  things  indicate 
that  land  is  going  at  the  present  time  into  the  possession 
of  large  holders,,  and  that  the  small  land  proprietors  are 
being  exterminated,  there  is  not  the  slightest  probability 
of  competition  in  agriculture  diminishing  for  ages  to 
come.  However,  let  the  monopoly  period  be  near  or 
remote,  competition  under  the  single-tax  regime  vould 
be  sufficiently  severe  to  exterminate  the  value  of  all 
improvements  to  the  small  holder,  either  through  their 

'  "Social  Problems,"  p.  301. 

•  When  Mr.  Edward  Atkinson  dealt  with  the  question  of  the  rail- 
way and  the  farmer  in  their  economic  relations,  he  evidently  thought 
it  quite  possible  for  an  industry  to  be  so  situated  that  it  would  be 
powerless  to  increase  the  prices  of  its  products  for  the  purpose  of 
throwing  its  taxes  or  any  thing  else  upon  the  consumer,  for  he  says  : 
"  The  charge  (freights)  which  can  be  put  upon  the  wheat  is  fixed  by 
the  price  at  which  East-India  wheat  can  be  sold  in  Market  Lane." 
("  Distribution  of  Products,"  p.  259.)  He  admits  in  this  that  the  farmer 
cannot  always  make  his  own  ^rices,  consequently  taxes  may  rest  upon 
him  when  placed  there.  "But,  since  railways  may  be  in  monopoly, 
the  price  of  wheat  at  Market  Lane  may  have  nothing  to  do  with  the 
amount  of  freight  they  may  take  from  the  farmer  ;  besides,  they  are 
of  the  industries  which  may  shove  u;;ir  taxes  upon  those  who  use 
them,  as  Mr.  Atkinson  elsewhere  states. 


TUB  SINGLE   TAX. 


'51 


abandonmg  their  lands  early  i„  the  contest,  or  later  on 
when  they  were  obliged  to  do  so 

wi.'^  h-^l"*''  "''"'''  "'*'  ""'  ™''"  '"^"  '"  competing 
w.th  h,s  bonanza  rival  would  gain  an  advantage  undef 
h.s  scheme  of  taxation  which  he  does  not  now  possess 
as  the  small  farmer  has  the  greater  proportion'"    im 
prove.„ents  to  be  freed.     But  has  he  sufficiently  con- 
stdered  the  fact  that  the  small  farmers  are  principally 
near  the  ctfes,  where  he  proposes  to  lay  the  burden  o!? 
his  tax    because  there  the  lands  have  the  greater  rent 
value  than  in  sections   more  remote,   while  the  small 
farmer^  most  troublesome  rival  is  situated  on   land 
vvhich  have  a  much  less  relative  value,  and  would  bear 
hi     '"'k    i.'''"'™  '""•'     "  '*  "'<*'»'  'hat  the  land- 
farmer  of  this    ountry  are  a  landed  plutocracy  as  com- 

withholding  land  from  use.  Little  England  years  ago 
with  a  large  consuming  population,  and  a  great  portion 
of  her  lands  kept  out  of  use  by  an  aristocracy,  and  with 
a  high  protective  tariff,  was  enabled  to  make  agriculture 
a  monopoly.  It  was  then  a  period  when  the  burdens  of 
taxation  were  shifted  from  this  industry.  From  at  ^ne 
time  bearing  all,  it  finally  fell  to  less  than  5  per  cent 

rbno^lrv  T.    ll'"  ^"'=''  ^  ™"'""-> '» '^  became 
abnormally  high.'    The  peculiar  position  of  England  for 

a  time  gave  to  agriculture  every  advantage  over  other 
'  If  this  be  met  by  the  claim  that  one  of  the  special  purposes  of  the 
single  tax  .s  ,„  bring  down  .he  rent  value  of  land  in  ^dTou  he 
mes  as  compared  wi.h  land  in  ,he  coun.or.  the  conclusion  mustfol 
lo»,  from  the  smgle-tax  theory,  that  the  cities  will  become  The  more 
des^able  tor  the  masses  ,0  congregate  in.     Then  what  becomes  0^1: 

See  Book  V.  Chapter  IV.  on  English  agriculture. 


t    ' 


152 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


i    ! 


industries, — a  condition  which  is  not  likely  to  occur 
again  very  soon,  certainly  not  over  the  principal  part  of 
the  globe.  In  the  States  and  Provinces  every  year  sees 
the  incomes  from  most  other  occupations  rise  in  com- 
parison to  the  value  of  farms,  and  Mr,  George  was  in 
profound  error  when  he  said  :  "  It  has  already  become 
impossible  in  our  older  States  for  a  man  starting  with 
nothing  to  become  by  his  labor  the  owner  of  a  farm." 
("Social  Problems,"  p.  314.) 

The  facts  are  that,  in  the  old  States  and  Provinces,  it 
is  becoming  all  the  time  easier  for  the  farm  laborer  to 
buy  out  the  typical  American  farmer  who  employs  him  ; 
at  the  same  time,  he  is  less  and  less  inclined  to  do  so, 
preferring,  as  he.  gains  means,  to  make  his  escape  to  the 
cities,  or  to  mechanical  occupations.  At  no  period  have 
there  been  greater  opportunities  for  men  of  small  capital 
to  gain  land  than  during  the  last  twenty  years.  Yet 
never  in  America  has  the  concentration  of  population  in 
the  cities  been  greater  than  during  this  period. 

In  leaving  the  country  they  leave  land,  if  not  falling  in 
value,  certainly,  in  most  cases,  not  rising,  to  go  to  where 
land  is  rising  rapidly  in  value.  The  human  family,  for 
some  cause  or  other,  is  preferring  those  very  spots  where 
to  obtain  land  gold  enough  to  near  cover  it  must  be 
offered.  It  follows  that  if  there  is  an  evil  in  this  flocking 
to  cities,  it  comes  not  from  pressure  for  Avant  of  land,  but 
from  something  outside  or  anterior  to  the  land-pressure 
trouble.  Then  the  flocking  of  people  to  cities,  in  its 
relation  to  land  values,  is  a  cause,  and  not  an  effect,  as 
the  single-tax  advocate  maintains.  The  first  cause  lying 
back  of  the  flocking  of  people  to  cities,  other  causes 
than  those  ascribed  by  Mr.  George  for  the  gregarious 
tendency  of  the  time  must  be  found. 


THE  SINGLE   TAX. 


'53 


uV^^'  ""■!"  *"""'*''""  conditions,  of  which  I  have 
r    l^en  wntmg,  seem  a  proof  that  the  land  of  th, 

the  extreme  pressure  of  taxation  of  all  sorts  which  has 

'rer^lh  :tt'rr  rTn"  "' '°  '^^  T"  "'  ""^  ^"^ '" 
;n  va.ue  h.  XfoTrectrS  '\7t  (.Tlrf 
.he  apphc..o„  Of  Mr.  George,  cure  would  he  hL^dd' 

supponed"?"'"''"'/''"^  '  """  ""'^  "»  f^""'i" 

tax?s  over  Z  "T"""  '™'"  '"""^  *'''^'>  ''^^  '"  d-ect 
taxes  over  three  t.mes  as  much  as  corresponding  incomes 

rtMs°arr„°oT7"'°r  '  '"''^  '  "^"^^  -ndi.i:L""s~r 
to  this  are  not  rare  all  over  America.     Is  this  eaualitv  ? 

Why  should  one  escape,  and  not  the  other  P       ^        " 

deriveVfrnm  t"  '"""'■  ''°"""  ™'"'    '"e  income 
pav    the  o«upat,on,  has  heavy  land  taxes  to 

nl;,    M  ™S^-^"°"'  "ho  -"^y  have  twice  the  income 
practically  escapes.     Is  this  equality  ?  ' 

upon  h^cS  "".'  T""''"^  P"^^  *"«  usurers- taxes 
upon  his  capital,  and  the  usurer  pays  on  mer^W  th. 

mcome.  and  more  frequently  escapes'aftogtLrtt'hi: 

Again  we  quote  from  Mr.  George  :    « If  we  impose 
a  tax  upon  money  loaned,  as  has  often  been  Itterpted 
the  lender  will  charge  the  tax  to  the  borrower  aTd, he 
borrower  must  pay  it,  or  not  obtain  the  loan  "    ("The 
Canons  of  Taxation,"  p.  2  )  V    me 

Geoll™  Ih'"  ?'"  '"^  ^^"^  ""P^"^'""  "'  Mr. 
error  soriC  f      '!,'"•     ^'  """^  '°  ^"^Sest  that  this 
error  springs  from  a  detective  analysis  of  the  question 
notwithstanding  the  fact  that  so  astuie  a  reasoner  a   Mr' 
George  is  among  the  number  who  hold  to  the  theo^ 


154 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


The  rate  of  interest  is  governed  by  demand  as  well  as 
supply  ;  decrease  the  number  of  those  who  borrow,  and 
demand  decreases.  Every  financial  burden  lifted  from 
the  borrower  makes  the  lender  less  necessary.  Relieve 
the  one  million  or  more  mortgaged  farms  of  the  United 
States  from  all  taxation  for  five  years  (say  $350  in  ali  to 
each),  and  put  it  upon  the  loaners  of  money,  and  then 
mark  the  decrease  in  the  number  of  mortgaged  farms. 

In  shifting  these  burdens  from  the  borrower  to  the 
lender  you  increase  the  number  of  those  who  have  cap- 
ital ;  you  are  working  in  the  direction  of  breaking  up  a 
monopoly.  With  a  sugar,  a  salt,  or  an  oil  combine  it  is 
different ;  put  the  single  tax  upon  them  and  still  they 
control  the  price  of  sugar,  of  salt,  and  of  oil  ;  for  these 
articles  are  still  required,  and  these  combines  only  fur- 
nish them.  Something  further  is  necessary  in  regulating 
the  incidence  of  taxation,  a  subject  which  will  receive 
due  consideration  further  on 

It  is  argued  by  the  supporter  of  the  single-tax  theory 
that  the  cities  would  bear  as  large  a  share  of  the  burden 
as  the  rural  districts,  with  all  taxes  levied  upon  the  rent 
value  of  land,  since  real  estate  in  our  cities  is  reaching 
an  aggregate  value  rj  great  as  in  the  country.  Even  so 
it  but  proves  an  abnormal  condition,  which  we  wish  to 
remedy.  Give  to  rural  property  the  relative  value  which 
it  had  forty  years  ago,  that  is  to  say,  from  representing 
"3  per  cent,  of  the  total  wealth  of  the  nation  to  60  per 
cent., — a  desirable  change, — and  where  then  would  the 
tax  fall  the  heaviest  ?  Or,  apply  the  tax  to-day  in  Can- 
ada, and  which  but  the  country  would  pay  it  ? 

Looking  "pon  the  single  tax  in  this,  its  most  flattering 
aspect,  it  is  found  that  it  can  only  be  applied  to  an 
abnormal  condition,  one  which  it  would  aid  in  continu- 


THE  SINGLE    TAX. 


»$5 


ing.  It  is  not  reasonable  that  the  lands  of  a  great  country 
•n  us  country.     Consequent  y,  our  aim  shonM  k. 

a  condition  wh.ch  must  continue  false,  in  order  that  th! 
.ys  em  may  be  maintained,  but  ,o  look  for  somehinV  o 
bnng  about  a  truer  state  "emrng  to 

dire«r"'  ""  "'"""""^  °'  "  'y''^"  ff  '^ying  a  just 
J    T  I  "  \"'^''"  °f  8"™  itnportance.     This  neces 

statesmen,  under  whose  province  it  comes  for  treatment 

™  It^becl'  '  h'  T"''  ''"■'''  """-^  "■-  "~ 
raus    become  the  base  on  which   fiscal   reforms  m,„t 

J^e    without  which  that  manyheaded  monste^  d"" 
taxation-must  continue  to  hold  sway. 


CHAPTER  III. 


INDIRECT   TAXATION. 


If  farmers  have  been  slow  to  appreciate  the  injustice 
of  the  system  of  direct  taxation  under  which  they  have 
labored,  and  the  dangers  now  threatening  them  in  the 
agitations  going  on  in  the  great  influential  centres  to  in- 
crease these  evils,  it  is  hardly  a  wonder  that  the  more 
intricate  question  of  indirect  taxation  has  failed  to  receive 
the  disapproval  which  it  merits  from  them.  Yet,  on  the 
other  hand,  it  seems  almost  incredible  that  a  scheme  for 
collecting  public  revenue  could  be  devised  to  work  so 
much  and  so  continuous  harm  as  our  customs  and  excise 
taxes  have,  without  causing  louder  protests  from  the 
masses  ere  this  ;  that  farmers,  who  are  the  most  deeply 
victimized,  should  nurse  the  delusion  that  possibly  it 
was  benefiting  them. 

It  is  plainly  evident  that  indirect  taxation  has  been  the 
chief  working  instrument  in  a  system  of  government 
prevailing  in  America,  through  which  the  slavery  of  class 
to  class  is  being  secured.  Through  it,  the  policy  of  pro- 
tection, of  which  we  have  said  so  much  in  condemnation 
in  the  preceding  chapters,  has  been  of  easy  application. 
It  has  shown  how  it  is  possible,  by  artificial  means,  to 
entirely  change  the  course  of  national  industry.  Without 
it,  or  similar  means,  it  must  have  followed  the  course  in 
America  which  the  protectionists  of  as  far  back  as  1789 


MDlKBCr  TAXArrotf. 


157 


competency  f.om  our  cheap  and  fertile  soil."  ■     Thu,  \ 
cemury  ago  .he  first  blow  at  American  agricuItuT.  w„ 

cer."rv"olf  ■  Th"""'"'.'  '■«'''«•■'«'"'-'■>  »y»tem  h  just  a 
century  old.  The  modest  proportions  of  the  monster", 
early  day,  seem  almost   ridiculous  compared  w.tht, 

t' r  ro  'To  '''=™"'7-'-     ■'■"<=  United  L,.e.,  custom 
tariff  of  1789,  equivalent  to  an  aJvator.m  rate  of  8J  ner 

tax  of'lh"  """'"'""  "P"^'"'^"''  '^'"'  6^°""  •"  "  vicious 
ax  of  above  40  per  cent.     Canada  is  marching  in  the 
same  d.recfon,  and  at  a  rate  quite  as  rapid. 

1 0-day  the  evasion.,  and  perversions  of  the  custom. 
aws  mvolve  sums  in  terms  of  money  not  far  behTnd  .r' 
.otal-revenue  considerations  of  a  hundred  years  ago  to 
»ay  httle  of  the  more  important  matter  of  the  morll 
effects  on  the  parties  immediately  in  contact  with  the 
operafons  of  the  law.     I.  is  well,  perhaps,  for  the  pel 
o    the  sp.r>ts  of  those  worthy  gentlemen  who  in  ,,8g 
protested  agamst  an  SJ  per  cent,  tariff,  because  of    he 
temptation  .t  would  offer  .0  the  breaking  of  law  and 
endangenng  the  morals  of  the   people,  ttat  they  are 
probably  .gnorant  of  the  fact,  that  he  e  in  Amerid 
wHhm  a  century,  under  the  fostering  influenceTf  the 
^stem  then  introduced,  smuggling  hi,  become  a  fine 

Jiy     From  il"  °r  '"'r '  '"^"™  '^  -  '"'"-""g 
study.     From  u  we  learn  how  it  is  possible  for  a  people 

to  become  gradually  and  unconsciously  enslaved    the 

aZ" fnd  th"""';  '°  ^r""  '"'■"^^'-''o  "--'ched 
away,  and  the  safety  of  our  civilization  brought  into 

pertl.     Even  away  back  in  the  days  of  the  Romans,  it 

'  Fisher  Ames. 


V'^ 


IS* 


AMEKiCAif  rAimts. 


Ill 


I 


ports  on  merchandise  were  levied,  it  is  true,  for  revenue 
purposes  ;  but  a  tariff,  as  a  chief  medium  m  holding 
together  a  system  of  governmen* — a  sort  of  despotism  by 
jugglery, — has,  strange  to  say,  its  highest  development  in 
modern  ages. 

Through  indirect  taxation,  alliances  between  selfish 
interests  having  the  command  of  wealth  and  govern- 
ments with  matchless  fondness  for  attachments  which 
insure  possession  of  abundant  money  resources,  are 
easily  formed.  Thus  combines,  monopolies,  and  other 
moneyed  interests  become  ascendant  in  government. 
Such  a  rule  brings  the  liberties  of  the  people  into  actual 
peril.  Farmers  have  much  to  fear  from  the  sway  of 
the  plutocrat.  Some  one  very  correctly  remarks  :  '*  A 
plutocracy  has  its  throne  in  '^'ties  ;  an  aristocracy  in 
the  country."  Even  an  aristocracy  is  in  sympathy  with 
the  great  rural  classes.  Moreover,  with  the  country 
shorn  of  its  political  power,  dero'>cracy  is  a  delusion.-  It 
follows,  that  the  farmers,  of  all  others,  are  imperilled  by 
a  revenue  system  which  secures  the  alliance  of  wealth 
and  government.     But  more  of  this  elsewh-^ic 

The  first  great  canon  of  taxation  laid  down  by  all 
eminent  economists  is  to  the  effect  that  the  volume  of 
taxation  be  rigidly  limited  to  the  actual  necessities  of 
the  state.  The  violation  in  America  of  this  first  rule  is 
to  be  laid  principally  to  the  door  of  our  system  of  in- 
direct taxadon.  Politicians  have  learnec  that  by  this 
system  "  the  fowl  is  plucked  without  crying  out."  Tax- 
ation always  becones  so  adjusted  ;is  to  bear  upon  those 
least  likely  to  rebel  against  it.  That  *he  farmers  "re  they 
of  America  who  have  never  yet  united  their  forces  to 
resist  this  system  of  oppression  is  patent  to  all  who  have 
given  the  subject  any  attention. 


IfD/KSCr  TAXATION.  ,5^ 

.  J^',,'""''  »'*'':«'"y  *''"'  »=  «y-it  cannot  be  uttered 
eoo  often-that  "mdirect  taxation  i,  a  cowardly.  me.„ 

the  people  a    large,  va.t  aggregate  amount,,  which,  if 
proportionately  borne  by  the  rich,  would  result  in  the 

crcaM,.g  the  violation  of  another  most  important  cinon 

proportion  between  rich  and  poor 
Adam  Smith's  rule  as  .0  equality  was,  that  "the  sub- 

Sn  ?1  .°  8°^""-"™'  »'  nearly  as  poss.ble  in  pro- 
portion  to  the  revenue  which  they  respectively  enlov 
under  the  protection  of  .he  state."  This  canon  mus^ 
.tand  as  the  citadel  of  justice  in  schemes  for  obtair' 
public  revenue  ;  for  .he  power  of  "private  revenue  i^ 
society  increases  to  the  individual  possessing  it,  as  reve- 
nue  ,s  augmented  from  that  of  yielding  what'  miv  barl 
suffice  for  ex.s.ei.ce  to  that  of  affluence  and  luxury 

tiZ""^    "  '""'"''■''  °'  '"'^''""  '""^'i""  on  consump. 
tion  .t  say  ,5  per  cent.,  we  will  have  the  family  whose 

total  income  is  $.40,  with  the  bare  necessities  of  ex^s,! 
ence  requiring  an  outlay  of  $.00  before  indirect  taxes 
are  paid,  con.ributi..g  $30  for  revenue,  or  ...5  pe  cem 
of  total  income;  while,  on  .he  other' hand,  the    am  1, 
whose  income  is  $:o,coo,  living  in  comparative  luxu   • 

only^rj  7  °'r*='°°°' r"  "'  '-^-«  «75o  in  ta«  . "I 
only  7  J  per  cent,  on  .otal  income.     One  will  be  pay  ne 

75  per  cent,  of  possible  savings-the  true  considera  ion 

m  estimating  the  incidence  of  taxation  ,  the  other,  less 

han  8  per  cent.     The  million-dollar  income  con.ribme 

>  to  ,J  per  cent,  'or  revenue,  and  the  so-called  poor 


i6o 


AMERICAN  FARAfS. 


man  his  lo  to  20  per  cent.  How  unjust !  the  state 
stimulating  the  growth  of  inequality  by  treatment  totally 
unscientific  as  well  as  inhumane.' 

To  those  who  say  that  our  indirect  taxes  are  so  regu- 
lated as  to  bear  heaviest  on  articles  consumed  by  the 
rich,  we  reply  :  A  study  of  our  tariff  laws,  our  trade 
and  navigation  returns,  and  the  opinions  cf  those  having 
practical  information  on  the  subject  does  not  warrant 
such  a  conclusion.  The  writer's  many  years  of  constant 
observation  of  the  workings  of  America's  customs  laws, 
and  a  knowledge  of  the  many  advantages  taken  and  con- 
cessions made,  permit  him  to  make  no  such  deduction 
in  behalf  of  the  wisdom  and  humanity  of  these  laws. 
"  Books,  carpets,  dishes,  "  and  the  like,  are  a  necessity  of 
civilized  life,  and  '*  surely  "  the  so-called  "  poor  men  "  of 
our  farmers  who  should  be  obliged  to  "  do  without  these  " 
are  few  ;  though  there  are  politicians  who  think  other- 
wise.' 

Another  important  canon  of  taxation  is  to  the  effect 
that  a  tax  should  take  as  little  as  possible  beyond  the 
sum  that  reaches  the  exchequer.  Our  system  of  indirect 
taxation  is  most  expensive,  for  it  exacts  large  sums  from 
the  payer,  through  the  profits  charged  by  the  merchant 
who  advan  :es  the  tax. 

Mr.  Henry  C.  Carey  was  an  uncompromising  opponent 
of  free  trade  and  decidedly  in  favor  of  land  taxes,  but  he 
has  left  on  record  the  result  of  a  vast  amount  of  research, 

'  One  hundred  thousand  capitalists  in  the  United  States  arc  enabled 
to  save  more  after  taxes  are  paid  than  fifteen  millions  of  its  people, 
in  whom  are  included  the  farmers,  the  greatest  actual  wealth  pro- 
ducers of  the  commonwealth. 

'  The  pauper  is  not  treated  as  a  subject  for  consideration  in  the 
incidence  of  taxation,  as  he  is  supported  by  the  state  in  any  case. 


INDIRECT  TAXATION.  ,6, 

.ccompanied  by  his  own  opinions,  all  in  most  pronounced 
oppos,t.on  .0  indirect  taxation.  He  tells  of  how  at  one 
time,  m  the  days  of  the  Koman  Empire,  "duties  on  im- 
ports  and  exports,  on  the  passage  of  country  produce 
mto  towns  and  cities,  on  the  passage  of  rivers,  on  sales 

the  whole  of  that  of  the  empire.  Slaves  could  not  change 
masters,  nor  could  property  change  hands  by  legacy  or 
donation  without  payment  of  a  tax.  The  raising  of 
cattle  and  the  consumption  of  salt  were  privileges  to  be 
pa.d  for  to  the  state  The  consumer  of  watef,  and  he 
who  needed  to  avoid  it,  alike  were  taxed.     Nothing  was 

ZT.  '"^Pf"""^''  ^=  'o  "arrant  its  escape  from 
the  hands  of  the  tax-gatherer,  provided  only  that  it 
promised  to  add  to  a  revenue  required  for  the  main- 
tenance of  a  system  under  which  labor  and  land  declined 
in  value  and  slavery  took  the  place  of  freedom  " 

Of  Turkey  he  said  :  "  Taxation  there  has  no  'reference 
whatever  to  the  value  of  the  land,  but  only  to  the  ability 
of  the  col  ector  and  his  agents  to  squeeze  from  its  culti- 
vator the  largest  share  of  its  product'  " 
th  Jn  >"r«?'  the  United  States  :  "  The  government  of 
the  United  States  has,  throughout  most  of  its  existence, 
be=n  mis  ed  by  the  erroneous  idea  thai  indirect  taxatio,^ 
wa.s  the    egitimate  mode  of  raising  the  public  revenue 

the  facts  already  stated  in  relation  to  the  comparative 
prices  of  agricultural  products  they  need  to  sell  and  those 
metallic  ones  they  require  to  purchase-the  experience 
of  forty  years  having  exhibited  a  steady  and  regular 
.ncrease  in  the  quantity  of  wheat,  flour,  rice,  tobacco, 
and  cotton  required  to  be  given  in  exchange  for  smaller 


1 62 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


n 


\\\ 


quantities  of  lead,  tin,  iron,  copper,  gold,  and  silver. 
That  being  the  road  towards  barbarism,  and  the  course 
in  that  direction  having  been  continued  with  remarkable 
pertinacity,  we  are  thus  supplied  with  an  explanation  of 
the  facts,  that  the  power  of  trade  grows  steadily  while 
that  of  commerce  declines,  and  that  in  the  land  in  which 
all  men  were  once  declared  to  be  free  and  equal  *  free 
society 'is  now  declared  to  have  proved  *a  failure.'"' 
And  still  the  difficulty  becomes  greater.  More  decided 
protection  has  only  augmented  the  forces  of  centraliza- 
tion within  the  national  bounds,  but  indirect  taxation 
remains  the  same  evil, 

'  '•  Social  Science,"  vol.  iii.,  p.  igi. 


CHAPTER  IV. 


DIRECT   TAXATION. 

Mr.  Thomas  G.  Shearman,  who  is  a  student  of  this 
subject,  claims  that  for  the  United  States,  by  the  sub  t 

nrLttrtr ''"''"'-'  '-^'-'  ^si^oiT: 

people    the  t"    ''  "'"'"'  '^"''^"'  ^S^t  t.^  saved  -he 

made  «;  of  ,h '"  T""^"''  ""S""  "^'"S  |.,35o,ooo,ooo, 
made  up  of  the  share  to  government,  profits  on  lew  bv 
merchants,  and  the  action  of  the  tariff  in  increasing'the 
cost  of  domestic  manufactures."  ^ 

The  writer's  estimate  is  as   follows  :  United   States 
customs  and  excise  taxes  amount  to  about  $335  ooo H 

about  16,000,000,000,  are  tncr-ased  in  price  ac  least  j 
^ivesTll  '""'J  '"^  ^™"Se  protection),  which 
fnL  t'!e?  '°°°-  ^^  '"^'='"«  '"Sethe,  the  taxes  paid 
havet,    o?"'  "'  '":'  '''"  "'^  --uf-t-ers'we 

1x37,000,000.  Thus  we  have  $,,  ■3.,ooo,ooo,  representing 

he  indirect  taxes  upon  the  people  of  »he  Jnited  States 

a  yearly  tax  equivalent  to  $r..86  •;.     capita,  or  $6430 

for  the  family  of  five.     If  diis  is  the  approximate  sum  of 

America,  ,t  is  quite  enough  to  account  for  the  decline  of 
American  agriculture. 

163 


164 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


In  Canada  the  federal  treasury  gets  about  $28,000,000 
at  the  present  time  through  indirect  taxation  ;  domestic 
manufactures,  which  now  amount  to  above  $400,000,000,' 
are  increased  on  the  average  not  less  than  5  per  cent., 
making  another  burden  on  the  consumer  of  at  least 
$10,000,000.  On  these  two  amounts  the  merchants, 
jobbers,  and  retailers  who  collect  them  get  at  least 
another  20  per  cent.,  or  $5,760,000,  making  in  all  the 
fine  sum  of  $57,600,000,  or  about  $57  for  the  average 
family. 

An  average  direct  tax  of  $25  against  the  million  or 
more  incomes  in  Canada  would  secure  a  revenue  of  $25,- 
000,000.  Would  this  not  be  a  change  calculated  to 
lighten  the  load  carried  by  many  a  tax-burdened  citizen  ? 
An  annual  direct  tax  of  $15  upon  each  of  the  upwards 
of  500,000  farm  holdings  in  Canada  would  yield  a 
revenue  greater  than  the  sum  total  of  its  customs  col- 
lections of  twenty  years  ago  ($8,578,000  in  1868).  This 
even  would  be  too  liberal  a  contribution  to  the  federal 
treasury  from  the  farmers  of  Canada ;  a  small  one,  how- 
ever, compared  with  that  now  extracted  from  them. 
The  cities  have  a  burden  to  bear,  and  personal  property 
h.^s  no  right  to  escape.  Death,  probate,  legacy,  or 
succession  duties,  to  a  limited  extent,  could  also  be 
utilized  to  regulate  inequality. 

But,  on  whatever  taxation  be  laid,  it  should  rest  on 
the  respective  payers,  as  strictly  as  pes  Ible,  in  propor- 
tion to  income,  and  it  should,  after  a  certain  limit,  be 
progressive.  This  is  really  the  only  scientific  base  on 
which  to  found  an  equitable  fiscal  structure  ;  one  at  the 
same  time  in  perfect  accord  with  the  highest  principles 
of  ethics.     God  never    intended  science  to  divide   the 

'  Estimated  1635,000,000  for  1889, 


DlSECr    TAXATION. 


.65 


brotherhood  of  men  by  an  impassable  gulf,  .rowing 
w^er  and  ever  wider.  Its  mission  is  rathfr  to  bZ  all 
th.s  seemtng  conflict  of  interests  into  harmony         * 

Properly  adjust  a  progressive  tax  on  property  and 
ZZTlTT'^""^  y-  give  relief  to'  the  "ne  .0 

rearburdent;  'Z^  i^f  .f "  "'  "'  "^"^^'''" ''  ^ 
an  .He  weight  .t'^uM^IZet  Z^^^  ^^ 
monopolies,  and  you  give  back  tn  c^.;..  ' 

w^ich  is  really  unUed.  "t.  'IT^ZZ  =t 
this  progressive  way,  relieve  the  small   proprieto"  and 

rr„r/c::^,t.---  -  -----^ro^ 

Small  farmers  could  well  demand  this-without  which 

.y  :itr:::e?c:  ^^'ti  ""  "^^"--^  "«"•  -  -»^™ 

ny  witn  science  and    the  common  weal-    h„f  «^f 

Ss"of  t  '"^  ^"""^°'  "^'^  ^^^^'^  '  -" -He 
millions  of  the  peasantry  of  France  and  Germanv  who 

are  now  receiving  presumed  favors  from  thel.e Mter 

being  destroyed  as  actual  forces  in  the  nationa  I  e 

Allow   the  small  farmers  of  the  world,  before  thev 

hT  i  re^crTth"'  ''■'""''  ''''^^''' '°  --  - 

take  ,  .>  ."'  '"''  "^^"S^'  ^'  '°  taxation  ;  to 

take  a  place  as  the  ideal  typical  farmers  of  America 
and  their  power  and  usefulness  as  tax  producers  would 
prove. hem  no  subjects  for  the  exercise' of  charftrbt 

w^h  makes  thetrra  su^bj^roft^^^ry^'  -""'- 

onTh:  o  h^twT  "'7/."  "'^  °"'  '''"'•  I  "-"'ain 
on  tne  other  that  it  would  be  harmful  as  well  as  im 

scientific  political  economy  to  prohibit  the  agg  eLLn" 
"f  capita,  in  mdustry.     Deal  with  these  mattefs  bTway 


# 


i66 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


N> 


of  taxation,  as  the  great  economist,  Adam  Smith,  sug- 
gested over  one  hundred  years  ago.  Allow  capital 
freedom  to  work — the  state  securing  its  share  ;  permit  no 
public  favors,  and  the  harm  from  it  will  be  brought  into 
small  proportions.  If  it  becomes  a  monopoly,  and  is  thus 
empowered  to  shift  its  burdens  on  the  consumers  of  its 
products,  it  is  then  robbing  the  citizens  of  the  state,  and 
taxes  should  be  put  upon  it  until  monopoly  is  broken. 
If  the  state  be  a  factor  in  the  accumulation  of  incomes, 
how  much  more  is  it  true  of  the  incomes  which 
roll  up  into  the  millions,  than  of  those  which  barely 
suffice  for  the  possessor's  existence  ?  How  much  more 
then  should  the  state  claim  from  the  former  than  from  the 
latter  ?  These  views  are  in  accord  with  those  of  many 
thoughtful  students  of  the  present  day,  while  a  few 
practical  statesmen  have  dared  to  utter  similar  ones. 

"  The  rich  man,  with  a  surplus  income,  should  con- 
tribute more  proportionately  out  of  that  income,  than 
the  poor  man  out  of  that  poverty  which  leaves  him  no 
more  than  a  bare  subsistence."  '  J.  B.  Say,  long  ago, 
taught  that  "  taxation  is  a  sacrifice  to  the  preservation  of 
society  and  social  organization,  which  ought  not  to  be 
purchased  by  the  destruction  of  individuals  "  ;  that  taxa- 
tion **  cannot  be  equitable  unless  its  ratio  is  progressive." ' 

An  excellent  precedent  for  a  progressive  tax  is  given 
in  the  eminently  successful  fiscal  legislation  of  Solon,  in 
the  little  community  of  Attica.  The  weight  of  taxation 
was  then  laid  upon  the  largest  property-holders — those 
having  the  highest  political  privileges  ;  the  next  class 
was  relieved  to  the  extent  of  \  ;  the  next  |,  and  so  on, 
until  those  were  reached  who  were  ineligible  for  office — 

'  Hon.  Edward  Blake,  speech  at  Toronto,  1886. 
^   '  Political  Economy,"  p.  459. 


DIRECT    TAXATION.  ,5^ 

people  «,ere  at  that  time  hndholders,  and  i    became   h! 

policy  acco™;!:  t\  zr^'r". "" '""'"'' 

hibited  the  "  most  enuLhi    1  ■    ^  '"  "  **'  "" 

•ies  Of  cUUe^H^'  S tltZ ^^^e^l^/Z- "t  d 

the  masses  became  re-enslaved  ' 

-ngland  he  suggested  the  fol'-nving  distribution  : 

■ -Lands  and  Tenerr-ents  at  4^.  i,,  ,he  pound 
income ^ 

a.~Railways,  Canals,'  Mines','  'Minerals," ai  '4.; 'in  '^''  ^ 

the  pound  income. . .  ,, 

3.— Legacy    Duty * '°-^  ^^ 

Succession  Duty  at'iV.  'in'  the  'pound 't  " 

7   Tax   (warehouses,   factories,   wo;ks',    ' 
offices,  shops,  etc.)... - 

S-— Miscellaneous.  ^°-° 

14.0  " 

1 00.0  ^ 
In  amplifying  this  Mr.  Haywood  said  •  "  Th.  f 


^.. 


M 


1 68 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


(I 


I'   IJi 


cient  revenue  may  thus  be  obtained  by  a  direct  system 
in  the  simplest  ma.iner  at  less  cost  of  collection,  and 
with  no  interference  with  the  operations  of  trade. 

"  The  present  house  duty  affords  the  best  foundation 
on  which  to  build  a  system  of  direct  taxation,  extending 
to  all  interests  beyond  the  owners  of  land.  Every  man 
resides  in  a  house  of  some  kind.  Household  suffrage  is 
now  the  basis  of  our  parliamentary  franchise,  and  this 
fact  will  go  far  to  reconcile  even  the  lower  classes  to  a 
revenue  system  constructed  upon  it.  Adam  Smith 
observes  that  *  a  proportional  house  tax  might  perhaps 
produce  a  more  considerable  revenue  than  any  that  has 
been  drawn  from  it  in  any  part  of  Europe.'  Again  he 
says  :  *  A  tax  put  upon  house  rents  would  in  general 
fall  heaviest  upon  the  rich,  and  in  this  sort  of  inequality 
there  would  not  be  any  thing  unreasonable.' 

"  It  is  not  very  unreasonable  that  the  rich  should  con- 
tribute to  the  public  expense,  not  only  in  proportion  to 
their  revenue,  but  something  more  than  that  proportion. 
To  this,  however,  ar  NtW  as  to  any  other  proposal  whatever, 
a  hundred  objections  will  be  raised.  But  a  graduated  tax, 
beginning  with  the  exemption  of  the  very  poorest  class 
having  a  bare  subsistence,  and  rising  in  a  scale  adjusted 
not  according  to  rent  alone,  but  taking  also  into  ac- 
count the  occupation,  profession,  and  position  in  rank, 
might,  and  doubtless  would,  bring  in  a  more  elastic  and 
productive  revenue  than  our  present  income  tax." 

The  more  these  matters  are  studied,  the  clearer  it  will 
appear  that  the  matter  of  adjusting  a  progressive  tax, 
is  not  a  more  insurmountable  difficulty  than  that  of 
adjusting  a  single  tax  by  taking  the  unearned  incre- 
ment of  land.  And,  whether  with  or  without  the  single- 
tax   system,    all   lands    held   for    speculative    purposes 


DIHECT    TAXATIOM. 


169 


«„^  .  '^utrai  ana  local  revL'nuH      Tk^ 

same  may  be  said  of  bonanza  farms.  "" 

VViih  direct  taxation,  however  levi^,l  -.    . 

depend  upon  direct  taxatir.h  ?^  "'"   '"'"""'^ 

odious  that  war  wonM  h      '     !  f"''"'=  "'""'''  ^^  '° 

would  incurTe  od    1     Z™"''^'  ^'"'""^   ""   >-«/ 
u^ur  me  Odium  of  carry  nc  it  on  "     'vu^  * 

s\:i-^:r:r;or:dt^ 
tTs-iLierrit^iT^h'-v^r-"  -  ^^^ 

circumslanc"     t  is  nil     """"''' '"'f'^'^'i-     Under  such 
will  weigh  wel.h..^'''''°"''''"  '"  ^"PPO^ethat  he 

be  avoided      TV         '^""'""^  expenditures  which  may 

inW       direc     a:at:^w?H"H*""^'^'''^''^«''-»' 

would  be  immed  atelv  r;,„  ,f  ' '"'"'°"  '  ^'•«'' 

liaraents      w;T  ,       ^  '"'  ^^^'''-K  Power  of  Par- 

TZT       ,T       "  ^'°P"'y  '''id,  and  with  the  results 
Which   would   rierp<5<jTrii,r  f^n  ,  fc!>uirs 

would  asainHrir^  "'  "'''  A^^'can  farmer 

would  again  take  his  place  m  our  legislative  chambers. 


CHAPTER    V. 

THE     REAL     STRENGTH     OF    AN     EVIL     SYSTEM     OF 

TAXATION. 


In  early  times  despotism  gained  its  power  by  physical 
force.  It  is  claimed,  with  good  reason,  that,  in  most  in- 
stances of  to-day,  governments  gain  ascendancy,  not  only 
over  their  opponents  but  over  the  people  at  large,  by 
cunning.  It  is  conspicuously  apparent  to  the  student 
of  these  subjects  that,  by  this  means,  they  are  continually 
increasing  their  command  of  the  purses  of  the  people  of 
America,  and  making  stronger  their  alliances  with  the 
wealthy  classes.  Surely,  with  such  an  advantage  as  this, 
they  have  the  power  of  position.  Will  they  yield  it  up 
without  a  desperate  struggle  ?    We  think  they  will  not. 

Professor  Sumner  very  correctly  remarks  :  "  It  is  the 
Forgotten  Man  who  is  threatened  by  every  extension  of 
the  paternal  system  of  government."  '  "  Every  new  sub- 
ject to  be  legislated  upon  strengthens  the  influence  and 
power  of  government,  makes  the  politician  more  import- 
ant in  his  own  eyes,  as  well  as  in  the  eyes  of  others." 
"  All  governments  like  to  interfere  ;  it  elevates  their 
position  to  make  out  that  they  can  cure  the  evils  of  man- 
kind." '  As  the  subjects  seeking  legislative  benefits  are 
continually  increasing,  these  potent  props  to  the  paternal 

'  "  What  the  Social  Classes  Owe  to  Each  Other,"  p.  150. 
*  Walter  Bagehot.  in  "  Economic  Studies." 

170 


-^A-  nviL  SYSTKM  OF  taxa  rrou.         ,7, 

one,     who  hope,  sooner  or  later,  .0  have  a  share  in 
n,an,p,.i,,„ng  .he  s.a...  ,„ntr„l,"-cven  down  .0  the  .lay 
laborer,-are  ever  putting  themselves  in  line  to  giv    it 
support.  Do  away  with  indirect  taxation.  an,l  pi  "eXec 

".en,  of  a nv.l.^cd  ...untry  would  be  shorn  of  its  'r7a,  "t 
power  and  the  leader,  of  its  force,  know  this  o„T.oo 
we        he  twenty  or  more  millionaire,  in  the  Senate  of  he 

wc^^and  r  ""  ''"'""""'  '■'"''"^•''  >""■  "•«  idea  t  a 
wealth  and  government  are  inseparable  ;  they  know  i..st 

how  specally  serviceable  government  may  be  to  wl 
and  how  specially  serviceable  wealth  may  be  t~r„ 

"le  pout  cal  machine,  govern   themselves  accordini-lv 
The  result  „  that  against  reform  in  our  systc™  ,  f  taxa' 
..on  and  the  evils  it  occasions  there  i,  /weU  :LsoH- 
dated     orce,  commanded  by  well-trained,  experienced 
and  self-mtcrested  officers.  experienced, 

But  it  is  not  only  this  regular  array  of  acf-e  forces 

ttf  Ire""  T  ""'""'  '"""=  '^  ^'-  "  force'   fneg! 
tives    more  or  less   irregular,  who   are  most  effective 

.mpediments  ,0  wholesome  efforts  .0  effect  Ms  purpr 
They  object   to  the   policies  of  the  actives    h^„  T 

ormulate  nothing  to  stimulate  hope  in    he  breast f:i; 

hose  who  long  for  remedial  action.     Worthless  a    are 

heir  objections  to  action  on  the  lines  of  their  profess  ons 
they  are  really  grave  stumbling-blocks  .0  the  many  who' 
may  desire  a  better  statP  nf  tuir.       c        /  ^ 

"wet  blank.f ''  "^''  ^°'  ^^^'^  ^''^'  ^eady 


a 


IMAGE  EVALUATION 
TEST  TARGET  (MT-3) 


/. 


fMr 


t 


1.0 


I.I 


1.25 


Ui|2^    12.5 
1^  1^    ill  2.2 

!£   U£   12.0 


1.4 


6" 


1.6 


Photographic 

Sciences 
Corporation 


23  WEST  MAIN  STREET 

WEBSTER,  N.Y.  14580 

(716)  872-4503 


m 
^ 


V 


\\ 


% 


v 


:^^v 


^^i 


<^ 


mamuimeimM 


mam^.imar^-'-'' 


K^^fl'M^M-itto 


ai 


172 


AAf£/f/CAJ^  FARMS, 


H 


However  ponderous  and  expensiv^e  the  machinery  of 
the  state  may  be,  it  draws  its  support  solely  from  the 
substance  of  the  people.  **  Woe  to  the  people  who  are 
incapable  of  limiting  the  sphere  of  the  action  of  the 
state.  Liberty,  private  activity,  riches,  well-being,  inde- 
pendence, dignity  depend  upon  this."  ' 

Have  the  farmers  and  the  thoughtful  people  of  America 
lost  that  power  which  alone  can  overcome  these  condi- 
tions, the  continued  triumphing  of  which  must  finally 
result  in  the  ruin  of  all  ? 

revenues  precludes  the  possibility  of  making  these  changes.  The 
reasoning  is  absurd  :  first,  because  revenue  will  always  be  required, 
and,  under  our  present  system,  whatever  party  is  in  power,  every  day 
is  making  the  conditions  worse  ;  second,  if  it  be  admitted  that  a 
change  would  be  des^irable  for  the  collection  of  a  small  revenue;  it  is 
still  more  desirable  for  the  collection  of  a  large  one.  Under  our 
system  of  taxation,  the  volume  is  increased  at  an  arithmetical  ratio, 
while  the  evils  may  be  said  to  increase  at  a  geometrical  ratio. 
'  Frederic  Bastiat. 


BOOK   Vi. 

POLITICS. 
Faton.  '  ^"■'"^"'^  ""'"^  -^Onditions—DOKMAN  B. 


mm 


h 


i 


CHAPTER  I. 

THE    FARMER    LOSING    HIS    POLITICAL    POWER. 

That  the  farmer  of   America  is  rapidly   losing   his 

concerns  of  his  country  ,s  patent  lo  all  who  will  give  the 
subject  any  consideration.     In  the  United  States  forty 
years  ago,  the  farmers  composed   70  per  cent,   of  the 
mdustnal    population.      And    even    twenty    years    ago 
the   cattle    farmers   and   agriculturists  outni  inhered  all 
others      1  o-day  they  are  in  the  minority.     In  Canada  the 
agriculturist    vote  is  still   in  the  majority;  but  even  in 
this  new  country  we  fear  the  farmer  is  losing  a  lingering 
chance  to  save  his  class  from  political  annihilation      In 
proportion  to  numbers  and  to  capital  inv.^ted  in  agri- 
culture  and  cattle  farming,  compared  with  numbers  and 
amounts  invested  by  other  classes,  there  should  be  over 
one  hundred  farmers   representing   their   various    con- 
stituenc.es,    sitting   in   the    Dominion    Parliament,    and 
looking  after  the  interests  of  the  agriculturists.     Instead 
of  tnat  number,  not  more  than  thirty-nine  can  in  anyway 
be  classed  as  representing  tlie  farmers.     Of  the  whole 
number  of  the  last  United  States  House  of  Representa- 
tives, only  seventeen  were  farmers,  or  i  to  every  470,000 
of  that  occupation.     Even  in  1 870  twenty-six  farmers,  or 
I  to  every  .28,000  of  their  number,  had  a  seat  in  Ihe 
House.     In  our  State  and   Provincial  Legislatures,  the 

175 


^•f'^''f^-?'^?gfiiriia>rt^-«g(iriii.: 


176 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


representatives  from  other  classes  outnumber  the  farmers 
by  three  to  one.  These  facts  prove  a  decreasing  power 
in  the  farmers  in  a  matter  fraught  with  vital  importance 
to  them. 

Educated  men  of  the  professions  are  necessary  for 
certain  positions  in  Parliament.     But  the  majority  of  our 
public  men  are  inclined  to  encourage  large  expenditures, 
elaborate  formulas,  numberless  acts,  and  to  the  securing 
of  vast  powers  to    Parliaments— much  of  all  which  is 
decidedly  antagonistic  to  the  true  interests  of  the  people. 
After  prorogations,  they  boast  of  their  labors,  and  the 
number  of  their  acts  passed,  many  of  which  will,  in  the 
public    interest,    require    repealing.     In    Mr.     Herbert 
Spencer's  "  Sins  of  Legislators,"  he  informs  us  that  in 
May,  1S73,  a  M^.  Jason,  vice-president  of  one  of  the  law 
societies  of  England,  publicly  stated  that  from  the  time 
of  Henry  HI.  to  1872,  there  had  been  passed  through 
Parliament,  in  England  18,110  public  acts,  of  which  four 
fifths  had  been  wholly  or  partially  repealed.     We  are  in- 
clined to  think,  that  at  no  time  have  politicians  been 
more  anxious  to  magnify  the  necessity  for  much  legisla- 
tion than  at  the  present  day,  and  in  no  portion  of  the 
globe  more  than  in  some  of  our  own  local  as  well  as  our 
federal  Legislatures. 

In  if  61,  the  farmers  of  Nova  Scotia  composed  61  pcj 
cent,  of  the  industrial  population  cf  the  province  ;  in 
1 88 1,  43  per  cent.  This  constant  relative  decline  in 'the 
numbers  of  the  agricultural  class,  as  compared  with 
others,  shows  most  plainly  that  however  prone  the 
farmer  may  be  at  the  present  to  throw  away  his  chances, 
the  time  is  not  far  distant  when  the  power  which  he 
might  exercise  to-day  will  be  gone,  perhaps  never  to 
return. 


Prow  Su™„e.  cans  h™.  'C/ro/go  :';":••''''" 

army."    The  agricultural  vote  C  o'fa  as  se^f  ,°„rT 
concerned,  practically  a  fruitless'efforT    VVVnour  o'; 

secrets  of  th  X'  be  P°'!' "-^-''^^g^arded  as  the 
bora  are  influencdTn  their  I^^  T  *''  """''  "^'^h- 
thc  main,  by  their  tlhj  W^rLce  ;:  *?  "f '^h"'  '" 
of  the  party  whose  name  the  ct^  dat  °b  rt  TutThe 
effect  on  the  ballot-box  bv  the  ,n„=/    f    ,  ^ 

are  to  be  march^rf  H„       7       .  ^  ^  °^  electors  who 
o  oe  marched  down  from  the  factories  near  by,  will 


■HHPiiMH 


178 


AMERICAN  I A  RMS. 


depend  altogether  upon  the  numbers  who  turn  out.     An- 
tecedents do  not  count  with  these.     At  such  important 
times  a  half-holiday  is  usually  granted.    "  Election  day  !  " 
"  Hurrah  for  Edgar  Thompson  !  "     "  Hurrah  for  the  age 
of  steel !  "    This  great  army  of  toilers  march  and  record 
their  votes  in  support  of  the  mijestic  power  of  capital. 
Their  numbers  decide  the  stu  e  of  the  poll  before  the 
ballot  closes.     The  friends  of  monopoly  gather  in  crowds 
around    the  booths,     the  opponents   disappear,    capital 
wins!      "Hurrah    for    the    hammer!"     "Hurrah   for 
patriotism  and  progress  !  "     A  daring  sceptic  may  have 
the  hardihood  to  wait  the  sheriff's  decision,  and  upon 
this   outburst   he  very  well  suggests  that  it  would  be 
better  if  they  could  hurrah  for  ''liberty,  patriotism,  and 
progress.'!     He  would  be  told  that  "the  man  who  cries 
'  liberty  '  is  an  enemy  to  his  country."     The  daring  op- 
ponent might  well  retort  that,  "  at  the  back  of  all  this, 
there  is  a  despotism  which  will  one  day  crush  us  all.'' 
He  would  be  told  :  "  If  you  don't  like  your  country,  you 
had  better  get  out."     "  Hurrah  for  the  age  of  steel  !" 
"There   will  be   a   grand   dinner  and  an   illumination 
at    the    factory  !  "     "  Hurrah    for    Mammon  v«^   Co  !  " 
Farmers   of  America  !     You   have   against  you  an   or- 
ganized enemy  that  requires  a  solid  union  of  your  whole 
strength  to  combat,  or  you  are  most  surely  undone  ! 

Though  far  from  believing  in  unbridled  liberalism,  or 
rather  the  extreme  of  egoism,  I  think  there  can  be  little 
doubt  that  Mr.  Herbert  Spencer  is  correct  in  his  claim 
that  one  of  the  most  alarming  tendencies  of  our  time  is 
the  encroaching  power  of  Parliaments,  and  the  willing, 
ness  with  which  the  people  are  surrendering  one  pre- 
rogative after  another  to  the  control  of  legislators.  By 
such  yielding  up  of  the  management  of  concerns,  which 


i  » 


TffE  ^MK>fg„  ,,os,^^  ^„  POUTKA,.  POW,.,.      ,;,, 

71\Zr  ""''""'''  '>«'  "»<•"  the  control  of  individ- 
ta  '  •.  ■  "  'u ™y  "  """-lished,  which,  though  volun- 
tary.  „  none  .he  less  real.  The  consequences  are  hat 
not  only  ,s  the  scope  of  individual  develonme„7  -,„!. 
relative  influence  lessened,  but,  through  tch  deliver 
ance,  new  opportunities  are  created  for  self,!  'd 
unscrupulous  lobbyists  to  victimize  the  :.as:  "' 

inTh^ti^d-^eraiTrLrrs-'te'""^^ 

wuh  which  Canadian  legislators  have  b    n    b  e  t^  sat!;: 
.he,r  constttuent.,  that  in  the  hands  of  "  pat-rna    '^? 

ernment  they    could    trust   the   ma,-,  gete'     of    ,hel' 
dearest  interest.  «<:'•  -  .t   ot    their 

tnan  one  hundred  years  ago,  rose  in  their  might  -d 

IZ     """r"'""   ^"«'""''  '°  8^'»   Perfect  commerdd 
^eedom.    Just  now,  in  Canada,  a  faction  are  cZorrJ 

cnJ    /r:^'  °^  ''"'"8  "■<='■'  commercial  de^[Z 
confined  to  th,s  continent  alone  ;  though  the     be   "es 
and  chances  for  trade,  which  they  are  wHling  to  imp  ri^ 
are  valuable  beyond  compare  with  those  which  thr^  o 

:r  o^r:  tv:h '"^  ^^°  -^  ^  '-^'^  - «« '^  '-^' 

oraer  to  secure  to  their  own  control.     In  America  the 

-"  es"  -rr:  '^r  °^  '^^^'■°" """  -n^e  ri  st: 

e«es  on  tmports-has  mcreased,  in  the  last  twenty-five 
years,  many  tunes  the  increase  of  population.  A"d  stul 
the  people  sanction  a  continual  increase.  Will  thev 
eventually  cry  a  halt  ?  Or  will  they  allow  it  to  <ro  on 
unchecked,  until  they  are  powerless  to  compe  a    Z.Z 


Pw 


t8o 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


W^ 


Our  political  systems  give  to  our  legislators  most 
tempting  opportunities,  by  effecting  slight  changes,  to 
put  thousands  into  the  hands  of  the  monopolist  and  the 
treasury  at  the  ex{)ense  of  the  people  ;  while  the  manu- 
facturer in  return  will  put  his  hundreds  into  the  poll- 
tician's  election  fund,  and  make  a  good  bargain  by  this 
exchange  of  services.  The  politician  has  but  to  support 
the  aims  of  the  monopolist,  and  the  monopolist  will  stand 
by  the  politician. 

So  apparently  irresistible  are  the  toils  of  our  various 
politico-fiscal  systems  that  even  some  of  our  best  men 
are  unable  to  escape  their  pernicious  influence.  Have 
we  not  recently  seen  our  most  earnest,  able,  high-minded, 
and  experienced  statesmen,  who,  from  their  first  entry 
into  the  politica.  arena,  have  stood  by  the  masses,  finally 
advocating  the  cause  of  the  oppressor  as  a  last  recourse 
for  a  return  to  power  ?  The  results,  of  course,  are  a 
greater  victory  for  capital  and  the  loss  of  champions  for 
the  interests  of  the  people. 

Many  of  our  laws  are  made,  not  in  the  interest  of  the 
masses,  but  for  the  selfish  ends  of  the  few,  and  very  often 
for  the  direct  benefit  of  the  selfish  politicians  who  make 
them.  A  goodlv  number  of  our  people  know  all  this  ; 
they  feel  that  its  corrupting  and  demoralizing  influence 
has  permeated  through  our  whole  social  life  ;  but  we,  in 
effect,  have  decided  that  party  despotism  must  be  main- 
tained. 

How  appropriate  are  these  words  of  Bastiat :  "  What ! 
the  law  is  no  longer  the  refuge  of  the  oppressed,  but  the 
arm  of  the  oppressor  !  The  law  is  no  longer  a  shield, 
but  a  sword  !  The  law  no  longer  holds  in  her  august 
hands  a  scale,  but  false  weights  and  measures  !  And  you 
wish  to  have  society  well  regulated  !     Your  system  has 


r/f/c  FAKME^  rosma  »,s  poutica,.  powek.    ,«, 
rords"  '  Wh  ""  """""  •"  ""  "8"'«"«  hall.  ,h.„ 

Yes,  many  of  us  know  full  well  that  our  law,  are  on 
press,ve,  demoralizing,  and  expensive.     P  ofe"  or  Sum' 
ncr  says  of  the  United  States  :  "  Men  are  jT, Tup  for  t hi 

*vs   memselves      —men    whose  hearts  are  nnf  ;«  »k 

opp":.":!  "c™"'  '-'■<'-  -'^ — P-pti :' 

li'e^;  at  their  hrnVsr-V"  "''"'""  "'  ^""-  ""' 

.n.t.>r.^\re  rre7iite^,r  i^L^'i""'-  '^ 

Z.  !  ■■","•  "''^  ^'"'  =  "  "  '»  »°  'i-^e  to  philoso^ 

Phi^e,  to  moralue,  to  theorize";  that  "the  man  Z 

iobbe,y,l,eTe     .:*i  *  ,:'''="'''7»f';  <"  ""wy  contracts  .„d 
tain  ,„d  clouded  with  ^ffi    'i,'  V^""" '"'"'■"'*"»"«  dark  and  uncr. 

dis.ncha„:i:,ri: '  *si';'rrv''°r"'"' " '  p"'"" »' 

emlion  U  enriching  rfolerfnt       '   T      ""' '"""''  """  ""'  C™f«-  • 


I82 


AMR/f/CAy  FARMS, 


advocates  princfpleu  is  a  crank,  a  lunatic  "  ;  that  "  the 
flnt  and  main  thing  is  victory,  p.inciplcs  afterwards." 
Victory  or  no  victory,  principles  are  shoved  aside  at 
degraded  into  merely  serving  the  objects  of  the  hour. 
T'  .'se  politicians,  it  is  true,  often  go  to  the  hustings 
advocating  changes  of  the  most  startling  character  for 
the  presumed  welfare  of  the  "  sovereign  people."  But 
when  they  get  into  secure  positions  themselves,  they 
coolly  take  effectual  measures  to  shelve  these  reforms  or 
warp  them  into  harmony  with  their  own  selfish  interests. 
And  are  they  brought  to  book  by  the  people,  as  they 
should  be  ?  O  no  !  Unforeseen  circumstances  require 
a  new  programme,  and  the  dissatisfied  are  silenced  for 
the  time.' 

New  schemes  are  being  continually  set  afloat  to  mys- 
tify and  captivate,  and  for  the  purpose  of  using  up  iaxi- 
tion  surpluser,,  and  to  furnish  excuses  for  further  drafcs 
on  the  people.  For  the  onerous  tax  extracted  from  the 
citizen  through  a  vicious  system  one  day,  he  is  made  to 
laud  and  glorify  his  representatives  the  next  for  gaining 
for  him,  in  the  most  conspicuous  and  flattering  manner, 
a  trifling  service  in  return,  the  intrinsic  value  of  which 
may  be  most  questionable. 

Our  political  schemes  are  decided,  not  by  the  inherent 
value  of  the  different  planks  in  the  platform  agreed  oa— 
not  because  those  planks  rest  upon  principles  of  high 
and  desirable  order,  but  because  their  adoption  offers,  as 

'  All  thoughtful  persons  can  bear  testimony  that  the  result  of  a 
dependence  upon  expedients  ends  in  barren  result— sorrow  and  con- 
fusion.  L*  gislators  are  but  human.  Statecraf%  however,  is  supposed 
to  be  the  work  of  ripe  experience.  Says  Ruskin  :  "  It  is  far  better 
to  spend  your  thousand  pounds  in  making  a  good  gun,  and  then  blow 
it  to  pieces,  than  to  pass  a  life  of  idleness.     Only  do  not  let  I't  be 


the  politici.„  bclicv,,,  ,he  e..i«e  and  <|uirk«.  ,oc„  ,„ 

The  professionals  uive  their  onl^r,   »«  •  ,  '      ^' 

workers,  who  are  su'ppo.ed  Z^i:^J^t  7L 
plan  of  the  "  bosses."    Tho«e  who  "  kirk  '•  ' 

or/^.^....,^  are  ostr.ci  J  ;:o:  ^^^^^^ 

th.  fl    .  ""''^  '^'  "'"^^'^^  ««^^^'"y.     Neither  or 

the  platform  nor  through  the  oresg  will   »h  l**''^  ^" 

public  ear,  it  the  nartv  m..K  ^^^  8^'"  '^'^ 

great  polUica,  pa.ie,.  Tho.^ho  a  „"  o.t  ™aj  it 
ttjc-r  busmes,  .„  a„is.  in  holding  .oge.hcr  th  'pr,'" 
which  they  a.e  mdebled  for  their  offices  Th„!e  who 
~^o.  Office  ..t  carry  .he  ne«e.ectionTrort 

.ion:rt':4r\r::re«:r«r;:^t^::- 

more,  either  indifferent,  discourage-  he^L  J'  T 
gusted  with  repeated  failures,  comp";„,te  "d  In  h'" 
ents,  n  lie,,  of  the  fuihning  o^  pro^::?  „d  ^edjs  or 
expectations  raised  by  the  clever  politician  t?  ou^h  th. 
vehement  denunciation  of  past  wrcnes  A  /"""S'' ">e 
and  there,  .ay  showdissati^f^traf.U  '^'^  J:;! 


f 


1 84 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


Ill 


testations  (should  he  choose  to  make  them)  are  not  to 
be  heeded,  if  it  can  be  avoided,  though  he  m.-^'.e  them 
ever  so  loudly.' 

The  same  old  story  is  repeated  over  and  over  again. 
We  tacitly  decide  that  either  one  or  the  other  despotism 
will  rule,  and  rule  in  its  own  way,  in  defiance  of  the 
objections  and  threatenings  of  the  victimized.  Our 
whole  political  and  social  morality  must  be  degenerating 
under  this  rigime.^ 

•  A  few  days  ago  the  writer  suggested  to  a  legislator  that  we  should 
have  more  farmers  in  our  Parliaments,  He  replied  :  "  It  is  a  hard 
place  for  a  farmer,  for  the  moment  he  rises  in  the  House  in  their  be- 
half  he  is  set  upon  by  a  half-dozen  lawyers."  The  Farm  and  Home 
expressed  similar  vie\.s  recently  when  referring  to  the  action  of  one  of 
our  legislative  bodies— views  which  apply  well  to  the  general  feelings 
of  politicians  toward  the  farmer  who  runs  the  gauntlet  of  presuming 
to  mix  in  political  matters—"  Whenever  the  Senate  could  see  a  farm- 
er's head,  it  hit  it." 

*  Recently  said  the  Quebec  Chronicle  (Conservative) ;  "  There  are 
honest  men  in  both  political  camps,  but  the  difficulty  is  to  get  them  to 
enter  public  life.  It  is  the  tactician  who  eventually  comes  to  the 
front,  and  success  only  crowns  the  effo  :s  of  the  man  who  possesses  an 
elastic  conscience.  In  the  old  days  there  used  to  be  a  strong  public 
opinion  in  the  country.  When  the  politicians  went  wrong  there  was 
such  a  thing  as  keeping  them  from  power  and  putting  into  their  places 
men  of  sterling  integrity.  Alas  !  we  have  no  public  opinioa  nowa- 
days worth  the  toss  of  a  copper.  Self-interest  is  the  first  law  of 
nature,  and  the  premier  who  knows  his  man  and  understands  the  art 
of  buying,  can  have  little  difficulty  in  maintaining  himself  in  power  as 
long  as  he  has  a  mind  to  reign." 

On  the  foregoing  the  St.  John  7V/^^^m//i  (Liberal)  remarks  :  "Has 
it  really  come  to  this,  that  an  honest  politician  cannot  succeed,  and 
that  there  is  no  public  opinion  worth  the  toss  of  a  copper  ?  We  trust 
it  is  not  yet  so  bad  as  that.  There  is,  no  doubt,  less  honesty  in  poli- 
tics than  there  was  a  quarter  of  a  century  aga,  and  vastly  less  of 
public  opinion.  .  .  .  What  fate  is  in  store  for  a  country  that  will 
not  have  honest  men  for  rulers  ?  " 


'%; 


TlfE  FAKME,  LOSmc  HIS  POLITICAL  PO^ER.      ,85 

Said  George  William  Curtis,  a  few  years  a^o  h.f 
one  of  the  universities  of  America     "Th!    ^  ;       °'^ 
men  who  founded  the  RepubHc  sa'  'in  J  T''" 

geneous    and    intelligent'  community    thT^p^ce  "  h" 
prosperity  and  intelligence  of  thp  cV  /       !,   ^  ^""^ 

virtue  and  wisdom  of  th"  ^^^  '"^^^^^^  ^"  ^^^^ 

^  vvisGom  ot  the  government      Rnf  ;„  *u' 
actual  America  ?    Or       i-        ^'"'"^"^-     ^"t  is  this  our 

Oceana  ?    Or  Sir  Thomas  More     U.op^  "  Zf™ 
the  political   maxims  of  the   hour?    Tr,    p  .   "' 

Romans  do.     Fight  fire  Jl  T     I  """^  ''°  "= 

his  own   weapons     Tnl  '     ^'"  """  <•«"!  with 

=ff.  .        "sapons-     Take  men  as  they  are  •  and  dnn'f 

our  c^r::'.  po, . :  ^iS::  ^"ir^-  ™' '- 

familiar     '  TiT;.  •  *^'5<»<"n .    and    the    results    are 

r'aL  r?  "  '  "^"^  State,' cries  the  eager  parti! 
arv  t  f>    Th"'  ^:  ''^  """^  ^"""^'^  nasty'work  to 

•rinfamoL"  X^roltf^tTe^t^t'd^r^S 

hy  the  political  LSry  Itr^srcrLs  wUl" 

h™rs:H^tt^^^----«--- 

How  well  all  this  applies,  at  this  very  hour    tn  ,h 
party  politics  of  Canada  as  well  as  th-  United  sL,        u 
know  too  well.     Either  party  in  each  colt  '  ^' 

however  direct  its  apneals  to  reason  ho         "'"  "'"'^"' 

-.stofthepeop,v,nitnrpi:'uT:;rrf,: 


J 

!  * 


1 86 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


political  wisdom  to  ostracise  public  discussion,  and  to 
favor  the  dependence  upon  petty  bribes,  secret  influ- 
ences, and  potrhouse  arguments. 

Knowledge  of  the  fact  that  in  less  than  fifteen  year: 
in  Canada,  over  seventy  elections  have  been  voided  by 
the  courts  of  that  country  for  corrupt  practices,  should 
cause  all  its  right-thinking  people  to  blush  for  its  political 
impurity. 

Even  as  late  as  thirty  years  ago,  Simon  Brown,  the 
politician,  and  gifted  editor  of  the  New  England 
Farmer  of  those  days,  had  not  lost  hope  for  the  future 
of  America,  through  the  power  of  the  rural  population 
to  guide  in  wisdom  and  virtue  the  political,  as  well  as  the 
social  and  ect  aic  destinies  of  the  Republic.  He  saw 
a  future  before  .he  farmers  of  America  as  the  proper 
governors  of  the  commonwealth.  In  January,  1859,  he 
said  to  them  :  "  The  people,  the  yeomanry,  the  dwellers 
in  the  rural  districts,"— the  readers  of  the  New  England 
Farmer,  and  the  like,  must  realize  that  they  are  the 
legitimate  rulers  of  the  land,  and  act  accordingly— must 
take  the  reins  of  government  into  their  own  hands. 

Every  year  sees  the  farmer  with  less  political  influence 
than  ever  before.  This  certainly  is  a  lamentable  fact. 
When  the  people  of  Greece  got  to  look  upon  its  rural 
populations  as  unfit  for  any  thing  but  drudgery,  they 
were  preparing  the  Grecian  Republic  for  its  downfall. 

This,  then,  is  a  first  cause  of  the  American  farmer's 
troubles,  the  neglect  of  his  political  rights  and  duties  ; 
others  follow  as  consequences. 


■..' 


CHAPTER  II. 

THE  FARMER'S  INTEREST  IN  FREE   TRADE   IN   NAT- 
URAL   PRODUCTS  ONLY  ' 

From  the  columns  of  a  valuable  little  farm  paper-r^, 
^arjn  and  Home-^^  read  the  other  day  :     '?Mos,  a«i 
cultural  products  seem  to  be  viewed  as  raw  mateHrr 

,nr,ri  K,'  J  "^^  *^'  ''PP^"»  destined  to  do 

m^aloulable  harm  to  our  agriculture,  if  permitted  to  pre! 

va..    .    .         Most  of  h.s   the  farmer's)  products  are  as 
really  manufactured  articles  as  are  the  clothes  he  ^ars 
Let  us  demand  aud  compel  a  halt  until  this  princ^le  ^ 
honestly  recogntzed."    This  protest  seems  to  us  corre 
and  timely  m  the  interest  of  the  farmer.    Is  there  no 

ricar^sfc^'d-aSr "'  - '-'  - 

187 


^#: 


i88 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


m 


Though  the  much-talked-of  "Mills  Bill,"  which  the 

American  people  have  lately  pasred  their  verdict  upon, 

was  certainly  a  free-trade  measure  in  an  international 

sense  ;  we  are  not  surprised  that  it  found  no  more  favor 

with  the  agricultural  classes.     It  offered  them  little  relief 

from  the  avarice  of  the  monopolist,  while  it  threatened 

to  take  from  a  large  class  of  farmers  the  little  protection 

they  may  have  enjoyed.     But  it  is  hard  to  conceive  it 

possible  that  the  farmers  of  the  United  States  should 

have  suffered  the  impositions  which  have  been  gradually 

put  upon  them,  without  louder  protests  ere  this.     We 

find,  however,  that  these  exactions  have  gathered  with 

more  or  less  increasing  force  for  a  century. 

The  "triumphant"  Republican  party  boasts  of  having 
done  much  in  the  interest  of  the  people  in  increasing  the 
free  list,  from  representing  an  import  of  only  14  millions 
per  annum  twenty  years  ago,  to  representing  244  millions 
at  the  present  time.     Into  this  free  list  has  gone  the 
greater  part  of  the  slight  protection  which  the  farmer 
may  have  had.     While  these  changes  have  been  made 
against  him,  more  important   ones  have  been  made  in 
another    direction.     The    duties    which    he    has    been 
obliged   to   pay  on  manufactured  articles,   have   risen 
from  about  25^^  per  cent,  in  the  decade  1850-60,  to  38 
per  cent,  in  the  decade  1860-70 ;  to  be  raised  again  to 
A2\  per  cent,  in  the  decade  1870-80 ;  and  then  again  to 
44  per  cent,  in  thv<^  last  seven  years  ;  to  finish  up  with  47 
per  cent,  in  1887.     The  free  list  has  been  made  to  cover 
such  articles  as  are  consumed  by  all,  and  productive  of 
revenue  for  the  government  treasury  only— when  taxed 
—and  the  few  articles  of  farm  produce  which  may  be 
imported.     Says  Professor  Taussig,  in  his  "  Tariff  His- 
tory of  the  United  States":    "Step  by  step,  in  the 


II  WW  f-i.l '    I 


THE  FARMER'S  INTER  EST. 


189 

variou,  uriff  acts  which  hav.  been  passed  since  the  war, 
all  the  non-protective  di-.ties  have  been  swept  awav  i„ 
order  that  the  protective  duties  might  be  reXd  I'r^^ 
cles  like  cocoa,  pepper,  cinnamon,  cloves,  olives  the 
most  natural  and  proper  sources  of  revenue  fron-Hmpo' 

step  n  .h,s  process  was  the  tea  and  coffee  act  of  ,87, 
our  tiriff/-    "'"'"'  """'  •"""  "'"'  P™'«'-=  I"-'  in 

frel  Ii«  r  k""  ""''  """'«''  "'^  United  States  custom, 
free  hst  has  been  extended,  it  has  been  by  ignoring  the 

tre^itt: '"sarrr  -  -^^-^-p-C 

c  ai  me  Same  time  mcreasmg  protection  tn 
manufactures.  While  these  changes  Urring  o  t  : 
dole«"'       ?   '""^piring,  the  internal   taxes   upon 

or   me  TT    ""'"  '"''  '"  '''''  "'^'<=''  -mounted  a" 
one  fme  to  $1.7,000,000,  nullifying,  to  a  slight  extent 

the  p^tect.on  given  the  manufactures,  have  bfen  dTs  on! 
tinued.     Besides  this  the  tax  nf  ^',^  ^  ,  •  , 

4.  1  ,  '  ^  °*  $72,000,000,  which  wa«5 

aken  yearly  from  the  46o,.7o  persons  ^ho  'were  ftund 
to  have  mcome=   exceeding  $,,000,   to  the  aggregate 
amount  of  $800,000,000,  is  no  more  collected,  ^fn  fact 
this  vast  aggregate  income,  which  has  doubled  or  trebled 
since  the  repeal  of  the  tax,  pavs  nothing  for  its  prote^LI 

whe '^he      H    "™°'"''  ""P'  '"  '"^  '■"''-dual  cases 
where  the  mdirect  taxes  operate  to  the  extent  that  the 
living  expenses  exceed  the  $1,000 
In  the  earliest  days  of  Canadian  protective  legislation 

were  to  be  directly  guarded  and  vastly  benefited  by  re- 
stnctive  duties  against  the  products  of  the  foreign  4al 
Many  farmers  were  highly  delighted  at  the  profpect  of 
having  the  domestic  markets  all  to  themselves  for  the 


fl 


IQO 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


h 


fl 


fruits  of  their  orchards.     The  beef,  pork,  and  hams  of 
the  United  States  were  to  be  kept  out  of  the  country, 
and  consequently  the  farmers  would  have  a  chance  to 
market  their  meats  at  pro/itable  prices.    The  duty  levied 
gainst  the  import  ot  corn  and  corn-meal,  it  was  argued, 
would  give  the  farmers  of  the  Maritime  Provinces  an 
opportunity  for  reviving  a  once  profitable  industry— the 
raising  of  coarse  grains  for  the  use  of  the  fisherman  and 
lumberman.  And  the  duty  of  fifty  or  seventy-five  cents  per 
barrel  on  the  import  of  wheat-flour  was,  it  was  claimed, 
to  cause  the  maritime  consumers  to  depend  upon  the 
lands  of  the  Lower  Provinces  for  their  bread.    No  doubt 
these  flattering  prospects  prompted  many  a  farmer  to 
cast  in  his  lot  with  the  party  for  protective  legislation. 
An  enthusiastic'advocate  of  this  new  policy,  residing  in 
the  western  part  of  Nova  Scotia,  was  so  deeply  impressed 
with  the  probable   happy  results   of  protection  to  the 
farmers'  grain  interests,  that  he  immediately  erected  an 
expensive  mill  for  the  grinding  of  domestic  grains,  im- 
ported large  quantities  of  seeds,  and  gave  his  farmer 
friends  every  assistance  possible  in  taking  advantage  of 
this  new  wealth-producing  policy.     The  mill  ran  little 
more  than  a  year,  and  then  closed  up. 

The  experience  of  the  years  which  have  passed  since 
the  inauguration  of  the  Canadian  policy  of  protection 
should  do  much  to  teach  how  delusive  and  unreliable  are 
the  promises  of  meddlesome  legislation  for  the  control 
of  industry.  Probably  never  before  were  the  farmers  of 
Canada  driven  more  to  depend  merely  upon  the  pro- 
duction of  those  articles  which  can  be  exported  in  com- 
petition with  all  rivals,  than  at  the  present  day.  When 
the  manufacturers  of  cottons,  of  rubber  goods,  of  agri- 
cultural implements,  and  of  the  products  of  sugar  refin- 


THK  FAKMBR's  MlSKESr, 


191 

«i«  and  the  like  have  found  that  foreign  com,ititor, 
have  cont.n.ed  ,0  send  in  their  producti^,  °    C  ' 
ex.s.,ng  restrictions,  the  paternal  government  has  atavs 
been  .    dy  to  answer  their  entreaties  for  more  pt.:' 
tion      Three  fmes  since  the  inception  of  the  high  tarTff 

een'l^dT  '"^  -""f-'--  "f  agricultural  t  of 
Deen  granted  increased  protection,  in  order  that  the  for 

tdrTh  ""-'t'  ":  """'"'"'<''  -<^  "'^'  'Cofi  .0 
tne.r  kbors  m.ght  be  increased.  We  ask-What  has 
been  done  for  the  Canadian  farmer  in  this?  We  h.nk 
the  an,.„  w,„  be.  a,l  over  Canada,  "practically  tl 

it  IhouM  tf  ft  '"r""""  ""^  ™"^'^  °f  '"dustries, 
1    ohould  be  good  pohcy  to  retain  and  augment  those 
already  ,n  existence.     W.,y  not  increase  the  oZ  ct™ 
to  the  .mport  of  beef,  pork,  and  hams  into  Canada  umi 
the  domesfc  productions  have  complete  control  ;f  "he 
W  mark^lsi    Why  allow  the  fruits  of  the  orchards  and 
gardens  of  the  United  States  to  take  any  partin  supply 
mg  consumers  .n  Canada  ?    Would  it  no,  be  encourarin. 
as  worthy  a  class  of  labor  as  that  of  the  foreign  wortoef 
and  workwomen,  who  are  being  drawn  ,0  our  factor"^ 

te    iv:  :  ir-T'"^"^  •='"='""  "^  ">«  Canadian;::, 
tecttve  principles  in  reference  to   this  very  imnortln, 

question,  and  what  are  the  views  of  its  gu  ding TpTriu 
S.r  John    Macdonald,   Premier    of    Canada,  mS    1' 
toundmgly  declares,  that:   "To   the  farmer  free   ilte 
change  of  natural   products   ^with    foreign  countrie    ' 
would  of  cou.se,  be  highly  advantageous  "  •  bu^of  !he 
manufacturer,  he  savs  •  "  Fr».  .    3     •  "^ 

w«„ij  1,    J  ^         "^*   '"<^«  "1    manufactures 

would  be  disastrous  for  him  at  present  "  ■ 

Sir  Leonard  Tilley,  at  present  Governor  of  New  Bruns- 

'  To  the  representative  of  the  Pall  Mall  Gaulle. 


19^ 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


\^ 


wick,  who  has  the  honor  of  being  one  of  the  principal 
framers  of  the  national  policy  of  Canada,  >vhich,  it  was 
claimed,  would  foster  and  develop  the  industries  of  all 
classes,  now  "  favors  a  largely  increased  free  list  of  the 
natural  products,  and  of  certain  'inds  of  manufactured 
goods." 

Sir  Charles  Tupper,  late  Finance  Minister  of  Canada, 
has  admitted  to  having  lately  offered  to  enter  into  nego- 
tiations with  the  United  States  Government  for  the  pur- 
pose of  placing  all  natural  products  upon  the  free  list 
between  the  two  countries.  At  the  Cutlers'  feast  at 
Sheffield,  England,  September  5,  1888,  Sir  Charles  stated 
that  **  they  (the  Conservatives  of  Canada)  had  always 
been  ready,  as  they  were  ready  now.  to  extend  their 
commercial  relations  with  them  (the  United  States)  with 
Tc'gard  to  the  natural  products  of  the  two  countries." 

Moreover,  in  debating  the  question  of  unrestricted 
reciprocity  before  Parliament  at  Ottav  i  (1888),  nearly 
every  speaker  on  the  government  side  of  the  House 
favored  absolute  free  trade  in  "natural  products." 

One  said  :  "  I  am  the  son  of  a  farmer,  and  I  believe 
in  protecting  every  individual  when  it  is  necessary  he 
should  be  protected.  But  I  contend  that,  so  far  as  the 
farmers  of  Annapolis  and  Kings  (in  Nova  Scotia)  are 
concerned,  they  do  not  want  any  protection."  * 

Further,  the  whole  government  press  in  Canada  is 
declaring  the  willingness  of  its  party  to  enter  into  the 
utmost  reciprocity  of  trade  in  farm'  products  with  any 
country  willing  for  it.  And  is  it  not  a  provision  of  the 
national  policy  act,  that,  whenever  the  United  States 
chooses  to  put  natural  products  upon  the  free  list, 
Canada  shall  reciprocate  ?  Of  course,  to  open  thus  the 
'Mr.  Mills,  of  Annapolis. 


THE  FAKMKKS  INTEKEST.  ,g, 

market,  of  C.,„ada  eo  the  farm  production,  of  the  United 

^:2:z::zr'' "-"'''' ''''"'^'^^^--^^-^^ 

The  more   that   is    known  oi  American  protection 

Be  found  that  it,  aims  are  not  for  the  benefit  of  all 
lasses,  but  for  a  special  class.  Either  this  o  protec 
.on  .s  a  delusion.  It  was  well  said  bv  Sir  John's  orl" 
the  Toronto  Empiy, :  "As  far  as  the  manufac  u^er  ",' 
concerned,  cheapening  food  (by  imports),  wh Lh  the 
CO  ntry  cannot  raise  in  sufficient  qnantitie  is  a  protlc! 
t.ve  measure,  not  an  abandonment  of  protection  "We 
pre  ume  th,s  to  be  an  authoritative  exposition  of  he  rell 

e  Xi"n'\:'  "'  '""■?«  '^^"•^'"^°  protectionist  X 
are  giving  the  cause  political  guidance.     Graduallv  the 

farmer  must  be  borne  on  to   the  conclusion    that  the 

national  policy  of  Canada  is  no,  for  his  benefit     and  , ha 

when  the  protectionist  politician,  whether  inn;cently  o 

irce  trade  in      natural  products  only,"  he  is  one  whn 
would    sacrifice    the    farmers    for    th     ben  fit   o      Z 

when    properly  looked    into,  like   its   prototype   in   the 
United  States,  means  protection  for  the  manufacturer 
and  plutocracy,  and  for  them  only.  ^^^^^cturers 

If  It  be  contended  the  farmers,  through  protection  fn 
manufacturers,  gain  indirectlv  hi  fh^  >"  Protection  to 
^,  ,    ^  '  ^        inairectly,  by  the  increase  of  home 

marke  s,  we  answer  :  Would  not  universal  free  tradeTn 
natur  1  p  ^ucts.  or  farm  products,  be  making  thes  1  e! 
markets  free  markets  for  the  farm  products  of  the  wo  Id  ? 
If  this  IS  so,  then  what  becomes  of  the  theory  of  buiWil 
up  home  markets  for  the  farmers  ?  ^ 

The  Hon.  Charles  Tupper,  in  a  speech  at  Beaverton, 


I* 
If  S 


194 


AAfE/lICAiV  FARfS 


il      t 


in  Septrimber,  1888,  gave  utterance  to  most  extraordinary 
views  on  this  subject.  He  said  :  *•  I  say  again,  that  we 
have  every  reason,  from  the  policy  of  the  (United  States) 
Democratic  party,  to  believe  that  we  can  have  virtually 
the  old  reciprocal  relations  and  still  keep  the  Canadian 
market  for  the  Canadian  manufacturer  and  the  Canadian 
farmer  as  well."  How  these  two  opposite  things  could  be 
accomplished  wp  are  unable  to  understand  :  keep  the 
home  market  for  the  farmer,  and  at  the  same  time  throw 
it  open  to  free  competition.' 

What  has  been  done  by  protection  to  make  a  home 

'  The  folIowinR,  from  the  St.  John  Sun  of  August  23,  1889,  states 
the  position  of  ilie  government  of  Canada  exactly  :  "In  declaring 
their  approval  of  reciprocity  in  natural  products,  therefore,  govern- 
ment  journals  are  ndt  hedging,  but  simply  restating  a  position  from 
which  they  have  never  withdrawn.' 

The  oppos.tion  press  are  equally  correct  in  their  claim  that  nc 
public  man  in  Canada  has  ever  opposed  "  free  trade  in  natural  products 
only  "  ;  therefore  the  farmers'  interests  are  not  represented  in  Par- 
liament. 

The  following  is  the  standing  proposition  appended  to  the  Canadian 
customs  act  of  1879  :  "Any  or  all  of  the  following  things,  that  is  to 
say,  anir^als  of  all  kinds,  green  fruits,  hay,  straw,  bran,  seeds  of  all 
kinds,  vegetables  (including  potatoes  and  other  roots),  plants,  trees  and 
shrubs,  coal  apd  coke,  salt,  hops,  wheat,  peas  and  beans,  barley,  rye, 
oats,  Indian  corn,  buckwheat  and  all  other  grain,  flour  of  wheat  and 
flour  of  rye,  Indian  meal  and  oatmeal  and  flour  and  meal  of  any  other 
grain,  butter,  cheese,  fish  (salted  or  smoked),  lard,  tallow,  meats 
(fresh,  salted,  or  smoked),  and  lumber  may  be  imported  into  Canada 
free  of  duty,  or  at  a  less  rate  of  duty  than  is  provided  by  this  act, 
upon  proclamation  of  the  Governor-in-Council,  which  may  be  issued 
whenever  it  appears  to  his  satisfaction  that  similar  articles  from  Can- 
ada may  be  imported  into  tlr^  Jnited  States  free  of  duty,  or  at  a  rate 
of  duty  not  exceeding  thru  payable  on  the  same  under  such  proclama- 
tion when  imported  into  Canada."  This  offer  has  been  modified 
slightly,  but  not  in  the  interest  of  the  farntcr. 


.Tnd'" '"^  '""■""  "'  ''^■"  '•-"«'-"  '     From  .h„u. 

f.nKlAn.l  ar,.  bang  s„ppli..,l  wi.h  farm  ,,r„d„c.      "  Th" 
4,000,000  of  pcodIl'  iisp  «r..;«  ••  k  *     ^  * 

brcacIsh.fT      ' '^"'"'-  '.""- 8^'"".    but  96  per  cent  of  their 
brcacIstufTs  are  sent  m  from  the  West.     The  West  senr . 
them  ann..a„y  upwards  of  500.000  tons  of  H  T.o 
000,000  of  brca(lshiff«  <tt^  «^  ^  .  ft^*""*  «2o,- 

of  provisionr  r,"     •  «'°°°''"'°  "'  I'""".  «55.ooo,ooo 
provisions,  $45,000,000  of  wool,   bc-si,|o»  hides  and 

o   f:™"!",™"'"-"-     '"  ""•  "»'  '-»  ">-  «-  Xo 
Of  farm  I  rodu,:c  per  year   or  equal  to  upwar.l,  of  «,!! 

for  each  individual  employed  in  manufa  .u      g    1  tC 

England    is  supplied  by  the  West  to  .h  . 

New  Kngl.nd.'  *•  consumers  of 

In  the  Maritime  Provinces  manufacturing  town,  m.,v 
pnng  up  bu,  any  increase  of  demand  forffrt^^^  ^.'ce 

-ns  of  the  dailies  of  th^-lX^tlr  nt:':':?  xt 

-ner,oo.toigrdL-j.rtf:^;ir;:;,er;: 

not  the  //^,^...„«^^,,  theory  a  delusion  ? '  ' 

the  purpose  of  bindll    ^htlu^^  t/etherr^re^:^^^ 

rulers  and  people  are  m  a  .semi-civili.ed  state.     But  in 
^  Mr  James  G.  Blaine  to  the  Western  farmers. 

of  ti^ tm'frr' !::v'^^"""^^  ^"^'^-^"^^  -^  ^^«  p-^-- 

whereas  suc^^h    m      rf^':Vr;''f.  '""^  *^"'^  ^--^'^  = 

has  not  amounted  to  «.OQ^  '°"^  '"  '^"  ^^^^  J^^°^i"^e« 

ouniea  to  f  50,000  in  a  quarter  of  a  century. 


,r-*«ia»«*«»i«i., , 


igtf 


AMBHICAN  FAKMS. 


I 


rirdcr  that  a  nation  may  be  created  is  it  neceiMry  for  an 
intelligf^nt  people  to  be  moulded  into  the  required  con- 
dition through  the  existence  of  a  fiscal  policy  that  it 
destitute  of  the  principles  of  equity,  that  is  scientifically 
and  economically  false, — a  policy  towards  which  our  best 
feelings  must  be  in  constant  rebellion  ?  Is  this  the  true 
national  poli(  y  tor  civilized  beings  ? 

And  we  may  also  ask,  Is  it  a  true  and  upright  policy  to 
strive  to  warp  any  intelligent  community  into  any  politi- 
cal change  through  the  workings  of  a  false  fiscal  policy? 

What  docs  protection  undertake  to  do  for  the  indus- 
trial classes  ?  We  have  but  to  glance  over  the  speeches 
and  writings  of  its  advocates  to  learn  that  it  assumes  the 
office  of  protecting  labor,  to  secure  to  industrial  classes  a 
profitable  market  for  their  productions  that  national 
labor  may  not  be  exposed  to  the  keen  competition  of  the 
foreign  rival.  This  being  its  aim,  why  should  this  pro- 
tection not  be  extended  to  the  laborers  who  ill  the  farms, 
who  cultivate  the  orchards,  and  who  tei  d  the  flocks  ? 
That  this  object,  the  creation  of  a  necessity  for  labor, 
without  regard  to  its  effect  upon  the  masses,  is  a  prin- 
ciple of  the  Canadian  national  policy,  may  be  seen  in 
many  ways.  We  have  an  illustration  in  the  peculiar 
sugar  duties,  which  cause  the  import  of  raw  sugars, 
which  require  refining,  from  countries  to  which  she  ex- 
ports nothing,  instead  of  encouraging  the  importation  of 
sugars  which  may  not  require  refining,  and  from  coun- 
tries which  buy  her  natural  products  from  her. 

We  must  certainly  admit  that  labor  may  not  coraposf 
the  total  exchange  value  of  productions,  though  it  does 
in  the  main,  but  we  contend  that  in  our  farm  productions 
labor  should  be  considered  as  important,  both  as  regards 
its  nature  and  extent,  as  in  any  of  the  manufactures  for 


THR  FARMRK'      INTKRRST.  ,97 

Which  the  farmer',  p.oduction,  are  eventimlly  exchanged. 
Taking  thii  view  as  being  undoiintedly  correct,  we  are 
unable  to  understand   why   the  laboring   farmer,  who 

Tl\  ''V  .'•"'k'^''  ^'  ^'''^^'  ^'^  «^'«'  h'^  Wics  his 
■iLaJl  fru.ts  his  beef  and  his  pork,  should  be  exposed  to 

a  world-w.de  competition  to  reduce  the  exchange  value 
of  h,s  labor  to  the  minimum  ;  while,  on  the  contrary,  the 
man  .facturer's  labor  must  be  so  protected  that  he  may 
be  enabled  lo  force  consumers  to  pay  the  maximum  price 
for  h.s  hours  of  labor.  For,  is  it  not  the  admission  of 
the  meddlesome  legislator,  that  the  tendency  of  f  re«  trade 
IS  to  reduce  the  price  of  articles  exposed  to  free  co...peti. 
.on  ?  If  not,  why  favor  the  free  import  of  raw  materials 
in  the  interest  of  the  manufacturers  ? 

But  we  will  go  a  little  into  particulars  to  show  how 
protection  m  Canada  has  s.rved  the  agricultural  interests. 
In  the  fiscal  year  ending  with  June  :.o,  ,887,  the  free  im- 
ports of  goods  classed  "animals  and  their  products,  and 
agricultural  products,"  composed  about  6A  per  cent,  of 
the  tota.  imports  into  Canada.  The  three  fourths  of  a 
million  dollars  of  fruits,  seeds,  and  trees,  lately  put  upon 
the  free  list,  increase  these  classes  n.  above  6»  per  cent 
of  the  total  import.  '  ^ 

In  the  fiscal  year  1887,  grain  and  grain  products,  ani- 
ma  s,  battel,  cneese,  lard,  meats,  sausage  casings,  vege- 
tables  tomatoes,  canned  vegetables,  seeds,  trees,  and 
green  fruits,  to  the  amount  of  $4,908,145,  were  imported, 

levied.  To  this  dutiable  import,  by  adding  the  $6,437  - 
219  free  imports  of  farm  products  (omitting  tobacco),  we 
nave Jlgi  1,345,264  to  represent  the  imports  of  farm  produce 
for  that  year.  By  a  little  calculating  it  will  be  found  that 
these  imports  paid  about  7  per  cent,  into  the  treasury  and 


i!»'fi 


I? 


:l* 


'^I^Mi'ikam 


'tmm 


198 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


li 


that  the  placing  of  about  three  quarters  of  a  million 
dollars'  worth  of  fruit,  seed,  and  tree  imports  upon  the 
free  list  reduces  the  farmer's  protection  down  to  about 
6  per  cent.  Small  as  these  figures  representing  the 
farmer's  protection  seem,  it  must  also  be  borne  in  mind, 
that  a  large  portion  of  even  these  small  figures  is  made  up 
of  protective  imposts  on  canned  goods  (really  protection 
to  manufacturers). 

While  the  tendency  in  the  past  has  been  so  much  in  the 
direction  of  putting  farm  products  on  the  free  list,  it  has 
been  also  in  the  direction  of  rapidly  increasing  the  pro- 
tective duties  upon  the  farmer's  articles  of  consumption. 
In  1867,  the  Canadian  tariff  gave  the  manufacturer  15  per 
cent,  protection,  and  in  1877,  17I  per  cent.  In  1881,  the 
tariff  had  grown  in  the  mterest  of  the  manufacturers  to 
about  27  per  cent,  calculating  on  the  dutiable  list  only, 
and  about  23!  per  cent,  if  th*^  free  list  of  manufactures 
be  also  taken  into  account.  In  1887,  the  average  protec- 
tion to  manufacturers  was  about  30  per  cent,  on  goods 
classed  dutiable,  and  27J  per  cent,  on  dutiable  and  free 
manufactured  goods  combined.  For  1SS8,  it  will  not  be 
less  than  33  per  cent,  on  dutiable  manufactures,  as  the 
tariff  for  this  year  has  been  vastly  increased.' 

Canadian  protection  has  worked  about  as  the  following 
table  shows  : 

Against 

the 

farmer  as 

3f  toi 

4f  to  I 

5ito  I 

The  average  Canadian  protectionist  seems  to  be  per- 
fectly satisfied  with  this  one-sided  protection.    We  had  a 

'  This  prediction  has  been  fully  confirmed. 

*  Over   500,000  families  in  Canada  are  depending  directly  upon 
agriculture  for  3  living,  and  less  than  one  rifth  of  this  number  upon 


1879.  Assumed  fair  play  all  round. 

188 1.  To  the  farmer  8  %,  to  the  manufacturer  27  ^       ,     . 

T887.   To  the  farmer  7  <^^  to  the  manufacturer  30  <g 

1888.  To  the  farmer  6  %,  to  the  manufacturer  about  33  $?,«* 


li.    ' 
It 


THE  FARMER'S  INTEREST.  199 

conspicuous  illustration  of  this  satisfaction  in  the  remarks 
of  the  protectionist  journal,  the  Halifax  Mail  (May  i 
1888),  relah.e  to  thfe  repeal  of  the  Canadian  fruit  duties 
in  an  editorial  entitled,  "Cheaper  Fruits  and  Berries.'' 
It  said  :  •  These  changes  in  the  tariff  will  place  within 
the  reach  of  our  citizens  a  more  bountiful  supply  of 
cheaper  berries  and  fruits  during  the  ensuing  season  '• 
Ihe  question  arises,  if  fruits  and  other  so-called  nat- 
ural products  are  made  "  cheaper  "  and  more  "  bountiful 
m  supply,"  and  placed  more  "  within  the  reach  of  our 
citizens  "  by  reason  of  such  freedom,  why  should  not  the 
same  results  follow  to  the  farmer  citizen,  if  manufactures 
were  put   upon    the  free   list?     If   articles   are  placed 
within  reach  of  citizens  "  by  being  made  ''  cheaper  " 
through  the  removal   A  tariff  obstructions,  we  ha-  e  to 
conclude  that  the  consumers  of  such  articles  have  here- 
tofore paid  the  duties,  and  have  by  these  removals  gained 
an  advantage  as  consumers,  without  corresponding  loss 
m  income  as  producers.      If  so,  why  should  not   the 
^^  cheapening     of  manufactures  by  free  trade  in  them 
place  them  in   more  bountiful  supply"  and  "  withir^ 
the  reach  of  the  farmers,"  or  increase  the'  fanners'  advan 
tages  as  consumers,  without  diminishing  their  power  as 
producers?   It  can  hardly  be  said  that  the  home  supply  o 
manufactures  is  greater  than  the  home  supply  of  ''fruits 
and  berries."  ■     If  the  increase  of  price  inTarm  products 

manufacturing  ;  yet  her  customs  laws  collect  less   than   |i  000  000 
upon    he  :.port  of  products  which  come  at  all  in.  competi  C^^ 

.t^utre^'^^^^^  °^^^  '-''"^'^  -'  -^^-^^  '--  ^-4n 
'The  fruit  growers  of  Nova  Scotia  have  now  (January,  1890)  a 

frv^  ZL:       .      """f "°"  ^°^^"^'"^"^  ^^'^'"^  ^-  ^  reim^^sition  o 
fruit  duties,  out  even  the  representatives  of  the  fruit-raising  constitu- 

:::  'r  'f  ^""^^^^'  ^^  ^^^^^  ^^^^-  -  ^^«-  ^^eir  real'econol 
>!f\rs  upon  tins  matter. 


iii 


»' 


200 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


Ir.t 


through  tariff  legislation  for  the  protection  of  the  fanrer 
cannot  be  met  by  the  other  classes  through  the  indirect 
benefits  which  protection  is  said  to  produce,  how  can  the 
farmer  expect  benefit  through  protection  to  the  manufa 
turers  ?    Moreover,  if  nothing  can  be  done  by  protecting 
farm  products  and  other  natural  products  in  the  way  of 
bringing  laborers  into  the  country,  or  to  Keep  them  in 
the  country  to  raise  such  natural  products,  and  thereby 
create   a  home  market  for  manufacturers,   how  is   the 
farmer  to  gain  a  benefit  by  protection  to  the  manufac- 
turers ?     Prosperous  farmers  mean  decidedly  good  home 
markets  for  the  blacksmith,  shoemaker,  carriage-builder, 
the  house-builder,  brick-maker,  the  school  teacher,  the 
clergyman,  and  the  merchant. 

The  protectionists  are  undoubtedly  right  in  the  admis- 
sion that  an  extension  of  free  tradf.  in  natural  products 
only,  means  an  increase  of  protection  to  domestic  manu- 
factures. Free  traders  who  contend  to  the  contrary,  are 
of  a  very  questionable  class  ;  though,  to  use  the  words 
of  Bastiat,  "  there  is  in  political  economy  no  more  gen- 
erally accredited  sophism  than  this."  In  serving  as 
argument  in  the  hands  of  the  pretended  free-trade 
school,  says  Bastiat,  "  its  most  mischievous  tendencies 
are  called  into  action.  For  a  good  cause  suffers  much 
less  in  being  attacked  than  in  being  badly  defended." 
Yet,  not  only  are  the  avowed  protectionists  willing  for 
this  one-sided  trade,  but  some  of  the  most  prominent 
figures  in  the  so-called  free-trade  party  in  Canada,  as 
well  as  in  the  United  States,  are  advocates  of  such  a 
system. 

It  certainly  appears  obvious  enough,  that  an  extension 
of  freedom  as  to  the  importation  of  raw  materials  and  of 
food  necessaries,  gives  the  manufacturer  a  new  advan- 


THE  FARMER'S  INTEREST, 


20 1 


tage  in^  producing  cheaply,  without,  in  the  least,  com- 
pelling nim  to  sell  his  productions  at  lower  prices     On 
the  other  hand,  it  is  evident  that  every  additional  article 
placed  upon  the  list  to  be  really  protected,  must,  in  a 
measure,  reduce  the  chances  for  the  monopolist  to  pocket 
monopoly  profits,  without  contributing  to  the  monopoly 
profits  of  others.     A  duty  which  raises  the  price  of  agri- 
cultural   implements,  discourages   agriculture.     A  duty 
which  increases  the  price  of  agricultural  fertilizers,  dis- 
courages  the  production  of  potatoes,  grains,  grasses,  etc. 
On  the  other  hand,  a  duty  which  increases  the  price  of 
ro'v  materials  ..nd  food  necessaries,  discourages  the  man- 
ufacture  of  cottons,  boots,  clothing,  hardware,  and  sugar 
refining  ;  but  why  should  these  manufactures  be  granted 
an  assurance  of  success  at  the  expense  of  the  farmer  ? 
^     '.  he  protective  system  cannot  be  fair  all  round,  unless 
It  protects  all  round.     Though  it  is  perfectly  clear  that 
to  protect  all  round  is  to  increase  the  price  of  production 
all  round,  until  the  object  sought-the  building  up  of 
special  industries-is  defeated.     Moreover,  to  increase 
prices  all  round,  or  the  cost  of  general  production,  is  to 
destroy  the  chances  to  supply  foreign  consumers.     This 
latter  assumption  is  conspicuously  shown  in  the  continu  J 
Cecline  in  Canada's  exports  of  many  lines  of  manufac 
ture  since  the  adoption  of  her  high-tax  policy.     And  yet 
the  farmer  is  not  true  to  the  interests  of  his  class,  if  he 
does  not  demand  either  free  trade  all  round,  or  protection 
all  round. 

The  protectionists  can  hardly  contend  that  the  farmers 
are  benefited  by  being  permitted  to  import  some  lines 
of  food,  trees,  seeds,  etc.,  from  other  countries,  instead  of 
producing  these  themselves,  or  buying  them  at  protected 
prices  from  their  neighbors.     Though  no  doubt  all  are 


i^ 


I* 
11 


202 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


:«' 


benefited  when  the  consumers— and  all  are  consumers — 
are  permitted  to  procure  every  article  required,  from  the 
place  where  most  cheaply  produced.  For  if  the  manu- 
facturers find  it  is  profitable  to  rob  one  another  a  little, 
for  the  chance  to  rob  the  multitudes  a  good  deal,  why 
should  not  the  farmers,  or  any  of  the  cultivators  of  the 
soil,  find  it  equally  profitable  ? 

When  England,  in  her  old  'protective  days,  sought  by 
this  means  to  serve  the  interests  of  her  farmers,  she  even 
prohibited  the  use  of  cotton  goods  at  one  time,  because 
their  use,  it  was  thought,  would  sacrifice  the  farmers' 
wool  industries.  It  might  be  asked,  why  allow  free 
cotton  lo  t  ome  into  Canada  to  interfere  with  the  con-^ 
sumption  of  wool  in  the  manufacture  of  light  woollen 
goods  ?  Or,  why  not  force,  by  increase  of  protection, 
Canadian  consumers  of  grapes  to  depend  ':pon  her  own 
vineyards,  as  England  did  in  the  early  days  of  her  his- 
tory ?  Would  it  not  be  quite  as  much  within  the  scope 
of  reason,  as  the  efforts  which  are  being  put  forth  to 
stimulate  the  growth  of  many  of  her  highly  proi  :ted 
manufactures  ? 

Sydney  Smith's  description  of  the  tax  system  which 
prevailed  in  England  at  the  end  of  the  French  war,  pre- 
sents a  picture  of  an  ideal  condition  of  universal  taxa- 
tion, which  as  well  might  serve  the  purpose  of  an  ideal 
of  universal  protection  :  "  Taxes  upon  every  article 
which  enters  the  mouth,  or  covers  the  back,  or  is  placed 
under  the  feet.  Taxes  upon  every  thing  which  it  is 
pleasant  lo  see,  hear,  feel,  smell,  or  taste.  Taxes  upon 
warmth,  locomotion,  light,  and  every  thing  that  comes 
from  abroad  or  is  grown  at  home.  Taxes  on  every  thing 
on  earth  or  under  the  earth.  Taxes  on  the  raw  material, 
taxes  on  every  fresh  value  that  is  added  to  it  by  the  in- 


THE  FA^MEH'S  mTRREST.  203 

dustry   of  man."     Certainly,  with   such  a  system,  few 
would  be  able  to  escape  the  privilege  of  at  least  p;yinl 

The  great  difficulty,  however,  in  .»-    ^ay  of  a  fair  deal 
ZIV'^  1  protection,  or  of  u.onop.ly,  was  pointed 
out  by  Mr.  Stanley  Jevons.     ''  There  would,"  remarked 
he,     be  a  certain  fairness  in  the  establishment  of  monop- 
olies If  all  trades  were  equally  able  to  combine  and  tax 
each  other.     The  result,  of  course,  would  be  very  absurd 
and  very  pernicious,  but  it  would  be  equal  ;  as  a  matter 
of    act  however,  those  who  most  need  combination  to 
better  their  fortunes  are  just  those  who  are  the  least  able 
to  carry  It  out."     This  is  true  enough,  and  the  farmers 
of  Canada,  as  those  of  the  United  States,  are  among 
those  who  cannot  combine  either  under  free  trade  or 
protection   as  protection   is   administered.      After    all 
what  do  wool  duties  amount  to  in  protecting  the  United 
States  farmer?    Measured  by  the  trade  and  navigation 
returns,  they  amount  annually  to  about  $1.70  per  farmer 
(his  whole  protection  amounting  to  not  more  than  $3  00 
per  capita).     Measured  in  the  same  way,  the  average 
manufacturer  gets  not  far  from  $100.     With  the  best 
that  can  be  done  for  him,  the  United  States  farme'-  can 
get  bi.t  the  merest  trifle  through  such  means 

rYrlr°''';'^°''  '°  '^'  ^""^^^^^  f^""er  ^a»  accom- 
plish little,  unless  each  province  or,  in  fact,  each  county 

could  be  made  a  protected  unit,  is  shown  by  the  fact 
that  even  with  the  slight  duties  she  imposes  against  the 
import  of  farm  produce,  the  import  of  this  line  of  goods 
IS  only  about  $1  to  $50  produc.  d,  while  she  is  able  to 
export  $r  to  every  $12  produced.  So  slight  is  the  ad- 
vantage which  the  Canadian  farmer  takes  of  the  little 
protection  allowed  him,  that  the  foreign  producer  makes 


II 


204 


AMERICAN  FARMS.   - 


but  slight  efforts  to  jump  over  if.  On  the  other  hand, 
notwithstanding  the  high-tariff  wall  placed  against  foreign 
manufactures,  %i  is  imported  to  each  $7  produced,  while 
i\it  home  market  for  manufactures  i  made  so  profitable 
to  fie  home  producer,  by  reason  of  forced  tributes  from 
the  home  consumers,  that  less  than  $r  finds  its  way  from 
the  country  to  the  $100  produced,' 

In  fact,  since  it  is  requisite  that  a  protected  area  be 
even  more  than  world-wide  in  extent,  to  save  the  farmer 
from  the  avarice  of  the  manufacturing  combines,  and 
extremely  small  to  be  of  any  service  in  enabling  farmers 
to  combine  for  their  advantage,  the  question  of  what  would 
be  a  just  and  equal  system  of  protection  seems  a  difficult 
problem  to  solve.  And  yet,  if  protecti-^n  is  to  be  the 
order  of  the  day»  it  is  the  protectionist  legislators'  duty 
to  devise  some  scheme  that  will  give  the  farmer  his  full 
share  of  advantages," 

The  miller  wants  $1  or  $1.50  per  barrel  duty  on  flour. 
His  right  is  just  as  good  to  20  per  cent,  protection  as 
that  of  the  manufacturer  of  shovels  to  35  per  cent,  and 
free  raw  materials.  The  pork-packer  wants  $4  per 
barrel  duty  on  pork.  He  has  as  good  a  right  to  it  as  the 
manufacturer  of  scythes  to  50  per  cent,  and  so  has  the 
apple  producer  to  $1  per  barrel.  Only,  in  these  changes 
the  farmers  should  see  that  an  undoubted  portion  of  the' 
legalized  plunder  really  comes  into  their  hands." 

'  Measured  by  Canada's  trade  and  navigation  returns  in  terms  of 
money,  the  farmers  of  Canada  get  less  than  |i.io  protection  per 
capita,  the  manufacturers  more  than  $130  per  capita, 

nVhen  an  effort  is  made  to  apply  protection  equitably,  it  is  then 
seen  what  a  fribble,  a  burlesque,  a  farce,  i'.  really  is, 

»Not  a  few,  of  even  those  who  pass  for  free  traders,  contend  that 
only  articles  of  luxury  should  bear  taxes,  but  we  must  remember  that 
great  aggregates  of  capita'   produced  through  a  whisky  or  a  cigar- 


THE  FARMER'S  INTEREST. 


205 


If  free  trade  is  the  watchword,  then  let  it  be  for  free 
trade  all  .ound,  the  only  true  policv-a  watchword  for 
reform  that  means  the  extermination  of  a  vicious  system 
on  all  sides. 

When    England,   in    the   famous  free-trade   struwle 
removed  or  lessened  the  duties  on  articles  of  food  the 
sanie  was  done   by  foreign   manufactured  goods.     Sir 
Robert   Peel,  in  the  onset  of  the  great  parliamentary 
struggle  of  1846,  sounded  no  rallying  call  to  selfish  inter- 
ests.       In  the  confidence,"  said  he,  "  that  the  principle 
for  which  I  contend  is  a  just  and  wise  one,  I  ask  all 
protected   interests  to  make  the  sacrifice,   if  it  be  a 
sacrifice,   which   the  application   of  that  principle  will 
render  necessary." 

Yet  there  are  in  England  to-day,  as  there  always  will 
be,  manufacturers  who  would  have  duties  put  upon  im- 
ported manufactures  ;  but  the  farmers  will  not  let  th-- 
So  should  it  be  with  the  farmers  of  America. 
^^  So  long  as  free  trade  goes  no  further  than  free  trade  in 
natural  products  only,"  so  long  will  the  blight  to  the 
farming  interests  of  America  spread  and  increase-so 
*ong  will  the  farmer  continue  to  be  the  victim  of  the 
politician  and  the  manufacturer. 

manufacturing  monopoly,  fostered  by  indirect  taxation,  may  be  a  far 
greater  menace  to  the  general  good,  than  any  advantage  that  the 
farmer  can  possibly  gain  by  protection  from  the  consumers  of  their 
products. 


CHAPTER    III. 


I 


FREE   TRADE    MAY    BE    SELFISH    AS  WELL  AS    PRO- 

TECTION;    OR,   THE   INEFFICIENCY   OF 

FREE-TRADE    MOVEMENTS. 

In  working  out  our  ideas  of  justice  to  the  farmers  of 
America,  in  reference  to  the  matters  treated  of  in  the 
chapters  on  taxation,  and  on  free  trade  in  natural  products 
only,  we  arrived  &t  the  conclusion  that  it  is  quite  within 
the  range  of  possibility  for  what  passes  for  free  trade  to 
be  altogether  selfish  in  its  aims;  that  it  is  within  the 
scope  of  probability  that  compromises  will  any  day  be 
made,  as  they  have  been  in  the  past,  between  the  manu- 
facturers and  their  political  friends,  and  those  interested 
in  commerce  and  their  friends,  by  which  free  irade  will 
appear  to  have  scored  a  triumph  for  the  people,  though 
the  very  opposite  is  the  actual  result.  By  these  com- 
promises the  evils  of  protection  may  not  be  lessened  one 
iota,  or  the  load  of  taxation  be  removed  in  the  slightest 
degree  ;  may,  in  fact,  be  increased. 

Free-trade  movements,  to  be  successes,  must  take 
higher  grounds  than  they  have  done  hitherto  ;  they  must 
aim  at  justice  to  all;  equality  in  the  benefits  of  the 
greater  freedom,  and  equality  in  the  bearings  of  taxation. 
These  are  the  matters  of  vital  interest  to  the  great 
majority  of  the  people.  The  commercial  questions  in- 
volved are  of  great  importance  ;   little,  however,  cora- 

206 


mEFFfClBNCY  OF  FREE-  TRADE  MOVEMENTS.     20/ 

pared  with  the  others  just  named.  Look  where  you  may 
over  America  to-day,  and  where  is  party  to  be  found 
standing  by  the  people  as  it  should  in  this  particular  ? 
Is  there  a  political  policy  working  which  offers  a  shadow 
of  hope  to  the  farmers  for  the  future  ?  All  that  is  before 
them  appears  little  else  than  the  selfish  outgrowth  of 
moneyed  and  partisan  interests,  and,  as  such,  must  be 
barren  of  results  favorable  to  the  people. 


\*-- 


I 


BOOK  VII. 

THE    PHYSICAL,     MENTAL,     SOCIAL,      AND 
CONSIDERATIONS    INVOLVED. 


'  Jl 


MORAL 


But  the  wealth  of  a  nation  depends  in  ti.e  long  run  upon  the  con 
d.Uons.  cental  and  bodily,  of  the  people  of  who.\  conS  .  and  hj 
expenence  of  al  mankind  declares  that  a  race  of  n,en  sound  in  slu 
and  hmb  c.n  be  bred  and  reared  only  in  the  exercise  of  plough  and 
spade,  m  the  free  air  and  sunshine,  with  country  enjoin^ents  and 
amusements  never  amidst  foul  drains  and  smoke  blackT  a,^d  thr 
eternal  clank  of  machinery. -James  Anthony  Froude 


II* 


i4. 


m  r  Si 

B     .    ^  « 
If        ii 

i 
I 


tl 


fa 

g< 
in 

P< 


ii 

* 


CHAPTER  I. 

THE  DIVERGENCE  OF  INTELLECTUAL  DEVELOPMENT 

FROM   A   UASLS  OF   PHYSICAL  STAMINA, 

AND    ITS   CONSEQUENCES. 

The  men   who   f-gured    p.ominertly   in    laying    the 
foundation  of  Am.,  .a's  political,  social,  and  industrial 
struc  ure  were  no  weaklings.     They  were  men  of  nerve 
muscle,  and  vitality.     Their  habits  and  exercises  were 
such  as  to  stimulate  the  growth  of  these  most  desirable 
functions.     The  claim  is  now  frequently  made  that  the 
majority  are  becoming  more  and  more  mental,  emotional 
nerveless,  and  effeminate.     The  whole  tendency  of  the 
country  8   varied  national   life   is    undoubtedly   in    the 
direction  of  increasing  in  the  characteristics  of  its  people 
these  most  undesirable  changes.     "  Functional  nervous 
dis     lers     are  increasingly  frequent  among  the  in  door 
c.asses  of  our  civilization  everywhere,  "and  specially  so 
n  all  the  Northern  and  Eastern  States  of  Ame-ica.  where 
the  sufferers  may  be  found  in  nearly  every  brain-working 
household."       It  may  indicate  a  future  far  from  happy  ^ 
Much  as  we  may  differ  as  to  the  nature  of  mental 
faculties,  we  can,  with  a  considerable  degree  of  reliability 
gather  data  from  which  to  prove  that  physical  perfection 
m  man  means  also  corresponding  completeness  of  brain 
power  ;  that  when  there  is  a  retrogression  in   the  first 
'  Dr.  George  W.  Beard, 
an 


"i 


"•^IK» 


212 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


particular  eventually  there  must  also  be  one  in  the 
second.  In  all  great  movements  of  the  world,  in  the 
growth  of  nations,  or  in  great  crises,  it  has  been  the  men 
of  well-developed  physique  who  have  triunphed.  The 
men  of  Greect  took  sufficient  interest  in  the  tilling  of  the 
soil  to  v.vikf  II  X  first  medium  for  fostering  the  growth 
of  muscle  -  -vi  sinew.  They  practised  also  such  manly 
exercises  as  made  them  the  admiration  of  the  world,  as 
w'ell  as  fitted  them  to  be,  as  they  were,  the  rulers  of  their 
time.  We  may  say  more  than  this  of  the  Roman,  whose 
national  industry,  in  their  palmy  days,  was  husbandry. 
The  brawny,  deep-chested  Englishman  and  the  sinewy 
Scotchman  have  made  themselves  masters  wherever  they 
have  planted  themselves. 

As  a  rule,  just  in  proportion  as  a  people  have  become 
effeminate   in  their  habits  and  exercises,  so  have  they 
degenerated    in    mental    capacity.     Observations    have 
proved  that  the  great  man  is  more  likely  to  be  greater 
in  stature,  more  symmetrically  proportioned,    ad  of  more 
pleasing  physical  appearance  than  his  contemporaries ; 
while  such  a  one  will  be  governed  by  a  brain  of  full 
physical  development.'     Science  also  claims,  with  good 
reason,   that  wherever  a   proper  equilibrium  has  been 
maintained  through  a  due  exercise  of  the  physical  and 
mental  functions,  there  the  tendency  has  been  towards  a 
constant  improvement  in  the  types  of  men.     And  when 
the  reverse  has  been  the  case,   there  has  been   experi- 
enced a  marked  deterioration.     Says  Herbert  Spencer  ; 
"  Each  function  has  some  relation,  direct  or  indirect,  to 
the  needs  of  life.     Then  the  complete  life  is  one  in  which 
all  functions  are  exercised  to  their  normal  capacity,  and 
this  can  only  tak-  place  in  the  physically  developed  man." 
'  Dr.  Woods  Kutchinson. 


'.•    •  <>'1I;J. 


INTELLECTUAL  DEVELOPMENT.  2 It 

It  follows  that,  as  few,  if  any,  occupations  are  better 
calculated  to  develop  the  physical  structure  than  work 
upon  the  soil,  and  at  the  same  time  offer  a  limitless  field 
for  the  most  useful  as  well  as  the  most  pleasurable 
mental  training,  we  must  conclude  that  the  farmer,  of  all 
others,  should  have  a  healthy,  enduring  brain.  In  fact, 
his  occupation  should  offer  the  medium  through  which 
the  highest  development  of  the  physical  and  mental  may 
be  united  in  force  for  the  production  of  the  perfectly 
developed  man. 

"  Once  let  the  human  race  be  cut  off  from  personal 
contact  with  the  soil  ;  once  let  the  conventionalities  and 
artificial  restrictions  of  so-calhd  civilization  interfere 
with  the  healthful  simplicity  of  nature,  and  decay  is 
certain."  ' 

Consequently,  how  im.nensely  important  may  be  our 
dependence  upon  rural  life— the  farmer's  well-developed 
brain— for  supplying  whatever  may  be  true  and  satisfying 
m  our  present  condition,  and  also  for  the  continuance  of 
civilization  itself  ! 

Therefore,  since  science  and  the  history  of  the  growth 
-nd  development  of  nations  testify  to  the  vast  importance 
of  physical  completeness  ar.  a  basis  of  brain  power,  and 
that  farm  life  is  most  conducive  to  this  end,  we  requ'ire  a 
numerous  body  of  tillers  of  the  soil  to  supply  our 
national  brain  capacity. 

The  fable  of  "Tellus,  the  Giant  Son  of  the  Earth,"  in 
his  valiant  struggle  with  Hercules,  and  his  final  defeat 
when  deprived  of  contact  with  his  "  mother  earth,"  is 
certainly  a  striking  parable  of  the  condition  of  the  human 
family  when  the  vast  majority  take  no  part  in  rural  pur- 
suits and  the  manly  exercises.  The  Prince  of  Darkness 
'  Dr.  Woods  Hutchinson. 


214 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


hi 


could  take  no  better  course  to  defeat  man's  progress  and 

subdue  the  earth  to  himself,  than  by  depriving  one  after 

another  of  intimate  contact  with  their  mother,  the  earth. 

If  it  be  health  that  is  desired  for  the  people  (taking 

another  view  of  the  subject),  co    pare  a  procession  of 

cotton  operatives  pouring  out  oi  a  cotton-mill  in  Law- 

i-ence  and  Lowell,  with  an  equal  number  of  farmers'  sens 

and  daughters  as   they  are  found  in  our  country,  and 

we  will  see  nothing  in  the  former  of  physical  appearance 

to  cause  us  to  wish  that  the  rural  classes  may  become 

manufacturers. 

In  1886,  there  was  published  in  Massachusetts  an  in- 
teresting collection  of  facts  relative  to  the  average  dura- 
tion of  life  among    he  several  occupations,  coverit  ;  a 
period  of  more'  than  thirty  years.     The  average  farmer 
died  at  (>6  years  of  age,  the  judge  at  64,  lawyers  at  56, 
physicians  at   55,   sheriffs   and  policemen  at   52,  while 
milliners  and  factory  girls  died  at  39,  clerks  and  book- 
keepers  at   2>^,  and  plumbers  and   carvers   at   35      In 
the  same  year  (1886),  Dr.  C.  W.  Chancoles,  in  a  paper 
read  before   the   American    Public-Health   Association, 
stated  that  stone-cutters,  both  in  Europe  and  America, 
on  an  average,  do  not  live  beyond  36  years,  while  knife 
and  file  grinders  die  at  35,  edge-tool  grinders  at  32,  razor 
grinders  at  31,  and  grinders  of  forks  at  29.     Of  the  100 
sick,  of  the  various  manufacturing  industries,  the  pro- 
portion of  consumptives  is  quite  suggestive  :  carpenters 
14,  cigarmakers  z(>.  stone-cutters  36,  steel  grinders  40, 
brush-makers  49,  cotton,  hemp,  and  flax  weavers  60  ;  file- 
makers  62,  needle-makers  70. 

With  such  facts  as  these  for  guidance,  both  statesmen 
and  people  should  pause  before  tempting  the  young  of 
the  rural  classes  to  the  manufacturing  occupations.     A 


INTELLECTUAL  DEVELOPMENT.  215 

week  in  the  year  does  not  pass  that  the  remains  of  human 

bemgs,  below  the  meridian  of  life,  are  not  conveyed  from 

he  great  manufacturing  centres  (o  their  early  hon.es  in 

entering  on  the  most  useful  efforts  of  their  lives.  While 
one  after  another  is  guided  back  to  the  country  settle! 
nents  ,n  tne  United  States,  others  go  to  their  siro"  Ig 

Nt7w    "'!,PJ°"--'  -">^  ">  Quebec,  others  tf 
lurn     ^^  T^u'^'"  Brunswick,  and  not  a  few  to  the 

hem  chHH         •"'  ""f-     ''"''  °'  '"-^  '--  behind 
them  children   m  tender  years,  to  become,  perhaps   a 

.    arefurtr''      f^'""' '"  '^  '""  '"  ^'«-    ^o  into  a 
careful  „„alys,s  of  the  causes  which  have  tempted  the 

young  country  people  away  from  their  rural  homes  in 

Canada,  to  seek  new  ones  in  the  Great  Rep,  blic  (a  poou- 

UwMltr'f  "  f  r '""'•  ^"-^  '"  *^  ".^jority  Of 'cases 
It  w.ll  be  found  that  it  has  not  been  from  a  desire  to 

change  their  political  allegiance,  or  because  of  theTaws 

of  their  country,  that  they  have  fled  from  it,  so  much! 

rom  a  desire  to  change  their  occupation.    The  effects  o 

cached   th~"rr""   •"'^'='""8^  "'  '"e  time  had 
reached   them,   and   had   rendered    them  incapable  of 

oE'Th  ^'  "T'^  °'  *^''  """P'"-"-     From  the 
pohfcan,  the  manufacturer,  and  even  the  college  pro- 

fessor,  they  were  told  that  an  agricultural  peoplfcouTd 

never  become  great,  and  this  poisoned  their  minds  and 

unsettled  .hem.     They  learned   from   these  authcriSs 

hat  ,t  was  beneath  a  people  of  spirit  to  cultivate  poU 

toes,  and  ,0  tend  the  dairy,  especially  with  aWew  of 

them    ?/?r'^  '.""°""'  "">  "'^  Productions  from 
hem    and  they  took  the  most  sp..dy  way  of  casting  off 
such  an  occupation.  ^ 


isal 


2l6 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


li 


It 


r 


Though  our  city  cousins  may  Gtiil  be  a  good  deal  prone 
to  look  upon  their  rustic  relations  as  rather  stupid  and 
unintellectual,  it  is  well  for  them  to  know  that  natural 
conditions  are  all  o  i  the  side  of  the  countryman.  And 
certainly  the  countryman  should  realize  more  fully  what 
are  his  possibilities.  The  feeling  which  generally  pre 
vails,  however,  makes  it  preposterous  for  even  the  lead- 
ing farmers  of  America  to  think  of  taking  a  place  in 
society  with  the  equally  prosperous  of  other  classes. 

In  business  concerns  we  have  regular  meetings  of  our 
Board  of  Trade,  in  all  our  great  commercial  centres,  to 
which  it  is  not  at  all  uncommon  for  lawyers,  doctors, 
manufacturers,  and  newspaper  editors  to  be  invited  to 
take  part  in  debating  questions  that  may  affect  the  rural 
classes  most  deeply.  But  when  are  farmers  requested 
to  become  members  of  these  societies,  or  to  give  their 
views  on  the  matters  discussed  ?  It  is  true,  that  the 
Grange  organizations — societies  which  should  have  a 
welcome  in  every  rural  district — are  beginning  to  give 
the  farmer  some  prominence  ;  through  this  med'  im,  he 
should  voice  his  sentiments  and  desires  with  effect.  Yet 
the  farmer  is  considered  rather  out  of  his  senses,  when 
he  presumes  to  match  his  intellectual  faculties  with 
others  ;  and,  in  fact,  his  want  of  success  is  frequently 
attributed  to  his  lack  of  ability. 

Have  not  the  majority  of  our  most  able  and  useful 
public  men,  in  all  the  walks  of  life,  been  bred  on  the  farm  ? 
Are  not  our  most  advanced  institutions  of  learning  pro- 
vided with  their  brightest  intellects  from  the  country 
families  ?  We  think  few  will  undertake  to  deny  this 
claim  for  the  country.  Said  Emerson  :  "  The  great  men 
are  not  in  the  halls  triumphing,  but  in  the  fields  work- 
ing.   .    .    .  The  city  is  recruited  from  the  country.  .    .  . 


ll'l 


INTELLRCTUAL   DEVELOPAtENT.  217 

The  City  would  have  died  out,  rotted,  and  exploded  long 
ago,  unless  it  were  recruited  from  the  country  "  The 
City  of  to-day  was  the  country  of  yesterday 

The  tendency  of  the  time  is  evidently  in  the  direction 
of  constantly  decreasing  the  number  of  those  who  have 
effectijal  contact  with  the  soil,  and  increasing  the  num- 
ber who  would  be  mere  parasites  upon  those  who  re- 
main, reducing  the  worst  victimized  to  the  mere  exercise 
of  their  animal  powers.     li  is  quite  frequently  contended 
by  students  of  ethnology,  that  slavery  was  a  necessity  of 
early  times,  in  order  that  a  few  might  be  enabled  to  have 
the  leisure  necessary  for  thought  and  for  mental  growth. 
To-day,  all  kinds  of  devices  are  set  on  foot  to  tempt  the 
illers   of  the   soil   into   permitting  others  to   do   their 
^l^^-^'      They,  in  effect  say  :    "You  work 

While  the  farmer's  income  is  not  increased,  most  other 
classes  combine  and  force  an  increase  of  theirs.     They 
tell  us  that  mental  giants  must  not  be  rorced  to  do  man- 
uallabor,  and  that  mental  workers  must  have  all  the  edu- 
eating  influences  possible  at  their  disposal,  and  if  their 
services  are  procured,  the  recompense  must   be  com- 
mensurate  with  a  satisfaction  of  these  conditions  ;  which 
amounts  to  this,  that  those  who  in  most  cases  have  to 
meet  these  conditions  must  work  a  little  harder,  with  the 
hope  that  eventually  an  indirect  benefit  will  follow     For 
instance,  our  governments  in  effect  are  great  armies  of 
parasites,  which  are  continually  creating  some  new  plan 
for  making  places  for  additions  to  their  numbers.     That 
these  new  ones  may  be  supported,  the  supporting  class 
must  work  a  little  harder,  and  have,  for  satisfaction,  the 
consoling  assurance  that  a  new  batch  has  been  created 
to  do  their  thinking. 
10 


2I8 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


I    i 


( J :     ;     ! . 


i    i 


Granted  that  there  may  have  been  a  necessity  in  prim- 
itive times  for  a  portion  of  the  numan  family  to  gain 
opportunities  for  thought,  have  not  the  conditions 
changed,  when  cunning  must  be  resorted  to  to  effect 
this  object  ?  Is  it  true  that  workers  cannot  think,  and 
that  thinkers  cannot  work  ?  Is  not  the  outcome  of  such  a 
condition  to  create,  on  c  le  side,  indolent,  enervated 
thinkers  ;  and  on  the  other  side,  only  working  machines, 
who  have  bartered  away  their  right  to  think— they  who 
should  be  in  mind,  as  well  as  in  body,  as  great  as  any  of 
God's  creatures  ? 

It  is  well  that  we  should  have  our  mental  giants  ;  but 
those  who  have  become  the  greatest  in  this  way  have 
been  self-supporting,  self-sacrificing  men.  There  is 
danger  in  the  sweeping  away  of  the  grand  opportunities 
for  a  union  of  the  mental  and  physical  forces  which  rural 
life  offers.  Shall  our  cities,  like  the  rotted-out  civiliza- 
tions of  old,  swell  to  overflowing  with  the  indigent,  the 
idle,  and  the  voluptuous  ?  Shall  the  edict  again  go  forth 
"—**  You  kill  while  I  eat ;  you  work  while  I  think,"— and 
the  freemen  again  depend  upon  martial  exercise  and  the 
slaughtering  of  men  for  the  stimulation  of  physical  de- 
velopment ? 

With  all  that  is  being  done  through  inventions  for  the 
saving  of  labor  and  the  utilization  of  natural  forces,  there 
should  be  an  ever  increasing  margin  for  mental  exercise. 
It  is  only  a  true  condition  which  favors  this,  and  it  is 
only  a  true  condition  which  finds  these  necessary  proofs 
of  progress  dispersed  through  the  whole  people  ;  and  it 
:3  only  a  true  condition  where  all  who  are  able  bear  some- 
thing of  labor  for  their  physical  benefit,  if  for  no  other. 
Emerson  thought  the  ideal  condition  one  in  which  man 
was  enabled  to  have  the  detachment  and  the  individuality 


INTELLECTUAL   DEVELOPMENT. 


219 


which  is  only  possible  in  the  country,  with  the  intel- 
lectual stimulus  which  is  only  possible  in  the  city.  But 
this  union  of  forces  can  only  have  healthy  and  enduring 
development  where  a  basis  of  physical  stamina  is  in- 
sured, and  this  basis  is  in  the  country.  Then  we  must 
come  to  the  conclusion  that  whatever  tends  to  make  one 
great  division  of  the  human  family  exclusively  brain- 
workers,  and  another  great  division  exclusively  manual 
laborers,  is  producing  a  false  and  dangerous  condition. 

It  is  a  grave  mistake  for  the  farmers  of  America  to 
concede  to  the  idea  that  the  rural  classes  are  peculiar  for 
lack  of  ability,  or  to  allow  the  results  of  their  industry 
to  be  valued  merely  as  the  product  of  so  much  animal 
exertion  ;  but,  on  the  contrary,  they  should  emphatically 
maintain  that  they  represent  an  intelligent,  a  dignified 
occupation. 

It  is  an  error  to  permit,  as  we  do,  the  curricula  of  our 
institutions  of  learning,  especially  of  those  where  the 
majority  of  the  pupils  attending  are  supposed  to  become 
agriculturists,  to  be  almost  void  of  branches  which  are 
calculated  to  create  an  interest  in  agriculture,  and  to 
ennoble  the  calling  in  the  minds  of  the  young. 

"As  it  is  at  present,  in  thousands  of  our  country 
schools,  the  instruction  is  wholly  apart  from  the  actual 
life  of  the  scholars.  The  teaching  is  a  weary  round  of 
book  studies,  and  the  wealth  of  practical  instruction  that 
is  to  be  gained  by  a  proper  consideration  of  the  every- 
day life  and  natural  surroundings  of  children  is  entirely 
missed.  Besides  turning  the  young  mind  in  the  direction 
of  agriculture,  such  instruction  in  the  common  schools 
would  tend  to  increase  the  inborn  love  of  the  soil,  and  sow 
the  germs  of  State  and  national  pride  and  patriotism.'" 

'  American  Agriculturist,  October,  1889. 


220 


AMEfiiCAS'  FARMS. 


It  IS  a)so  very  far  from  wise  for  farmers  themselves, 
as  It  IS  also  for  the  general  safety,  to  allow  the  opinion 
to  prevail    that  they  are    unfit  to  grace  our  legislative 
halls  or  to  put  character  into  our  laws.     Mr.   Gladstone 
says  of  the  statesmen  of  the  early  history  of  the  United 
States  :   "  It    is  no  extravagance  to   say  that,  although 
there  were  only  three  millions  of  people  in  the  thirteen 
States  at  the  time  of  the  Revolution,  the  group  of  states- 
men  ihat  proceeded  from  them  were  a  match  for  any  in 
the  whole   history  of   the  world,  and  were  superior  to 
those  of  any  one  epoch.    Their  fortunate  appearance  was 
undoubtedly  due  to  well-regulated  muscular  freedom." 
It  is  a  calamity  for  society  to  be  governed  by  physical 
weaklings,  with  less  and  less  brain  capacity,  who  may 
become  finally,  as  the  monarchs  of  Europe  were  said  to 
have  been  at  the  beginning  of  the  century— imbecile. 


M  ;  i  I ! 


I 


♦'^ 


CHAPTER  II. 

THE  FARMERS*  INTEREST  IN  THE  SOCIAL  OUTLOOK. 

We  may  disinter  the  vanished  draperies,  we  may  revive  the 
stately  minuet,  we  m  ly  rehabilitate  the  old  scenes,  but  the  march  of  a 
century  cannot  be  halted  or  reversed,  and  the  enormous  change  in 
the  situation  can  neither  be  disguised  nor  ignored.  Then  we  were 
though  not  all  of  us,  sprung  from  one  nationo'-ty,  practically  one 
people.  Now  that  steadily  deteriorating  process,  against  whose 
dangers  a  great  thinker  of  our  own  generation  warned  his  country, 
men  just  fifty  years  ago,  goes  on  on  every  hand  apace." 

— Bishop  Potter. 

Probably  the  most  far-reaching  problem  before  the 
public  mind  in  America  to-day  is  the  vexe<    <iuestion  of 
social  rights.     Whether  we  have  presented  to  our  con- 
sideration  the  difficulties   existing   between  labor  and 
capital,  the  distribution  of  land,  the  matter  of  public 
mstruction,  or  the  formation  of  fiscal  policies,  we  have 
m  some  measure  to  deal  with  an  important  phase  of  the 
social  question.     Nearly  every  important  movement  in 
industrial  and  social  life  has  much  to  do  with  this  truly 
great  matter  ;  and  it  might  be  stated,  with  little  proba- 
bility of  contradiction,  that  at  few  former  periods  has 
this  problem  been  subjected  to  such  varied  and  urgent 
notice  as  it  is  no.v  receiving.     America  is  not  now  very 
much  behind  the  rest  of  the  world  in  furnishing  material 
for  the  study  of  these  matters  ;   and  the  old  maritime 
States  of  the  northeast  of  the  Union,  in  a  marked  de- 

221 


'='?••• 


■•<^li^8*i^..ysi«iai 


2:73 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


gree,  furnish  a  history  of  social  changes  of  very  great 
interest,  especially   as   it   relates  to   the   rural  classes. 
If  we   look   for  a  locality  where  the  development   of 
industrial   progress,  with   all   the  attendant  social  con- 
sequences  which  industrial  progress  implies,  should,  in 
its  growth,  correspond  with  the  ideal  of  at  least  one 
great  school,  and,  in  fact,  in  line  with  the  general  trend 
of  the  economic  thought  of  the  day  in  America,  we 
instinctively  turn  to  those  old  maritime  States.     Their 
social  history  will,  in  relation  to  political  economy,  serve 
to  a  great  extent  as  an  index  to  the  whole  question  in 
America.     Is  it  satisfactory  to  any   thoughtful   mind? 
While  it  will  be  generally  admitted  that  half  a  century 
ago  the  average  ruralist  of  New  England  was  an  enviable 
type  of  citizen,   tliat  his  social,  fmancial,  and  political 
influence  was  a  power  in  his  country,  that  he  was  ac- 
knowledged  on  all  sides  to  be  a  reliable,  intelligent,  and 
weighty  authority  on  all  political,  economic,  and  social 
questions,  and  that  his  influence  extended  even  to  other 
countries,   few  make  this  claim  for  him  to-day.     The 
opinion  that  in  character,  ability,  and  enterprising  spirit, 
the  farmer  of  New  England  is  losing  ground,  is  expressed 
in  the  works  of  nearly  every  writer  upon  the  condition 
of  the  farmers  of  those  States. 

^  One  writer  very  pertinently  remarks  :  "  There  was  a 
time  when  New  England  was  looked  upon  as  a  sort 
of  reservoir  of  the  true  American  spirit  ;  when  she  sent 
her  sons  and  her  daughters  out  from  the  towns  to  be 
teachers  to  the  rest  of  the  nation,  and  to  found  new 
towns  in  the  West  ;  when  New  England  spirit  seemed 
to  be  a  leaven,  leavening  all  the  national  life.  ...  All 
this  is  changed."  '  Certainly  it  is  not  in  the  farmers  alone, 
'  Mr.  Geoffrey  Chaplin,  in  the  North  American  Review, 


THE  hAKMERS'   SOCIAL   OUTLOOK,  323 

there  is  to  be  noticed  the  loss  of  Puritan  character  and 
true  American  spirit,  though  in  them,  in  the  fullest  meas- 
ure, dwelt  these  characteristics.    And  they  were  teachers 
to  the  rest  of  the  nation,  because  in  them  rested  a  posi- 
tive realization  of  the  fact  that  it  devolved  upon  them  to 
infuse  their  spirit  into  all    measures   for   the  political, 
moral,  intellectual,  and  industrial  progress  of  their  coun- 
try.    It  was  their  count  ;,  tucir  land,  and  they  esteemed 
their  privileges  and  their  achievements,  as  became  an 
independent  and  truly  sovereign  people.     They  honored 
and  highly  valued  the  result  of  honest  labor,  and  of  rural 
labor  above  all  others.      The  "  country  squire  "  could 
talk  politics  with  lively  interest  to  the  best  man  in  the 
community,  and  the  best  man  was  very  like'y  to  be  his 
near   neighbor,  because  the  politics  of  his   time  were 
to  him  of  practical   significance.     He  was  sensib'e  of 
a  perceptible  result  in  his  efforts  to  influence  the  fashion- 
ing of  laws  and  the  course  of  law-makers.     They  had 
not  reached  out,  as  now,  beyond  him.' 

'  Since  my  monograph  was  placed  in  the  hands  of  its  publishers, 
the  following  interesting  editorial  rema.ks  upon  an  article  of  Judge 
Notfs  has  appeared  in  the  New  York  Evening  Post:  "  No  other 
uch  body  of  cultivators  of  the  soil  as  the  New  England  colonists 
were,  down  to  our  own  day,  has  ever  been  seen.  No  other  men  who 
tilled  the  ground  with  their  own  hands  have  had  such  an  acute  and 
active  intelligence,  such  intense  preoccupation  with  religious  and 
moral  problems,  such  a  keen  sense  of  the  superior  importance  of 
spiritual  things,  such  reverence  for  learning,  such  familiarity  vith 
and  appreciation  of  literature,  and  such  capacity  for  government  by 
discussion.  Puritanism,  as  has  often  been  said,  missed  its  mark 
in  England  ;  but  it  came  as  near  realizing  its  ideal  as  human  nature 
would  permit  on  American  soil.  No  student  of  politics  or  sociology 
will,  in  all  probability,  for  ages  to  come,  light  on  an  experiment  in 
all  respects  so  interestirg  and  »o  successful  as  Massachusetts  and 
Connecticut  were  and  continued  to  be  down  to  the  outbreak  of  the 


224 


AMKk/CAN  FAfiMS, 


I 


It  18,  notwithstanding,  a  great  mistake  that  the  farmers 
of  New  Eni,land  do  not  compare  well  with  the  average 
citizen  in  all  that  goes  to  make  up  the  invaluable  portion 
of  the  commonwealth.     Especially  in  this  the  case,  as  we 
look  at  the  mailer  from  the  standpoints  of  morality,  re- 
ligion, or  social  order.     Social  safety  is  with  the  citizen 
who  possesses  a  desire  to  preserve  his  country's  instilu- 
lions  and  her  political  integrity.     The  farmers,  sprung 
from  the  loins  of  the  stock  which  shaped  their  country's 
early  life,  must,  of  all,  be  her  truest  patriots  ;  whereas 
the  Ignorant,  shifting,  migrating  classes,  of  which  the 
American  cities  are  becoming  largely  composed,  have 
cast  off  their  patriotic  sentiments,  if  they  ever  had  any. 
In  them  is  danger,  now  and  always.     Fortv-seven  per 
cent,  of  the  populaUon  of  the  cities  and  factory  towns 
of    Massachusetts    in     1885    were   foreign-born;    while 

civil  war.     The  only  important  point  in  the  catastrophe,  which  Judee 
Nott  does  not  attempt  to  exj.iain,   or  even  to  touch  upon,   is  the 
equanimity,    and  even    rejoicing,    with   which    the    New    Enuland 
farmers  have  witnessed  the  disa,.pearance  of  the  social  edifice  which 
they  ha.l  passed  two  centuries  in  building  up.  and  cementing  with  an 
enormous  amount  of  rdigious  zeal  and  self-sacrifice.     For  more  than 
a  quarter  of  a  century  New  Englanders  have,  through  their  organs 
m  politics.   ,n  literature,  and  oratory,  e.ngerly  supported  the  policy 
which  was  visibly  and  rapidly  changing  the  character  of  their  popula- 
tion  and  the  structure  of  their  society.     The  most  ardent  advocates 
and  promoters  of  'the   fact(,ry  at   your   doors.'  with  its  swarm  of 
foreign-born  voters,  have  been  New  England  men.     They  have  seen 
It  rapidly  and  surely  converting  Connecticut  and  Massachusetts  into 
foreign,  and  even  into  Catholic  States,   ousting  the  natives  of  the 
Puritan  stock  from  all  real  influence  in  the  government,  and  consign- 
ing to  the  lumber-room  of  history  the  old  Puiitan  traditions  of  public 
spirit  and  puolic  duty,  and  have  seen  it  sending  all  their  boys  and 
girls  flying  into  the  cities  and  to  the  West,  without  a  protest  or  even 
a  word  of  complaint."     December  5,  1889. 


THR  FARHtF.RS    SOCIAL  OUTLOOK.  23$ 

only  aj  p€r  cent,  of  the  agriculturists  of  the  State  were 
so  born. 

In  the  older  provinces  of  Canada  the  farmers  compose 
as  fine  a  class  of  men  as  are  to  be  found  anywhere.  They 
form  the  bef>t  law  -abiding,  industrious,  moral  forces  of 
the  confederacy. 

Yet,  with  the  decline  of  American  agrf  ulture,  and 
the  diminution  of  the  number  of  the  small  land  pro- 
prietors,  dangers  to  the  social  order  and  the  security 
of  the  state  must  be  more  and  more  augmented  as  the 
evil  goes  on.  The  first  impetus  towarus  social  insecurity 
may  now  be  seen  in  the  dissatisfaction  which  is  growing 
among  farmers  because  of  their  relative  disadvantages. 
The  second  is  rapidly  approached  when  legislators  begin 
to  consider  favorably  the  policy  of  repeoj.ling  the  old 
country  towns  with  foreign  stock,  in  place  of  removing 
the  difficulties  which  are  driving  the  old  families  away. 
The  third  danger  is  the  relative  decline  in  il.c  number  of 
those  WHO  should  have  direct  interest  in  preserving  the 
institutions  of  the  country. 

It  is  no  doubt  too  true,  that  the  farms  and  the  villages 
of  New  England  are  no  longer  the  nurseries  oi  the  type 
of  "earnest  thinkers  and  patient  wr-kers"  that   they 
once  were  ;  while  it  is  true  that  there  is  a  growing  unrest 
among  the  rural  classes,  because  of  the  changes  which 
oppress  them.     It  is  also  conspicuously  apparent  that  it 
is  the  exception  to  find  farmers  who  look  forward  with 
pride  to  fitting  their  sons  for  an  occupation  which,  as 
they  must  believe,  is  every  day  losing  ground  in  social 
rank.     New  England,  being  the  oldest  English  commu- 
nity in  America,  or  the  one  most  ripened  in  development, 
shows   these  changes   more  conspicuously   than    other 
parts     But  is  it  not  a  disease  which  is  spreading  rapfd^y  ? 


11 


AMERICAN  FAHMS, 


ill 


M 


1 


The  merest  glance  at  the  subject  is  sufficient  to  show 
that  the  whole  world  is  growing  gregarious  with  alarming 
rapidity  ;  that  the  rural  life  is  viewed  with  more  and 
more  aversion.  The  cities  of  France — an  old  country — 
in  1848  represented  34  per  cent,  of  the  entire  pcpul.n- 
tion  ;  a  proportion,  however,  which  grew  to  2,^  per  cent, 
in  J  886.  Beautiful  rural  France,  with  all  its  charms, 
tVien,  fails  to  retain  its  due  proportion  of  the  people. 
Germany,  since  1867,  has  increased  her  urban  popula- 
tion at  the  rate  of  a  little  over  ij  per  cent,  per  annum  ; 
the  rural  population  in  the  same  period  increased  at  the 
rate  of  only  \  per  cent,  per  annum.  In  parts  of  rural 
Italy,  every  means  is  being  devised  by  the  farmer  to  ex- 
change country  for  city  life.  But  of  all  the  world  this 
tendency  is  more  marked  in  America  than  elsewhce. 
Had  the  increase  of  persons  engaged  in  agriculture,  in 
the  decade  ending  with  1880,  been  equal  to  the  average 
entire  increase  of  population,  there  would  have  been 
42,341  more  engaged  in  this  pursuit  than  were  so  f  nd. 
In  the  same  period,  1,147,977  represented  the  propor- 
tional increase  of  those  in  the  professional  services, 
trade,  transportation,  mining,  manufacturing,  and  me- 
chanical pursuits.  The  same  movements  are  taking 
place  in  Canada.  Of  the  province  of  Nova  Scotia,  we 
find  that  in  the  period  1861-81,  the  agricultural  class 
fell  behind  the  professional  and  trading  classes,  in  pro- 
portional increase,  over  20,000. 

The  cities  and  city  occupations  are  evidently  drawing 
the  people  to  themselves.  In  1790,  the  urban  population 
of  the  United  States  was  only  8.3  per  cent,  of  the  total  ; 
in  1850,  12.5  per  cent.  ;  but  in  1880  it  had  reached  22.5 
per  cent.  The  Canadian  census  returns  for  1881  re- 
ported an  increase  of  33.0  per  cent,  in  the  growth  of  the 


THE  FARMERS'   SOCIAL   CUTLOOK. 


227 


urban  population  during  the  decade  of  which  it  treated  ; 
while  the  growth  of  the  rural  population  had  only  been 
15.6  per  cent.  The  cities  of  the  United  States  having 
over  8,000  inhabitants  in  1790  contained  but  one  thir- 
tieth of  the  population  ;  in  1880  they  contained  one 
fourf  .  In  the  State  of  Massachusetts,  with  all  her 
marl  jts  created  by  a  manufacturing  population,  her  rural 
den  /-ens  decreased  by  37,000  in  the  years  1860-85.  I" 
the  first-named  year,  she  had  a  rural  population  of  698,- 
261  ;  ir.  1870,  677,601  ;  in  1880,  672,462  ;  while  in  1885 
it  had  fallen  to  661,588.  In  1789  the  cities  of  this  State 
contained  5  per  cent,  of  the  population  ;  in  1885,  (i(i\ 
per  cent. 

Recently  the  Toronto  Empir.e  (Conservative)  spoke, 
through  its  columns  devoted  to  agricultural  matters,  to 
this  effect  :  "  Everywhere  on  the  continent,  east  of  the 
Mississippi  at  any  rate,  the  drift  during  the  past  ten  to 
thirty  years  has  been  from  the  country  to  the  towns  and 
cities  .  .  .  This  continent  is  rapidly  approaching  the 
condition  of  Europe,  where  the  city  populations  are  far 
too  large  for  the  rural  populations  that  sustain  them." 
Yes,  sustain  them  !  Our  cities  fill  up  with  unnecessary 
government  officials,  or  those  who,  by  combinations,  are 
enabled  to  increase  their  numbers  through  gathering 
to  themselves  a  margin  between  service  rendered  and 
service  received.  Two  perform  a  seivice  that  should 
require  but  one.  The  victim  who  receives  it  has  double 
service  to  perform  in  return.  Why  should  he  not  make 
his  escape  from  such  enslavement,  if  possible  ?  Prior  to 
the  fall  of  the  Roman  and  Grecian  republics.,  the  cities 
were  filled  to  overflowing,  and  nearly  f^very  free  citizen 
had  fled  from  the  country.  "  The  cities  increased  in 
splendor  from  day  to  day,  and  from  age  to  age.     Temples 


228 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


\) 


!  J 


1     «! 


%\ 


% 


were  ever  being  erected  of  greater  magnificence  than  any 
heretofore.  Theatres  were  made  still  more  and  more 
attractive  for  the  free  exhibition  of  gladiatorial  and  other 
depraving  f.ghts.  With  all  this,  depopulation  and  poverty 
went  on  in  the  country,  until  disease  spread  throughout 
all  the  vital  organs  of  society,  and  then  the  whole  system 
collapsed."  '  What  course  will  our  rural  classes  take 
when  they  come  to  feel  that  all  escape  from  this  enslave- 
ment may  be  cut  off  ? 

The  New  World,  as  well  as  the  Old,  echoes  and  re- 
echoes with  the  threatenings  of  the  social  revolutionist  ; 
and  we  are  not  alone  in  the  opinion  that  republics  and 
democracies  may  not  be,  under  certain  conditions,  any 
more  safe  than  monarchies  from  the  machinations  of  the 
socialist.'      He   reasons:    What    abiding   profit   is   the 
proclamation  that  all  are  equal,  when  gross  inequality  is 
allowed  to  go  on  gathering  new  elements  of  oppression  ? 
"What  can  be  expected,  when  the  .sole  aim  of  government 
is  to  footer  such  institutions  as  promise  solely  to  increase 
riches  and  population?      To  give  stability  to  law  and 
national  life,  the  social  ideal  should  be  character." '    The 
governments  of  America  lend  their  influence  to  building 
up  populous  industrial  centres,  the  citizens  of  which  are 
a  danger  to  the  social  fabric.     Lord  Macaulay's  predic- 
'  Henry  C.  Carey. 

"  Ab  this  chapter  is  being  prepared  for  publication,  news  comes 
from  Chicago  of  (he  doings  of  a  mass-meeting  (October  13,  1889),  at 
which,  in  the  presence  of  one  thousand  people,  of  whom,  the  account 
says,  over  one  half  hissed  at  the  Stars  and  Stripes,  while  the  banner 
of  Anarchy  was  greeted  with  cheers.  One  speaker  said  he  was  proud 
of  the  city  in  which  the  execution  of  anarchists  occurred,  because 
he  felt  that  one  day  it  would  be  the  Paris— the  city  of  revolutions— 
of  America. 

*  Bishop  Spalding. 


THE  FARMERS'   SOCIAL   OUTLOOK.  229 

tion,  that  the  American  Republic  may  yet  be  "ravaged  by 
Huns  and  Vandals,  engendered  Avithin  itself  and  by  its 
own  laws,  and  by  its  own  institutions,"  has  not  lost  its 
significance. 

It  seems  imperative,  for  the  safety  of  a  democratic  coun- 
try, that  all  its  people  take  a  direct  interest  in  preserving 
its  institutions.     As  matters  are  going  in  America,  the 
proportion  of  those  who  are  not  so  interested  is  rapidly 
increasing.     While  we  extend  political  rights  to  all,  in 
some  communities,  and  propose  to  extend  them  in  others, 
we  increase  the  effectiveness  of  systems  which  are  caus- 
ing continual  accessions  to  the  ranks  of  those  who  at  any 
time  may  become  a  revolutionary  force.     How  long  un- 
der such  circumstances  before  the  rule  of  the  despot  will 
become  a  necessity  ?     It  was  a  direct  interest  in  protect- 
ing their  own,  which  stimulated  the  hardy  farmers  of  the 
Revolution  to  fight  so  well  for  their  land.     They  fought 
not  only  to  make  it  a"  land  of  liberty,"  but  their  land  of 
liberty.    "  The  shocks  of  corn,"  said  Xenophon,  "  inspire 
those  who  have  raised  them,  to  defend  then.  " 
.  It  will  be  well,  however,  not  to  nurse  the  delusion  that 
socialistic  sentiments  are  destined  to  obtain  lodgment  in 
the  breasts  of  only  the  laborers  in  our  towns  and  manu- 
facturing centres.     They  are,  in  some  sort  of  shape,  rap- 
idly spreading  to  the  rural  districts.'     All  are  aware  of 
•  It  is  a  striking  coincidence,  that  while  the  first  President  of  the 
United  States  made  stronger  claims  than  any  of  his  successors  for  the 
interests  of  agriculture,  and  for  its  value  in  civilization,  the  President 
who  leaves  office  in  the  centennial  year  of  the  inauguration  of  the  first, 
should  feel  called  upon  in  his  last  message  to  Congress,  to  sound  an 
alarm  at  the  unsatisfactory  position  of  agriculture  in  this  latter  day. 
Mr.  Cleveland  looks  with  apprehension  to  the  time  when  the  farmers^ 
among  others,  will,  realizing  the  inequality  and  injustice  under  which 
they  labor,  breed  a  discontent  dangerous  to  the  beneficent  operation  of 


i 


230 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


IJ? 


the  agitations  in  Ireland,  and  other  parts  of  Great  Britain, 
over  the  land  question.  In  Germany,  Bismarck's  social, 
istic  measures  for  the  assumed  benefit  of  the  working 
classes  have  failed  to  satisfy  the  farmers.  In  France, 
these  sentiments  gain  ground  in  the  rural  districts.  The 
peasantry  of  Russia,  Spain,  and  Italy  are  on  the  verge  of 
revolt.  In  parts  of  Italy  they  have  already  shown  their 
hand.  In  1882,  and  again  in  1888  Lombardy  was  the 
scene  of  serious  disturbances  among  the  rural  classes  ; 
buildings  were  burned,  and  various  crimes  committed. 
Official  reports  state  that  "  it  will  require  energetic 
measures  to  combat  these  fermentations." 

Collectivism,  land  nationalization,  and  other  socialistic 
schemes  are  proposed  to  remedy  all  our  social  ills.  These 
grow  in  favor  as  capitaKcontinues  to  rob  the  small  hold- 
ers of  their  land.  In  Mantua,  a  province  in  Italy,  between 
187 1  and  1879,  land  proprietors  had  decreased  from  39,- 
868  to  35,535.  The  peasant  in  many  cases  holds  on  to  his 
land  with  a  death-like  grip,  with  all  the  harrowing  anxiety 
which  its  ownership  entails  ;  and  it  is  only  when  its  load 
of  debt  devours  it,  that  he  gives  it  up.  He  is  then  found 
low  and  servile,  or  the  bitter  enemy  to  the  existing  order. 
The  three  millions  of  so-called  pauper  land  proprietors 

government.  He  says  :  "  Communism  is  a  hateful  thing,  and  a  men- 
ace to  peace  and  organized  government.  But  the  communism  of  com- 
bined wealth  and  capital,  the  outgrowth  of  overweening  cupidity  and 
selfishness,  which  insidiously  undermines  the  justice  and  integrity  of 
free  institutions,  is  no  less  dangerous  than  the  communism  of  oppressed 
poverty  and  toil,  which,  exasperated  by  injustice  and  discontent,  attacks 
with  wild  disorders  the  citadel  of  rule."  This  is  not  the  disturbing 
utterance  of  a  mere  demagogue,  or  the  hallucination  of  a  disordered 
crank,  but  the  timely  warning  of  the  true  patriot,  who  would  avert  a 
calamity  terrible  to  contemplate. 


THE  FARMERS'   SOCIAL   OUTLOOK. 


231 


of  France,  inheriting  from  their  ancestors  a  load  of  injus- 
tices, are  hardly  responsible  even  for  what  their  own  exer- 
tions might  remedy.  Circumstances  may  make  men  but 
little  removed  from  the  brute. 

However,  all  socialistic  schemes  as  continuous  policies 
mean  slavery.     It  is  only  when  the  evil    which  prompt 
retaliation  by  combination  are  removed,  that  freedom  is 
real.     Socialism  is  in  direct  antagonism  with  the  true 
interests  of  agriculture.     Under  a  general  regime  of  one 
socialistic  scheme  against  another,  the  game  is  against 
the  best  condition  of  agriculture.     Freedom  !   Freedom  ! 
Individuality  !  must  be  the  watchwords  of  the  husband- 
man.     The  present  state  of  land  ownership   in  Great 
Britain  is  admitted  on  most  sides  to  be  unsatisfactory, — 
in  proof  of  which  is  the  endeavor  of  successive  govern- 
ments to  remedy  the  evil  legislation  of  centuries  past. 
*  There,  as  in  other  parts  of  Europe,  the  disease  having, 
in  a  certain  sense,  become  chronic,  a  leiurn  to  a  better 
state  of  land  ownership  is  most  difficult.     In  America, 
the  acute  stage  is  approaching  rapidly,  through  a  some- 
what different  channel  from  that  by  which   England's 
farmers  lost  their  lands  ;  but  I  trust  it  is  not  too  late,  in 
most  localities  at  least,  for  the  application  of  a  salutary 
remedy. 

I  believe  in  a  numerous  land-holding  class  ;  small  land 
proprietors  have  been  the  backbone  of  nearly  all  real 
progress  in  America  ;  and  the  outlook  is  dark  indeed 
if  their  power  and  influence  is  gradually  to  disappear. 
Sismondi  says  :  *'  Wherever  we  find  peasant  proprietors, 
we  find  comfort,  security,  confidence  in  the  futv.re,  and 
that  which  assures  at  once  happiness  and  virtue."  This 
independence  certainly  should  be  the  desired  condition. 


II 1 1 


1! 


it 


iil 


23^ 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


\ 


I', 


i.. 


The  Belgian  economist  De  Lavelcye's  opinion  is,  that 
*  in  England,  large  farming  and  large  properties  have 
killed  this  class  of  free  and  brave  peasant  proprietors,  the 
yeomen    who  won  the  battles   of   Poitiers,  Cr^cy,  aid 
Agincourt.    .   .    .   Never  to  be  forgotten  is  Pliny's  cr>  of 
grief,  which  echoes  like  a  warning  note  through  economic 
history.     Overgrown  estates  ruined  Italy  and  the  prov- 
inces.     Large  properties  produce  everywhere  excessive 
inequality,   depopulation,    class    divisions,    and    decay. 
Countries  inhabited  by  peasant  proprietors  have  with- 
stood  all  these  crises."     If  we  compare  country  with 
countjy,  period  with  period,  we  will  find  that  where  the 
land  has  been  well  divided  among  the  people,  other  things 
being  equal,  there  prosperity  will  be  the  more  generally 
apparent. 

It  is  the  Abbe  St.  Pierre's  decision,  that  the  infraction 
of  the    Roman  laws   limiting  the   size  of  the   Roman  ' 
citizen's  estates  to  small  dimensions,   hastened  rapidly 
the  ruin  of  the  republic. 

All  through  the  history  of  Greece  we  are  impressed  by 
the  idea,  that,  notwithstanding  her  growth  towards  per- 
fection in  literature,  science,  and  politics,  she  carried 
along  with  it  the  seeds  of  her  own  destruction.  The 
depravity  of  the  masses  resulted  largely  from  depriving 
them  of  the  reasonable  use  of  the  lands.  The  history 
of  the  rise  and  progress,  decay,  and  final  downfall  of 
these  old  civilizations,  showing  that  the  general  features 
of  each  progressive  stage  were  an  index  to  the  condition 
and  importance  of  the  agricultural  classes,  and  of  t;v 
manner  in  which  the  land  was  held  by  them,  is  of  very 
great  practical  interest  to  us. 

Dr.  Bowen,  an  American  authority  of  some  note  on 
these  matters,  believes  that  "  every  farmer  should  own 


THF  FARMERS'    SOCIAL   OUTLOOK.  233 

the  soil  he  tills  •• ;  that  « it  n.akes  him  a  better  farmer,  a 
better  citizen,  and  a  more  patriotic  one  " 

Collectivism  would  be  no   remedy  for  the  abnormal 
state  of  things  toward  which  we  are  now  tending ;  it 
would  be  a  cure  more  to  be  dreaded  than  the  disease  • 
and  the  same  may  be  said  of  land  nationalization.     Ex- 
tinguish that  impulse  which  prompts  our  farmers  to  cul- 
tivate  with  energy,  and  beautify  the  lands  of  their  fore- 
fathers, and  you  have  stricken  that  land  with  a  blight  • 
cause  the  farmer  to  view  the  orchards  and  gardens  which 
have  been  his  childhood's  delight,  as  the  property  of  the 
highest  bidder,  and  his  interest  in  them  fails ;  deprive 
him  of  the  stimulus  to  work,  which  sole  ownership  and 
management  of  an  estate  freed  from  all  encumbrances 
naturally  gives  him,  and  make  a  collectivate  or  govern- 
ment agent  sole  manager  of  his  individual  industries,  and 
you  have  robbed  him  of  the  best  incentives  toward  true 
progress.     There  is  nothing  original  in  all  this.     They 
are   but   the   views   of  our   ablest    economists.     Adam 
Smith  s   observations   led  him   to   the   conclusion,  that 
the  small  proprietor  who  tills  every  part  of  his  little 
territory,  who  views  it  with  all  the  affection  which  prop- 
erty (especially  small  property)  inspires,  and  who,  on 
that  account,  takes  pleasure  not  only  in  cultivating  but 
m  adorning  it,  is  generally  of  all  improvers  the   most 
industrious,  the  most  intelligent,  and  the  most  success- 
ful.     Arthur  Young  makes  this  striking  and  enthusiastic 
remark  :      Give  a   man  secure  possession   of  a  bleak 
rock,  and  he  will  turn  it  into  a  garden." 

Nothing  can  be  more  conducive  to  the  success  cf  the 
farmer's  enterprise  than  the  confidence  that  his  kbors 
may  secure  him  thorough  independence.     With  increas- 


l  J 


iii 


\    m 


1^^» 


234 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


01 


1)1. ; ! 


ing  faith  in  his  opportunities  to  become  an  individual 
owner,  his  chances  to  become  something  of  a  capitalist 
are  increased.  As  he  gathers  capital,  he  gathers  power  to 
defy  the  land-grabber  or  the  usurer.  But  this  is  not  the 
tendency  in  America  to-day,  and  the  consequence  must 
be  fewer  and  fewer  men  on  whom  to  depend  for  social 
security — a  most  momentous  matter. 


CHAPTER  III. 


DANGER   TO   MORALS. 

Everywhere  we  find  political  centralization  counteracting  the  In- 
fluenceof  that  social  decentralization  which  looks  to  elevating  the 
condition  of  all  the  people  of  the  state,  whether  malo  ,  r  female. 

—Henry  C.  Carey. 

In  an  opening  chapter  I  made  the  claim  in  behalf  of 
the  rural  classes,  that  they,  in  addition  to  their  many 
other  valuable  characteristics,  were  peculiarly  the  moral 
safeguards  of  society.  Especially  is  this  so  in  reference 
to  the  use  of  intoxicants. 

Regrettable  though  it  be,  we  are,  in  some  particulars, 
becommg  more  susceptible  to  the  acquirement  of  this 
habit  than  heretofore.     We  have  already  learned  that 
nervous  disorders  are  increasing.     This  is  not  only  the 
case  m  the  United  States,  but  in  Canada  as  well.  "  When 
the  nervous  system  loses,  through  any  cause,  much  of 
Its  nervous  force,  so  that  it  cannot  stand  upright  with 
ease  and  comfort,  it  leans  on  the  nearest  and  most  con- 
venient artificial  support  that  is  capable  of  temporarily 
propping  up   the   enfeebled   frame.     Any   thing  which 
gives  ease,  sedation,  oblivion,  such  as   chloral,  chloro- 
form,  opium,  or  alcohol,  may  be  resorted  to,  first  as  an 
incident,  and  finally  as  a  habit."  ' 

'  Dr.  George  M.  Beard. 
235 


236 


AMEKICAN  FARMS. 


■ 


The  Rev.  Josiah  Strong,  commenting  on  the  above,  in 
dealing  with  this  subject  in  his  book,  "  Our  Country," 
says  :  "  Men  of  nervous  organizations  are  not  only  more 
likely  than  others  to  use  alcohol,  and  to  use  it  to  excess, 
but  its  effects  in  their  case  are  worse  and  more  rapid. 
The  wide  difference  between  a  nervous  and  a  phlegmatic 
temperament  accounts  for  the  fact  that  one  man  will  kill 
him.sclf  with  drink  in  four  or  five  years,  and  another  in 
forty  or  fifty." 

The  annual  expenditure  of  the  United  States  for 
foreign  and  domestic  liquors  is  now  estimated  at  one 
thousand  millions  of  dollars.  "  This  is  more  than  is  ex- 
pended for  beef,  pork,  and  flour,  and  nearly  equals  the 
amount  paid  tor  wages  in  all  the  manufacturing  estab- 
lishments  of  every  description."  '  Official  statistics  show 
that  beer  has  largely  taken  the  place  of  spirits,  but 
though  in  1840,  the  United  States  consumed  four  gallons 
of  liquor  per  capita,  in  1888  she  consumed  over  twelve 
gallons  per  capita. 

As  the  people  gather  more  into  the  cities,  a  larger  pro- 
portion of  the  nation  becomes  more  subject  to  nervous 
disorders,  and  a  consequent  susceptibility  to  intemper- 
ance, a  habit  which  further  impairs  the  moral,  the  men- 
tal, and  the  physical  capacities  of  men,— which  fills  jails 
with  criminals,  poorhouses  with  paupers,  and  makes 
many  homes  of  wretchedness.  The  increased  exposure 
to  the  vice  of  intemperance  is  one  grrve  objection  to 
change  from  country  to  city  life.  Especially  is  this  the 
case  with  those  who  become  engaged  in  the  very  unhealthy 
occupations — occupations  which  are  on  the  increase. 
Higher  wages  are  paid  to  those  who  are  likely  to  be  soon 
cut  down  by  the  deadly  effects  of  their  peculiar  industry. 

'  Senator  John  J    '   galls,  North  American  Review,  August,  1889. 


DANGER  TO  MORALS, 


m 


Consequently  a  greater  opportunity  is  afforded  for  holi- 
days.     Indeed,  it  is  claimed   that  the  drinkers  live  the 
longest,  owmg  to  their  more  frequent  absence  from  work 
VVe  might  wish  that  iCbenezer  Klliotfs  character  of  the 
gnnder  applied  better  to  that  class  in  his  time  than  now  : 

"  There  draws  the  grimier  his  laborious  breath  ; 
There,  coiiyhiny.  at  his  deadly  tra<Ie,  he  bends  ; 
Born  to  die  young,  he  fears  nor  man,  nor  death  ; 
Scorning  the  future,  what  he  earns,  he  spends'; 
Debauch  and  riot  are  his  bosom  friends." 

As  our  young  men  drift  into  the  cities,  they  come  into 
contact,  not  with  the  once  denounced  and  degraded  bar- 
room, but  with   the  respectable  "  beer  palace,"    where 
every  thing  is  made  as  attractive  and  entertaining  as 
possible.     To-day,  as  compared  with  twenty  years  ago 
the  selling  of  intoxicating  liquors  is  an  eminently  re- 
spectable occupation,  and  consequently  the  tendency  is 
to  make  the  habit  of  drinking  equally  so.     These  "  beer 
palaces  "  are  gilded  traps  for  our  country  boys,  when 
they  come  to  change  country  for  city  life.     The  city  of 
New  York  alone  has  seven  thousand  of  these  legalized 
life-  and  soul-destroying  dispensaries  of  sin  and  ruin 
some  of  them  being  most  costly  and  gorgeous  in  their 
appointments. 

That  the  cities  contain  a  larger  proportion  of  excessive 
drinkers  than  the  country,  is  proved  by  the  much  larger 
ratio  of  deaths  in  them  from  this  cause,  as  compared  with 
the  country.  In  the  city  of  London,  one  to  12,800  of 
the  population  dies  from  the  use  of  alcohol,  while  of  the 
whole  kingdom,  only  one  to  26,000  dies  from  its  use. 

In  fact,  the  ruralists  of  our  country    an  hardly  realize 
how  much  the  cause  of  temperance  depends  upon  them 


til 


. 


^i 


r  %"  \ 


238 


AMERICAS'  FARMS. 


for  its  life  and  vigor ;  though  it  is  not  difficult  to  obtain 
iataio  prove  that  the  backbone  of  organized  temperance 
reform  is  with  the  rural  classes,  while  it  is  little  less 
diflficult  to  discover  that  organized  opposition  to  this 
work  has  its  chief  strength  with  the  urban  classes. 

To-day  with  the  vast  city  vote  against  the  country,  the 
country  majority  is  handicapped  by  the  city  majority, 
whatever  it  may  wish  to  do  in  order  to  stay  the  tide  of 
intemperance.  The  great  temperance  reforms  of  the 
past  have  been  principally  fought  out  in  the  country 
towns.  To  carry  on  this  warfare  successfully  must 
become  more  and  more  difficult,  as  the  cities  grow  while 
the  country  stands  still. 

Remarks  Mr.  Strong  :  "Our  cities  are  growing  much 
more  rapidly  than,  the  whole  population,  as  is  the  liquor 
power  also."  After  which  he  propounds  the  query  :  "If 
this  power  continues  to  keep  the  cities  under  its  heel, 
what  of  the  nation,  when  the  city  dominates  the  country  ? " 
New  York  is  now  practically  ruled  by  the  liquor  inter- 
ests, but  New  York  is  not  alone  in  this  by  any  means. 

There  are  no  more  active  workers  in  our  political 
caucuses  than  the  city  and  town  dealers,  manufacturers 
and  promoters  of  this  degrading  and  destructive  traffic. 
These  men  spend  vast  amounts  at  every  election  to 
corrupt  voters.  And  thousands  of  dollars  are  put  up  at 
every  session  of  our  legislatures,  to  buy  up  legislators  for 
the  purpose  of  keeping  open  this  highway  to  destruction. 

It  is  not  the  farmers  of  America  who  desire  the  growth 
of  this  evil,  or  who  crave  its  exhilarating  effects.  And, 
be  they  prohibitionists  or  moral-suasionists,  they  have 
little  desire  to  see  the  accumulation  of  revenue  through 
the  sale  of  privileges  to  import,  to  manufacture,  or  dis- 
pense that  which  debases,  enslaves,  and  pauperizes  so 


oaxgek  to  morals. 


»39 


many  of  the  people.  Neither  can  prt  huionflits  nor 
moral-suasionists  anywhere  permit,  wic.r  .t  heartfelt 
regret,  the  continuous  change  of  conditions  which  tend 
to  nourish  prochviHs;,  towards  the  drinking  habit,  and 
to  see  those  who  arc  engaged  in  this  trade  the  rulers  of 
the  land. 

It  was  to  some  a  startling  statement,  recently  made 
by  a  prominent  clergyman,  that,  unless  a  substitute  be 
found,  the  hquor  saloon  supplies  an  absolute  necessity  in 
our  great  cii.es  such  as  New  York,  with  their  "hundreds 
of  thousands  of  homeless  board  ag-house  and  lodging- 
house  population."  •      This  condition  has  assumed  gigan- 
tic  proportions,  apparently  unnoticed.     But  now  we  must 
ask  :  As  matters  are  drifting,  will  a  substitute  be  found  ? 
Every   new  day  sees  a  larger  proportion  of  American 
people  than  hitherto,  of  the  boarding-  and  lodging-house 
stamp.     It  follows,  that  we  are  rapidly  increasing  the 
proportion  of  our  citizens  to  whom  the  beer  saloon  or  a 
substitute  is  a  necessity.     The  country  of  small  farn.ers 
such  as  has  been  the  pride  of  America  in  the  past,  requires 
nothing  of  the  kind.     To  such  the  beer  saloon,  instead  of 
being  a  necessity,  is  always  a  curse  when  established. 

But,  whether  the  sale  of  intoxicants  for  the  purpose  of 
being  used  as  a  beverage  should  be  pr  ^hibited  or  limited 
by  law,  or  its  control  be  left  to  the  influences  of  moral 
forces,  there  is  no  quenion  as  to  the  imperative  necessity 
for  ^he  human  family  to  avoid,  by  all  means,  that  condi- 
tion which  must  constantly  increase  their  chances  to  b'i 
the  victims  of  this  increasing  peril. 

Another  most  serious  phase  of  the  question  of  the 
drift  from  the  old  farms  to  other  occupations  in  the 
towns  and  cities-the  dispersion  of  the  old  families  from 

'  The  Rev.  Dr.  Bacon. 


J  k 


\  if 


'%\ 


240 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


the  hoTnes  of  their  fathers— is  in  the  diminution  of  per- 
manent homes  just  where  pt-manent  homes  should  be 
increased.     There  is  a  safety  to  the  state  and  to  truest 
aims  of  life  in  the  multiplicity  of  complete  family  circles. 
I  once  heard  the  Rev.  Henry  Ward  Beecher  say,  that 
he  had  no  fear  for  the  people  who  must  build  cellars 
under  their  homes  ;  for,  in  a  climate  where  such  were 
necessary,  the  father  would  be  found  at  home  when  the 
day's   work  was   over.     Mr.    Beecher    was   right.     The 
home  life  is  of  the  most  desirable  character,  where  the 
husband  and  father  looks  to  his  own  fireside,  himself  to 
become  the  central  figure  in  the  family  group,  when  he 
seeks  rest  and  recreation  from  his  toil  ;  the  life  where 
the   wife   and  mother  is  least   likely  to   have   occasion 
to  carry  a  heaVy  heart,  because   of  the  marriage   vow 
having  become  shorn  of  the  virtue  it  should  possess  ;  the 
home    where    the   round   of  household  duties,  though 
perhaps  rough  and  laborious,  may  be    performed  with 
cheerfulness,  because  it  is  a  work  in  which  a  family's 
interests  and  sympathies  share  in  promoting  their  accom- 
plishnent  ;  the  home  where  the  children  may  view  wiih 
pleasure  and  with  profit  a  harmony  of  purpose  in  all  the 
details  of  the  varied  efforts  which  ar  j  being  put  forth  to 
further  the  interests  of  the  individual,  the  family,  and  the 
state. 

Every  new  rontingent  which  leaves  the  old  fr'-ms  for 
city  or  factory-town  life,  go.  i  to  swell  the  ranks  of  the 
classes  which  are  doing  least  to  preserve,  in  its  full  sig- 
nificance, the  sovereign  value  of  the  family  compact.  We 
cannot  give  too  much  heed  to  the  danger  which  must 
befall  us,  through  thus  following  in  the  track  of  the 
civilizations  which  have  gone  down.  With  the  people 
flocking  to  cities,  and  the  corresponding  moral  dangers 


I  1 


DANGER  TO  MORALS.  24 1 

therefrom  a  growing  disregard  of  the  sanctity  and  indis- 
soluble character  and  purpose  of  the  marriage  vovv-the 
family  compact,-we  endanger  the  whole  fabric  of  society 
Any  reflecting  person,  considering  these  questions  from 
the  pomt  of  view  of  public  policy  and  in  the  interests  of 
civilization,  without  any  prepossessions  upon  the  subject 
tha,  can  be  called  religious,  must  see  that  the  institution 
of  the  family  is  at  the  base  of  all  our  civilization,  and  it 

upon  it^' '"^        '"^''^  ^""^  '^'^''"  ^^  ^^P^^  ^"  ^^'^^^'^ 

Notwithstanding  our  great  accumui.uons  of  wealth, 
our  palatial  residences  with  their  varied  attractior  and 
appointments  to  make  the  average  city  home  luxurious 
and  comfortable,  the  father  and  husband,  as  a  rule,  is 
less  at  home  than  m  the  ruder  days  of  the  early  Tilgrims 
and  Puritans  With  our  development,  the  modern  du" 
house  and   the   fashionable  restaurant  have   come -a 

They  take  the  heart  out  of  the  family  circle,  and  leave  it 
cold  and  purposeless.  These  insti  .tions  are  growing 
m  America  out  of  all  proportion  to  the  increase  of 
population. 

ent,  that  tue  number  of  married  women  looking  for  em- 
ployment  at  the  stores,  offices,  .nd  factories  is  alarmingly 
on  the  increase.  It  is  said  by  those  who  have  given  this 
matter  attention,  that  the  married  who  are  thus  striving 
.for  situations  in  our  cities  are  not  fewer  in  numbers  than 

whose  husbands  have  either  left  them,  or  who  are  com- 
pelled  to  assist  '.he  husband  in  procuring  a  subsistence  for 
the  family  ;  that  a  vast  proportion  are  wives  of  perfidious 
husbands.     There  was  once  a  time  when  the  young  wife 


'    M 


242 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


A  1 


of  the  man  of  small  income  was  enabled  to  join  by  the 
side  of  the  husband  in  the  labors  of  his  calling,  as  in  the 
small  retail  stores— now  almost  extinct  in  our  large  cities. 
But  of  all,  the  country,  under  the  r^^ime  of  the  small 
farmer,  has  afforded  the  best  chances  for  this  most 
desirable  of  partnerships. 

The  state  wherein  is  destroyed  the  permanent  home 
life  must  expect  moral  degeneracy,  and  the  state  which 
depends  upon  the  great  capitalists,  and  hired  labor,  and 
mechanics  to  supply  if  with  the  fruits  of  the  earth  must 
one  day  see  its  homes  become  devoid  of  character  or 
honor— its  mother,  forced  down  from  the  high  and 
rightful  place  which  they  should  occupy. 

Of  the  fallen    Grecian  Republic,  says  Mr.  Henry  C. 
Carey  :    "  Wisdom,'  love,   chastity,    poetry,  history,  the 
liberal  arts,  and  even  Athens  herself,  were  typified  by 
female  figures— Minerva,  Venus,  Diana,  and  the  Muses 
having  been  the  objects  of  divine  worship  among  the 
people  who  looked  to  Solon  for  their  instructions  and 
their  laws.    When,  however,  we  look  to  the  interior  of  the 
Athenian  family,  we  find,  as  in  all  cases  of  semi-barbarism, 
the  home  to  have  no  real  existence,  the  wife  having  been 
a  mere  drudge,  whose  sphere  of  action  was  limited  to  the 
perpetuation  of  the  family  and  the  superintendence  of  the 
household— the  \  jsband  meanwhile  finding  the  best  so- 
ciety the  city  could  supply  in  the  dwelling  of  his  mistress. 
Neglected  as  she  was,  chastity  was  then,  nevertheless,  the 
characteristic  of  the  Athenian  matron.     When,  however, . 
Athens  had  become  mistress  of  one  thousand  cities,  when 
centralization  had  been  fully  carried  out,  when  trade,  war, 
and  politics  had  become  the  sole  pursuit  of  the  Athenian 
nien,  we  find  Socrates  lending  his  wife   to   his  friend, 
while  Pericles  scarcely  surprises  his  fellow-citizens  when 


DANGER    TO  MORALS. 


243 


presenting  to  them  Aspasia,  his  own  mistress,  and  the 
mistress  of  so  many  others,  as  his  legitimate  wife-the 
class  of  hetcBKCB  then  constituting  the  most  distinguished 
feature  in  the  highly  civilized  society  which  had  Attica 
for  Its  home.'" 

"  The  tendency  of  legislation  in  this  country  has  been 
to  a  relaxation  of  the  matrimonial  tie,  and  this  is  a  ten- 
dency that  there  is  urgent  need  of  resisting." '  It  indi- 
cates a  general  relaxation  of  moral  forces.  We  are  creating 
a  state  which  is  the  least  likely  to  resist  this  tendency! 
and  legislators  as  well  as  others  are  participating  in  it 

Says  Cardinal  Gibbons  :  "  In  Rome  adulteries  in- 
creased  as  divorces  were  multiplied." 

After    speaking    of    the    facility    and    frequency    of 

divorce     among    the    Romars,    Gibbons    adds-      "A 

specious    theory   is   confuted  by  this  free  and  perfect 

experiment,   which    demonstrates    that    the    liberty   of 

divorce  does  not  contribute  to  happiness   and  virtue. 

1  his  facility  of  separation  would  destroy  all  mutual  con- 

fidence  and  inflame  every  trifling  dispute.     The  minute 

difference   between   a   husband   and   a  stranger  which 

might  so  easily  be  removed,  might  still  more  easily  be 

forgotten."  ^ 

How  apropos    in  this    connection  are  the   words   of 
Professor  Woolsey  :     "  Nothing  is  more  startling  than 
to  pass  from  the  fir,     part  of  the  eighteenth  to  the  latter 
part  of  the  nineteenth  century,  and  to  observe  how  law 
has  changed  and  opinion  has  altered  in  regard  to  mar- 
riage—the great  foundation  of  society— and  to  divorce  • 
and  how,  almost  pari  passu,  various  offences   against 
chastity,  such  as  concubinage,  prostitution,  illegitimate 
'  "  Social  Science,"  vol.  iii.,  p.  370. 
'  New  York  Times,  October  25,  1889. 


'  t'  1 


244 


AMERICAN  FARMS, 


\x 


m 


births,  abortion,  disinclination  to  family  life,  have  in- 
creased also,  not  indeed  at  the  same  pace  everywhere, 
or  all  of  them  equally  in  all  countries,  yet  have  decidedly 
increased  on  the  whole.  Surely  in  few  parts  of  the 
wide  world  is  the  truth  of  these  strong  words  more 
evident  than  in  those  parts  of  our  country  where  loose 
divorce  laws  have  long  prevailed."  ' 

From  a  total  of  9,937  divorces  granted  in  the  United 
States  in  1867,  they  increased  to  25,535  i^^  1886  :  an  in- 
crease double  the  increase  of  population.  Near  to  every 
tenth  family  is  broken  up  through  difficulties  between 
husbands  and  wives  resulting  in  divorces.  In  fact,  in 
some  cities  of  America  it  is  the  exception  to  find  a 
family  that  is  not  in  some  way  afflicted  by  this  growing 
evil.  While  this  is  the  case  in  the  cities,  the  separation 
of  husband  and  wi'^.-;  is  of  infrequent  occurrence  in  the 
country. 

Woman — whose  history,  until  a  very  recent  period  has 
been  one  of  subordination,  shame,  and  suffering,  from 
the  hands  of  her  lord  and  master ;  who  looks  forward 
to  the  days  of  equal  rights  and  greater  freedom  ;  who 
would  sit  enthroned  in  her  proper  sphere,  honored,  re- 
spected, and  deferred  to  as  an  equal  in  intelligence  and 
in  worth, — has  every  thing  to  fear  from  the  breaking  up 
of  the  small  land  proprietories. 

Every  consideration,  however,  pales  before  the  last 
that  we  shall  mention — our  tendencies  towards  those 
conditions  least  likely  to  preserve  or  increase  Christian 
characteristics.  Statistics  bearing  upon  this  subject  are 
to  the  effect,  that  the  country  people  have  been  greater 
church-goers  than  the  city  people,  and  that  these  pro- 
clivities have  become  in  the  past  more  and  moro  marked. 
'  North  American  Review,  November,  1889. 


DANGER    TO  MORALS. 


245 


In  1880,  one  of  the  chief  cities  of  America,  Chicago,  had 
only  one  church  to  each  2,081  of  the  people,  whereas  the 
country   had   more   than   one  to  every  5,6.     In   1840, 
Chicago  had  one  to  every  747  of  its  people.     The  change 
has  been   more  noticeable  in  this  city  than  with  most 
others,  but  the  whole  tendency  has  been  in  the  direction 
thus  indicated.     The  cities  of  America  are  being  filled 
with  those  who  have  no  desire  for  Christian  worship 
indeed  the  extreme  socialist  declares  himself  the  direct 
opponent  of  religion  of  any  sort.     The  city  is  his  home 
and  It  IS  there  that  his  contaminating  influence  is  exercised' 
Corresponding  to  the  weakening  of  the  desires  of  the 
people  for  religious  worship,  has  crime  increased      The 
ratio  of  prison  population  to  each  million  of  the  inhab- 
itants  of  the  United  States  was  290  in   1850;    607  in 
i860;  853  m  1870;  and  1,169  in  1880.     These  figures 
show  that  crime  in  America  is  increasing  out  of  all  pro- 
portion to  increase  of  population.     It  is  in  the  great 
cities  that  the  increase  of  crime  is  chiefly  taking  place 
But  It  seems  a  time  does  come  when,  the  country  hav- 
ing lost  Its  economic,  political,  and  social  vitality,  it  may 
fail  in  moral  and  religious  character.  It  has  been  so  with 
the  fallen  civilizations.     In  its  appearance  we  see  that 
which  may  be  the  beginning  of  the  end.     What  a  pure 
noble,  and  grand  development,  in  high  religious  purpose,' 
has  been  that  worked  out  on  the  farms  and  in  the  coun- 
try towns  of  New  England  !    How  sad  that  the  scenes  of 
these  religious  activities  should  cease  to  see  perpetuated 
the  Christian  traditions  marked  so  indelibly  upon  the 

tt^Nr  Wo'rldt"^^^  "'^  ''  ''''  ^"^^^^'^"^  ^--  °^ 

^  The  Rev.  Mr.  Henry  Fairbanks  stated  recently,  before 

i..-e  Evangelical  Alliance  of  America,  that  in  Vermont 


'li 


'  i 


246 


AMERICAxV  FARMS. 


1|v    r 


there  were  but  150,000  of  the  population  of  the  State 
who  now  attend  any  place  of  worship,  whereas  there  are 
183,000  who  nevfer  go  at  all.  Another  says  that  a  gen- 
eration of  infidels  has  been  reared  upon  the  hillsides  of 
New  England,  and  that  they  are  the  worst  heathen  that 
he  has  *^ver  met  with.' 

The  Rev.  Mr.  J.  S.  Buckminster,  in  the  first  years  of  the 
present  century,  or  when  the  typical  American  farmer  was 
a  most  prominent  figure  in  the  affairs  of  that  early  period, 
saw  in  those  farmers  the  greatest  spiritual  hope  of  the 
Commonwealth.  He  said  :  "  No  situation  in  life  is  so  favor- 
able to  the  establishment  of  habits  of  virtue,  and  powerful 
sentiments  of  devotion,  as  a  residence  in  the  country,  and 
rural  occupations.     I  am  not  speaking  of  a  condition  of 
peasantry  (of  which,  in  this  country,  we  know  little)  who 
are  mere  vassals  of  an  absent  lord,  or  hired  laborers  of 
an  intendant,  and  who  are  therefore  interested  in  nothing 
but  the  regular  receipt  of  their  daily  wages  ;  but  I  refer 
to  the  honorable  character  of  the  owner  of  the  soil,  whose 
comforts,  whose  weight  in   the   community,  and  whose 
very  existence  depends  upon  his  personal  labors,  and  the 
regular  returns  of  the  abundance  from  the  soil  he  cul- 
tivates.    No  man,  one  would  think,  would  feel  so  sensibly 
his  immediate  dependence  upon  God,  as  the  husband- 
man."    In  the  American  farmer  of  his  day,  he  saw  the 
ideal  farmer,  in  fact ;  he  saw  in  him  the  one  in  whom 
religious  character  was  of  the  most  likely  development 
from  the  circumstance  among  others,  that  the  nature  of 
agricultural  pursuits,  as  he  saw  them  in  his  time,  "  does 
not  completely  engross  the  attention  as  other  occupa- 
tions.    Even  then  he  saw  the  necessity  of  entreating  the 
city  classes,  few  as  they  were  then  by  comparison,  to 

*  Rev.  Mr.  Haynes. 


DANGER    TO   MORALS. 


247 


\\ 


"avoid  the  practice  of  any  thing  which  might  impair  the 
vigor  of  rural  virtues,  simplicity  nnd  morality,  and  espe- 
cially of  the  institution  of  the  Sabbath." 

Coming  down  to  the  middle  of  our  century,  we  find 
the  Rev.  Mr.  Beecher  sounding  a  note  of  warning  :  "  If 
we  neglect  our  duty  and  suffer  our  laws  and  institutions 
to  go  down,  we  give  them  up  forever.     It   is   easy    to 
relax,  easy  to  retreat,  but  impossible,  when  the  abomina- 
tion of  desolation  has  passer'  over  New  England,  to  rear 
again  the  thrown  down  altars,  and  gather  again  the  frag- 
ments, and  build  up  the  ruins  of   Icmolishcd  institutions. 
Another  New  England  nor  we,  nor  our  children   shall 
ever  see,  if  this  be  destroyLU.     All  is  lost  ii  ictrievably 
when  the  landmarks  are  once  removed  and  the  bands 
which  now  hold  us  are  broken.     Such  institutions  and 
such  a  state  of  society  can  be  established  only  by  such 
men  as  our  fathers  were,  and  in  such  circumstances  as 
they  were  in.     .     .     .     The  hand  that  overthrows  our 
laws  and  temples  is  the  hand  of   death  unbarring  the 
gate  of  Pandemonium,  and  letting  loose  upon  our  land 
ihe  crimes  and  miseries  of  Hell." 

Robbed  of  that  link  of  hope  and  reverence  which 
])rompts  to  aims  and  actions  which  are  true  and  eter- 
nal in  their  influence  upon  character,  the  people  thus 
divested  must  become  as  all  nations  that  forget  God.  It 
matters  not  what  the  method  employed  to  break  down  our 
best  of  institutions,— the  direct  or  the  indirect,— the  result 
must  be  the  same  in  the  end,  and  the  responsibility  upon 
those  instrumental  in  bringing  it  about,  will  be  in  propor- 
tion to  the  knowledge  they  possess  of  the  drift  and  pur- 
pose of  our  social  and  national  undertakings.  The  catas- 
trophe in  New  England,  should  be  an  instruction  and  a 
warning  to  the  rest  of  America. 


THE  CONCLUSION,  IN  WHICH  THE  REMEDY  IS  FOUND. 
"  Morality  is  stronger  than  a  Majority." 


Ill 

if 

If 


THE   CONCLUSION. 


The  first  step  towards  a  remedy  for  the  decline  ot 
American  agriculture,  and  an  escape  from  the  dangers 
It  foreshadows,  must  be  in  a  proper  and  more  general 
realization  of  the  imperative  necessity  for  a  larger  propor- 
tion of  the  people  to  be  engaged  in  tilling  the  soil  than  at 
present ;  a  realization  that  agriculture  must  be  made 
prosperous,  and  rank  first  among  the  great  industries. 

A  further  step  may  be  taken  in  the  farmers  of  America 
making  themselves  a  political  force,  uniting  for  this  pur- 
'  pose,  and  securing,  wherever  and  whenever  possible,  the 
return  of  an  intelligent  farmer  to  Parliament ;  then,  in 
the  legislative  halls  bending  their  energies,  not  to  further 
the  schemes  of  the  communist,  nor  those  of  the  socialist, 
but  the  projects  of  the  true  social  reformer-not  seeking 
more  laws,  but  better  laws,  and  the  liberty  of  a  true 
equality.  Buckle  was  no  doubt  correct  in  his  remark  : 
The  best  laws  which  have  been  passed  have  been  those 
by  which  some  former  laws  were  repealed." 

We  can  abolish  all  laws  which  tend  to  engender 
national  strife,  the  destructive  results  of  which  must  be 
borne  by  our  toiling  people  ;  all  laws  which  are  barriers 
between  supply  and  demand,  preventing  production— that 
is,  man's  labor— from  enjoying  its  n  -tural  and  true  value  ; 
all  laws  which  tend  to  prevent  the  reduction  of  taxes 
to  the  actual  needs  of  the  government,  and  the  reduction 

251 


ri 


ASTER  re  A IV   FARMS, 


lit 


^1. 


Of  govcmmenl  to  the  actual  needs  of  the  people  ;  all 
laws  which   prevent   the   placing  of  taxes   where  they 
shoukl  be  placed  ;  and  all  laws  which  force  labor  to  give 
unfair  support  to  capital  or  to  monopoly,  creating  in- 
equality, sacrificing  the  true  ethical  spirit,  which  should 
prevad,  to  the  wiles  of  scheming  politicians.     This  would 
<lo  much,  very,  very  much,  to  correct  that  preatly  ncg- 
lected  division  of  political  economy-the  distribution  of 
wealth.    'I'hen  the  farmers,  both  large  and  small,  would  be 
upon  an  erpial  footing  with  all  others  in  the  community. 
With  the  powers  which  prosperity  gives,  well  diffused 
among  the  small  estates,  dangerous  socialistic  movements 
can  make  little  headway.     Individual  ownership  incites 
to  individual  responsibility,      i  hus  an  effectual  security 
IS  given  to  the  pretention  of  social  disturbances.     In 
th.s  greater  diffusion  of  an  augmented  prosperity  among 
the    rural   classes,  is  also  to  be  found  an  escape   from 
the  dangers  to  morals,  intellect,  and  the  physical  stamina 
of  men,  which  now  threaten  the  human  family. 

But,  however  true  all  this  is,  as  conditions  now  exist, 
It  may  well  be  questioned  if  the  farmers  of  America, 
with  all  the  forces  they  may  gather  in  our  parliamentary 
assemblies,  would  Mone  be  able  to  combat  the  forces 
which  we  see  are  pitted  against  them  ;  able  to  meet  the 
argument  that,  though  admitting  a  policy  of  universal 
economic  freedom  to  be  an  "immense  blessing  to  the 
world,"  yet  since  the  nations  and  so  many  individuals 
have  given  themselves  over  to  a  "general  scramble  for 
wealth  and  commercial  supremacy,"  it  would  be  puerile 
and  absurd  for  us  to  take  the  lead,  or  even  to  follow  in 
an  effort  to  gain  for  the  world  these  immense  blessings, 
but  instead  should  take  part  in  the  scramble  ourselves  ;' 
that  it  is  a  practical  age,  which  has  little  ioom  for  visiona- 


THE  CONCLUSlOff. 


353 


I 


ncs  ;  and  that  the  "practical  politir' ...  "  Vcides  against 
visionarieH,  while  majorities  supi  o.t  tl.c    practical  poli- 
tician  "     This  rearoning.  thong:,  rons-^icuously  false  in 
f«ct,  has  many  sup;.orters.     Ii  i-     .  ,,  .,  the  assumption 
that  othc^"  go  farther  than  we  in  A.ntika  in  false  eco- 
nomic system...    We  represent  taer.V  .I.ed  portion  of  one 
of  the  r.ve  continents.     Surely  thi .  uiukcs  us  responsible 
for  much.    Second,  to  assume  that  the  people  of  America 
arc  mcapable  of  appreciating  the  advantages  of  a  course 
which,  If  adopted,  would  undoubtedly  lead  to  "  immense 
blessmgs,"  is  far   from   flattering   to    their   intellectual 
capacities.     Third,  it  puts  a  terribly  low  estimate  on  the 
power  01  moral  purpose  ;  this  is  w!.ere  the  great  mistake 
IS  made,  when  the  would-be  reformer  allows  it  to  deter 
him  from  action  in  behalf  of  the  right.     Ani  yet  it  does 
deter. 

Men  of  character,  of  the  noblest  purpose,  see  that  dan- 
rerous  conditions  are  settling  in  upon  us,  and  that  every 
good  citizen  is  required  to  scand  for  that  which  is  true 
and  right,  and  that  only.  Bishop  Cleveland  Coxe  tells 
us  in  Amer-^a,  that  "we  are  confronted  by  the  terrible 
fact  that  we  are  undergoing  changes  similar  to  those 
which  have  been  the  ruin  of  ancient  peoples  in  manr 
examples."  ^ 

Bishop  Benjamin  Whipple  says  :  "Awful  problems 
stare  us  in  the  face  -the  centralization  of  swarms  of 
souls  in  th  ^  cities,  the  wealth  of  the  nation  in  fewer 
hands,  competition  making  a  life-and-death  struggle  " 
BisLop  Spalding  points  to  dangers  which  already  hover 
over  rnd  around  ^he  great  American  Republic  •  "  If  we 
have  been  able  to  found  a  durable  state  with  what  else- 
where and  hitherto  has  been  the  least  stable  kind  of 
government,  our  success  is  to  be  ascribed  to  causes 


»54 


AMERICA  M  FARMS. 


If 


some  of  which  have  ceased  to  exist,  while  others  are 
disappearing." 

Says  Prof.  Austin  Phelps  ;  "  Turn  whichever  way  we 
will-Sc.th,  West,  North,  East-we  are  confronted  by 
the  same  element  of  crisis  in  the  outlook  upon  the  future. 
Every  thing  seems,  to  human  view,  to  depend  on  pres- 
ent and  dissolving  chances.  Whatever  can  be  done  at 
all  must  be  done  with  speed." 

Every  thing  warns  us  that  this  is  no  time  for  trifling 
with  principles.  It  is  a  time  for  great  victories  or  great 
failures.  To  whom  and  to  what,  then,  are  we  to  look  for 
deliverance  ? 

Says  the  scholarly  Mr.  George  William  Curtis  ;  "  They 
are  called  visionaries  who  hold  that  morality  is  stronger 
than  a  majority.";  "  But,"  says  he,  'the  educated  re- 
former of  America  has  faith  enough  iu  the  people  to 
appeal  to  them  against  themselves,  for  he  knows  that  the 
iinal  principle  of  popular  government  is  the  abihty 
.     .he  people  to  correct  their  own  errors." 

It  is  true  that  the  men  who  have  led  in  great  reforms 
as  a  rule,  have  been  educated  men  ;  but,  they  have  been 
men  who  have  always  stood  out  conspicously  in  their 
precepts,  and   examples  as  independent  self-sustaining 
characters.     I'hey  have  been  no  parasites,  but  men  o: 
moral  courage  :  men  who  could  give  to  the  world  more 
than  they  expected  to  receive  from  it.     We  have  such 
to-day  scattered  all  over  our  land— in  our  colleges  in 
our  school-rooms,  in  our  editorial  chairs,  in  our  pulpits 
and  in  oui  courts  of  justice.    But  it  is  not  with  such  only 
that  loyalty  to  high  principles  is  recognized  as  the  true 
monitor  in  the  decision  of  matters  pertaining  to  family 
to  society,  to  the  state.     It  is  found  strong  in  the  rank 
and   file,   and   nowhere  stronger   than   with   our  rural 


■i,  \ . 


THE  CONCLUSION. 


255 


classes,  however  they  may  have  stood  aloof  from  any 
practical  part  in  the  settlement  of  public  questions,  or 
however  they  may  have  appeared  merely  as  partisans. 

Knowledge  is  power,  and  it  is  a  greater  power  for 
good  than  for  evil  ;  but  is  a  mighty  power  for  evil. 
Knowledge,  though,  is  a  greater  power  for  good  when 
in  possession  of  those  whose  occupations,  habits,  and 
surroundings  are  calculated  to  develop  morality  and 
virtue.  Good  knowledge  and  morality  are  correlatives. 
In  the  rural  classes,  then,  we  may  look  for  good  knowl- 
edge to  be  most  extensively  disseminated,  and  in  the 
greatest  volume  in  the  aggregate. 

In  America,  in  our  day,  that  education  which  should 
render  men  capable  of  doing  valuable  service  for  most 
reforms  is  within  the  grasp  of  the  average  rural  voter.  It 
is  only  required,  in  addition,  that  he  become  inspired  by 
real  convictions.  It  has  not  been  through  men  of  profound 
speech,  or  of  brilliant  oratory  alone  that  reforms  have 
been  wrought,  but  by  all  who  are,  to  use  an  expression  of 
Emerson,  "  appointed  by  Almighty  God  to  stand  for  a 
fact."  "  Him  who  has  the  facts  and  can  i.nd  will  state 
them  people  will  listen  to,  thoijgh  he  is  otherwise  igno- 
rant."    It  is  this  standing  for  facts  that  finally  tells. 

Reform's  best  weapon  is  the  plain,  unvarnirhed  truth, 
which  strikes  home  to  the  heart  of  the  humblest.  Rich- 
ard Cobden,  when  urging  on  his  fellow  leaguers  in  the 
great  reform  to  which  he  had  pledged  his  life's  best 
efforts,  said  to  them  :  *'  This  is  the  work  which  requires 
no  gifts  of  oratory,  or  powerful  public  appeals  ;  it  is  a 
labor  in  which  men  can  be  useful  privately  and  without 
ostentation."  The  same  can  be  said  of  all  great  reforms 
in  which  the  people  are  interested.  Yes  !  the  most  of  us 
are  eligible  for  service  in  the  cause  of  truth. 


256 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


A  belief  in  "  the  ability  of  the  people  to  correct  their 
own  errors  "  also  implies  a  belief  in  their  ability  to  see 
their  own  errors.     This  awakening  may  be  the  hardest 
part  of  reform.     If  the  citizens  of  the  Roman  Republic 
had  been   able,  at  some  turning-point  in  its  history, 
to  see  their  own  errors  in  their  true  light,  that  civili- 
zation  might  have  gone  on  in  its  own  development     We 
may  say  the  same  of  the  Grecian,  or  any  other  of  our 
past  civilizations.     The  lack  of  a  proper  realization  of 
error  is   a  continual   stumbling-block  in  itself,  and  is 
ceaselessly  working  the  downfall  of  men.    Notwithstand- 
ing,  we  have  faith  in  the  people  of  America,  not  only  to 
eventually  see  the  right,  but  to  act  in  its  behalf. 

When  with  such  vexed  social  and  political  problems  as 
the  difficulties  now>  existing  between  labor  and  capital 
the  distribution  of  land,  the  threatening  power  of  combi- 
nations  of  wealth,  and  reforms  in  our  governing  methods, 
we  affirm  that  we  have  faith  in  the  people  to  solve  them 
we  also  imply  a  belief  in  the  sovereignty  of  the  people' 
Certainly  in  this  we  mean  not  merely  a  passive  sover- 
eignty,  not  only  in  the  people   being  represented  here 
and    there    through    an   unpledged    and    uninstructed 
leader,  but  a  sovereignty  in  v/hich  the  individual  citizen 
acts  tne  part  of  the  true  sovereign,  and  becomes  respon- 
sible for  the  welfare  of  his   subjects.     Therefore,  with 
such  as  we  in  America,  where  the  people  are  empowered 
to  be  the  chief  rulers,  safety  is  always  in   the   timely 
action  of  the  people,  alive  to  a  requisite  appreciation  of 
truth,  and  realizing  their  responsibilities  as  sovereigns. 

That  portion  of  the  people  by  whom  error  should  be 
the  more  easily  recognized  is  composed  of  these  in  whom 
morality  and  virtue  more  largely  predominate.  It  follows 
that  all,  be  they  clergymen,  statesmen,  judges,  teachers, 


THE  CONCLUSION. 


257 


merchants,  fishermen,  or  mechanics,  who  believe  in  the 
abstract  right  as  the  true  expedient,  and  who  believe  in  the 
principles  of  liberty,  justice,  harmony,  righteousness,  and 
peace,  as  the  true  element  in  forming  the  base  on  which 
to  found  social  and  political  systems,  are  natural  allies 
with  our  farmers  in  all  reforms  having  this  end  in  view 
Should  they  not  be  their  natural  allies  in  resisting  the 
forces  which  are  now  weaving  the  network  of  illiberal, 
unjust,  unchristian,  soul-enslaving  laws  around  the  peo- 
ple of  America  ? 

Our  paternal  governments  have  sought  for  and  formed 
their  alliances  with  wealth  and  the  parts  of  society,  social- 
istic in  their  tendencies.  They  are  plutocracies,  made 
powerful  by  sucking  the  blood  of  the  state  ;  in  league 
with  that  part  of  the  state  which  seeks  relief  from  its 
burdens  by  throwing  them  on  the  remainder. 

Are  not  these  leally  the  two  great  parties  about  to  en- 
gage  in  a  struggle  which  is  noi  very  far  off .?  The  latter 
party  is  already  a  consolidated,  disciplined  force,  as  we 
have  shown  ;  and  it  has  the  wealth  of  the  country  and 
the  greater  number  on  its  side.  The  former  has  yet  to 
bnng  its  forces  together.  But  are  not  thousands  of  our 
own  people  willing  to  enter  into  the  contest  for  reform  ? 
Will  some  only  wait  the  rallying  cry,  while  others  are 
waiting  the  command  to  march  ?  They  are  in  the  minor- 
ity, but  "morality  is  stronger  than  a  majority." 

We  have  long  since  come  to  the  conclusion  that  we 
have  not  been  dealing,  in  this  work,  with  an  economic 
question  only,  but  a  far-reaching  n  -  .1  question  ;  and  that 
when  the  moral  question  is  settled,  the  economic  question 
will,  necessarily,  in  a  great  measure,  be  of  easy  adjust- 
ment. We  must  keep  in  vie  .he  fact  that,  nearly  nineteen 
hundred  years  ago,  Christ  came  into  the  world  to  teach 


358 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


men  a  new  morality  •  ;  to  give  men  a  higher  conception 
of  human  responsibility  than  they  had  hitherto  known  ; 
a  new,  startling  realization  of  the  all-important  truth  that 
the  whole  human  race  is  one  great  brotherhood  ;  that 
their  rights  are  essentially  equal ;  that  all  through  the 
centuries  that  had  gone  before,  an  abnormal  condition 
had  existed  in  the  alienation  of  these  rights  from  the  great 
majority  of  mankind  ;  that  principles  have  no  bounds. 

It  is  indubitably  correct  that  the  human  family  have 
been  far  too  slow  in  grasping  these  truths,  with  even  a 
rudimentary  conception  of  their  immense  importance  to 
man,  or  of  ^he  responsibilities  they  call  upon  him  to 
assume.  We  nave  much  to  assure  us,  however,  that  they 
do  sink  into  men's  hearts,  and  influence  their  actions. 
From  the  light  they  now  furnish,  error  should  be  more 
easily  distinguished.  Had  it  shone  around  men  and 
pierced  their  hearts  in  the  earlier  civilizations,  who  can 
say  that,  notwithstanding,  they  would  still  have  fallen .? 

To  this  same  morality  we  must  look  to  shed  a  light 
over  those  difficulties  which  now  seem  insurmountable. 
Morality  is  stronger  than  a  majority. 

Men  must  one  day  scorn  the  thought  of  seeking  priv- 
ileges through  legislation  at  the  expense  of  others.  The 
day  must  come  when  all  men  will  look  upon  the  whole 
system  of  protection  as  a  mean,  selfish,  un-Christian  bar- 
barism  of  the  past ;  when  free  trade  will  not  mean  merely 
liberty  for  particular  interests,  but  justice  to  all ;  when 
no  man  will  dare  insult  his  fellow-men  by  insinuating 
that  they  do  not  so  far  value  liberty  as  to  submit  to  a  direct 
burden  as  its  cost,  rather  than  to  be  cheated  into  it  by 
an  indirect  one  ;  when  men  will  put  no  bounds  to  recti- 
tude or  justice  ;   when  statesmen  must  look  upon  it  as 

'  Geikie. 


THE  CONCLUSION. 


*59 


childish  and  undi.gnified  in  the  extreme  to  be  guided  in 
their  pohcies  in  these  matters  by  false  systems  of  foreign 
countries.  ° 

It  was  for  no  small  purpose  that  our  Saviour,  when  on 
earth  taught  men:  ''Whatsoever  ye  would  that  m.n 
should  do  unto  you,  do  ye  even  unto  them." 

We  are  no  pessimists,  no  fatalists.  We  believe  that 
man  is  a  being  of  high  measures  of  perfectibility,  not 
only  individually,  but  that  he  is  one  day  to  see  his  fellows 
harmoniously  and  unitedly  working  out  the  great  prob- 
lems of  social  and  industrial  life  with  their  brothers 
1  hat  principles  shall  grow  and  finally  prevail  in  grand 
triumph,  we  have  implicit  faith.  Strip  us  of  this  pro- 
spective faith,  and  life  would  be  a  delusion 

But  while  we  feel  all  this,  we  are  nU  blind  to  the  fact 
that  many  years  may  pass  before  we  have  reached  that 
happy  state  ;    many  ye.-3  of  hard,  unflinching  labor  for 
reform  on  the  part  of  those  who  represent  the  true  moral 
forces  of  our  country.     After  years  of  strife  between 
nations,  engendered  and  quickened  by  their  irrational 
irritating  fiscal  policies  ,  after  the  communistic  elements 
o^society,  which  our  state  socialisms  have  fostered  into 
active  being,  have  joined  the  forces  of  "the  Universal 
Revolution  "  ;   after  myriads  of  our  small  land-holdings 
have  cased  to  be,  as  such  ;  when  the  typical  American 
farmer  will  be  known  only  in  history  ;   and,  after  years 
perhaps  ap:s,  of  efforts  to  adjust  all  the  abnormal  con- 
ditions vvhich  our  unwise  laws  have  occasioned,  the  truth 
may  finally  prevail. 

Can  we  permit  this  delay  .?    Shall  we  not  strike  for 
reforms  now,  and  by  so  doing  save  years  of  suffering 
sorrow,  and  desolation  in  our  land  }    Shall  not  the  moral 
forces  be  concentrated  for  a  mighty  effort  to  purge  our 


26o 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


Western  world  from  the  disease  which  has  fastened  itself 
upon  it  ?  Surely  we  will  not  let  the  sun  go  down  upon 
our  days  without  the  consoling  thought  that  we,  in  this 
respect,  hav-  done  something  to  make  the  world  fairer, 
brighter,  hr.ppier,  and  better. 

It  is  unwise  for  any  citizen  who  desires  the  best  good 
for  his  country  to  shun  the  study ;  or  evade  a  part,  in  a 
practical  solution  of  these  vexed  political,  economic,  and 
social  problems.  It  is  not  reasonable  for  us  to  complain 
of  our  evil  laws,  or  of  our  law-makers,  if  we  take  no 
responsibility  in  improving  them,  or  do  nothing  in  the 
way  of  giving  a  moral  backing  to  those  who  do.  Plato's 
remark  that  "the  wise  are  punished  for  taking  no  part 
in  government,  by  being  governed  by  worse  people  than 
themselves,"  still  holds  good. 

While  from  our  pulpits  and  platforms  proceed  loud  and 
emphatic  denunciations  of  the  evils  of  selfishness,  greed, 
injustice,  robbery,  duplicity,  fraud,  and  corruption  ;  the 
people  should  know  that  some  of  the  false  systems  which 
engender  these  evils  can,  and  will,  be  swept  away,  and 
that  they  must  take  part  in  its  accomplishment.  And 
while  it  is  necessary  that  we  place  in  our  governing 
bodies,  men  of  genuine  integrity,  of  wise  foresight,  and 
strong  purpose,  to  represent  our  views  and  to  carry  them 
into  the  statute-books ;  it  should  not  be  forgotten,  that 
it  is  necessary,  that  all  who  represent  these  sentiments 
among  the  people  become  an  -ctive  part  of  an  organized 
body  of  reformers. 

It  is  the  people's  great  question,  and  it  is  needless  to 
spend  time  trying  to  convert  politicians.  When  the  spirit 
of  reform  sinks  deep  into  the  hearts  of  the  people,  and  a 
determination  is  shown  to  bring  it  about,  the  politician 
is  powerless  to  stay  its  progress. 


THE   CONCLUSION. 


261 


The  Cobdens,  the  Brights,  the  Peels,  and  the  Glad- 
stones are  rare  ;  yet,  when  men  of  purpose  do  appear 
they  should  be  borne  up  by  the  people. 

If  all  who  are  heart  and  soul  in  sympathy  with  reform 
will  unite,  and  stand  by  the  principles  involved,  they  will 
carry  them  through,  in  spite  of  parties.     If  they  be  ani- 
mated by  the  spirit  and  determination  which  impelled 
Cobden  and  his  colleagues  in  their  great  work  of  freeing 
the  commerce  of  England,  political  parties  cannot  stand 
m  the  way.     Said  Cobden  :  "  We  have  nothing  to  do 
with  Whigs  or  Tories  ;  we  are  stronger  than  either  of 
them  ;  if  we  stick  to  our  principles,  we  can,  of  necessity, 
beat  both."     Speaking  of  himself,  he  said  :  "I  seek  no 
alliance  with  parties,  and  I  will  take  none  ;  but  having 
the  feeling,  I  have  the  sacredness  of  the  principle,  and 
I  can  never  agree  to  tamper  with  it."     So  may  it  be  with 
the  people  who  desire  the  true  freedom  of  America- 
freedom  from  false  systems.     May  they  rise  and  go  be- 
yond party  !     May  there  be  with  them  no  compromising 
of  principles  !     If  defeat  comes,  let  it  come,  once,  twice 
thrice,  or  more  ;  but  may  there  be  no  surrender  !     May 
they  hold  out  as  Abraham  Lincoln  did  when  facing  the 
great  crisis  in  his  party,  and  as  expressed  in  his  exclama- 
tion     If  I  must  go  down,  then  let  me  go  down  linked  to 
truth— die  in  the  advocacy  of  what  is  right  and  just  !  " 
"  Morality  is  stronger  than  a  majority." 
And  now  we  have  accomplished  our  part  of  what  we 
have  considered  to  be  a  duty-in  some  respects  a  cheer- 
ful,  and  m  some  respects  an  onerous,  duty ;  but  in  all 
respects  a  conscientious  one  ;  a  duty  to  our  country  ;  a 
duty  to  ourselves,  and  to  others  who  are  suffering. 

We  leave  the  question,  for  the  present,  to  the  good 
people  of  Canada  and  of  the  United  States.     It  is  of  in- 


362 


AMERICAN  FARMS. 


tense  importance  to  each,  and  especially  to  the  farmers. 
May  they  put  forth  new  energy  in  the  cause  of  rectify- 
ing this  great  mistake  of  our  day  :  that  of  legislating  the 
annihilation  of  the  Typical  American  Farm  and  the 
Typical  American  Farmer— sl  wrong  to  tne  best  interests 
of  their  country,  a  wrong  to  the  universal  brotherhood, 
a  wrong  to  themselves  especially,  and  a  grievous  wrong 
to  their  children,  who  are  soon  to  take  their  places  m  the 
battle  of  life. 

The  century  which  has  seen  in  America  freedom 
gained  for  the  slave,  in  what  may  well  be  called  "  The 
Last  Crusade,"  is  drawing  to  a  close  ;  but  there  is  space 
left  in  it  yet  to  win  one  more  holy  war  ;  a  victory  which 
will  confer  upon  all,  the  blessings  of  that  equality  in 
economic  rights,  without  which,  they  can  scarcely  be 
called  freemen. 

THE   END. 


I 


srs. 

ify- 
the 
the 
;sts 
od, 

)ng 
the 


om 
'he 
ice 
ich 
in 
be 


IMAGE  EVALUATION 
TEST  TARGET  (MT-3) 


A 


V 


/£c 


/. 


H^ 


1.0 


I.I 


11.25 


I   1^    112.0 


2.2 


6" 


1.8 


M  11.6 


<^ 


% 


/I 


/ 


*>>' 

^ 


/A 


nU  _x^ 


riiUlUgidpiiiC 

Sciences 
Corporation 


23  WEST  MAIN  STREET 

WEBSTER,  N.Y.  14580 

(716)  872-4503 


QUESTIONS  OF  THE   DAY 


89— Lincoln  and  Stanton,     By  Hon.  W.  D.  Kbli^y.     Octavo,  cloth, 

50  cents;  paper .         25 

80— The  Industrial  Situation.    By  J.  Schoeshof.   Octavo  cloth,  1  00 

81-EricMon'8  Destroyer.     By  Wm.  H.  Jaques,  Lieut.  U.  S.  Navy. 

Octavo,  paper,  illustrated      .....  -SO 

88— Modern  Armor  for  National   Defence.      By  Wm.  H,  Jaques, 

Lieut.  U.  S.  Navy.     Octavo,  paper,  illustrated     ...        50 

88— The   Physics    and    Metaphysics    of    Money.      By  Rodmond 

Gibbons.    Octavo,  paper     .......        35 

^^—Torptdof  for  National  Defence.      By  Wm.  H.  Jaoues,  Lieut. 
U.  S.  Navy.     Octavo,  paper,  illustrated        .         .         .         .50 

85— Unwise    Laws.     By  Lewis    H.   Blair.     Octavo,    cloth,     i  00 
86— Railway  Practice.    By  E.,  Porter  Alexander.    Octavo,  cloth,  75 
87— American  State  Constitutions :    A  Study  of  their  Growth.    By 
Henry  Hitchcock,  LL.D.    Octavo,  cloth         .        .        .75 
88— The  Inter-State  Commerce  Act :    An  Analysis  of  Its  Provisions. 
By  John  R.  Dos  PassoS.     Octavo,  cloth      .        .        .        .125 

89— Federal  Taxation  and  State  Expenses;  or.  An  Analysis  of  a 
County  Tax-List.  By  W.  H.  Jones.  Octavo,  cloth  .  .  i  00 
40— The  Margin  of  Profits  :  How  Profits  are  now  Divided  ;  What  Part 
of  the  Present  Hours  of  Labor  can  now  be  Spared.  By  Edward 
Atkinson.  Together  with  the  Reply  of  E.  M.  Chamberlain,  Rep- 
resenting the  Labor  Union,  and  Mr.  Atkinson's  Rejoinder.  Cloth, 
75  cents ;  paper   . ^o 

*1— The  Fishery  Question.  A  Summary  of  Its  History  and  Analysis 
of  the  Issues  Involved.  By  Charles  Isham.  i2mo,  cloth,  with 
Map  of  the  Fishing-Grounds.        ......        75 

48- Bodyke:  A  Chapter  in  the  History  of  Irish  Landlordism.  By 
Henry  Norman.    8vo,  cloth,  illustrated     ....        75 

**— Slav  or  Saxon  :  A  Study  of  the  Growth  and  Tendencies  of  Russian 
•       Civilization.     By  Wm.  D.  Foulke,.A.M.     Octavo,  cloth    .     100 


O.  P.  PUTNAM'S  SONS,  Pabllshera,  New  York  and  London. 


QUESTIONS   OF  THE   DAY 

44— The  Present,  Condition  of  Tconomic  Science,  an4  the  DeffiAad 
for  A  Radical  Change  in  Its  Methods  and  Alms.  By 
Edward  C.  Lunt.    Octavo,  c'oth       •        ,        .        .        .        75 

1»— The  Old  South  and  The  New.  By  Hon.  W.  D.  Kelley. 
Octavo,  cloth  "      .        .  .         .     ^  .  .         .     I  35 

4® — Property  in  Land.  An  essay  on  the  New  Crusade.  By  Henry 
Winn.     Octavo,  papfer 35 

47— The  Tariff  Histcrj|r  of  the  United  States.    By  F.  W.  Taussig. 

Octavo,  cloth     ,:'  > j  j. 

48— The  President's  Message,  1887.    With  Annotations  l^  R.  R. 

BowKER.     Octavo,  paper    .        .        .        ,        .         .       ,»        25 

49— Essays    on    Practical    Politics.      By   TK'zonoRE    Roosevelt. 

'     Octavo,  paper       .         .         .         .         ,         .         .         ,         _         a^ 

eO-— Friendly  Letters  to  American  Farmers  and  Others.    By  J.  S. 
Moore.     Octavo,  paper       .         .         .         .         .         .         .         j. 

61— American  Prisons  in  the  Tenth  United  States  Census.     By 

Frederick  Howard  Wines.     Octavo,  paper,    ...        25 

58— Tariff  Chats.     By  Henry  J,  Philpoit.     Octavo,  paper  25 

68— The  Tariff  and  its  Evils ;  or.  Protection  which  does  not  Protect. 

By  John  H.  Allen.    Octavo,  cloth i  00 

64— Relation  of  the  Tariff  to  Wages.   By  David  A.  Wells.    Octavo, 

paper 25 

**^— True  or  False  Finance.    The  Issue  of  1888.    By  A  Tax-payer. 

Octavo,  paper 25 

66— Outlines  of  a  New  Science.  By  E.  J.  Donnell.  8vo,  cloth,  i  00 
^''—The  Plantation  Negro  as  a   P'reeman.    By  Philip  A.   Bruce. 

Octavo,  cloth I  2i, 

88— Politics  as  a  Duty  and  as  a  Career.  Octavo,  paper  .  .  25 
59— Monopolies  and  the  People.  By  Chas.  W.Baker.  ,vo,  cloth,  125 
60— Public  Regulation  of  Railways.    By  W.   I).  Dabney.    i2mo 

^l<^th .  .     X25 

61— Railway  Secrecy  and   Trusts.      By  John  M.  Bonham.      8vo, 

^*«t^ •        .        .        .        .     X  oi 

O.  P.  PUTNAM'S  SONS.  PubUahera,  New  York  and  London. 


